Explore the vast range of titles available.

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with cardiovascular disease in the general population and is also a potential cardiovascular risk factor in survivors of haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We report an EBMT cross-sectional, multi-centre, non-interventional study of 453 adult HCT patients surviving a minimum of 2 years post-transplant attending routine follow-up HCT and/or late effects clinics in 9 centres. The overall prevalence of MetS was 37.5% rising to 53% in patients >50 years of age at follow-up. There were no differences in rates of MetS between autologous and allogeneic HCT survivors, nor any association with graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) or current immunosuppressant therapy. Notably, there was a significantly higher occurrence of cardiovascular events (CVE, defined as cerebrovascular accident, coronary heart disease or peripheral vascular disease) in those with MetS than in those without MetS (26.7% versus 9%, p < 0.001, OR 3.69, 95% CI 2.09–6.54, p < 0.001), and, as expected, MetS and CVE were age-related. Unexpectedly, CVE were associated with occurrence of second malignancy. Screening for and management of MetS should be integrated within routine HCT long-term follow-up care for both allogeneic and autologous HCT survivors. Further research is warranted, including randomised controlled trials of interventional strategies and mechanistic studies of cardiovascular risk in HCT survivors.

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) has curative potential counterbalanced by its toxicity. Prognostic scores fail to include current era patients and alternative donors. We examined adult patients from the EBMT registry who underwent alloHCT between 2010 and 2019 for oncohaematological disease. Our primary objective was to develop a new prognostic score for overall mortality (OM), with a secondary objective of predicting non-relapse mortality (NRM) using the OM score. AI techniques were employed. The model for OM was trained, optimized, and validated using 70%, 15%, and 15% of the data set, respectively. The top models, “gradient boosting” for OM (AUC = 0.64) and “elasticnet” for NRM (AUC = 0.62), were selected. The analysis included 33,927 patients. In the final prognostic model, patients with the lowest score had a 2-year OM and NRM of 18 and 13%, respectively, while those with the highest score had a 2-year OM and NRM of 82 and 93%, respectively. The results were consistent in the subset of the haploidentical cohort ( n  = 4386). Our score effectively stratifies the risk of OM and NRM in the current era but do not significantly improve mortality prediction. Future prognostic scores can benefit from identifying biological or dynamic markers post alloHCT.

The EBMT Complications and Quality of Life Working Party has developed a computer-based algorithm, the ‘ e GVHD App ’, using a user-centered design process. Accuracy was tested using a quasi-experimental crossover design with four expert-reviewed case vignettes in a convenience sample of 28 clinical professionals. Perceived usefulness was evaluated by the technology acceptance model (TAM) and User satisfaction by the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). User experience was positive, with a median of 6 TAM points (interquartile range: 1) and beneficial median total, and subscale PSSUQ scores. The initial standard practice assessment of the vignettes yielded 65% correct results for diagnosis and 45% for scoring. The ‘ e GVHD App ’ significantly increased diagnostic and scoring accuracy to 93% (+28%) and 88% (+43%), respectively (both P <0.05). The same trend was observed in the repeated analysis of case 2: accuracy improved by using the App (+31% for diagnosis and +39% for scoring), whereas performance tended to decrease once the App was taken away. The ‘eGVHD App ’ could dramatically improve the quality of care and research as it increased the performance of the whole user group by about 30% at the first assessment and showed a trend for improvement of individual performance on repeated case evaluation.

Recent registry studies have established umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation as a safe and feasible alternative to bone marrow transplantion in adults when no sibling donor is available. There is, however, no gold standard to guide optimal treatment choices. We review here factors leading to the choice of the ‘best available donor’ and ‘best available unit’ in the case of UCB. For instance, it is clear that higher cell dose may partially overcome the negative impact of certain histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA) disparities in UCB transplantation, leading us to choose the more closely HLA-matched unit with a cell dose >2.5 × 10 7 /kg. New approaches in adult UCB transplantation are systematically covered, with a quantitative appreciation of the evidence available to date. Reduced intensity conditioning, for example, broadens the range of potential recipients by reducing transplant-related mortality, but suffers from unproven risks and benefits long term. Potential advantages of multiple units over single unit transplants are discussed, with a particular emphasis on confounding factors that impact interpretation. The limited clinical results of ex vivo UCB expansion, the possible benefits of co-infusion of haploidentical cells and controversial issues (e.g. killer immunoglobulin-like receptor matching and alternative graft sources) are also addressed with a debate on the future of UCB transplantation.

Outcomes and prognostic factors of reduced intensity-conditioned allo-SCT (RIC allo-SCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) relapsing or progressing after prior autologous (auto)-SCT are not well defined. We performed an analysis of 413 MM patients who received a related or unrelated RIC allo-SCT for the treatment of relapse/progression after prior auto-SCT. Median age at RIC allo-SCT was 54.1 years, and 44.6% of patients had undergone two or more prior auto-SCTs. Median OS and PFS from the time of RIC allo-SCT for the entire population were 24.7 and 9.6 months, respectively. Cumulative non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year was 21.5%. In multivariate analysis, CMV seronegativity of both patient and donor was associated with significantly better PFS, OS and NRM. Patient–donor gender mismatch was associated with better PFS, fewer than two prior auto-SCT was associated with better OS, and shorter time from the first auto-SCT to the RIC allo-SCT was associated with lower NRM. The results of this study identify patient and donor CMV seronegativity as the key prognostic factor for outcome after RIC allo-SCT for MM relapsing or progressing after prior auto-SCT.

In patients diagnosed with B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) or B-non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL) relapsing after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT), it is a standard practice to perform anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. When collected from the patient after allo-HCT, the produced CAR-T cells are likely to be donor T-cell-derived, creating unknown safety risks due to their potential allo-reactivity. We therefore performed an EBMT registry-based study on the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in this setting. We included 257 allo-HCT patients (n = 172 ≥ 18 years) with B-ALL or B-NHL, treated with anti-CD19 CAR T-cells (tisagenlecleucel n = 184, brexucabtagene autoleucel n = 43 and axicabtagene ciloleucel n = 30), between 2018 and 2022. Three patients developed aGvHD, whereas 6 patients developed cGvHD after CAR T-cell. The 100-day cumulative incidence (CI) of new aGvHD was 1.6% and the 12-month CI of new cGvHD was 2.8%. The 1-year GvHD relapse-free survival and non-relapse mortality were 52.1% and 4.7%, respectively. Last, with a median follow up of 18.8 months, the 1-year overall survival was 76.8%. In summary, the GvHD rate in allo-HCT patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy is relatively low. Our data support the view that GvHD is not a major safety issue in this setting.

The question of the best donor type between haploidentical (HAPLO) and matched-related donors (MRD) for patients with advanced HL receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is still debated. Given the lack of data comparing these two types of donor in the setting of non-myeloablative (NMA) or reduced-intensity (RIC) allo-HCT, we performed a multicentre retrospective study using graft-vs.-host disease-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) as our primary endpoint. We analysed the data of 151 consecutive HL patients who underwent NMA or RIC allo-HCT from a HAPLO ( N   =  61) or MRD ( N   =  90) between January 2011 and January 2016. GRFS was defined as the probability of being alive without evidence of relapse, grade 3–4 acute GVHD or chronic GVHD. In multivariable analysis, MRD donors were independently associated with lower GRFS compared to HAPLO donors (HR  =  2.95, P    < 0.001). Disease status at transplant other than CR was also associated with lower GRFS in multivariable analysis (HR  =  1.74, P   =  0.01). In addition, the administration of ATG was independently linked to higher GRFS (HR  =  0.52, P   =  0.009). In summary, we observed significantly higher GRFS in HL patients receiving an allo-HCT using the HAPLO PT-Cy platform compared to MRD.

Even with the availability of targeted drugs, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the only therapy with curative potential for patients with CLL. Cure can be assessed by comparing long-term survival of patients to the matched general population. Using data from 2589 patients who received allo-HCT between 2000 and 2010, we used landmark analyses and methods from relative survival analysis to calculate excess mortality compared with an age-, sex- and calendar year-matched general population. Estimated event-free survival, overall survival and non-relapse mortality (NRM) 10 years after allo-HCT were 28% (95% confidence interval (CI), 25–31), 35% (95% CI, 32–38) and 40% (95% CI, 37–42), respectively. Patients who passed the 5-year landmark event-free survival ( N =394) had a 79% probability (95% CI, 73–85) of surviving the subsequent 5 years without an event. Relapse and NRM contributed equally to treatment failure. Five-year mortality for 45- and 65-year-old reference patients who were event-free at the 5-year landmark was 8% and 47% compared with 3% and 14% in the matched general population, respectively. The prospect of long-term disease-free survival remains an argument to consider allo-HCT for young patients with high-risk CLL, and programs to understand and prevent late causes of failure for long-term survivors are warranted, especially for older patients.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients have a substantial risk of developing secondary solid cancers, particularly beyond 5 years after HCT and without reaching a plateau overtime. A working group was established through the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation with the goal to facilitate implementation of cancer screening appropriate to HCT recipients. The working group reviewed guidelines and methods for cancer screening applicable to the general population and reviewed the incidence and risk factors for secondary cancers after HCT. A consensus approach was used to establish recommendations for individual secondary cancers. The most common sites include oral cavity, skin, breast and thyroid. Risks of cancers are increased after HCT compared with the general population in skin, thyroid, oral cavity, esophagus, liver, nervous system, bone and connective tissues. Myeloablative TBI, young age at HCT, chronic GVHD and prolonged immunosuppressive treatment beyond 24 months were well-documented risk factors for many types of secondary cancers. All HCT recipients should be advised of the risks of secondary cancers annually and encouraged to undergo recommended screening based on their predisposition. Here we propose guidelines to help clinicians in providing screening and preventive care for secondary cancers among HCT recipients.