Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background and objectiveChoosing a medical specialty is one of the most critical career decisions medical students and interns make. However, little is known about the factors these graduates consider when choosing their specialty. Our study assessed factors that medical students and interns consider when determining their specialty.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional survey-based study, conducted from November to December 2022. We utilized a previously published questionnaire for 1074 participants, including 837 medical students and 237 interns from Saudi Arabian universities.ResultsThe majority of female participants (80.4%), compared with only 19.6% of male participants, considered interest in specific procedures and techniques typical of the specialty an important factor in choosing a specialty (p = 0.036). Dissertation research experience was an important factor for 83.5% of female participants and 16.5% of male participants (p = 0.024). Additionally, good quality teaching within the study program framework was important for 81.2% of female participants and 18.8% of male participants (p = 0.033), suggesting that male and female participants viewed the importance of good quality teaching differently. Female participants accounted for 80% of those who considered the overseas experience a factor in their specialty choice. Also, 74.4% of female and 25.6% of male participants considered friends, relatives, or other connections in the healthcare field a factor that affects their choice. Furthermore, 79.6% of female and 20.4% of male participants reported having good experiences with physician role models as an impactful factor in their specialty choice.ConclusionFemale participants were most interested in obstetrics and gynecology (12.1%,), internal medicine (11.8%), and family medicine (10.8%). Male participants, on the other hand, showed more interest in family medicine (12.7%,), internal medicine (11.0%), and emergency medicine (10.1%). Medical schools and healthcare institutions must provide students and interns with enough information and resources to help them explore different specialties and make well-informed decisions about their careers.

IntroductionConventional liposuction has provided good outcome for years. Abdominal etching (or abdominal high definition liposuction) allows the surgeon to shape and enhance the abdominal muscles by removing specific grooves of subcutaneous fat. The aim of this study is to describe the technique and the complications and to assess patients’ satisfaction rate.Materials and MethodsBetween January 2015 and January 2017, 25 patients (21 men and 4 women) underwent abdominal etching procedures in our department. The authors describe the technique and the specific key points of the procedure. All patients were seen at day 5, 10, 30, and 180. At day 180, everyone answered a modified Likert scale survey relating to their satisfaction.ResultsNo hematoma, infection, or seroma was reported. One patient experienced a superficial pressure wound caused by an improper positioning of the final dressing. Almost all patients (96%) were happy or very happy with the overall outcome of their abdominal etching.ConclusionThe number of requests for abdominal liposculpture should increase in the coming years, and plastic surgeons specialized in silhouette surgery should be able to master this technique in order to add it to their therapeutic arsenal.Level of Evidence IVThis journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in Saudi and non-Saudi female health care providers in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. One -hundred twenty (60 Saudi and 60 non-Saudi) sexually active female health care professionals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, were anonymously surveyed using the English version of the female sexual function index questionnaire. The individual domain scores for pain, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, pain and overall score for the Saudi and non-Saudi women were calculated and compared. The two groups were comparable in demographic characteristics. No statistically significant differences were found between Saudi and non-Saudi women in desire (P = .22) and arousal scores (P = .47). However, non-Saudi women had significantly higher lubrication (P < .001), orgasm (P = .015), satisfaction (P = .004) and pain scores (P = .015). The overall scores in Saudi and non-Saudi women were low (23.40 ± 4.50 compared with 26.18 ± 5.97), but non-Saudi women had a significantly higher overall score (P = .005). Taken together, sexual dysfunction is prevalent among Saudi and non-Saudi female health care providers, with Saudi women demonstrating lower scores in four sexual function domains and the overall score.

Unplanned readmissions are frequent, costly, and perhaps avoidable. We aim to identify the rate, causes, and predictive factors of hospital readmission after hysterectomy within 60 days post-discharge at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH). Retrospective record review of all patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign and malignant conditions from January 2017 to December 2022. Patients were evaluated for demographics, comorbidities, and causes for readmission. Of 117 patients, the unplanned readmission rate was 9.4% and 7.7% for benign and malignant conditions, respectively. Infections (25%) and abdominal pain (20%) were common causes. Patients with increased intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.013) and cancer patients (0.044) had an increased risk for readmission. Readmitted patients had significantly higher baseline health burdens when compared to non-readmitted patients using the American Society of Anesthesiology scores (ASA) (p = 0.011) and the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) (p = 0.004). The 60-day readmission rate after a hysterectomy was 17.1%. Infections and abdominal pain represented common causes. Malignancy and increased intraoperative blood loss are significant risk factors. In order to decrease the readmission rate, addressing common reasons may be beneficial.

IntroductionFemale genital cosmetic surgery (FGCS) is a trending topic in the field of gynecology practice. It is defined as any genital procedure that is not medically indicated but is designed to improve the appearance of the genitals. With the increasing demand for FGCS, little is known about the attitudes of physicians, especially gynecologists, toward FGCS. The study objective is to assess physicians' attitudes towards female genital cosmetic surgeries in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was done among physicians in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Four-sectioned questionnaires were distributed to physicians. All board-certified consultants and registrars of obstetrics and gynecology, plastic, and reconstructive surgery in private/public hospitals were included in the study. Data management was done using the SPSS program version 19 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).ResultsOut of 165 physicians, 40 were practicing physicians (female genital cosmetic surgery) (24.2%) while 125 were non-practicing physicians (75.8%). The age of practicing and non-practicing respondents ranges from 26 to 60 with a mean and standard deviation (42.6±8.6) and 24 to 60 (40.1±8.9) years old. Our study showed that there were females under 18 years old requesting FGCS from all physicians. Results of attitude towards FGCS showed that the majority of non-practicing physicians were more comfortable in providing advice about FGCS (N=53) and very confident about female anatomy (N=65). Non-practicing physicians also knew a lot more about the long and short-term risks of FGCS and discussed them all the time with their patients. In terms of giving advice on labiaplasty, clitoral hood reduction, perineoplasty, hymenoplasty, and G-spot augmentation procedures, practicing physicians were more confident compared to non-practicing physicians. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference between practicing and non-practicing physicians in terms of gender (p=0.001), career level (p=0.005) and type of work (p=0.006), giving advice on labiaplasty (p=0.001), clitoral hood reduction (p=0.001), perineoplasty (p=0.016) and G-spot augmentation (p=0.001), the number of patients per month, patients seeking advice about FGCS, knowledge about short-term and long-term risks and possible risks of FGCS, vaginal examination, offering referral/counseling and confidence in assessing female anatomy (all, p=0.001). ConclusionPhysicians in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia showed an overall positive attitude towards FGCS. The study suggests that with enough training and knowledge about FGCS, physicians could exhibit a more positive attitude towards FGCS.

Background and Objectives: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) significantly contribute to global rates of UTI. This study aimed to compare the prevalence and trends of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales and CRE in patients with CAUTIs and non-CAUTIs. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of 4262 UTI-positive urine cultures was conducted at King Fahad Hospital of the University, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia (January 2022–November 2023). Demographic, clinical, and microbiological data were obtained from hospital records. Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using the Vitek® System; ESBL and CRE were identified using Ezy MIC™ strips and Xpert® Carba-R assay, respectively. Results: ESBL-producing Enterobacterales accounted for 11.3% of cases; CRE comprised 1.8%. ESBL was significantly more prevalent in non-catheterized patients and those in emergency care. CRE was significantly associated with catheterized patients and inpatient settings. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were the predominant ESBL-producing and CRE isolates, respectively. bla-OXA-48 was the most frequently detected carbapenemase gene (66.7%). ESBL was prevalent in younger, non-catheterized females, suggesting increasing community transmission. Conversely, CRE were primarily observed in older, catheterized inpatients, emphasizing the role of invasive devices in resistance spread. Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of targeted infection control and early catheter removal to mitigate resistance trends.