Explore the vast range of titles available.

Chronic antihypertensive treatment often includes combination of two or more therapies with complementary mechanism of action targeting different blood pressure (BP) control system. If available, these components are recommended to be administered as a fixed‐dose combination (FDC) to reduce tablet burden, improve adherence and thus BP control. A combination of ramipril (RAMI) and bisoprolol (BISO) is one of the options used in clinical practice and is supported by therapeutic guidelines. The clinical program for a novel BISO/RAMI FDC consisted of two randomized, open‐label, bioequivalence (BE) studies and one drug‐drug interaction (DDI) study. The BE was examined between two FDC strengths of BISO/RAMI (10/10 and 10/5 mg) and the individual reference products administered concomitantly at respective doses after a single oral dose under fasting conditions. In both BE studies, 64 healthy subjects were randomized according to a two‐way crossover design. The DDI study evaluated a potential pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between BISO 10 mg and RAMI 10 mg following their single or concomitant administrations in 30 healthy subjects under fasting condition. BE for BISO/RAMI 10/5 mg and absence of a clinically relevant PK DDI between BISO and RAMI was demonstrated as the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for area under the concentration time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) remained within the acceptance range of 80.00 to 125.00%. However, BE for BISO/RAMI 10/10 mg was not demonstrated, as the lower bound of the 90% CI of Cmax for RAMI was outside the acceptance range of BE. Both drugs administered alone or combined were well‐tolerated. No PK interaction was observed between BISO and RAMI/ramiprilat, since the co‐administration of BISO and RAMI 10 mg single doses resulted in comparable rate and extent of absorption for BISO and RAMI when compared to their individual products.

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a common chronic liver disease that may advance to fibrosis and lead to mortality; however, no pharmacotherapy is currently available. We tested the hypothesis that inhibition of both the sodium–glucose cotransporters 1 and 2 with licogliflozin would lead to improvement in NASH. A total of 107 patients with phenotypic or histologic NASH were randomized (1:2:2) to receive oral administration of either placebo ( n  = 21), licogliflozin 30 mg ( n  = 43) or 150 mg ( n  = 43) once daily for 12 weeks. Licogliflozin 150 mg showed a significant 32% (80% confidence interval (CI): 21–43%; P  = 0.002) placebo-adjusted reduction in serum alanine aminotransferase after 12 weeks of treatment, the primary endpoint of the study. However, the 30 mg dose of licogliflozin did not meet the primary endpoint (placebo-adjusted reduction 21% (80% CI: 7–32%; P  = 0.061)). Diarrhea occurred in 77% (33 of 43), 49% (21 of 43) and 43% (9 of 21) of patients treated with licogliflozin 150 mg, 30 mg and placebo, respectively, which was mostly mild in severity. No other major safety concerns were identified. Treatment with 150 mg licogliflozin led to reductions in serum alanine aminotransferase in patients with NASH. Studies of longer duration and in combination with drugs that have different mechanisms of action are needed to validate these findings and to define a role of licogliflozin as a therapeutic option for NASH. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03205150. In a phase 2a clinical trial in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, dual inhibition of sodium–glucose cotransporters 1 and 2 with 150 mg of licogliflozin led to reductions in serum alanine aminotranferase levels.

Background and Objective Co-Crystal of Tramadol–Celecoxib (CTC), in development for the treatment of moderate to severe acute pain, is a first-in-class co-crystal containing a 1:1 molecular ratio of two active pharmaceutical ingredients; rac-tramadol·HCl and celecoxib. This randomised, open-label, crossover study compared the bioavailability of both components after CTC administration under fed and fasting conditions. Methods Healthy adults received single doses of 200 mg CTC under both fed and fasting conditions (separated by a 7-day washout). Each dose of CTC was administered orally as two 100 mg tablets, each containing 44 mg tramadol·HCl and 56 mg celecoxib. In the fed condition, a high-fat, high-calorie meal [in line with recommendations by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)] was served 30 min before CTC administration. Tramadol, O -desmethyltramadol and celecoxib plasma concentrations were measured pre- and post-dose up to 48 h. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Safety was also assessed. Results Thirty-six subjects (18 female/18 male) received one or both doses of CTC; 33 provided evaluable pharmacokinetic data under fed and fasting conditions. For tramadol and O -desmethyltramadol, fed-to-fasting ratios of geometric least-squares means and corresponding 90% confidence interval (CI) values for maximum plasma concentration ( C max ) and extrapolated area under the plasma concentration–time curve to infinity (AUC ∞ ) were within the pre-defined range for comparative bioavailability (80–125%). For celecoxib, C max and AUC ∞ fed-to-fasting ratios (90% CIs) were outside this range, at 130.91% (116.98–146.49) and 129.34% (121.78–137.38), respectively. The safety profile of CTC was similar in fed and fasting conditions. Conclusions As reported for standard-formulation celecoxib, food increased the bioavailability of celecoxib from single-dose CTC. Food had no effect on tramadol or O -desmethyltramadol bioavailability. Clinical trial registration number 152052 (registered with the Therapeutic Products Directorate of Health Canada)

MK-6194, an interleukin-2 mutein designed to selectively activate regulatory T cells (Tregs), was evaluated for safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics in healthy participants. In a single ascending dose trial (N = 56), participants received subcutaneous MK-6194 or placebo (3:1 ratio) across dose levels ranging from 1 to 10 mg. In a multiple ascending dose trial (N = 54), participants received subcutaneous MK-6194 or placebo (3:1 ratio) at dose levels ranging from 0.5 to 5 mg every 2 wk (total 3 doses) as well as 5 mg every 4 wk (total 2 doses). Baseline characteristics were comparable between trials, with participants mostly male with a mean age of 36 yr. There were no serious adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities. The most common adverse events were injection site erythema and eosinophil count elevations (with no indication of severe eosinophilia or eosinophilia-related organ damage). PK showed dose-proportionality and repeated doses of MK-6194 did not result in accumulation or time-dependent PK. Immunogenicity was low with no impact on PK or safety. Treg expansion as assessed by flow cytometry and Treg-specific demethylation region analysis was observed in a dose-dependent manner during both trials and expanded within about 8 d postdose up to about 5-fold and returned to baseline by 14 to 29 d postdose. Minimal impact was observed on other lymphocytes including total T lymphocyte and natural killer cell counts. These findings support the further development of MK-6194 as a potential treatment for autoimmune disorders.

Aims This bioequivalence study was conducted to assess the bioequivalence of two formulations, test and reference, of pregabalin 300 mg hard capsules, under fasting conditions. Methods This was a single-center, randomized, single-dose, open-label, laboratory-blinded, two-way crossover study, with a minimum washout period of 7 days. Plasma samples were collected prior to and up to 36 h after dosing. Pregabalin plasma concentrations were determined, using a validated method, by reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography coupled to a tandem mass spectrometry detector (LC–MS–MS). Pharmacokinetic metrics used for bioequivalence assessment were the AUC (0–t) (area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to time of last observed non-zero plasma concentration) and the C max (maximum observed plasma concentration). These parameters were determined from the pregabalin plasma concentration data using noncompartmental analysis. Results Forty healthy subjects, age ranging from 18 to 43 years old, were enrolled and randomized, of whom 39 completed the study. The ratio of geometric least square means for C max was 99.29 % (90 % confidence interval [CI] 93.29–105.67). The ratio of geometric least square means for AUC (0–t) was 101.54 % (90 % CI 100.13–102.98). The 90 % CIs were within the predefined range (80.00–125.00). Conclusions Bioequivalence between test and reference formulations, under fasting conditions, was concluded both in terms of rate and extent of absorption.

Background Doxylamine succinate, an ethanolamine-based antihistamine, is used in the short-term management of insomnia because of its sedative effects. The data available on the pharmacokinetic profile of doxylamine in humans are limited, notwithstanding that this drug has been marketed in European countries for more than 50 years. In fact, no data on the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic parameters of doxylamine are available. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of doxylamine following a single oral dose of doxylamine hydrogen succinate 25 mg in healthy human subjects under fed and fasting conditions. Study Design This was a single-center, randomized, single-dose, laboratory-blinded, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study. Setting The study was conducted in a phase I clinical unit. Subjects and Methods A single oral dose of doxylamine hydrogen succinate 25 mg (equivalent to 17.4 mg of doxylamine base) was administered to healthy volunteers under either fed conditions (high-fat, high-calorie food intake) or fasting conditions in each study period. The drug administrations were separated by a wash-out period of seven calendar days. Plasma samples were collected for up to 60 hours postdose, and plasma doxylamine concentrations were determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography method with tandem mass spectrometry detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. Safety was evaluated through assessment of adverse events, standard laboratory evaluations, vital signs, and 12-lead electrocardiography. Results In total, 24 healthy subjects (12 male and 12 female) were included in the study. Doxylamine succinate 25 mg tablets exhibited similar oral bioavailability of doxylamine in the fasting state (mean maximum plasma drug concentration [C max ] 118.21 ng/mL, coefficient of variation [CV] 19.2%; mean area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero to time t [AUC t ] 1746.97 ng · h/mL, CV 31.6%) and in the fed state (mean C max 120.99 ng/mL, CV 15.0%; mean AUC t 1712.20 ng · h/mL, CV 26.7%). No statistically significant between-treatment differences were observed for any of the pharmacokinetic parameters under study. The fed: fasting ratios of the geometric least squares means with corresponding 90% confidence intervals for C max and AUC t were within the range of 80–125%. Conclusion High-fat, high-calorie food intake does not affect the kinetics of doxylamine in healthy subjects. The drug was safe and well tolerated by the subjects in this study.

Background Doxylamine succinate, an ethanolamine-based antihistamine, is used in the short-term management of insomnia because of its sedative effects. No data on the dose proportionality of the pharmacokinetics of doxylamine are available, although this drug has been marketed in European countries for more than 50 years. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the dose proportionality between two marketed strengths (12.5 mg and 25 mg) of doxylamine hydrogen succinate after a single oral dose administration under fasting conditions in healthy human subjects. Study Design This was a single-center, randomized, single dose, laboratory-blinded, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study. Setting The study was conducted in a phase I clinical unit. Subjects and Methods A single oral dose of doxylamine hydrogen succinate of 12.5 mg (equivalent to 8.7 mg of doxylamine base) or 25 mg (equivalent to 17.4 mg of doxylamine base) was administered to healthy volunteers under fasting conditions in each study period. The drug administrations were separated by a wash-out period of 7 calendar days. Blood samples were collected for up to 60 h post-dose, and plasma doxylamine levels were determined by an ultra high-performance liquid chromatography method with tandem mass spectrometry detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Dose proportionality was assessed based on the parameter area under the concentration–time curve (AUC t normalized ). Safety was evaluated through assessment of adverse events, standard laboratory evaluations, vital signs and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Results In total, 12 healthy volunteers (3 male; 9 female) were included in the study. Mean maximum observed plasma concentration ( C max ) and area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to time t (AUC t ) of doxylamine hydrogen succinate 12.5 mg and 25 mg tablets increased linearly and dose-dependently [12.5 mg: mean C max 61.94 ng/mL, coefficient of variation (CV) 23.2 %; mean AUC t 817.33 ng·h/mL, CV 27.4 %; and 25 mg: mean C max 124.91 ng/mL, CV 18.7 %; mean AUC t 1630.85 ng·h/mL, CV 22.8 %]. Mean AUC t normalized was 815.43 ng·h/mL, CV 22.8 % for 25 mg. The dose-normalized geometric mean ratio (%, 12.5 mg/25 mg) of AUC t was 98.92 (90 % CI: 92.46, 105.83). The most common adverse event was somnolence. Conclusions Exposure to doxylamine was proportional over the therapeutic dose range of 12.5–25 mg in healthy volunteers. Based on the results, a predictable and linear increase in systemic exposure can be expected. Doxylamine hydrogen succinate was safe and well tolerated.

BackgroundDoxylamine succinate, an ethanolamine-based antihistamine, is used in the short-term management of insomnia because of its sedative effects. The data available on the pharmacokinetic profile of doxylamine in humans are limited, notwithstanding that this drug has been marketed in European countries for more than 50 years. In fact, no data on the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic parameters of doxylamine are available.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of doxylamine following a single oral dose of doxylamine hydrogen succinate 25 mg in healthy human subjects under fed and fasting conditions.Study DesignThis was a single-center, randomized, single-dose, laboratory-blinded, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study.SettingThe study was conducted in a phase I clinical unit.Subjects and MethodsA single oral dose of doxylamine hydrogen succinate 25 mg (equivalent to 17.4 mg of doxylamine base) was administered to healthy volunteers under either fed conditions (high-fat, high-calorie food intake) or fasting conditions in each study period. The drug administrations were separated by a wash-out period of seven calendar days. Plasma samples were collected for up to 60 hours postdose, and plasma doxylamine concentrations were determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography method with tandem mass spectrometry detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. Safety was evaluated through assessment of adverse events, standard laboratory evaluations, vital signs, and 12-lead electrocardiography.ResultsIn total, 24 healthy subjects (12 male and 12 female) were included in the study. Doxylamine succinate 25 mg tablets exhibited similar oral bioavailability of doxylamine in the fasting state (mean maximum plasma drug concentration [Cmax] 118.21 ng/mL, coefficient of variation [CV] 19.2%; mean area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero to time t [AUCt] 1746.97 ng · h/mL, CV 31.6%) and in the fed state (mean Cmax 120.99 ng/mL, CV 15.0%; mean AUCt 1712.20 ng · h/mL, CV 26.7%). No statistically significant between-treatment differences were observed for any of the pharmacokinetic parameters under study. The fed: fasting ratios of the geometric least squares means with corresponding 90% confidence intervals for Cmax and AUCt were within the range of 80–125%.ConclusionHigh-fat, high-calorie food intake does not affect the kinetics of doxylamine in healthy subjects. The drug was safe and well tolerated by the subjects in this study.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive scarring disease of the lung with few effective therapeutic options. Structural remodelling of the extracellular matrix [i.e. collagen cross-linking mediated by the lysyl oxidase (LO) family of enzymes (LOX, LOXL1-4)] might contribute to disease pathogenesis and represent a therapeutic target. This study aimed to further our understanding of the mechanisms by which LO inhibitors might improve lung fibrosis. Lung tissues from IPF and non-IPF subjects were examined for collagen structure (second harmonic generation imaging) and LO gene (microarray analysis) and protein (immunohistochemistry and western blotting) levels. Functional effects (collagen structure and tissue stiffness using atomic force microscopy) of LO inhibitors on collagen remodelling were examined in two models, collagen hydrogels and decellularized human lung matrices. LOXL1/LOXL2 gene expression and protein levels were increased in IPF versus non-IPF. Increased collagen fibril thickness in IPF versus non-IPF lung tissues correlated with increased LOXL1/LOXL2, and decreased LOX, protein expression. β-Aminoproprionitrile (β-APN; pan-LO inhibitor) but not Compound A (LOXL2-specific inhibitor) interfered with transforming growth factor-β-induced collagen remodelling in both models. The β-APN treatment group was tested further, and β-APN was found to interfere with stiffening in the decellularized matrix model. LOXL1 activity might drive collagen remodelling in IPF lungs. The interrelationship between collagen structural remodelling and LOs is disrupted in IPF lungs. Inhibition of LO activity alleviates fibrosis by limiting fibrillar collagen cross-linking, thereby potentially impeding the formation of a pathological microenvironment in IPF.