Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
3 result(s) for "Sierzputowski, Pawel"
Sort by:
The effects of maximizing stroke volume versus maintaining preoperative resting cardiac index on oxygen delivery, oxygen consumption, and microcirculatory tissue perfusion in patients having major abdominal surgery: The exploratory randomized CUSTOM trial
Mechanistic effects of intraoperative blood flow-guided hemodynamic therapy remain poorly understood. Therefore, we aimed to determine the effects of a) maximizing stroke volume and b) maintaining preoperative resting cardiac index on oxygen delivery, oxygen consumption, and sublingual and abdominal microcirculatory tissue perfusion in major abdominal surgery patients. We randomized 76 patients to maximizing stroke volume, maintaining preoperative resting cardiac index, or routine care during and for the first 6 h after surgery. We measured oxygen delivery index, oxygen consumption index, sublingual microvascular flow index, and urethral perfusion index. At the end of surgery and 6 h after surgery, the median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) oxygen delivery index was higher in patients assigned to stroke volume maximization (460 (404, 556) ml/min/m2 and 503 (466, 595) ml/min/m2) or to preoperative cardiac index maintenance (507 (460, 664) ml/min/m2 and 516 (403, 604) ml/min/m2) than in patients assigned to routine care (403 (338, 517) ml/min/m2 and 390 (351, 510) ml/min/m2). There were no important differences in oxygen consumption index and sublingual microvascular flow index among the three groups. The intraoperative average urethral perfusion index was slightly higher in patients assigned to stroke volume maximization or to preoperative cardiac index maintenance than in patients assigned to routine care. In our trial, both maximizing stroke volume and maintaining preoperative resting cardiac index resulted in higher intraoperative and postoperative oxygen delivery index than routine care in major abdominal surgery patients. Large clinical trials are required to determine whether achieving higher perioperative oxygen delivery index translates into better outcomes. •There are various strategies for intraoperative blood flow-guided management.•Their effects on oxygen delivery and tissue perfusion are unclear.•Stroke volume maximization increased oxygen delivery.•Maintaining preoperative cardiac index increased oxygen delivery.•Both strategies increased abdominal microcirculatory tissue perfusion.
Personalized perioperative blood pressure management in patients having major non-cardiac surgery: A bicentric pilot randomized trial
We hypothesize that personalized perioperative blood pressure management maintaining intraoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) above the preoperative mean nighttime MAP reduces perfusion-related organ injury compared to maintaining intraoperative MAP above 65 mmHg in patients having major non-cardiac surgery. Before testing this hypothesis in a large-scale trial, we performed this bicentric pilot trial to determine a) if performing preoperative automated nighttime blood pressure monitoring to calculate personalized intraoperative MAP targets is feasible; b) in what proportion of patients the preoperative mean nighttime MAP clinically meaningfully differs from a MAP of 65 mmHg; and c) if maintaining intraoperative MAP above the preoperative mean nighttime MAP is feasible in patients having major non-cardiac surgery. Bicentric pilot randomized trial. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, and RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany. Patients ≥ 45 years old having major non-cardiac surgery. Personalized blood pressure management. Proportion of patients in whom preoperative automated nighttime blood pressure monitoring was possible; proportion of patients in whom the preoperative mean nighttime MAP clinically meaningfully differed from a MAP of 65 mmHg (difference > ±10 mmHg); intraoperative time-weighted average MAP below the preoperative mean nighttime MAP. We enrolled 105 patients and randomized 98 patients. In 98 patients (93 %), preoperative automated nighttime blood pressure monitoring was possible. In 83 patients (85 %), the preoperative mean nighttime MAP clinically meaningfully differed from a MAP of 65 mmHg. The median time-weighted average MAP below the preoperative mean nighttime MAP was 3.29 (1.64, 6.82) mmHg in patients assigned to personalized blood pressure management. It seems feasible to determine the effect of personalized perioperative blood pressure management maintaining intraoperative MAP above the preoperative mean nighttime MAP on postoperative complications in a large multicenter trial. [Display omitted] •Optimal blood pressure targets during surgery remain unknown.•Individual nighttime mean arterial pressure (MAP) may be a reasonable blood pressure target.•Performing preoperative automated blood pressure monitoring is feasible.•Nighttime MAP meaningfully differs from a MAP of 65 mmHg in most patients.•Targeting nighttime MAP during surgery is feasible.