Explore the vast range of titles available.

Electrolytes (sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, chloride, phosphate) are required in specific amounts for proper functioning of the human body. Although the body has different organ systems, such as the kidneys, that regulate electrolyte levels in the blood, electrolyte abnormalities occur frequently in people with eating disorders. The objective of this review will be to examine the association between electrolyte imbalances and adverse outcomes in people with eating disorders. A systematic review of studies on eating and electrolyte disorders shall be conducted. Electronic searches shall be done in the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases. Selected studies shall include randomized control trials (RCTs), non-randomized controlled trials, and cross-sectional studies published in English or French. Quality appraisal of studies and a narrative synthesis of extracted data shall be conducted. This review will synthesize existing evidence on electrolyte abnormalities in people with eating disorders. It will identify the type of electrolyte imbalances, their impact, and outcomes in people with eating disorders. We anticipate that information that will be useful to policy makers and clinicians in designing better policies to prevent eating disorders and or manage people with eating disorders shall be elucidated in this study. The final manuscript will be submitted for publication in a journal. This protocol has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO); registration number CRD42023477497.

Background Physician wellness programs are being implemented to offset rises in physician burnout. Insight into the effectiveness of these programs and to whom they are being offered, remains unclear. Objectives To identify and characterize wellness program interventions to improve physician wellness. Methods A PRISMA-P 2020-compliant systematic review as conducted, searching PubMed, Scopus, and Medline from May 2006 to July 2024. Search terms included Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords related to physicians and wellness program interventions. Peer reviewed published studies that qualitatively and/or quantitively measured outcomes of wellness interventions for practicing physicians were included. Results Thirty-six studies involving 6,708 total participants were included. Interventions were heterogenous and included group therapy, stress reduction strategies, time off/workload reductions, education, and peer support. The efficacy of interventions varied, with sixteen studies (44.4%) demonstrating some measurable degree of effectiveness, with statistically significant changes ( p  < 0.05) post-intervention. Few studies reported improvements by physician sex, age groups, or comparisons across specialities. Conclusion Studies examining physician wellness program interventions are highly heterogenous in terms of intervention, study design and methods of outcome assessment, limiting definitive conclusions about their general effectiveness. Trial registration The review protocol has been registered on Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8SDM9 ).

BackgroundEquity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in the healthcare field are crucial in meeting the healthcare needs of a progressively diverse society. In fact, a diverse healthcare workforce enables culturally sensitive care, promotes health equity and enhances the understanding of various needs and patients’ viewpoints, potentially resulting in more effective patient treatment and improved patient outcomes. Despite this, information on the effectiveness of policies or programmes promoting EDI in health institutions is scarce. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the effects and outcomes of EDI programmes in healthcare institutions.MethodsWe will conduct Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review of studies on EDI programmes and describe their effects and outcomes in healthcare institutions. We will search PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases. Selected studies will include randomised control trials (RCTs), non-RCTs and cross-sectional studies published either in English or French. Quality appraisal of studies and a narrative synthesis of extracted data will be conducted as well as a meta-analysis if possible. The quality of evidence in this review will be assessed by the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation.Anticipated resultsWe anticipate that this systematic review will reveal information on the effect of EDI programmes and their outcomes in healthcare institutions. We expect this information will provide insights that will lead to improvements in designing EDI policies and programmes in healthcare institutions.Ethics and disseminationNo ethical clearance is required for this study as no primary data will be collected. The final manuscript will be submitted to a journal for publication. In addition to this, the results of the study will also be disseminated through conference presentations to inform the research and clinical practice.Review registrationThis protocol has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; registration number CRD42024502781.