Explore the vast range of titles available.

Repeated exposure to blast overpressure remains a major cause of adverse health for military personnel who, as a consequence, are at a higher risk for neurodegenerative disease and suicide. Acute, early tracking of blast related effects holds the promise of rapid health assessment prior to onset of chronic problems. Current techniques used to determine blast-related effects rely upon reporting of symptomology similar to that of concussion and neurocognitive assessment relevant to operational decrement. Here, we describe the results of a cross sectional study with pared observations. The concentration of multiple TBI-related proteins was tested in serum collected within one hour of blast exposure as a quantitative and minimally invasive strategy to augment assessment of blast-exposure effects that are associated with concussion-like symptomology and reaction time decrements. We determined that median simple reaction time (SRT) was slowed in accordance with serum Nf-L, tau, Aβ-40, and Aβ-42 elevation after overpressure exposure. In contrast, median levels of serum GFAP decreased. Individual, inter-subject analysis revealed positive correlations between changes in Nf-L and GFAP, and in Aβ-40 compared to Aβ-42. The change in Nf-L was negatively associated with tau, Aβ-40, and Aβ-42. Participants reported experiencing headaches, dizziness and taking longer to think. Dizziness was associated with reaction time decrements, GFAP or NfL suppression, as well as Aβ peptide elevation. UCH-L1 elevation had a weak association with mTBI/concussion history. Multiplexed serum biomarker quantitation, coupled with reaction time assessment and symptomology determined before and after blast exposure, may serve as a platform for tracking adverse effects in the absence of a head wound or diagnosed concussion. We propose further evaluation of serum biomarkers, which are often associated with TBI, in the context of acute operational blast exposures.

Targeting drugs to the mitochondrial level shows great promise for acute and chronic treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in both military and civilian sectors. Perhaps the greatest obstacle to the successful delivery of drug therapies is the blood brain barrier (BBB). Intracerebroventricular and intraparenchymal routes may provide effective delivery of small and large molecule therapies for preclinical neuroprotection studies. However, clinically these delivery methods are invasive, and risk inadequate exposure to injured brain regions due to the rapid turnover of cerebral spinal fluid. The direct intranasal drug delivery approach to therapeutics holds great promise for the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) disorders, as this route is non-invasive, bypasses the BBB, enhances the bioavailability, facilitates drug dose reduction, and reduces adverse systemic effects. Using the intranasal method in animal models, researchers have successfully reduced stroke damage, reversed Alzheimer’s neurodegeneration, reduced anxiety, improved memory, and delivered neurotrophic factors and neural stem cells to the brain. Based on literature spanning the past several decades, this review aims to highlight the advantages of intranasal administration over conventional routes for TBI, and other CNS disorders. More specifically, we have identified and compiled a list of most relevant mitochondria-targeted neuroprotective compounds for intranasal administration based on their mechanisms of action and pharmacological properties. Further, this review also discusses key considerations when selecting and testing future mitochondria-targeted drugs given intranasally for TBI. Graphical Abstract Highlights Noninvasive intranasal drugs administration bypass the BBB, and can be rapidly delivered from the nasal mucosa to the brain The intranasal delivery is an attractive route for mitochondria-targeted neuroprotective drugs administration Accurate screening of intranasal compounds based on physiochemical properties is crucial When optimizing the intranasal administration by nanocarriers, drugs protection from chemical and enzymatic degradation must be carefully applied The intranasal route offers means to pharmacologically counter TBI pathogenesis in austere combat settings.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results from external mechanical forces exerted on the brain, triggering secondary injuries due to cellular excitotoxicity. A key indicator of damage is mitochondrial dysfunction, which is associated with elevated free radicals and disrupted redox balance following TBI. However, the temporal changes in mitochondrial redox homeostasis after penetrating TBI (PTBI) have not been thoroughly examined. This study aimed to investigate redox alterations from 30 min to two-weeks post-injury in adult male Sprague Dawley rats that experienced either PTBI or a Sham craniectomy. Redox parameters were measured at several points: 30 min, 3 h, 6 h, 24 h, 3 d, 7 d, and 14 d post-injury. Mitochondrial samples from the injury core and perilesional areas exhibited significant elevations in protein modifications including 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT) and protein carbonyl (PC) adducts (14–53%, vs. Sham). In parallel, antioxidants such as glutathione, NADPH, peroxiredoxin-3 (PRX-3), thioredoxin-2 (TRX-2), and superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) were significantly depleted (20–80%, vs. Sham). In contrast, catalase (CAT) expression showed a significant increase (45–75%, vs. Sham). These findings indicate a notable imbalance in redox parameters over the two-week post-PTBI period suggesting that the therapeutic window to employ antioxidant therapy extends well beyond 24 h post-TBI.

Despite the large number of promising neuroprotective agents identified in experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) studies, none has yet shown meaningful improvements in long-term outcome in clinical trials. To develop recommendations and guidelines for pre-clinical testing of pharmacological or biological therapies for TBI, the Moody Project for Translational Traumatic Brain Injury Research hosted a symposium attended by investigators with extensive experience in pre-clinical TBI testing. The symposium participants discussed issues related to pre-clinical TBI testing including experimental models, therapy and outcome selection, study design, data analysis, and dissemination. Consensus recommendations included the creation of a manual of standard operating procedures with sufficiently detailed descriptions of modeling and outcome measurement procedures to permit replication. The importance of the selection of clinically relevant outcome variables, especially related to behavior testing, was noted. Considering the heterogeneous nature of human TBI, evidence of therapeutic efficacy in multiple, diverse (e.g., diffuse vs. focused) rodent models and a species with a gyrencephalic brain prior to clinical testing was encouraged. Basing drug doses, times, and routes of administration on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data in the test species was recommended. Symposium participants agreed that the publication of negative results would reduce costly and unnecessary duplication of unsuccessful experiments. Although some of the recommendations are more relevant to multi-center, multi-investigator collaborations, most are applicable to pre-clinical therapy testing in general. The goal of these consensus guidelines is to increase the likelihood that therapies that improve outcomes in pre-clinical studies will also improve outcomes in TBI patients.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major global health problem that affects both civilian and military populations worldwide. Post-injury acute, sub-acute, and chronic progression of secondary injury processes may contribute further to other neurodegenerative diseases. However, there are no approved therapeutic options available that can attenuate TBI-related progressive pathophysiology. Recent advances in preclinical research have identified that mitochondria-centric redox imbalance, bioenergetics failure and calcium dysregulation play a crucial role in secondary injury progression after TBI. Mitochondrial antioxidants play an important role in regulating redox homeostasis. Based on the proven efficacy of preclinical and clinical compounds and targeting numerous pathways to trigger innate antioxidant defense, we may be able to alleviate TBI pathology progression by primarily focusing on preserving post-injury mitochondrial and cerebral function. In this review, we will discuss novel mitochondria-targeted antioxidant compounds, which offer a high capability of successful clinical translation for TBI management in the near future.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an established risk factor for the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Here the effects of severe penetrating TBI on APP and tau cleavage processing were investigated in a rodent model of penetrating ballistic-like brain injury (PBBI). PBBI was induced by stereotactically inserting a perforated steel probe through the right frontal cortex of the anesthetized rat and rapidly inflating/deflating the probe's elastic tubing into an elliptical shaped balloon to 10% of total rat brain volume causing temporary cavitation injury. Separate animals underwent probe injury (PrI) alone without balloon inflation. Shams underwent craniectomy. Brain tissue was collected acutely (4h, 24h, 3d) and subacutely (7d) post-injury and analyzed by immunoblot for full length APP (APP-FL) and APP beta c-terminal fragments (βCTFs), full length tau (tau-FL) and tau truncation fragments and at 7d for cytotoxic Beta amyloid (Aβ) peptides Aβ40 and Aβ42 analysis. APP-FL was significantly decreased at 3d and 7d following PBBI whereas APP βCTFs were significantly elevated by 4h post-injury and remained elevated through 7d post-injury. Effects on βCTFs were mirrored with PrI, albeit to a lesser extent. Aβ40 and Aβ42 were significantly elevated at 7d following PBBI and PrI. Tau-FL decreased substantially 3d and 7d post-PBBI and PrI. Importantly, a 22 kDa tau fragment (tau22), similar to that found in AD, was significantly elevated by 4h and remained elevated through 7d post-injury. Thus both APP and tau cleavage was dramatically altered in the acute and subacute periods post-injury. As cleavage of these proteins has also been implicated in AD, TBI pathology shown here may set the stage for the later development of AD or other tauopathies.

Cathepsin B (CatB), a lysosomal cysteine protease, is important to brain function and may have dual utility as a peripheral biomarker of moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The present study determined levels of pro- and mature (mat) CatB protein as well as cysteine protease activity within the frontal cortex (FC; proximal injury site), hippocampus (HC; distal injury site), and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) collected 1–7 days after craniotomy and penetrating ballistic-like brain injury (PBBI) in rats. Values were compared with naïve controls. Further, the utility of CatB protein as a translational biomarker was determined in CSF derived from patients with severe TBI. Craniotomy increased matCatB levels in the FC and HC, and led to elevation of HC activity at day 7. PBBI caused an even greater elevation in matCatB within the FC and HC within 3–7 days. After PBBI, cysteine protease activity peaked at 3 days in the FC and was elevated at 1 day and 7 days, but not 3 days, in the HC. In rat CSF, proCatB, matCatB, and cysteine protease activity peaked at 3 days after craniotomy and PBBI. Addition of CA-074, a CatB-specific inhibitor, confirmed that protease activity was due to active matCatB in rat brain tissues and CSF at all time-points. In patients, CatB protein was detectable from 6 h through 10 days after TBI. Notably, CatB levels were significantly higher in CSF collected within 3 days after TBI compared with non-TBI controls. Collectively, this work indicates that CatB and its cysteine protease activity may serve as collective molecular signatures of TBI progression that differentially vary within both proximal and distal brain regions. CatB and its protease activity may have utility as a surrogate, translational biomarker of acute-subacute TBI.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) carries a risk of developing post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE). Currently, animal models that replicate clinical PTE (delayed spontaneous and recurrent seizures) are limited, which hinders pre-clinical research. In this study, we used two rat models of penetrating ballistic-like brain injury (PBBI) and closed-head injury (CHI) to induce spontaneous seizures and also measure changes in seizure susceptibility. In the PBBI model, two trajectories (frontal and lateral) and two injury severities for each trajectory, were evaluated. In the CHI model, a single projectile impact to the dorsal/lateral region of the head was tested. Continuous video-electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings were collected for 10 days at 1 or 6 month(s) post-injury. After EEG recording, all rats were given a sub-convulsant dose of pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) to challenge the seizure susceptibility. The video-EEG recording did not detect PTE following the PBBI. Only one CHI rat demonstrated persistent and recurrent non-convulsive seizures detected at 6 months post-injury. However, after PTZ challenge, 50–100% of the animals across different TBI groups experienced seizures. Seizure susceptibility increased over time from 1 to 6 months post-injury across the majority of TBI groups. Injury severity effects were not apparent within the PBBI model, but were evident between PBBI and CHI models. These results demonstrated the difficulties in detecting delayed spontaneous post-traumatic seizures even in a high-risk model of penetrating brain injury. The PTZ-induced increase in seizure susceptibility indicated the existence of vulnerable risk of epileptogenesis following TBI, which may be considered as an alternative research tool for pre-clinical studies of PTE.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) was the signature injury in both the Iraq and Afghan wars and the magnitude of its importance in the civilian setting is finally being recognized. Given the scope of the problem, new therapies are needed across the continuum of care. Few therapies have been shown to be successful. In severe TBI, current guidelines-based acute therapies are focused on the reduction of intracranial hypertension and optimization of cerebral perfusion. One factor considered important to the failure of drug development and translation in TBI relates to the recognition that TBI is extremely heterogeneous and presents with multiple phenotypes even within the category of severe injury. To address this possibility and attempt to bring the most promising therapies to clinical trials, we developed Operation Brain Trauma Therapy (OBTT), a multicenter, pre-clinical drug screening consortium for acute therapies in severe TBI. OBTT was developed to include a spectrum of established TBI models at experienced centers and assess the effect of promising therapies on both conventional outcomes and serum biomarker levels. In this review, we outline the approach to TBI modeling, evaluation of therapies, drug selection, and biomarker assessments for OBTT, and provide a framework for reports in this issue on the first five therapies evaluated by the consortium.

Operation Brain Trauma Therapy (OBTT) is a fully operational, rigorous, and productive multicenter, pre-clinical drug and circulating biomarker screening consortium for the field of traumatic brain injury (TBI). In this article, we synthesize the findings from the first five therapies tested by OBTT and discuss both the current work that is ongoing and potential future directions. Based on the results generated from the first five therapies tested within the exacting approach used by OBTT, four (nicotinamide, erythropoietin, cyclosporine A, and simvastatin) performed below or well below what was expected based on the published literature. OBTT has identified, however, the early post-TBI administration of levetiracetam as a promising agent and has advanced it to a gyrencephalic large animal model—fluid percussion injury in micropigs. The sixth and seventh therapies have just completed testing (glibenclamide and Kollidon VA 64), and an eighth drug (AER 271) is in testing. Incorporation of circulating brain injury biomarker assessments into these pre-clinical studies suggests considerable potential for diagnostic and theranostic utility of glial fibrillary acidic protein in pre-clinical studies. Given the failures in clinical translation of therapies in TBI, rigorous multicenter, pre-clinical approaches to therapeutic screening such as OBTT may be important for the ultimate translation of therapies to the human condition.