Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
46 result(s) for "Scheyerer, Max J"
Sort by:
OF spine classification of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral body fractures by MRI and conventional radiographs only leads to high inter-observer agreement rates-an additional CT adds limited information for the of classification and the OF score
Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the addition of computed tomography (CT) to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves the accuracy of classifying osteoporotic vertebral body fractures (OVBF). Methods A retrospective analysis of a prospective single-center database has been performed. All consecutive patients who had suffered an acute thoracolumbar OVBF in one level II spine center between 2017 and 2019 were analyzed. Thereby, fractures of type OF 1 and OF 5 were excluded. All fractures were initially classified by 5 board-certified orthopaedic surgeons based on MRI and conventional radiographs. Afterwards a reclassification including CT scans were performed. Differences in OF classification and OF score values between both measurements were analyzed. Results A total of 61 patients were analyzed with a mean age 75.8 years (SD: 8.8 years). In 82.9% of the cases, there was no difference in OF classification comparing classification based only on MRI versus MRI + CT. A difference of more than two OF types was observed in less than 1% of all ratings. The inter-rater reliabilities of the OF classification based on CT + MRI and MRI alone were 0.63 and 0.49, respectively. In 97.5% of the cases there was no therapy-relevant difference of the treatment recommendation with respect of a surgical or nonoperative treatment recommendation based on the OF score. Conclusion In terms of the OF classification and the OF score, the addition of CT add limited value compared to conventional radiographs and MRI only. Additionally, there is only a minor rate of disagreement in treatment recommendations when adding a CT.
Correlation between kidney function and mortality in pyogenic spondylodiscitis: the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as new predictive parameter?
ObjectivePyogenic spondylodiscitis is a severe medical condition, often requiring surgical intervention. Numerous risk factors are known, such as obesity, neurological impairment and old age. In-hospital mortality remains high, therefore other factors may be contributing to the increased mortality. To evaluate kidney function as a risk factor for increased morbidity of pyogenic spondylodiscitis, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was correlated with the patients' clinical course.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the cases of 366 patients and 255 were included for analysis. Clinical, laboratory and surgical data were recorded with a minimum follow-up of three months. For clinical outcome measurement, mortality, length of stay and perioperative complications were analysed.ResultsThe study included 255 patients (173 men, 82 women; mean age 66.3 years). Patients with a GFR < 59 mL/min spent an average of 5 days longer in the hospital than those with a GFR ≥ 60 mL/min (p = 0.071). The mortality rate increased significantly with a decrease in GFR: A GFR of 30–59 mL/min had a mortality rate of 17.6%, whereas a GFR of < 29 mL/min had one of 30.4% (p = 0.003). Patients with impaired GFR showed an increased rate of postoperative complications (OR 4.7 p = 0.002) and higher rate of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (OR 8.7 p =  < 0.001).DiscussionPreoperative GFR values showed a significant correlation with in-hospital mortality in patients with spondylodiscitis, when graded according to the KDIGO stages. Furthermore, a GFR of < 29 ml/mL contributes to a longer ICU stay, postoperative complications and a longer total hospital stay. Therefore, the preoperative GFR could be a marker of kidney function and as a valuable predictive risk factor regarding the clinical in-hospital course of patients suffering from pyogenic spondylodiscitis.
Postoperative Surgical Site Infections in Spine Surgery: Can the Duration of Surgery Predict the Pathogen Spectrum?
Surgical site infection (SSI) is a severe complication of spinal surgery, which typically results in prolonged length of hospital stay, an increased number of revision surgeries, re-hospitalizations, worse clinical functional outcomes, and increased healthcare costs. The aim of the present study was to analyse if the duration of surgery can predict the spectrum of pathogens causing SSI in orthopaedic spine surgery. We conducted a retrospective study over a period of two years at the University Hospital of Cologne in which all patients with postoperative surgical site infections were included. In addition to descriptive characteristics (such as sex, age, BMI), the duration of the surgery, the administration of intra-operative antibiotics, the main diagnosis, the postoperative course of the infection parameters (CRP & WBC) and the responsible pathogens were analysed. A total of 75 patients were included with a median age of 64 years. The mean time of operation time was 131.52±70.91 min (range=23-285 min). The most frequently isolated germs in the postoperative blood culture were S. aureus (n=7), S. haemolyticus and S. hominis (n=2). There was a significant correlation between the duration of the primary surgical intervention and the postoperatively detected pathogens (p=0.002). A significant correlation was shown between the duration of surgery and the species of pathogens detected causing postoperative SSI. The use of perioperative antibiotics, the use of longer-lasting antibiotics or the repeated intravenous administration of prophylactic antibiotics should be evaluated.
Prospective clinical feasibility assessment of the Osteoporotic Pelvis Fracture Score (OFP-Score)—a multicenter prospective cohort study
Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of using the recently developed OF-Pelvis-Score (OFP-Score) for treatment decisions in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the pelvis (OFP) based on standard clinical diagnostics. Methods A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted at 14 trauma centers including 375 consecutive patients who were treated for an OFP over a period of 19 months. All fractures were classified according to the OF-Pelvis-Classification (OFP-Classification). The decision for either conservative or surgical therapy was made independently of the OFP-Score recommendation. Final decisions were compared to the recommendations given by the OFP-Score. Results 375 patients with an average age of 81.0 years (± 7.6) were included, mainly female (85.6%). According to the OFP-Score, surgery was recommended in 60.5%, and conservative treatment was recommended in 21.9%. In 66 patients (17.6%) the score was undetermined with no treatment recommendation. In daily practice, 33.6% of the patients were treated conservatively and the remaining 66.4% operatively. Overall, the agreement between the OFP-Score and the performed treatment was 91%. The score was obtained in a mean of 3.1 min (± 2.9). All patients improved significantly with respect of VAS ( p  < 0.001) and ODI ( p  < 0.001) during their hospital stay. Conclusion Patients with osteoporotic sacral fractures improved clinically both after surgical and conservative treatment. The OFP-Score-based therapy recommendations showed a promisingly high rate of agreement with the therapy of daily practice. The scoring method provides a structured framework that supports clinical decision-making, complementing clinical judgment and other evidence-based tools in guiding treatment choices.
Spondylodiscitis in Geriatric Patients: What Are the Issues?
Study Design Review article. Objectives A review of literature on the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis in geriatric patients was performed with the aim to give an overview about these special patients and a recommendation on necessary diagnostics as well as conservative and operative treatment options. Methods A systematic computerized literature search was done by the spondylodiscitis working group of the German Society for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery. Results Spondylodiscitis has an increasing incidence by age with a peak at 75 years or older. The 1-year mortality without an appropriate treatment is with 15 to 20% extremely high. Pathogen detection is the essential diagnostic step and the basis for a sufficient antibiotic treatment. Geriatric patients have initially less elevated inflammatory parameters. Compared to younger patients. They have a longer length of hospital stay and take longer for CRP normalization. Even the outcome between conservative and operative treatment is comparable after one year. Patients with spinal instability, immobilizing pain, epidural abscess, and newly emerged neurological deficits should be considered for operative treatment. Conclusions The treatment of geriatric patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis must take into account that these patients usually have multiple comorbidities. The main goals are resistance-based antibiotics and the shortest possible time of immobilization of the patient.
Risk Factors for Failure in Conservatively Treated Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Systematic Review
Study Design: Systematic review. Objectives: Osteoporosis is one of the most common diseases of the elderly, whereby vertebral body fractures are in many cases the first manifestation. Even today, the consequences for patients are underestimated. Therefore, early identification of therapy failures is essential. In this context, the aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate the current literature with respect to clinical and radiographic findings that might predict treatment failure. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive, systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) checklist and algorithm. Results: After the literature search, 724 potentially eligible investigations were identified. In total, 24 studies with 3044 participants and a mean follow-up of 11 months (range 6-27.5 months) were included. Patient-specific risk factors were age >73 years, bone mineral density with a t-score <−2.95, BMI >23 and a modified frailty index >2.5. The following radiological and fracture-specific risk factors could be identified: involvement of the posterior wall, initial height loss, midportion type fracture, development of an intravertebral cleft, fracture at the thoracolumbar junction, fracture involvement of both endplates, different morphological types of fractures, and specific MRI findings. Further, a correlation between sagittal spinal imbalance and treatment failure could be demonstrated. Conclusion: In conclusion, this systematic review identified various factors that predict treatment failure in conservatively treated osteoporotic fractures. In these cases, additional treatment options and surgical treatment strategies should be considered in addition to follow-up examinations.
Geriatric Odontoid Fractures: Treatment Algorithms of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Based on Expert Consensus and a Systematic Review
Study Design Systematic review/expert consensus. Objectives Fractures of the axis represent the most frequent injury of the spine in elderly patients. Both, operative and non-operative treatment are associated with a high rate of complications and mortality. The aim of this article was to summarize the current literature on the management of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients and to weigh it based on an expert consensus process. Methods In a joint consensus process, members of the Spine Section of the German Orthopaedic and Trauma Society (DGOU) aimed to formulate recommendations for the diagnostic workup and treatment of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients. Based on the previously published recommendations, this article is an updated version with incorporating a systematic review of the recent literature. Results Based on the new data available, the recommendations established in the initial consensus process were adapted. Conclusions Computed tomography represents the diagnostic standard for patients with suspected injuries of the upper cervical spine. Anderson/D’Alonzo odontoid fractures type 1, non-displaced type 2, and type 3 can be treated conservatively. Even non-unions do not necessarily result in poor clinical outcome. In Anderson/D’Alonzo type 2 fractures, surgical therapy offers the advantage of relatively safe osseous healing with no increased complication rate even in elderly patients and can thus be recommended. In very high aged patients, however, a case-by-case decision should be made. When surgical stabilization of osteoporotic odontoid fractures is indicated, posterior techniques are biomechanically advantageous and can be considered the standard.
Management of Pathological Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: Multidisciplinary Recommendations
Study Design Mutlidisciplinary consensus recommendations for patients suffering from multiple myeloma (MM) involvement of the spinal column by the Spine Section of the German Association of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgeons. Objective To provide a comprehensive multidisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic approach and to summarize the current literature on the management of pathological thoracolumbar vertebral fractures in patients with multiple myeloma. Methods Multidisciplinary recommendations using a classical consensus process provided by radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, orthopaedic- and trauma surgeons. A narrative literature review of the current diagnostic and treatment strategies was conducted. Results Treatment decision has to be driven by a multidisciplinary team of oncologists, radiotherapists and spine surgeons. When considering surgery in MM patients, differing factors compared to other secondary spinal lesions have to be included into the decision process: probable neurological deterioration, the stage of the disease and prognosis, patient’s general condition, localization and number of the lesions as well as patient’s own wishes or expectations. Aiming to improve quality of life, the major goal of surgical treatment is to preserve mobility by reducing pain, secure neurological function and stability. Conclusion The goal of surgery is primarily to improve quality of life by restoring stability and neurological function. Interventions with an increased risk of complications due to MM-associated immunodeficiency must be avoided whenever feasible to allow early systemic treatment. Hence, treatment decisions should be based on a multidisciplinary team that considers patient’s constitution and prognosis.
Postoperative Spinal Implant Infections (PSII)—A Systematic Review: What Do We Know So Far and What is Critical About It?
Study Design: Systematic review. Objectives: Postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII) are an increasing challenge in the daily clinical routine. This review summarizes existing knowledge in the field of PSII, including definitions, epidemiology, classifications, risk factors, pathogenesis, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment. Methods: A systematic review was performed using a structured PubMed analysis, based on the PRISMA criteria. The search terminology was set as: “spinal implant associated infection OR spinal implant infection OR spinal instrumentation infection OR peri spinal implant infection.” PubMed search was limited to the categories randomized controlled trials (RCT), clinical trials, meta-analysis and (systematic) reviews, whereas case reports were excluded. Studies from January 2000 to December 2020 were considered eligible. A total of 572 studies were identified, 82 references included for qualitative synthesis, and 19 for detailed sub analysis (12 meta-analysis, 7 prospective RCT). Results: Structural problems in the field of PSII were revealed, including (1) limited level of evidence in clinical studies (missing prospective RCT, metanalyzes), (2) small patient numbers, (3) missing standardized definitions, (4) heterogeneity in patient groups, and (5) redundancy in cited literature. Conclusion: Evidence-based knowledge about spinal implant-associated infections is lacking. All involved medical fields should come together to define the term PSII and to combine their approaches toward research, training, and patient care.
Mediating Medical Comorbidities in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Surgery for OVCF: From Preoperative Screening to Risk and Outcomes Optimization
Objectives Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) are a common increasing entity in elderly patients and represent a tremendous economic burden. Surgical treatment is related to high complication rates and little is known about patient-specific and internal risk factors associated with poor clinical results. Methods We carried out a comprehensive, systematic literature search according to the PRISMA checklist and algorithm. Risk factors for perioperative complications, for early inpatient readmission, for the duration of the hospital stay, the hospital mortality, the total mortality and the clinical result were analyzed. Results A total of 739 potentially usable studies were identified. After considering all inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 studies with 15,515 patients were included. Non-adjustable risk factors were age >90 years (OR 3.27), male gender (OR 1.41), BMI less than 18.5 kg/m2 (OR 3.97), ASA score >3 (OR 2.7), activity of daily live (ADL) (OR 1.52), dependence (OR 5.68), inpatient admission status (OR 3.22), Parkinson disease (OR 3.63) and disseminated cancer (OR 2.98). Adjustable factors were insufficient kidney function (GFR <60 mL/min, and Creatinine Clearance below 60 mg/dl) (OR 4.4), nutrition status (hypalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dl)), liver function (OR 8.9) and further cardiac and pulmonary comorbidities. Discussion We identified a couple of non-adjustable risk factors, which should be considered preoperatively in terms of risk assessment. However, even more important were adjustable factors that can be influenced preoperatively. In conclusion, we recommend a perioperative interdisciplinary cooperation, especially with geriatricians, to achieve the best possible clinical results in geriatric patients undergoing surgery for OVCF.