Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundStroke is the most common acquired neurological disease in the adult population worldwide with an incidence of 16 million new cases every year responsible for about 6.1 million deaths and 130.6 million disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). The objectives of this work were to study the level of stroke awareness and the proper response for suspected stroke patients in urban and rural areas of Tanta City, Egypt. The study was conducted on 1869 Egyptian Citizens; 908 and 961 reside in urban and rural areas, respectively, who were submitted to a face-to-face interview using the stroke awareness questionnaire (Arabic version).ResultsRural participants showed a significant reduction in acute cerebrovascular stroke (CVS) awareness and knowledge including the most affected organ by CVS, what are the risk factors, what are the early stroke symptoms, is there specific treatment for acute ischemic stroke, and what is the proper reaction when confronted with a case of acute CVS?ConclusionUrban populations have better recognition of stroke risk factors, early stroke symptoms, and the proper response when confronted with a case of acute CVS when compared with rural people possibly due to better socioeconomic status and higher educational levels.

Background Dementia is a growing public health concern, affecting over 55 million people worldwide, with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) being the most prevalent cause. Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) and memantine remain the mainstay pharmacological treatment for AD and other dementias, despite their modest benefits and potential adverse effects. The safety profiles of these medications, particularly at different doses and formulations, remain inadequately explored, necessitating a comprehensive evaluation. Methods This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) will assess the safety of ChEIs (donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine) and memantine in dementia treatment. We will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with ≥ 3 months of follow-up, evaluating adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and treatment discontinuation rates. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, with additional searches in Google Scholar and reference lists of included studies. Data extraction will follow a standardized approach, and study quality will be assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool-2. A Frequentist or Bayesian NMA framework will be used to compare safety profiles, with heterogeneity assessed using the I 2 test. Discussion By addressing gaps in prior NMAs, this study aims to provide an in-depth evaluation of safety outcomes associated with different ChEI and memantine doses and formulations across various dementia types. The findings will support clinicians in making informed treatment decisions and guide future research and policy development for dementia management. Systematic review registration PROSPERO (CRD42025642902).

Objective A cohort study was conducted with the support of the WHO, where a standardized WHO protocol was followed to assess vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic RT‒PCR confirmed SARS‒CoV-2 infection among hospital health workers (HWs) eligible for vaccination at Al-Azhar University hospitals. Methods A WHO-supported cohort study was conducted from July 2022 through September 2023 and included 1249 HWs who were randomly selected and followed up biweekly for one year. At enrollment, nasopharyngeal (NP) and blood samples were collected from each participant and evaluated to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA via a real-time PCR assay (QIAGEN) and for the quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 binding antibodies via the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, GmbH, Germany). During follow-up, NP samples were collected from anyone who developed symptoms consistent with the WHO definition of suspected cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results At enrollment, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 119/1235 (9.6%) HWs and 89% of the participants with positive RNA were asymptomatic. COVID-19-binding antibodies were detected among 1245/1248 (99.8%) HWs, and 53.2% of them had titers > 2500 U/mL, regardless of vaccination status. During follow-up, 232 participants had COVID-19 symptoms, but only 108 provided NP samples, and 18 (16.7%) of them were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. No hospitalization or mortality was recordedat enrollment or during the follow-up period. The cumulative incidence of COVID-19 infection was higher among HWs with incomplete vaccination compared to unvaccinated, fully vaccinated, or those who received booster doses ( P  = 0.025). There was no significant difference in VE among HWs who were fully vaccinated or had booster doses compared with unvaccinated HWs, with adjusted VE values of 68% (95% CI -28–92%) and 64% (95% CI -170–95%), respectively ( P  = 0.106 and 0.318 respectively). The adjusted VE increased to 89% (95% CI -33–99%) among HWs with hybrid immunity compared with those who were unvaccinated with a previous COVID-19 infection ( P  = 0.082). Conclusion This study indicates that VE against symptomatic lab-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection was quite high with over 60% protection and was higher among HWs with hybrid immunity (immunity due to a combination of previous infection and vaccination) compared to unvaccinated HWs with previous COVID-19 infection. The findings also highlight the importance of completing the primary vaccination series against COVID-19. This study reveals a high rate of asymptomatic COVID-19, a lower rate of confirmed cases, who showed marked decrease in hospitalization and fatality rates. Real-world VE studies are essential to address several unresolved issues, such as the appropriate number of booster doses and the longevity of protection.