Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose This study aimed to assess psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the EQ-5D-Y (3 levels) with a focus on feasibility, reliability, and construct validity. Methods Respondents were recruited from the general populations of three cities in Japan. First, children and adolescents responded to the EQ-5D-Y and PedsQL by self-report. Parents were also asked to evaluate the health states of their children/adolescents using proxy versions of these questionnaires. Next, the EQ-5D-Y was mailed to their residence approximately 2 weeks later, and both children/adolescents and their parents responded to the questionnaire. Reliability was confirmed by self-report test–retest methods and a comparison of self-report responses with proxy responses. Spearman’s correlation coefficients were calculated between responses to the EQ-5D-Y and both responses to and scores of the PedsQL in order to assess construct validity. Results A total of 654 children/adolescents from aged 8 to 15 (median age: 11) responded to the questionnaires at both the first- and second-stage surveys. Test–retest agreement was sufficiently high and was influenced by age. Proxy test–retest results revealed that parents’ responses were more reliable compared to the self-report results. Some correlations (| r | > 0.3) between items of the EQ-5D-Y and PedsQL were found. Meanwhile, no correlations were found between proxy responses to the EQ-5D-Y and self-report responses to the PedsQL. Conclusions The EQ-5D-Y demonstrates reliability and validity among children/adolescents and their parents in Japan. Construct validity of the EQ-5D-Y by self-report was confirmed through comparisons with the PedsQL. Proxy responses to the EQ-5D-Y were more reliable compared to the self-report results, but construct validity was not confirmed in the proxy version.

PurposeThis study aimed to develop a Japanese value set for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a multi-attribute utility measure derived from the cancer-specific health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) questionnaire, the EORTC QLQ-C30. The QLU-C10D contains ten HRQL dimensions: physical, role, social and emotional functioning, pain, fatigue, sleep, appetite, nausea, and bowel problems.MethodsQuota sampling of a Japanese online panel was used to achieve representativeness of the Japanese general population by sex and age (≥ 18 years). The valuation method was an online discrete choice experiment. Each participant considered 16 choice pairs, randomly assigned from 960 choice pairs. Each pair included two QLU-C10D health states and life expectancy. Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression, parameterized to fit the quality-adjusted life-year framework. Preference weights were calculated as the ratio of each dimension-level coefficient to the coefficient for life expectancy.ResultsA total of 2809 eligible panel members consented, 2662/2809 (95%) completed at least one choice pair, and 2435/2662 (91%) completed all choice pairs. Within dimensions, preference weights were generally monotonic. Physical functioning, role functioning, and pain were associated with the largest utility weights. Intermediate utility weights were associated with social functioning and nausea; the remaining symptoms and emotional functioning were associated with smaller utility decrements. The value of the worst health state was − 0.221, lower than that seen in most other existing QLU-C10D country-specific value sets.ConclusionsThe Japan-specific QLU-C10D value set is suitable for evaluating the cost and utility of oncology treatments for Japanese health technology assessment and decision-making.

Purpose The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General (FACT-G) questionnaire is frequently used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer patients. However, data obtained using the FACT-G cannot be directly used to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The newly developed FACT Eight Dimensions (FACT-8D) is a preference-based measure that generates health utilities scores from 9 of the 27 FACT-G items, representing eight HRQOL domains (Nausea, Pain, Fatigue, Sleep, Work, Worry, Sadness, Support from family/friends). This study aimed to create a Japanese FACT-8D value set. Methods A cross-sectional online survey of the Japanese general population recruited participants via a Japanese online panel, quota sampled by age (≥ 18 years) and sex. FACT-8D valuation data were collected with a discrete choice experiment. The valuation task required each participant to consider 16 pairs of hypothetical health states, randomly assigned per participant from 800 choice-sets. Preference weights were obtained from conditional logit models by dividing estimated HRQOL coefficients by the life duration coefficient. Results Data from 2320 participants were used to assess sample representativeness and estimate the Japanese value set. All preference weights other than Worry Level 2 were negative and increased in absolute terms in progressively higher levels of adverse HRQOL impact. The most influential domains for health utilities were Pain and Nausea, followed by Work problems. Fatigue, Sleep, Support, Sadness, and health Worry had moderate influences on health utilities. The lowest score, for the pit state [55555555], was − 0.60. This value is much lower than that of the EORTC QLU-C10D pit state [4444444444], -0.22. Health states were consistently scored higher in the USA, Australia and the UK than in Japan. Canadian health states are generally lower than for Japan, but not universally so. Conclusions We established the Japanese FACT-8D value set based on the internationally common protocol. The value set provides another option for quantifying health utilities for cancer outcomes. This contributes to improving the feasibility of deriving health utilities from the widely used FACT-G.

Background: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of trastuzumab plus chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor type-2 (HER2)-positive advanced gastric cancer (GC) based on data obtained from the Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer (ToGA) trial from a Japanese perspective. Methods: The following Japanese and Korean populations of the ToGA trial were analysed to obtain mean overall and progression-free survival times: (1) all HER2-positive populations, (2) immunohistochemical (IHC) 2+/fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH)+ or IHC 3+ populations, and (3) IHC 3+ only population. The effect of trastuzumab treatment on mean survival time was estimated by fitting a Weibull parametric function. Costs were calculated from the perspective of health-care payer. Neither costs nor outcomes were discounted because of short life expectancy. Results: In the base-case analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was (1) JPY 12 million (€110 000) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and JPY 8.9 million (€81 000) per life-year gained (LYG) for all HER2-positive populations, (2) JPY 9.1 million (€83 000) per QALY gained and JPY 6.6 million (€60 000) per LYG for the IHC 2+/FISH+ or IHC 3+ population, and (3) JPY 6.1 million (€55 000) per QALY gained and JPY 4.3 million (€39 000) per LYG for the IHC 3+ population. Conclusion: Trastuzumab treatment for IHC 3+ populations is cost effective. Our analysis can find a cost-effective subgroup when advanced GC is treated by trastuzumab.

Purpose The goal of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is to prolong survival and maintain healthrelated quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate longterm health status of patients with MBC who participated in the phase III randomized SELECT BC trial. Methods In the SELECT BC trial, patients were randomly allocated to the S-1 or taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) arm. Health status was assessed by EQ-5D at pre-treatment, 3 and 6 months after randomization, and every 6 months thereafter to the extent possible. Least square mean scores were assessed to compare EQ-5D index values between groups. Time to deterioration analysis was also performed by defining the minimally important difference of EQ-5D as 0.05 or 0.1. Results The number of patients for EQ-5D analysis was 175 and 208 in the taxane and S-1 arms, respectively. Least square mean EQ-5D index values up to 60 months were 0.741 (95 % CI [0.713-0.769]) in the taxane arm and 0.748 [0.722-0.775] in the S-1 arm. The EQ-5D index value during PFS up to 12 months in the S-1 was superior to the corresponding index value in the taxane (0.812 [0.789-0.834] vs. 0.772 [0.751-0.792], P = 0.009). Time to deterioration analysis also revealed that S-1 significantly delayed the deterioration of EQ-5D index value during the period before progression (P = 0.002 and 0.003). Conclusions Our findings suggest that the EQ-5D index value was higher in patients treated with S-1 during firstline chemotherapy. Considering non-inferiority of S-1 in terms of OS, obtained quality-adjusted life years may be greater in the S-1 arm.

Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) compared with 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) as first-line or second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: On the basis of NO16966 and NO16967 trials, mean costs and effectiveness were calculated from patient-level data. Until the disease progressed, the mean costs were calculated from the perspective of health-care payers in Japan. We estimated mean quality-adjusted progression-free survival days (QAPFSD), considering adverse events and patient preference for chemotherapy regimens. Utility scores were obtained by a web-based survey from general people, randomly sampled from a large panel adjusted for sex and age. Results: Incremental effectiveness of XELOX as first-line and second-line chemotherapy for colorectal cancer patients was significantly greater. By use of XELOX, patients gained 10.5 QAPFSD from first-line treatment or 11.3 QAPFSD from second-line treatment. Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) was also proven to significantly reduce treatment costs by €3000 (JPY 360 000) and €2300 (JPY 270 000) for first-line and second-line treatment, respectively. In health-care settings in the United Kingdom, XELOX decreased medical costs for National Health Service by £7600 and £3900 for patients who received first-line and second-line treatment, respectively. Conclusion: Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as first-line and second-line chemotherapy was ‘dominant’. In terms of effectiveness and cost, XELOX was superior to FOLFOX4.

Purpose To establish minimal important differences (MIDs) for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Methods The dataset was obtained from the SELECT BC-CONFIRM randomized clinical trial. Anchors obtained from patients (transition items) and clinicians (performance status) were used for anchor-based methods. Anchors obtained through 6 months after starting treatment were used for this analysis. Correlation coefficients of anchor and change in QLQ-C30 and effect size were used to qualify for estimating MIDs. Mean change method and generalized estimating equation were applied to estimate MIDs. Distribution-based methods were used for comparison. Results We analyzed a dataset of 154 metastatic breast cancer patients. MIDs were estimated in 8 of 15 scales of QLQ-C30. Estimated MIDs for within-group improvement varied from 7 to 15 and those for deterioration varied from − 7 to − 17. Estimated MIDs for between-group improvement varied from 5 to 11 and those for deterioration varied from − 5 to − 8 across QLQ-C30 scales. Patient-reported anchors were more susceptible to early changes in health status than clinician-reported anchors. Conclusion We provided the MIDs of the QLQ-C30 using both patient- and clinicians-reported anchors measured in a randomized trial of Japanese patients with metastatic breast cancer. We recommend patient-reported anchors for anchor-based estimation of MID. Our results can aid patients and clinicians, as well as researchers, in the interpretation of QLQ-C30.

Background In economic evaluation, cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) is generally used as an indicator for cost-effectiveness. Although JPY 5 million to 6 million (USD 60, 000 to 75,000) per QALY is frequently referred to as a threshold in Japan, do all QALYs have the same monetary value? Methods To examine the relationship between severity of health status and monetary value of a QALY, we obtained willingness to pay (WTP) values for one additional QALY in eight patterns of health states. We randomly sampled approximately 2,400 respondents from an online panel. To avoid misunderstanding, we randomly allocated respondents to one of 16 questionnaires, with 250 responses expected for each pattern. After respondents were asked whether they wanted to purchase the treatment, double-bounded dichotomous choice method was used to obtain WTP values. Results The results clearly show that the WTP per QALY is higher for worse health states than for better health states. The slope was about JPY −1 million per 0.1 utility score increase. The mean and median WTP values per QALY for 16 health states were JPY 5 million, consistent with our previous survey. For respondents who wanted to purchase the treatment, WTP values were significantly correlated with household income. Conclusion This survey shows that QALY based on the EQ-5D does not necessarily have the same monetary value. The WTP per QALY should range from JPY 2 million (USD 20,000) to JPY 8 million (USD 80,000), corresponding to the severity of health states.

Background In clinical studies, the EQ-5D-5L is often employed with disease-specific health-related quality of life instruments. The questions in the former are more general than the latter; however, it is known that responses to general questions can be influenced by preceding specific questions. Thus, the responses to the EQ-5D-5L have the possibility of being influenced by the preceding disease-specific health-related quality of life instruments. This may lead to bias in the cost-effectiveness analysis results. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of the preceding cancer-specific health-related quality of life instruments on the EQ-5D-5L responses. Methods We prepared questionnaire booklets containing the EQ-5D-5L, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General with different orders. Using a quasi-randomized design, they were distributed to the patients undergoing drug therapy for advanced cancer, who were classified into three groups: Groups 1, 2, and 3 (the EQ-5D-5L placed first, second, and last, respectively). We compared the EQ-5D-5L index and the missingness of EQ-5D-5L among the groups. Results The mean EQ-5D-5L index was 0.796, 0.760, and 0.789 for groups 1 (n = 300), 2 (n = 306), and 3 (n = 331), respectively. The difference between Groups 2 and 1 was − 0.036 (95% CI − 0.065 to − 0.007; p = 0.015). The proportion of patients with an incomplete EQ-5D-5L was 0.11, 0.11, and 0.05 for Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The difference of the proportions between group 3 and 1 and between 3 and 2 was − 0.06 (95% CI − 0.10 to − 0.02; p = 0.003) and − 0.06 (95% CI − 0.10 to − 0.02; p = 0.003), respectively. Conclusions Although the EQ-5D-5L index differed according to the instrument orders, the difference size would not be considerably larger than the minimally important difference. The patients tended to complete the EQ-5D-5L when they were placed at the end of the questionnaire.

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of adverse events (AEs) on health utility and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing first-line chemotherapy. Methods We analyzed the data from the SELECT BC study, a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III study conducted in Japan, which compared first-line S-1 with taxane therapies. Heath utility and HRQOL were assessed using the EQ-5D-3L and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment initiation. Health utility was calculated based on societal preferences, and AEs were reported at each cycle of the study treatment. Linear marginal mean models were used to quantify the impact of the last AEs (with 10 or more incidences) observed before HRQOL assessment on health utility and HRQOL. Results Analysis included 380 patients and 12 (of 15) AEs. Grade 1 nausea and oral mucositis, grade 1 and 2 edema, and grade 2 fatigue, motor and sensory neuropathy, and myalgia were significantly associated with disutility, measured using the EQ-5D-3L. Grade 1 oral mucositis, grade 1 and 2 fatigue, and grade 2 sensory neuropathy were significantly associated with impaired global health status in the EORTC QLQ-C30. AEs associated with decrements in the five functioning scales included fatigue, oral mucositis, nausea, edema, motor and sensory neuropathy, and myalgia. Conclusions We reported disutilities caused by AEs in patients with metastatic breast cancer under chemotherapy. These findings can be applied to future model-based cost-effectiveness analyses. Trial Registration Number C000000416.