Explore the vast range of titles available.

Surgery triggers a systemic inflammatory response that ultimately impacts the brain and associates with long-term cognitive impairment. Adequate regulation of this immune surge is pivotal for a successful surgical recovery. We explored the temporal immune response in a surgical cohort and its associations with neuroimmune regulatory pathways and cognition, in keeping with the growing body of evidence pointing towards the brain as a regulator of peripheral inflammation. Brain-to-immune communication acts through cellular, humoral and neural pathways. In this context, the vagal nerve and the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (CAP) have been shown to modify peripheral immune cell activity in both acute and chronic inflammatory conditions. However, the relevance of neuroimmune regulatory mechanisms following a surgical trauma is not yet elucidated. Twenty-five male patients undergoing elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery were included in this observational prospective study. Serial blood samples with extensive immune characterization, assessments of heart rate variability (HRV) and cognitive tests were performed before surgery and continuing up to 6 months post-surgery. Temporal immune responses revealed biphasic reaction patterns with most pronounced changes at 5 hours after skin incision and 14 days following surgery. Estimations of cardiac vagal nerve activity through HRV recordings revealed great individual variations depending on the pre-operative HRV baseline. A principal component analysis displayed distinct differences in systemic inflammatory biomarker trajectories primarily based on pre-operative HRV, with potiential consequences for long-term surgical outcomes. In conclusion, individual pre-operative HRV generates differential response patterns that associate with distinct inflammatory trajectories following surgery. Long-term surgical outcomes need to be examined further in larger studies with mixed gender cohorts.

ObjectivesTo evaluate if 10 sessions of hyperbaric oxygen treatments (HBOTs) improve short- and long-term health related quality of life, symptoms and physical performance in long covid patients compared with placebo.DesignParallel, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.SettingSingle-centre, university hospital, Sweden.ParticipantsPreviously healthy subjects aged 18–60 years, diagnosed with long covid were included. We excluded pregnant women, patients with RAND-36 (role limitations due to physical health (RP) and physical functioning (PF)) above 70, diabetes, hypertension and contraindications for HBOT.InterventionsSubjects were randomly assigned to 10 sessions of HBOT or sham (placebo) treatments over 6 weeks. HBOT involved 100% oxygen, 2.4 bar, 90 min, placebo medical air, 1.34–1.2 bar. Randomisation (1:1) was done electronically, in blocks stratified by sex and disease severity. Subjects and investigators were blinded to allocation.Primary and secondary outcome measuresPrimary endpoints were changes from baseline in RAND-36 PF and RP at 13 weeks. Efficacy was analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Harms were evaluated according to the actual treatment given.ResultsBetween 15 September 2021 and 20 June 2023, 80 subjects (65 women, 15 men) were enrolled and randomised (40 in each group). The trial is completed. The primary endpoint analysis included 79 subjects (40 in HBOT and 39 in control). At 13 weeks, both groups showed improvement, with no significant difference between HBOT and placebo in PF (least square mean difference between groups (LSD), 0.63 (95% CI −7.04 to 8.29), p=0.87) and RP (LSD, 2.35 (95% CI −5.95 to 10.66), p=0.57). Harms: 43 adverse events (AEs), most commonly cough and chest pain/discomfort, occurred in 19 subjects (49%) of the HBOT group and 38 AEs in 18 subjects (44%) of the placebo group, one serious AE in HBOT and one death in the placebo group.Conclusions10 HBOT sessions did not show more short-term benefits than placebo for long covid patients. Both groups improved, with a notable sex difference. HBOT has a favourable harm profile.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04842448), EudraCT (2021-000764-30). The trial was funded by Vetenskapsrådet (2022-00834), Region Stockholm (2020-0731, 2022-0674), Hjärt-Lungfonden and OuraHealth Oy.