Explore the vast range of titles available.

In a study involving patients with non–small-cell lung cancer with a MET exon 14 skipping mutation, the use of tepotinib (a selective MET inhibitor) was associated with a partial response in approximately half the patients. The main adverse event was peripheral edema.

Abstract Background Second-line FOLFOX-bevacizumab treatment is effective in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment after irinotecan-based chemotherapy failure. First- or second-line raltitrexed-oxaliplatin (TOMOX) treatment has an acceptable toxicity profile in mCRC. The aim of this study was to evaluate TOMOX-bevacizumab combination as a second-line treatment. Methods The BEVATOMOX study was a non-comparative, prospective, randomized, open-label, multicentric phase II trial. Patients with histologically proven unresectable mCRC and progressive metastatic disease after irinotecan-based chemotherapy were randomized (1:2) to receive mFOLFOX6-bevacizumab (control arm, bevacizumab 5 mg/kg, mFOLFOX6 D1 = D15, 12 cycles) or TOMOX-bevacizumab (experimental arm, bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg, raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 based on creatinine clearance, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2, D1 = D21, 8 cycles). The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (6PFS). Target enrollment was 30 and 62 patients in the control and experimental arms, respectively. Results Eighty-three patients (median age 66 [48-82] years, 63.9% male, 54.2% KRAS mt) were included: 33 in the control and 50 in the experimental arms. The 6PFS rate and median overall survival were 51.5 (95% CI, 36-67) and 11.1 months (9.5-16.4) in the control arm vs 38 (95% CI, 26-51) and 9.3 (5.7-11.6) months in the experimental arm. In the experimental arm, left-sided tumors had a longer overall survival vs right-sided (11.6 vs 4.6 months, P < .001). Grade 3-4 toxicities (mucositis, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, paresthesia, hand-foot syndrome) were similar between arms. Conclusion The TOMOX-Bev combination is a feasible second-line mCRC treatment with an acceptable toxicity profile. Recruitment failure prevents efficacy conclusions, but TOMOX-Bev may be an alternative if fluropyrimidines are contraindicated. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01532804.

The aim of this multicentric study was to prospectively compare 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT versus somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) with SPECT/CT, combined with multiphasic CT scan and MRI in patients with grade 1 or 2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET). Patients with histologically proven grade 1 or 2 GEP-NET with suspicion of recurrence or progression, or with typical aspects of GEP-NET on morphological imaging, were explored with conventional imaging (CI): SRS with SPECT/CT, multiphasic CT scan and/or liver MRI followed by 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT. The gold standard was based on histology and imaging follow-up. The data of 105 patients (45 woman and 60 men; median age) were analyzed. 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT sensitivity was significantly higher than CI sensitivity in per-patient (98.9% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.016) and per-region (97.6% vs. 75.6%, p < 0.001) analyses, in the detection of the primary (97.9% vs. 78.7%; p = 0.016), peritoneal carcinomatosis (95% vs. 30%, p < 0.001), and bone metastases (100% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.041). 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT had an impact on the therapeutic management of 41.9% (44/105) patients compared to decisions based on CI explorations. Our data confirm the superiority of 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT over CI in the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis and bone metastasis, as well as its strong therapeutic impact on the management of patients with grade 1-2 GEP-NETs.

Background: Fluoropyrimidines (FPs) carry around 20% risk of G3-5 toxicity and 0.2-1% risk of death, due to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency. Several screening approaches exist for predicting toxicity, however there is ongoing debate over which method is best. This study compares 4 screening approaches. Method: 472 patients treated for colorectal, head-and-neck, breast, or pancreatic cancers, who had not been tested pre-treatment for FP toxicity risk, were screened using: DPYD genotyping (G); phenotyping via plasma Uracil (U); phenotyping via plasma-dihydrouracil/uracil ratio (UH2/U); and a Multi-Parametric Method (MPM) using genotype, phenotype, and epigenetic data. Performance was compared, particularly the inability to detect at-risk patients (false negatives). Results: False negative rates for detecting G5 toxicity risk were 51.2%, 19.5%, 9.8% and 2.4%, for G, U, UH2/U and MPM, respectively. False negative rates for detecting G4-5 toxicity risk were 59.8%, 36.1%, 21.3% and 4.7%, respectively. MPM demonstrated significantly (p < 0.001) better prediction performance. Conclusion: MPM is the most effective method for limiting G4-5 toxicity. Its systematic implementation is cost-effective and significantly improves the risk-benefit ratio of FP-treatment. The use of MPM, rather than G or U testing, would avoid nearly 8,000 FP-related deaths per year globally (500 in France), and spare hundreds of thousands from G4 toxicity.

This 38‐year‐old man has a familial BRCA2 mutation. He presented with skin erythema, polyarthritis, dactylitis, and febrile erythema nodosum; a biopsy of a liver metastase revealed acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas. After FOLFIRINOX, olaparib was initiated, and 24 months after, the patient was PS 0 and asymptomatic. Pancreas acinar cell carcinomas frequently present with skin lesions, dactylitis, and hyperlipasemia. In more than 20% of the cases, there exists a germline BRCA mutation allowing an efficient maintenance treatment by olaparib.

We report the case of a 57-year-old woman who presented with local invasion of the anal canal by mucinous adenocarcinoma, the malignant transformation of a long-term preexisting retrorectal tailgut cyst. This progression is infrequent and justifies preemptive surgical treatment of retrorectal cysts.

Oxaliplatin, a platinum-based chemotherapeutic agent, is responsible for induced peripheral sensory neuropathy. Only a few cases of ophthalmologic toxicity have been reported. We report here two cases of sudden transient vision loss after oxaliplatin administration, in one case intraperitoneally. These symptoms likely reflect optic neuritis that could be included in the spectrum of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy.

Background: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) allow the real-time monitoring of tumor course and treatment response. This prospective multicenter study evaluates and compares the early predictive value of CTC enumeration with EPISPOT, a functional assay that detects only viable CTCs, and with the CellSearch® system in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: Treatment-naive patients with mCRC and measurable disease (RECIST criteria 1.1) received FOLFIRI–bevacizumab until progression or unacceptable toxicity. CTCs in peripheral blood were enumerated at D0, D14, D28, D42, and D56 (EPISPOT assay) and at D0 and D28 (CellSearch® system). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed with the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Results: With the EPISPOT assay, at least 1 viable CTC was detected in 21% (D0), 15% (D14), 12% (D28), 10% (D42), and 12% (D56) of 155 patients. PFS and OS were shorter in patients who remained positive, with viable CTCs between D0 and D28 compared with the other patients (PFS = 7.36 vs. 9.43 months, p = 0.0161 and OS = 25.99 vs. 13.83 months, p = 0.0178). The prognostic and predictive values of ≥3 CTCs (CellSearch® system) were confirmed. Conclusions: CTC detection at D28 and the D0–D28 CTC dynamics evaluated with the EPISPOT assay were associated with outcomes and may predict response to treatment.

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a recognized treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. We postulated that local responses could be improved by SBRT with a concomitant radiosensitizing agent (irinotecan). Methods: RADIOSTEREO-CAMPTO was a prospective multi-center phase 2 trial investigating SBRT (40–48 Gy in 4 fractions) for liver and/or lung inoperable CRC oligometastases (≤3), combined with two weekly intravenous infusions of 40 mg/m2 Irinotecan. Primary outcome was the objective local response rate as per RECIST. Secondary outcomes were early and late toxicities, EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life, local control and overall survival. Results: Forty-four patients with 51 lesions (liver = 39, lungs = 12) were included. Median age was 69 years (46–84); 37 patients (84%) had received at least two prior chemotherapy treatments. Median follow-up was 48.9 months. One patient with two lung lesions was lost during follow-up. Assuming maximum bias hypothesis, the objective local response rate in ITT was 86.3% (44/51—95% CI: [76.8–95.7]) or 82.4% (42/51—95% CI: [71.9–92.8]). The observed local response rate was 85.7% (42/49—95% CI: [75.9–95.5]). The 1 and 2-year local (distant) progression-free survivals were 84.2% (38.4%) and 67.4% (21.3%), respectively. The 1 and 2-year overall survivals were 97.5% and 75.5%. There were no severe acute or late reactions. The EORTC questionnaire scores did not significantly worsen during or after treatment. Conclusions: SBRT with irinotecan was well tolerated with promising results despite heavily pretreated patients.

We report the case of a 32-year-old man with a caecal adenocarcinoma with major lymph node extension and peritoneal carcinomatosis, presenting a BRAF-K601E mutation. A triplet (5FU plus oxaliplatin plus irinotecan) combination with bevacizumab achieved tumor control but the disease progressed immediately after cessation and the patient died 8 months after the diagnosis. A short review of BRAF non-V600E mutations shows that outcome and clinical features depend on the mutation.