Explore the vast range of titles available.

Unmet needs remain in the treatment of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in later lines. Sequential use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is associated with decreased overall survival and emergence of new mutations, particularly the T315I mutation. Among the new drugs developed to overcome resistance and intolerance, the STAMP inhibitor asciminib (which specifically targets the ABL myristoyl pocket) is the first example of a drug that works by allosteric inhibition. This review focuses on its mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic, efficacy, and toxicity, as well as how this drug will change the therapeutic approach for CML patients not eligible to receive other available drugs.

Since July 2017, different generic imatinib formulations have been introduced in Italy for the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). We analyzed 168 chronic phase CML patients treated with branded imatinib for a median of 12 years (range 1–16) at a single institution who switched to a single generic formulation in order to assess the safety and impact on molecular response. The Sokal risk was low/intermediate/high in 63%, 33%, and 4% of patients, respectively. The median duration of generic imatinib treatment was 19 months (range 4–22). Twenty-seven percent of patients were in MMR and 73% were in deep molecular responses (MR4–4.5) at the time of the switch. After 12 months of treatment with generic imatinib, 140 patients were evaluable for response: 23.6% and 76.4% were respectively in MMR and in deep molecular response. When the degree of response was compared with the best molecular response observed with branded imatinib, it was found that 84% of patients maintained the response previously achieved, 6% improved it, and 10% of patients had a molecular fluctuation from the previous deep molecular response to MMR. Only 1 patient lost the MMR and no patient switched to another TKI for inefficacy. In terms of safety, 20% of patients reported new or worsening side effects, but only 2 patients returned to branded imatinib for toxicity. Our data show that the switch to generic imatinib in patients who have been previously treated with branded imatinib appears to maintain efficacy, although a proportion of patients experience new or worsening side effects.

There are five tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that are currently approved (in the European Union and the United States) for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in the chronic phase (CP) and each of them has its own efficacy and toxicity profile. Oral ponatinib (Iclusig®) is a third-generation TKI structurally designed to inhibit native BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase and several BCR-ABL1 mutants, including T315I. Ponatinib is now approved for patients with CML who are resistant or intolerant to prior TKI therapy (European Union) or for whom no other TKI therapy is indicated (United States). Despite achieving results in heavily treated patients, which led to its approval, the drug may induce cardiovascular events, requiring a careful baseline assessment of predisposing risk factors and specific management during treatment. Pharmacokinetic analysis has indicated the possibility of reducing the starting dose of ponatinib to 15 mg/day and preliminary data showed advantages in terms of safety while maintained its efficacy. This review summarizes the results achieved and drug-related side effects reported in all clinical trials and real-life experiences, testing ponatinib in patients with CP-CML. In addition, we focus on the appropriate use of ponatinib in clinical practice suggesting some useful recommendations on the proper management of this drug.

Predictive factors of response to hypomethylating agents (HMA) in elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients remain unclear in the real-life setting and no direct comparison between azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC) has been carried out. We retrospectively evaluated 110 AML patients treated with HMA (78 AZA, 32 DEC) as first-line therapy outside of clinical trials. Median age was 75 years (range 58–87). The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 8.0 months (95% CI 6.1–10), without significant differences among the subgroups: AZA 8.8 months vs DEC 6.3 months (p = 0.291). HMA treatment yielded an overall response rate (ORR) of 40% (AZA 37% vs DEC 47%, p = 0.237). A stable disease (SD) after 4 HMA cycles was not associated with a worse survival outcome compared with an early optimal response. Factors independently associated with a better OS were transfusion independence during treatment (p = 0.049), achievement of an optimal response to treatment (p < 0.001), and a baseline hemoglobin level ≥ 9.25 (p = 0.018). A bone marrow (BM) blast count ≥ 30% (p < 0.001) and a therapy-related AML (p = 0.008) remain poor survival predictors. Of the available biologic features, an adverse risk category according to the ELN classification was significantly associated with a shorter survival over the intermediate risk category (p = 0.034). Disease progression remains the primary cause of death. Infectious complications were more severe (p = 0.036) and occurred earlier (p = 0.006) in the DEC group compared with that of the AZA group. In conclusion, clinical prognostic factors associated to response and survival have been identified without significant associations concerning overall outcomes between the two HMAs.

Background/Objectives: Myelofibrosis (MF) predominantly affects older individuals, and its incidence increases with age. Ruxolitinib (RUX), a JAK1/2 inhibitor, effectively reduces spleen volume and relieves disease-related symptoms in MF patients and can be prescribed regardless of age. Although advanced age is associated with poorer MF prognosis, the influence of patient age on RUX treatment efficacy and safety has not been fully elucidated. Methods: In this single-center, retrospective study, we included 216 adult MF patients who initiated RUX therapy between 2012 and 2024. Patients were stratified by age at the start of RUX as follows: <65 (n = 105), 65–74 (n = 64), and ≥75 years (n = 47). Clinical data were analyzed in order to assess the impact of age on RUX-associated responses, toxicities, and survival. Results: Compared to younger patients, those ≥65 years showed features of more advanced MF and 45% higher odds of not achieving SR [OR = 1.45 (95% CI, 1.10–1.91), p = 0.009]. Patients ≥65 years presented a higher incidence of drug-related anemia at 3 (p = 0.003) and 6 months (p = 0.020). These patients had a two-fold increased risk of RUX discontinuation [HR = 2.07 (95% CI, 1.30–3.31) (p = 0.002) and presented a shorter OS than younger patients [HR = 2.74 (95% CI, 1.67–4.49)] (p < 0.001). In the sub-analysis focused on patients older than 65 years, very elderly patients (≥75 years) exhibited similar baseline characteristics, SR rates, median RUX treatment duration (p = 0.22), and OS (p = 0.86) to the 65–74 years cohort. More patients in the very elderly group presented an infectious event grade ≥ 2 (19.2%) than in the 65–74 years group (3.1%) (p = 0.008). Conclusions: RUX demonstrates overall robust rates of SR and favorable OS across all age groups. However, patients aged ≥65 years experienced higher rates of adverse events and worse outcomes. Our data support RUX usage in all age cohorts while highlighting the need for tailored strategies and close clinical monitoring in older patients.

Abstract Ruxolitinib is approved for polycythemia vera (PV) patients after failure to previous cytoreductive therapy, based on durable results observed in phase 3 trials. We report a multicenter retrospective study demonstrating the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in real-life setting. Eighty-three patients were evaluated. Median follow-up was 24.5 months (IQR 14.0–29.3). At a 3-month response assessment, ruxolitinib provided significant benefit in reducing hematocrit (HCT) level (p < 0.001), phlebotomy requirement (p < 0.001), leucocytes (p = 0.044), and disease-related symptoms (p < 0.001). The exposure-adjusted rates (per 100 patient-years) of infectious complications, thromboembolic events, and secondary malignancies were 6.9, 3, and 3.7, respectively. Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) were the most frequent (40%) SM type. Lymphoproliferative disorders were not detected. Five (6%) patients permanently discontinued ruxolitinib treatment and four (5%) evolved in myelofibrosis (MF), but none in acute leukemia. The rate of MF evolution per 100 patient-years of exposure was 2.8. In our experience, ruxolitinib confirmed its efficacy and safety outside of clinical trials.

Introduction Myelofibrosis (MF) is often characterized by a multifactorial anemia determined, in part, by bone marrow (BM) fibrosis, extramedullary erythropoiesis and splenomegaly. Ruxolitinib (RUX) is the first-in-class janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor approved for treatment of MF, proved to reduce spleen volume and decrease symptom burden. The red cell distribution width (RDW) is the measure of erythrocyte volume variability (anisocytosis). RDW has been recognized as a marker of clinical and subclinical systemic inflammation, and its elevation has also been associated with poor outcome in a wide spectrum of benign disorders and in different types of neoplasms. Methods We retrospectively evaluated RDW in a single-center series of 200 consecutive patients with primary and secondary MF at RUX treatment initiation and examined any possible correlation with adverse MF features or drug-related anemia and any prognostic impact. Results We suggested 20.5% as the optimal cutoff point in RDW values at start of RUX to dichotomize patients in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for spleen response and for survival. Higher RDW values at RUX start were associated with clinical and laboratory features of an aggressive MF phenotype. Lower spleen response ( p  < 0.001) and greater odds of drug-related anemia at 3 ( p  = 0.006) and 6 months ( p  < 0.001) were also seen in patients with higher RDW. Both increased RDW (considered as a continuous variable) and RDW ≥ 20.5% were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) from RUX initiation in univariate and multivariate analysis: HR 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–1.40) ( p  < 0.001) and HR 3.01 (95% CI 1.81–4.99) ( p  < 0.001), respectively. RDW ≥ 20.5% at RUX start seems to possibly improve patients’ sub-stratification along with anemia and conventional prognostic scoring systems. Conclusions RDW at RUX start might represent a good indirect measure of MF features and might have prognostic significance for RUX-treated patients affected by MF, aiding in the rapid detection of patients with poor prognosis.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the backbone of treatment for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients (CP-CML), have changed the long-term outcome of the disease. Nonetheless, over 20% of patients fail front-line therapy due to intolerance or resistance. A head-to-head comparison of dasatinib and nilotinib as second-line treatment outside of sponsored clinical trials has not been reported. We retrospectively analyzed 131 CP-CML patients who, after front-line imatinib failure, switched to a second-line therapy with nilotinib (59, 45%) or dasatinib (72, 55%). Median duration of second-line treatment was 33 months (range 2–100). The reason for switching therapy was resistance in 83.2% and intolerance in 16.8% of patients. The overall survival of the entire cohort at 7 years was 78.9%, while it was 72% and 85.6% for patients treated with dasatinib and nilotinib, respectively (p=0.287). With regard to efficacy after 12 months of treatment, 108 patients were evaluable for molecular response: 47% achieved a major molecular response and 18.2% a deep molecular response with dasatinib, compared to 38% and 16.2% with nilotinib (p=ns). We observed 35% of grade 3–4 adverse events, more frequently in the dasatinib group (47%) compared to the nilotinib group (22%), without affecting molecular responses. Our study suggests that, in the real-life setting, dasatinib and nilotinib used as second-line treatment in CP-CML are equally effective, with high molecular response rates and an acceptable tolerability.

Recommendations for dyslipidemia management aimed at reducing arterial occlusive events (AOEs) have been recently published. So far, no data have been reported on the management of dyslipidemia in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with nilotinib. We investigated 369 CML adult patients, stratified according to the new Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) scoring system. Plasma levels of cholesterol, HDL, LDL, and triglycerides were measured prior to the start of nilotinib and after 3, 6, and 12 months. The 5-year cumulative incidence of AOEs was 15.9%. Patients with cholesterol levels > 200 mg/dL and LDL > 70 mg/dL 3 months after treatment showed a significantly higher incidence of AOEs (21.9 ± 4.6% vs 6.2 ± 2.5, P = 0.003). Patients belonging to the high and very high SCORE risk group showed a significant increase of AOEs (34.4 ± 6% vs 10 ± 2.1%, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, both high cholesterol and LDL levels and a high and very high SCORE risk remained significantly associated with the risk of AOEs (P = 0.008; HR = 3.5; 95% CI = 1.4–8.7 and P < 0.001; HR = 4.4; 95% CI = 2–9.8, respectively). Overall, 78 patients (21.1%) presented dyslipidemia at the time of CML diagnosis and 88 (23.3%) after starting nilotinib, but only 26 of them (29.5%) were treated with statins.Low LDL and cholesterol plasma levels are associated with a significant lower risk of AOEs in CML patients treated with nilotinib in the real life.