Explore the vast range of titles available.

How can ordinary people protect themselves from high-tech government busybodies? Since the internet touches almost every area of our public and private lives, internet privacy is an important guiding principle. Open-source software is licensed in such a way that its source code is available for anyone to view, audit, modify, and redistribute. Because the open-source community is so large and diverse, the likelihood of anything nefarious being hidden in the code is at or near zero. [...]given that the source codes of proprietary software are closely guarded secrets, it is impossible to be certain that such software does not contain back doors. Because of this, this writer recommends using only open-source software whenever possible. While the files are in this state, they are unreadable and are only reassembled into something readable by a key that is activated by the correct passphrase. Since unencrypted information is impossible to secure, this writer recommends encrypting everything you can.

To even begin imagining the future of the internet and the web, it is important to know the history of each. Since both the internet and the web are such integral parts of life in the 21st century, it is important to know where they are taking us. [...]while IMPs and subnetworking solved the problem of connecting computers that would otherwise have been incompatible with each other, this solution was a trade-off that introduced a new problem: Since the IMPs needed to handle the subnetworking were the size of refrigerators and carried a price-tag of roughly $2,700 in 1965 (over $25,000 in 2023), getting connected to ARPANET was out of the budget for many universities and companies, and even some departments of the government. By the very early 1990s, educational institutions, companies, and individuals were going \"online\" via the World Wide Web with the advent of commercial Internet Service Providers (ISPs) such as America Online. [...]of that idea and the reality of the emerging internet, Tim BernersLee - an English computer scientist working as a software engineer at CERN (the large particle-physics laboratory near Geneva, Switzerland) - proposed an information-management system that would employ several emerging technologies.

FBI Target: Traditional Catholics On February 8, former FBI special agent, federal whistleblower, and Air Force veteran Kyle Seraphin published an article for UncoverDC exposing the FBI's focus on \"Radical-Traditionalist Catholics\" (RTCs) - a designation and acronym created out of whole cloth by the extreme left-leaning Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Jordan and Johnson's letter to Wray comes just days after attorneys general from 20 states sent a similar letter to both Wray and U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland demanding that Wray and Garland produce the unredacted document and its accompanying paper trail, as well as \"a full and complete briefing of the process by which the report was drafted, an explanation of its conclusions, and the effect that is likely to be experienced by the Catholic populations of the undersigned's States, and what efforts, if any, have been taken to ensure that the memorandum's recommendations have not been, and will not be, implemented.\" [...]those 20 attorneys general demanded \"information on whether the FBI has been adhering to its guidelines restricting the use of operatives to infiltrate houses of worship and if not, providing an explanation as to the extent of those activities and their constitutionality.\"

About two weeks later, Rebecca courageously shared her account before the Santee City Council. [...]that is where Rebecca - who, despite the palpable fear betrayed in her voice, managed to be clear, articulate, and logical in her comments to the council - put her finger on the real point in all of this: Rebecca did not know that her comments to the Santee City Council were being corded and be posted online. Christynne Wood, 66, has variously been described in liberal media as \"shocked,\" \"thunderstruck,\" and \"amazed\" that his nude presence in a place designated for females would cause such a fuss.

Groups such as Compact for America, the Balanced Budget Amendment Task Force (BBATF), and Convention of States Action offer various plans to rein in the federal government by encouraging states to apply for an Article V Convention to amend the Constitution. [...]while the leaders of those groups deny an obvious truth, a distinction must be made between those leaders and the followers who are deceived by that dishonest denial. Since those groups are well-funded - thanks to a handful of wealthy special-interest groups such as the Kochs and the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) - many thousands of good, patriotic men and women have believed the lies they have been told: that what Compact for America, the BBATF, COS Action, and other such groups are proposing is a safe, reasonable, limited solution to a federal government that runs roughshod over the rights of the people and the states. According to Article V of the Constitution, if two-thirds of the states apply to Congress for a convention, Congress is obliged to call one. Since there are 50 states, two-thirds is 34. [...]since \"Congress ... shall call\" the convention, it is highly likely that

The board is eerily similar to the Ministry of Truth from Orwell's 1984, and it is the creation of the Department of Homeland Security - a department so deeply Deep State that it nearly defines the term. [...]while she has subsequently claimed that she was \"livetweeting\" during the debate and that the tweet was \"a direct quote\" form the debate and not \"a key to all my views,\" she is simply lying. Because the next morning, she tweeted, \"I was thinking of pitching a quick piece about the election security section of the debate, but I realized it can be summed up in a tweet,\" continuing, \"One candidate cogently discussed actual policies for keeping our democracy safe. In the final analysis, the creation of a DHS Disinformation Governance Board - headed by a bleeding-heart liberal, manhating woman who never met a conservative fact she didn't accuse of being right-wing misinformation and who has herself unapologetically spread misinformation - is a naked attempt on the part of the Biden administration to control the flow of information.

In the just over three years between October 28, 2017 and December 8, 2020, one or more bloggers claiming to have access to secret intelligence from inside the Trump White House published nearly 5,000 cryptic posts known as \"drops\" under the moniker \"QAnon,\" or simply \"Q.\" At the time, many viewed the posts as credible, yet the passage of time showed beyond a reasonable doubt that they were not. Since the claims of the post were so outrageous, Q offered this assurance at the conclusion of the post: \"Proof check: [...]nothing predicted or claimed in the drop turned out to be true. What is known is that the last post from Q was on December 8, 2020 -just over a month before President Trump left the White House and turned the keys over to Joe Biden.

[...]that despite overwhelming evidence pointing to voter fraud, millions of suspicious votes would be certified to allow Joe Biden to take the election? [...]can you imagine being told that in the wake of that election, President Trump - while still in office and contesting the results of the election - would see social-media giants delete his accounts and ban him from their platforms? When asked why they chose to join the JBS instead of focusing their efforts within the Republican party or some other conservative organization, Mary Ann said, \"First of all, the Republican party is one and the same\" with the Democratic party, \"You can find conservatives, but most of them are neo-conservatives.\" The good news is that the enemies of freedom have - by accelerating their plans too quickly - awakened a sleeping giant (and as those enemies of freedom continue to press forward, many more Americans will continue to awaken), and that there is an organization with both the experience and a proven track record of exposing and fighting against the plans of freedom's enemies. [...]Nelson went bankrupt as a result of the war. Since only love for America and her freedom will drive men and women to work courageously and tirelessly to preserve and restore liberty, we must love America and paint such

[...]the Capitol Building had been breached, five people were dead, many others were injured, scores had been arrested. [...]good; a \"redress of grievances\" is enthroned in the First Amendment as a sacred right of the people, against which \"Congress shall make no law.\" Because what happened next is that \"Antifa people\" indeed stirred up the pro-Trump crowd, leading a very small percentage of them to join in on storming the Capitol Building, breaching its walls, and vandalizing offices and other parts of the building. [...]one poster child for the \"insurrection\" is Jake Angeli - the \"shamanic practitioner\" who appeared at the D.C. march in his usual attire of face and body paint and fur headdress complete with horns.

Again, the power of confirmation bias showed itself. Since it was obvious to any honest observer that President Trump was the victim of a tar-and-feather campaign, as well as a well-orchestrated witch hunt, Q seemed to \"fill in the blanks\" and explain what was really going on \"behind the scenes.\" [...]many suspended critical thinking and took - as unquestionable truth - whatever Q proposed, including Q's predictions of what would happen. [...]nothing predicted or claimed in the drop turned out to be true. [...]if someone who follows and cites Q on issues related to the Deep State conspiracy attempts to share information about an issue that is well documented - such as the evidence of actual collusion between Clinton and Russia - people have already ceased listening because the credibility of the person presenting the information has been sacrificed by repeating Q's myriad cries of \"wolf!\" Perhaps it would ameliorate things to at least a small degree if Q had followed Drop #1 with something that had a shred of credibility, but instead, Drop #2 followed an hour and a half later with claims that \"HRC\" had been \"detained,\" but \"not arrested (yet)\" and enigmatic questions with no foundation in truth, such as, \"Why did Soros donate all his money recently?\" It is obvious two and a half years later that Hillary Clinton has not been detained or arrested.