Explore the vast range of titles available.

PurposeTo implement a straightforward workflow that allows to establish augmented reality (AR) support in spine surgery.MethodsIntraoperative computed tomography (iCT) applying a 32-slice movable scanner was used for navigation registration in a series of 10 patients who underwent surgery for extra- or intradural spinal lesions. Preoperative multimodal image data were integrated by nonlinear registration with the iCT images. Automatic segmentation was used to delineate the 3-dimensional (3-D) outline of the vertebra, and in addition, the tumor extent, as well as implants, was segmented and visualized.ResultsAutomatic patient registration without user interaction resulted in high navigation accuracy with a mean registration error of only about 1 mm. Moreover, the workflow for establishing AR was straightforward and could be easily integrated in the normal surgical procedure. Low-dose iCT protocols resulted in a radiation exposure of 0.35–0.98 mSv for cervical, 2.16–6.92 mSv for thoracic, and 3.55–4.20 mSv for lumbar surgeries, which is a reduction in the effective radiation dose by 70%. The segmented structures were intuitively visualized in the surgical field using the heads-up display of the operating microscope. In parallel, the microscope video was superimposed with the segmented 3-D structures, which were visualized in a semitransparent manner along with various display modes of the image data.ConclusionsA microscope-based AR environment was successfully implemented for spinal surgery. The application of iCT for registration imaging ensures high navigational accuracy. AR greatly supports the surgeon in understanding the 3-D anatomy thereby facilitating surgery.Graphical abstractThese slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

BackgroundMicroscope-based augmented reality (AR) is commonly used in cranial surgery; however, until recently, this technique was not implemented for spinal surgery. We prospectively investigated, how AR can be applied for intradural spinal tumor surgery.MethodsFor ten patients with intradural spinal tumors (ependymoma, glioma, hemangioblastoma, meningioma, and metastasis), AR was provided by head-up displays (HUDs) of operating microscopes. User-independent automatic AR registration was established by low-dose intraoperative computed tomography. The objects visualized by AR were segmented in preoperative imaging data; non-linear image registration was applied to consider spine flexibility.ResultsIn all cases, AR supported surgery by visualizing the tumor outline and other relevant surrounding structures. The overall AR registration error was 0.72 ± 0.24 mm (mean ± standard deviation), a close matching of visible tumor outline and AR visualization was observed for all cases. Registration scanning resulted in a low effective dose of 0.22 ± 0.16 mSv for cervical and 1.68 ± 0.61 mSv for thoracic lesions. The mean HUD AR usage in relation to microscope time was 51.6 ± 36.7%. The HUD was switched off and turned on again in a range of 2 to 17 times (5.7 ± 4.4 times). Independent of the status of the HUD, the AR visualization was displayed on monitors throughout surgery.ConclusionsMicroscope-based AR can be reliably applied to intradural spinal tumor surgery. Automatic AR registration ensures high precision and provides an intuitive visualization of the extent of the tumor and surrounding structures. Given this setting, all advanced multi-modality options of cranial AR can also be applied to spinal surgery.

BackgroundRegistration accuracy is a main factor influencing overall navigation accuracy. Standard fiducial- or landmark-based patient registration is user dependent and error-prone. Intraoperative imaging offers the possibility for user-independent patient registration. The aim of this paper is to evaluate our initial experience applying intraoperative computed tomography (CT) for navigation registration in cranial neurosurgery, with a special focus on registration accuracy and effective radiation dose.MethodsA total of 200 patients (141 craniotomy, 19 transsphenoidal, and 40 stereotactic burr hole procedures) were investigated by intraoperative CT applying a 32-slice movable CT scanner, which was used for automatic navigation registration. Registration accuracy was measured by at least three skin fiducials that were not part of the registration process.ResultsAutomatic registration resulted in high registration accuracy (mean registration error: 0.93 ± 0.41 mm). Implementation of low-dose scanning protocols did not impede registration accuracy (registration error applying the full dose head protocol: 0.87 ± 0.36 mm vs. the low dose sinus protocol 0.72 ± 0.43 mm) while a reduction of the effective radiation dose by a factor of 8 could be achieved (mean effective radiation dose head protocol: 2.73 mSv vs. sinus protocol: 0.34 mSv).ConclusionIntraoperative CT allows highly reliable navigation registration with low radiation exposure.

This study aims to report on the capability of microscope-based augmented reality (AR) to evaluate registration and navigation accuracy with extracranial and intracranial landmarks and to elaborate on its opportunities and obstacles in compensation for navigation inaccuracies. In a consecutive single surgeon series of 293 patients, automatic intraoperative computed tomography-based registration was performed delivering a high initial registration accuracy with a mean target registration error of 0.84 ± 0.36 mm. Navigation accuracy is evaluated by overlaying a maximum intensity projection or pre-segmented object outlines within the recent focal plane onto the in situ patient anatomy and compensated for by translational and/or rotational in-plane transformations. Using bony landmarks (85 cases), there was two cases where a mismatch was seen. Cortical vascular structures (242 cases) showed a mismatch in 43 cases and cortex representations (40 cases) revealed two inaccurate cases. In all cases, with detected misalignment, a successful spatial compensation was performed (mean correction: bone (6.27 ± 7.31 mm), vascular (3.00 ± 1.93 mm, 0.38° ± 1.06°), and cortex (5.31 ± 1.57 mm, 1.75° ± 2.47°)) increasing navigation accuracy. AR support allows for intermediate and straightforward monitoring of accuracy, enables compensation of spatial misalignments, and thereby provides additional safety by increasing overall accuracy.

Study Design: A prospective, case-based, observational study. Objectives: To investigate how microscope-based augmented reality (AR) support can be utilized in various types of spine surgery. Methods: In 42 spinal procedures (12 intra- and 8 extradural tumors, 7 other intradural lesions, 11 degenerative cases, 2 infections, and 2 deformities) AR was implemented using operating microscope head-up displays (HUDs). Intraoperative low-dose computed tomography was used for automatic registration. Nonlinear image registration was applied to integrate multimodality preoperative images. Target and risk structures displayed by AR were defined in preoperative images by automatic anatomical mapping and additional manual segmentation. Results: AR could be successfully applied in all 42 cases. Low-dose protocols ensured a low radiation exposure for registration scanning (effective dose cervical 0.29 ± 0.17 mSv, thoracic 3.40 ± 2.38 mSv, lumbar 3.05 ± 0.89 mSv). A low registration error (0.87 ± 0.28 mm) resulted in a reliable AR representation with a close matching of visualized objects and reality, distinctly supporting anatomical orientation in the surgical field. Flexible AR visualization applying either the microscope HUD or video superimposition, including the ability to selectively activate objects of interest, as well as different display modes allowed a smooth integration in the surgical workflow, without disturbing the actual procedure. On average, 7.1 ± 4.6 objects were displayed visualizing target and risk structures reliably. Conclusions: Microscope-based AR can be applied successfully to various kinds of spinal procedures. AR improves anatomical orientation in the surgical field supporting the surgeon, as well as it offers a potential tool for education.

Background and Objectives: Microsurgical resection with intraoperative neuromonitoring is the gold standard for acoustic neurinomas (ANs) which are classified as T3 or T4 tumors according to the Hannover Classification. Microscope-based augmented reality (AR) can be beneficial in cerebellopontine angle and lateral skull base surgery, since these are small areas packed with anatomical structures and the use of this technology enables automatic 3D building of a model without the need for a surgeon to mentally perform this task of transferring 2D images seen on the microscope into imaginary 3D images, which then reduces the possibility of error and provides better orientation in the operative field. Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent surgery for resection of ANs in our department were included in this study. Clinical outcomes in terms of postoperative neurological deficits and complications were evaluated, as well as neuroradiological outcomes for tumor remnants and recurrence. Results: A total of 43 consecutive patients (25 female, median age 60.5 ± 16 years) who underwent resection of ANs via retrosigmoid osteoclastic craniotomy with the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (22 right-sided, 14 giant tumors, 10 cystic, 7 with hydrocephalus) by a single surgeon were included in this study, with a median follow up of 41.2 ± 32.2 months. A total of 18 patients underwent subtotal resection, 1 patient partial resection and 24 patients gross total resection. A total of 27 patients underwent resection in sitting position and the rest in semi-sitting position. Out of 37 patients who had no facial nerve deficit prior to surgery, 19 patients were intact following surgery, 7 patients had House Brackmann (HB) Grade II paresis, 3 patients HB III, 7 patients HB IV and 1 patient HB V. Wound healing deficit with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak occurred in 8 patients (18.6%). Operative time was 317.3 ± 99 min. One patient which had recurrence and one further patient with partial resection underwent radiotherapy following surgery. A total of 16 patients (37.2%) underwent resection using fiducial-based navigation and microscope-based AR, all in sitting position. Segmented objects of interest in AR were the sigmoid and transverse sinus, tumor outline, cranial nerves (CN) VII, VIII and V, petrous vein, cochlea and semicircular canals and brain stem. Operative time and clinical outcome did not differ between the AR and the non-AR group. However, use of AR improved orientation in the operative field for craniotomy planning and microsurgical resection by identification of important neurovascular structures. Conclusions: The single-center experience of resection of ANs showed a high rate of gross total (GTR) and subtotal resection (STR) with low recurrence. Use of AR improves intraoperative orientation and facilitates craniotomy planning and AN resection through early improved identification of important anatomical relations to structures of the inner auditory canal, venous sinuses, petrous vein, brain stem and the course of cranial nerves.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study is to present our experience in the surgical treatment of calcified thoracic herniated disc disease via a transthoracic approach in the lateral position with the use of intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) and augmented reality (AR). Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent surgery for calcified thoracic herniated disc via a transthoracic transpleural approach at our Department using iCT and microscope-based AR were included in the study. Results: Six consecutive patients (five female, median age 53.2 ± 6.4 years) with calcified herniated thoracic discs (two patients Th 10–11 level, two patients Th 7–8, one patient Th 9–10, one patient Th 11–12) were included in this case series. Indication for surgery included evidence of a calcified thoracic disc on magnet resonance imaging (MRI) and CT with spinal canal stenosis of >50% of diameter, intractable pain, and neurological deficits, as well as MRI-signs of myelopathy. Five patients had paraparesis and ataxia, and one patient had no deficit. All surgeries were performed in the lateral position via a transthoracic transpleural approach (Five from left side). CT for automatic registration was performed following the placement of the reference array, with a high registration accuracy. Microscope-based AR was used, with segmented structures of interest such as vertebral bodies, disc space, herniated disc, and dural sac. Mean operative time was 277.5 ± 156 min. The use of AR improved orientation in the operative field for identification, and tailored the resection of the herniated disc and the identification of the course of dural sac. A control-iCT scan confirmed the complete resection in five patients and incomplete resection of the herniated disc in one patient. In one patient, complications occurred, such as postoperative hematoma, and wound healing deficit occurred. Mean follow-up was 22.9 ± 16.5 months. Five patients improved following surgery, and one patient who had no deficits remained unchanged. Conclusions: Optimal surgical therapy in patients with calcified thoracic disc disease with compression of dural sac and myelopathy was resectioned via a transthoracic transpleural approach. The use of iCT-based registration and microscope-based AR significantly improved orientation in the operative field and facilitated safe resection of these lesions.

The aim of this study was to report on the clinical experience with microscope-based augmented reality (AR) in transsphenoidal surgery compared to the classical microscope-based approach. AR support was established using the head-up displays of the operating microscope, with navigation based on fiducial-/surface- or automatic intraoperative computed tomography (iCT)-based registration. In a consecutive single surgeon series of 165 transsphenoidal procedures, 81 patients underwent surgery without AR support and 84 patients underwent surgery with AR support. AR was integrated straightforwardly within the workflow. ICT-based registration increased AR accuracy significantly (target registration error, TRE, 0.76 ± 0.33 mm) compared to the landmark-based approach (TRE 1.85 ± 1.02 mm). The application of low-dose iCT protocols led to a significant reduction in applied effective dosage being comparable to a single chest radiograph. No major vascular or neurological complications occurred. No difference in surgical time was seen, time to set-up patient registration prolonged intraoperative preparation time on average by twelve minutes (32.33 ± 13.35 vs. 44.13 ± 13.67 min), but seems justifiable by the fact that AR greatly and reliably facilitated surgical orientation and increased surgeon comfort and patient safety, not only in patients who had previous transsphenoidal surgery but also in cases with anatomical variants. Automatic intraoperative imaging-based registration is recommended.

Background. Lateral approaches to the spine have gained increased popularity due to enabling minimally invasive access to the spine, less blood loss, decreased operative time, and less postoperative pain. The objective of the study was to analyze the use of intraoperative computed tomography with navigation and the implementation of augmented reality in facilitating a lateral approach to the spine. Methods. We prospectively analyzed all patients who underwent surgery with a lateral approach to the spine from September 2016 to January 2021 using intraoperative CT applying a 32-slice movable CT scanner, which was used for automatic navigation registration. Sixteen patients, with a median age of 64.3 years, were operated on using a lateral approach to the thoracic and lumbar spine and using intraoperative CT with navigation. Indications included a herniated disc (six patients), tumors (seven), instability following the fracture of the thoracic or lumbar vertebra (two), and spondylodiscitis (one). Results. Automatic registration, applying intraoperative CT, resulted in high accuracy (target registration error: 0.84 ± 0.10 mm). The effective radiation dose of the registration CT scans was 6.16 ± 3.91 mSv. In seven patients, a control iCT scan was performed for resection and implant control, with an ED of 4.51 ± 2.48 mSv. Augmented reality (AR) was used to support surgery in 11 cases, by visualizing the tumor outline, pedicle screws, herniated discs, and surrounding structures. Of the 16 patients, corpectomy was performed in six patients with the implantation of an expandable cage, and one patient underwent discectomy using the XLIF technique. One patient experienced perioperative complications. One patient died in the early postoperative course due to severe cardiorespiratory failure. Ten patients had improved and five had unchanged neurological status at the 3-month follow up. Conclusions. Intraoperative computed tomography with navigation facilitates the application of lateral approaches to the spine for a variety of indications, including fusion procedures, tumor resection, and herniated disc surgery.