Explore the vast range of titles available.

In recent years, we have seen rapid expansion of chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell (CAR‐T) therapies in multiple malignancies. CAR‐T therapy has profoundly altered the treatment landscape of non‐Hodgkin lymphoma, B‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and multiple myeloma. Currently available CD19 and B‐cell maturation antigen‐directed CAR‐T therapies have shown high overall response rate and durable remissions in patients who have failed standard therapies. Multiple studies are underway exploring the role of CAR‐T‐cell therapy as earlier line of treatment. In high‐grade B‐cell lymphoma, CD19 CAR‐T therapy may replace autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation as second line therapy in near future. CAR‐T‐cell therapy targeting novel tumor‐associated antigens will help expand utility of this treatment modality in other hematological malignancies. It may also help overcome limitations of currently approved CAR‐T‐cell therapies. In this review, we have provided an overview of currently approved CAR‐T therapies and upcoming clinical trials which may potentially impact the clinical practice.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has made tremendous strides in the arena of hematological malignancies with approved therapies in certain leukemias, lymphomas, and recently myeloma with overall highly favorable response rates. While numerous clinical studies are still ongoing for hematological malignancies, research is developing to translate the feasibility of CAR T therapy in solid organ malignancies. Unfortunately, the majority of diagnosed cancers are primarily solid tumors. Thus, a highly unmet clinical need for further research and development exists in this field. This review article highlights currently active clinical trials and a few pertinent preclinical studies involving CAR T cell therapy in solid tumors while briefly discussing study outcomes and potential key targets that may allow for the feasibility of this therapy option. Finally, we mention critical challenges existing in the solid tumor environment and discuss developing strategies that may potentially overcome the existing barriers to CAR T cell progress in solid tumors.

Haploidentical donors are now increasingly considered for transplantation in the absence of HLA-matched donors or when an urgent transplant is needed. Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) have been recently recognized as an important barrier against successful engraftment of donor cells, which can affect transplant survival. DSA appear more prevalent in this type of transplant due to higher likelihood of alloimmunization of multiparous females against offspring’s HLA antigens, and the degree of mismatch. Here we summarize the evidence for the role of DSA in the development of primary graft failure in haploidentical transplantation and provide consensus recommendations from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplant Group on testing, monitoring, and treatment of patients with DSA receiving haploidentical hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematopoietic malignancy generally associated with poor prognosis. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) continues to be the most potent anti-leukemia treatment for adult patients with intermediate and high-risk AML. However, disease relapse after alloHCT remains unacceptably high and is the primary cause of treatment failure and mortality following alloHCT. It is therefore that post-transplant early cellular or pharmacologic maintenance or preemptive strategies to enhance the graft-versus-leukemia effect or to eradicate persistent minimal residual disease have been of renewed interest, particularly with the availability of more sensitive technologies to measure residual AML. Although preliminary studies have demonstrated improved outcomes with the use of post-alloHCT remission therapies, prospective randomized trials are required to determine their clinical efficacy and role in the treatment of AML. On behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, we summarize the available evidence on the use and efficacy of available pharmacologic post-remission therapies, including hypomethylating agents, deacetylase inhibitors, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, as well as cellular therapies, including preemptive and prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusions for the prevention of relapse of AML.

Limited data is available on factors impacting the outcomes of second hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT2) in patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). This study aimed to assess HCT2 outcome for sAML comparing reduced-intensity (RIC) to myeloablative (MAC) conditioning. Two hundred and fifteen patients were included: RIC (n = 134), MAC (n = 81). The median follow-up was 41.1 (95% CI: 26.7–69.3) and 28.5 (95% CI: 23.9–75.4) months, respectively. At two years, the relapse incidence (RI) was 58.3% versus 51.1% in RIC and MAC, respectively. The 2-year leukemia free survival (LFS) was 26.6% versus 26%, and the graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 16.4% versus 12.1%, while OS was 31.4% and 39.7%, for RIC and MAC respectively. MVA showed a significantly lower RI [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.46 (95% CI, 0.26–0.8, p = 0.006)] and improved LFS [HR = 0.62 (95% CI, 0.39–0.98, p = 0.042)] with MAC versus RIC. The choice of conditioning regimen did not impact non-relapse mortality [HR = 1.14 (95% CI, 0.52–2.5, p = 0.74)], overall survival (OS) [HR = 0.72 (95% CI, 0.44–1.17, p = 0.18)] or GRFS [HR = 0.89 (95% CI, 0.59–1.36, p = 0.6)]. In conclusion, MAC was associated with a lower RI and superior LFS. These results support the use of MAC for eligible patients with sAML who are being considered for HCT2.

Following chemotherapy, secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML), occurring after antecedent hematologic diseases, previous chemotherapy or radiation, has an inferior prognosis compared with de novo AML. To define the outcome of sAML in the context of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), a retrospective, registry-based comparison was performed, including 11,439 patients with de novo and 1325 with sAML. Among transplants in first complete remission (CR1) (n = 8,600), the 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 28.5% and 16.4% for de novo, and 35% and 23.4% for sAML. Three-year overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS) and Graft-versus-Host Disease/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 60.8%, 55.1%, and 38.6% for de novo, and 46.7%, 41.6%, and 28.4% for sAML, respectively. In multivariate analysis, sAML was associated with a lower OS (HR = 1.33 [95% CI = 1.21–1.48]; p < 10−5), LFS (HR = 1.32 [95% CI = 1.19–1.45]; p < 10−5) and GRFS (HR = 1.2 [95% CI = 1.1–1.31]; p < 10−4) and higher NRM (HR = 1.37 [95% CI = 1.17–1.59]; p < 10−4) and RI (HR = 1.27 [95% CI = 1.12–1.44]; p < 10−3). Results of the Cox model were confirmed in a matched-pair analysis. In contrast, results did not differ between de novo and sAML after alloSCT in induction failure or relapse. Hence, this analysis identified sAML as an independent risk factor for outcome after alloSCT in CR1.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy has been approved for use in several relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies and has significantly improved outcomes for these diseases. A number of different CAR T products are now being used in clinical practice and have demonstrated excellent outcomes to those in clinical trials. However, increased real‐world use of CAR T therapy has uncovered a number of barriers that can lead to significant delays in treatment. As a result, bridging therapy has become a widely used tool to stabilize or debulk disease between leukapheresis and CAR T cell administration. Here we review the available data regarding bridging therapy, with a focus on patient selection, choice of therapy, timing of therapy, and potential pitfalls.

We analyzed late cardiovascular outcomes of 661 patients who survived at least 2 years from hematopoietic cell transplantation for childhood hematologic malignancy between 1995 and 2008. Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research data was supplemented with surveys focused on cardiotoxicity and potential risk factors. The median duration of follow-up was 97 months (range 24–230). 4.2% of survivors experienced at least one of the primary outcomes including coronary artery disease (0.2%), cerebrovascular accident (0.6%), cardiomyopathy (3%), and cardiac-related death (0.5%). Patients who received anthracycline chemotherapy (HR 4.67, p  = 0.036) or cranial or chest radiation (HR 5.58, p  < 0.0001; HR 2.18, p  = 0.0087) were at increased risk for developing one of the primary outcomes. Dyslipidemia was diagnosed in 18% of survivors. Pre-transplant anthracycline (HR 1.74, p  < 0.0001) and chest radiation (HR 1.34, p  = 0.0371) were risk factors for dyslipidemia. Overweight/obese body mass status was present in 63% of patients at baseline, 65% at 2 years, and 52% at most recent evaluation. Diabetes was diagnosed in 7% of subjects. In conclusion, severe cardiovascular complications were infrequently reported. The incidence of risk factors including obesity and dyslipidemia were significant and will likely increase the risk of cardiovascular disease over time in transplant survivors.

Background Limited data is available to guide the choice of the conditioning regimen for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing transplant with persistent disease. Methods We retrospectively compared outcome of fludarabine-treosulfan (FT), thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine (TBF), and sequential fludarabine, intermediate dose Ara-C, amsacrine, total body irradiation/busulfan, cyclophosphamide (FLAMSA) conditioning in patients with refractory or relapsed AML. Results Complete remission rates at day 100 were 92%, 80%, and 88% for FT, TBF, and FLAMSA, respectively ( p  = 0.13). Non-relapse mortality, incidence of relapse, acute (a) and chronic (c) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) rates did not differ between the three groups. Overall survival at 2 years was 37% for FT, 24% for TBF, and 34% for FLAMSA ( p  = 0.10). Independent prognostic factors for survival were Karnofsky performance score and patient CMV serology ( p  = 0.01; p  = 0.02), while survival was not affected by age at transplant. The use of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) was associated with reduced risk of grade III–IV aGVHD ( p  = 0.02) and cGVHD ( p  = 0.006), with no influence on relapse. Conclusions In conclusion, FT, TBF, and FLAMSA regimens provided similar outcome in patients undergoing transplant with active AML. Survival was determined by patient characteristics as Karnofsky performance score and CMV serology, however was not affected by age at transplant. ATG appears able to reduce the incidence of acute and chronic GVHD without influencing relapse risk.

CD19‐directed chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy (CAR‐T) represents a significant advancement for patients with relapsed/refractory large B‐cell lymphoma (LBCL). Long‐term follow‐up confirms durable remissions in nearly half of the patients, a population that was previously estimated to have a median survival of around 6 months with standard salvage therapy. This initial success of CAR‐T has led to significant expansion across other lymphoma histologies resulting in the recent regulatory approval of CAR‐T in mantle cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma. Additionally, multiple novel platforms of CAR‐T therapy are under development to improve efficacy and limit toxicity such dual antigen targeting, allogeneic and natural killer CARs. In this review, we focus on the new indications of CAR‐T in lymphomas beyond LBCL as well as emerging platforms of CAR‐T therapy.