Explore the vast range of titles available.

Elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease and stroke. Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemia from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) were updated in late 2019 in light of recent intervention trials involving the use of innovative lipid-lowering agents in combination with statins. The new guidelines advocate achieving very low LDL-C levels in individuals at highest risk, within the paradigm of ‘lower is better’. With the advent of combination therapy using ezetimibe and/or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors in addition to statins, the routine attainment of extremely low LDL-C levels in the clinic has become a reality. Moreover, clinical trials in this setting have shown that, over the 5–7 years of treatment experience to date, profound LDL-C lowering leads to further reduction in cardiovascular events compared with more moderate lipid lowering, with no associated safety concerns. These reassuring findings are bolstered by genetic studies showing lifelong very low LDL-C levels (<1.4 mmol/L; <55 mg/dL) are associated with lower cardiovascular risk than in the general population, with no known detrimental health effects. Nevertheless, long-term safety studies are required to consolidate the present evidence base. This review summarises key data supporting the ESC/EAS recommendation to reduce markedly LDL-C levels, with aggressive goals for LDL-C in patients at highest risk, and provides expert opinion on its significance for clinical practice.

Aims: The HEYMANS study observed patients receiving evolocumab as part of routine clinical hyperlipidemia management. It was designed to capture data on clinical parameters relevant to health authorities and physicians. Methods: This was a European multi-country observational cohort serial chart review study; data on the Swiss cohort are reported here. Patients were prescribed evolocumab as per the Swiss reimbursement criteria in force at the time and were invited chronologically. The study consisted of a 6-month period prior to initiation of evolocumab, a 12-month core observation period (entered by 75 patients, completed by 74 patients), and an 18-month extended observation period (entered by 40 patients, completed by 34 patients). The primary objective was to describe the clinical characteristics of patients receiving evolocumab. Secondary objectives included to describe lipid levels, evolocumab use, and patterns of use of other lipid-lowering therapies (LLT, that is, statins and/or ezetimibe) over time. The study was conducted in the Swiss cohort between May 2017 and June 2021. Results: Patients who received evolocumab in Swiss routine practice mostly were in secondary prevention (93%) and had a history of statin intolerance (85%) with 53% receiving no background LLT. One-third had familial hypercholesterolemia. Patients initiated evolocumab at a median low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of 3.6 mmol/L, which decreased by 54% within 3 months to 1.6 mmol/L and was stable thereafter. Overall, 61% achieved the LDL-C goal of <1.4 mmol/L with more patients attaining this goal when they received evolocumab with a statin and/or ezetimibe (84%) compared to 41% when receiving evolocumab alone. An LDL-C reduction of ⩾50% was achieved by 85% of patients. Persistence with evolocumab at 12 months was 85%. Conclusion: In Swiss clinical practice, evolocumab was mainly prescribed to patients with very high cardiovascular risk, who had very high LDL-C levels. Most patients continued to use evolocumab throughout the study period. In these patients, LDL-C was reduced by >50% within 3 months and LDL-C reductions were maintained over time. Guideline-recommended LDL-C goals for this very high-risk cohort were more frequently attained in patients receiving a combination of statin and/or ezetimibe and evolocumab. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02770131.

Abstract Aims To describe the characteristics of patients receiving evolocumab in clinical practice across 12 European countries and simulate the association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction and cardiovascular (CV) risk reduction. Methods and results The characteristics of hyperlipidaemic patients at initiation of evolocumab and treatment patterns study—HEYMANS (n = 1952) is a prospective registry of patients ≥18 years old who initiated evolocumab from 1 August 2015 onwards. Mean (standard deviation) age was 60 (10.8), 85% had a prior CV event, 45% were diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), and 60% had statin intolerance. At evolocumab initiation, 43% were receiving any statin, 16% were receiving ezetimibe without statin, and 41% received no background lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), with LDL-C levels reflecting local proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) reimbursement criteria. Median LDL-C decreased from 3.98 to 1.63 mmol/L within 3 months of evolocumab initiation and was maintained over 24 months. Overall, 58% achieved risk-based 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society LDL-C goals but that proportion was higher (68%) in patients receiving background LLT compared with those not receiving background LLT (44%). In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease without FH, the simulated relative CV risk reduction associated with evolocumab treatment was 34% (25–44%). Conclusion Across Europe, LDL-C levels at evolocumab initiation were three times higher than recommended thresholds for PCSK9i initiation, reflecting disparities between implementation and guidelines. More patients attained risk-based LDL-C goals when receiving evolocumab in combination with LLT vs. those not receiving combination therapy. Population health could be improved and LDL-C goals better attained if LDL-C thresholds for PCSK9i reimbursement were lowered, enabling more patients to receive combination therapy when needed. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract In a large registry study across Europe, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels at evolocumab initiation were three times higher than recommended thresholds for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor initiation, reflecting disparities between reimbursement criteria and guidelines.

Abstract Aims To assess the cost-effectiveness of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibition with evolocumab added to standard-of-care lipid-lowering treatment [maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of statin and ezetimibe] in Swedish patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI). Methods and results Cost-effectiveness was evaluated using a Markov model based on Swedish observational data on cardiovascular event rates and efficacy from the FOURIER trial. Three risk profiles were considered: recent MI in the previous year; history of MI with a risk factor; and history of MI with a second event within 2 years. For each population, three minimum baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were considered: 2.5 mmol/L (≈100 mg/dL), based on the current reimbursement recommendation in Sweden; 1.8 mmol/L (≈70 mg/dL), based on 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines; and 1.4 mmol/L (≈55 mg/dL), or 1.0 mmol/L (≈40 mg/dL) for MI with a second event, based on 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibition with evolocumab was associated with increased quality-adjusted life-years and costs vs. standard-of-care therapy. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were below SEK700 000 (∼€66 500), the generally accepted willingness-to-pay threshold in Sweden, for minimum LDL-C levels of 2.3 (recent MI), 1.7 (MI with a risk factor), and 1.7 mmol/L (MI with a second event). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that base-case results were robust to changes in model parameters. Conclusion Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibition with evolocumab added to MTD of statin and ezetimibe may be considered cost-effective at its list price for minimum LDL-C levels of 1.7–2.3 mmol/L, depending on risk profile, with ICERs below the accepted willingness-to-pay threshold in Sweden.