Explore the vast range of titles available.

With that aim, the International Conference on Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs was first held in 2005 in Stockholm, Sweden, covering a range of issues with support from the Office of Rare Diseases at the National Institutes of Health, USA, and the European Commission.5 This international collaboration still continues, and one of many important issues is improved alignment, coordination, and harmonisation of European and US orphan drug designations, leading to more cooperation in the approval process of novel treatments.

Chronic renal diseases as a public health problem: Epidemiology, social, and economic implications. The impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on the global burden of diseases is probably underestimated by current methods of evaluation. However, CKD are emerging as a major health problem. First, the costs of renal replacement therapy are excedingly high and are consuming a significant proportion of health care budgets of developed countries, while in developing countries are out of reach. Second, complex interaction are clearly emerging between chronic kidney, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes.

[...]the diseases, not the drugs, are the orphans because all drugs are very expensive,3 having marrying this success story (table). [...]in some cases, several OMPs are available for the same disease; for example, three drugs are licensed for treatment of Gaucher's disease (imiglucerase, velaglucerase alfa, and taliglucerase alfa).15 No evidence favours any one product over the other, and each drug costs about US$200 000 per patient per year. In a landmark departure from previous practice in 2014, the US Senate requested information on developmental costs and numerous other details for sofosbuvir, a drug for radical treatment of hepatitis C virus infection.19 Individual EU member state governments have since increasingly been requesting that industry disclose information about costs incurred during drug development that justify drug prices, but without legal obligations, these requests have largely been evaded. First synthesised in 1869, hydroxyurea has been used for decades in patients with myeloproliferative disorders and is now also indicated for sickle-cell disease.22,23 In the 2017 issue of the British National Formulary, one type of hydroxyurea for myeloproliferative disorders is listed at £0·24 per g, and another type of hydroxyurea for sickle-cell disease is listed at £16·7 per g. Common sense suggests that something must be wrong here.

The prevalence of chronic renal disease is increasing worldwide. Most chronic nephropathies lack a specific treatment and progress relentlessly to end-stage renal disease. However, research in animals and people has helped our understanding of the mechanisms of this progression and has indicated possible preventive methods. The notion of renoprotection is developing into a combined approach to renal diseases, the main measures being pharmacological control of blood pressure and reduction of proteinuria. Lowering of blood lipids, smoking cessation, and tight glucose control for diabetes also form part of the multimodal protocol for management of renal patients. With available treatments, dialysis can be postponed for many patients with chronic nephropathies, but the real goal has to be less dialysis–in other words remission of disease and regression of structural damage to the kidney. Experimental and clinical data lend support to the notion that less dialysis (and maybe none for some patients) is at least possible.

Background: The Angelman Syndrome Registry (RISA) was developed as a retrospective study with the following objectives: to evaluate the clinical history of individuals with Angelman Syndrome (AS) in Italy and compare it with the existing literature; to investigate the feasibility of gathering data by directly involving participants in the data collection process; and to explore the relationship between different symptoms and genotypes. Methods: Established in 2018, RISA enrolled a total of 82 participants, with 62 (75.6%) providing complete data. Demographic, clinical, and genetic information was collected using electronic case report forms. Descriptive statistics characterized the sample, while associations between genotype and clinical characteristics were examined. Results: Descriptive analysis revealed a median participant age of 8.0 years, with males comprising 48.8% of the sample. Deletion (58.1%) was the most common genotype. The majority (82.2%) experienced epilepsy, with seizures typically onset before 3 years of age. Most patients (86.2%) required multiple anti-epileptic drugs for control, with generalized tonic–clonic seizures and atypical absence seizures being most prevalent. The deletion group exhibited more severe developmental delays and a trend towards higher seizure severity. Sleep problems affected 69.4% of participants, characterized by difficulties in sleep onset and maintenance. Conclusions: This study offers valuable insights into the clinical history and genetic characteristics of AS in Italy, consistent with the prior literature. Additionally, it underscores the efficacy of patient registries in capturing comprehensive data on rare diseases such as AS, highlighting their potential to advance research and enhance patient care.

Increased recognition by governments and by health services of the problems faced by patients with rare diseases has been a major advance, and an important component has been to incentivise the development of orphan drugs. However, these incentives have to some extent backfired.

Although in some parts of the world acute and chronic kidney diseases are preventable or treatable disorders, in many other regions these diseases are left without any care. The nephrology community needs to commit itself to reduction of this divide between high-income and low-income regions. Moreover, new and exciting developments in fields such as pharmacology, genetic, or bioengineering, can give a boost, in the next decade, to a new era of diagnosis and treatment of kidney diseases, which should be made available to more patients.

Strategies for national health care systems in emerging countries: The case of screening and prevention of renal disease progression in Bolivia. There are close to 1 million people in the world who are alive simply because they have access to one form or another of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Ninety percent live in high-income countries. Little is known of prevalence and incidence of chronic kidney disease and of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in middle-income and low-income countries, where the use of RRT is scarce or nonexistent. However, no intervention is undertaken, these people will experience progression to ESRD and death from uremia, because RRT is out of reach for them. These are the individuals for whom efforts should be focused to prevent or delay progression toward ESRD. In 1992, the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research in Bergamo, Italy, with the cooperation of the young doctors of the Ospedale Giovanni XXIII in La Paz (Bolivia), activated a specific project titled “El Proyecto de Enfermedades Renales en Bolivia” (The Project for Renal Diseases in Bolivia). The project sought to demonstrate that in emerging countries the best strategies against renal disease are prevention and early detection. After proper training of local personnel at the Clinical Research Center “Aldo e Cele Dacco” of the Mario Negri Institute in Bergamo, Italy, an educational campaign titled “First Clinical and Epidemiological Program of Renal Diseases”—under the auspices of the Renal Sister Center Program of the International Society of Nephrology—was conducted in 3 selected areas of Bolivia, including tropical, valley, and plains areas. The goal was to define the frequency of asymptomatic renal disease in these areas by screening a large population of patients at relatively low costs. The screening was formally performed at first-level health centers (Unidad de Salud). Participants were instructed to void a clean urine specimen, and a dipstick test was performed. Patients with positive urinalysis were enrolled in a follow-up program with subsequent laboratory and clinical checks. The study was conducted by 21 clinical centers. Apparently healthy patients (14,082) were enrolled over a period of 7 months. Urinary abnormalities were found on first screening in 4261 patients, but only 1019 patients (23.9%) were available for follow-up. At second urinalysis, 35% of patients had no abnormalities. In the remaining positive group of patients, further investigations disclosed the following abnormalities: urinary tract infection (48.4%), isolated hematuria (43.9%), chronic renal failure (1.6%), renal tuberculosis (1.6%), and other diagnoses 4.3% (kidney stones, 1.3%; diabetic nephropathy, 1%; polycystic kidney diseases, 1.9%). The experience gained from this initial screening program formed the basis for a second study aimed to prevent renal disease progression in a selected Bolivian population with high altitude polycythemia. In conclusion, our studies show that mass screening of the population for renal disease is feasible in developing countries and can provide useful information on frequency of renal diseases. Also, in patients with altitude polycythemia, long-term treatment with low doses of enalapril safely prevents increase in arterial blood pressure and progressively reduces hematocrit and proteinuria. Aside from its scientific value, this last study can be taken as an example of how, by rationalizing resources and investing in research programs, renal disease progression and cardiovascular risk may eventually improve, which ultimately should translate into less demand for dialysis, and thus provide alternatives to costly RRT. The transformation of the Bolivian pilot model into a systematic program applicable to most emerging countries may be seen as a task of national nephrology societies, along with methodologic and economic support of international bodies.