Explore the vast range of titles available.

Whether ibrutinib-related atrial fibrillation (IRAF) is a dose-dependent adverse drug reaction (ADR) and whether ibrutinib should be discontinued or dose-reduced in case of IRAF occurrence remains unknown. Using the World Health Organization individual case safety report pharmacovigilance database, VigiBase®, we aimed to determine the association between ibrutinib dosing regimens and IRAF reporting. Ibrutinib daily dose was extracted from IRAF cases from VigiBase® and was divided into 5 ibrutinib dosing regimen (140–280–420–560 and >560 mg/day). Disproportionality analysis was used to evaluate the association between IRAF reporting and ibrutinib daily dose, through logistic regression. Single term deletions produced the ibrutinib daily dose global p -value. Then, a multivariable adjusted reporting odds-ratio with its 95% confidence interval was calculated for each ibrutinib dosing regimen, against the lowest dosing regimen (140 mg/day) as reference. A total of 1162 IRAF cases were identified in VigiBase® ( n  = 62 for ibrutinib 140 mg/day, 114 for ibrutinib 280 mg/day, 811 for ibrutinib 420 mg/day, 164 for ibrutinib 560 mg/day and 11 for ibrutinib >560 mg/day). After adjustment on several variables of interest, IRAF reporting was not significantly associated with ibrutinib dosing regimen ( p  = 0.09). Our results from Vigibase® do not support IRAF as a dose-dependent ADR (ClinicalTrial registration number: NCT06224452).

ObjectivesLimited information is available on the safety of a rechallenge with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) after occurrence of an immune-related adverse event (irAE). We aim to identify potential emergent safety signals.DesignThis is an update of our observational pharmacovigilance cohort study.SettingWe exanimated individual case safety reports from the WHO database VigiBase.ParticipantsWe included all individual case safety reports with ICI and rechallenged ICI.InterventionsWe identified that incident irAE cases using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities V.26.1 related with at least one ICI administration were systematically collected until 1 March 2024.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the recurrence rate (expressed as a percentage with its 95% CI) of the initial irAE postrechallenge with the same ICI.ResultsWe identified 1016 irAEs cases from ICI rechallenges. Of these, 323 irAEs recurrences occurred (31.8%, 95% CI 28.1 to 34.0). The most common postrechallenge irAEs were nephritis (recurrence rate: 50%, 95% CI 25 to 75), skin irAEs (44%, 95% CI 31 to 58) and colitis (39%, 95% CI 33 to 44).ConclusionsIn this updated, largest cohort study on rechallenge (NCT04696250), we observed a 31.8% recurrence rate of the same irAE postrechallenge with the same ICI, building on our previous findings.Trial registration number NCT04696250.

Background Exploring the value of baseline and early 18 F-FDG PET/CT evaluations in prediction PFS in ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients treated with a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor in combination with an endocrine therapy. Methods Sixty-six consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent a pre-therapeutic 18 F-FDG PET/CT and a second PET/CT within the first 6 months of treatment were retrospectively included. Metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and D max , which represents tumour dissemination and is defined as the distance between the two most distant lesions, were computed. The variation in these parameters between baseline and early evaluation PET as well as therapeutic evaluation using PERCIST were assessed as prognosticators of PFS at 18 months. Results The median follow-up was equal to 22.5 months. Thirty progressions occurred (45.4%). The average time to event was 17.8 ± 10.4 months. At baseline, D max was the only predictive metabolic parameter. Patients with a baseline D max ≤ 18.10 cm had a significantly better 18 m-PFS survival than the others: 69.2% (7.7%) versus 36.7% (8.8%), p  = 0.017. There was no association between PERCIST evaluation and 18 m-PFS status ( p  = 0.149) and there was no difference in 18 m-PFS status between patients classified as complete, partial metabolic responders or having stable metabolic disease. Conclusion Disease spread at baseline PET, as assessed by D max , is predictive of an event occurring within 18 months. In the absence of early metabolic progression, which occurs in 15% of patients, treatment should be continued regardless of the quality of the initial response to treatment.

Background HER2 expression has a prognostic and predictive impact in early-stage breast cancer (BC). HER2 positive BC (immunohistochemistry (IHC) score 3 + or 2 + with in situ hybridization (ISH) amplification) are treated with HER2 targeted therapies. The concept of HER2-low BC (IHC score 1 + or 2 + without ISH amplification) is drawing attention as anti-HER2 treatment has recently shown efficacy in this subgroup. We aimed to explore the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in HER2-low early BC according to the HER2 score (1 + or 2 + without amplification). Methods We conducted a retrospective study in two French comprehensive cancer centers. All patients with HER2-low BC treated with NAC from January 2014 to December 2020 were included. The primary objective was to analyze the pathological complete response (pCR) rate to NAC using the Sataloff or RCB system, according to the HER2 score. Secondary objectives were to assess disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and to explore the immune environment through the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), according to HER2 expression. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results We included 237 tumors for 229 patients. Of these, 160 (67.5%) tumors were HER2 1 + , 77 (32.5%) were HER2 2 + , and 152 (64.1%) were hormone receptor (HR) positive. The median age was 53.9 years. No differences in tumor characteristics were observed between HER2 1 + and HER2 2 + subgroups. pCR was achieved in 38 tumors (17%), without any difference between HER2 1 + and HER2 2 + subgroups ( p  = 0.77). DFS and OS were significantly different between HER2 1 + and HER2 2 + patients (HR = 0.41,CI95%[0.17;0.97] p  = 0.037 and HR = 0.31,CI95%[0.09;1.02] p  = 0.042, respectively). HER2 status was still associated with DFS and OS after adjustment for age, HR status and NLR, with better outcomes in favor of HER2 score 2 + (HR = 0.35 [0.15–0.84] and HR = 0.24 [0.07–0.81], respectively). NLR was not associated with worse DFS or OS. Conclusion In HER2-low early BC, no differences in pCR were observed between HER2 1 + and HER2 2 + tumors, however patients with HER2 2 + tumors had a better DFS and OS than those with HER2 1 + . Further investigations are needed to describe the intrinsic differences in the spectrum of HER2-low BC.

Introduction: Clozapine is primarily reserved for treatment-resistant schizophrenia due to safety concerns associated with its use. Infections have been reported with clozapine, which may lead to elevated serum levels of the drug. However, the existing literature on this topic is limited. Therefore, we conducted a study using VigiBase ® to investigate the potential over-reporting of infections associated with clozapine, to explore the presence of dose-dependency, and to investigate the underlying mechanism. Methods: Disproportionality analyses were performed using VigiBase to assess the association between clozapine and all types of infections, the association between clozapine-associated infections and neutropenia, the association between clozapine-associated infections and agranulocytosis, the dose–effect relationship between clozapine and infections, and the interaction between clozapine and the main strong CYP450 inhibitors using reports carried out until 11 April 2023. Results: A statistically significant signal of infections was observed with clozapine, as indicated by an information component of 0.43 [95% CI: (0.41–0.45)]. The most commonly reported infections were respiratory and gastrointestinal in nature. Neutropenia showed weaker association with clozapine-associated reports of infections compared to other clozapine-associated reports [X2 (1, N = 204,073) = 454; p < 0.005], while agranulocytosis demonstrated a stronger association with clozapine-associated reports of infections [X2 (1, N = 204,073) = 56; p < 0.005]. No evidence of dose-dependency was observed. Among the 17 tested CYP inhibitors, significant drug–drug interactions were found with clarithromycin, metronidazole, valproic acid, lansoprazole, omeprazole, amiodarone, and esomeprazole. Discussion: Our study revealed a significant safety signal between clozapine use and infections, predominantly respiratory and gastrointestinal infections. The co-administration of clozapine with valproic acid or proton pump inhibitors may potentially contribute to an increased risk of infection. Further vigilance is warranted in clinical practice, and consideration of therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine in cases involving concomitant use of these drugs or in the presence of infections may be beneficial.

Importance: Endocrine therapies (ETs) and inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases-4/6 (iCDK4/6s) are a standard treatment in breast cancer. However, data on potential neurocognitive impacts remain inconsistent for ET and are scarce for iCDK4/6s. Objective: To evaluate whether ET and iCDK4/6s are associated with neurocognitive impairment (NCI). Methods: We used observational, real-world cases of NCI from the World Health Organization’s database VigiBase ® to perform disproportionality analysis. Cases were defined as any symptom of NCI in females treated with ETs or iCDK4/6s. The study period was from the date of the first adverse event reported in VigiBase ® with iCDK4/6s (1 January 2014) until the date of data extraction (16 March 2022). In our primary analysis, we calculated the reporting odds ratio (ROR) adjusted for age to identify a potential association between NCI and individual ETs in isolation or in combination with iCDK4/6s. We also performed subgroup analyses by the NCI class. Results: We identified 2.582 and 1.943 reports of NCI associated with ETs and iCDK4/6s, respectively. NCI was significantly associated with each ET [anastrozole: n = 405, aROR = 1.52 (95% CI: 1.37–1.67); letrozole: n = 741, aROR = 1.37 (95% CI: 1.27–1.47); exemestane: n = 316, aROR = 1.37 (95% CI: 1.22–1.53); tamoxifen: n = 311, aROR = 1.25 (95% CI: 1.12–1.40); and fulvestrant: n = 319, aROR = 1.19 (95% CI: 1.06–1.33)] and only with palbociclib for iCDK4/6s [ n = 1,542, aROR = 1.41 (95% CI: 1.34–1.48)]. Conclusion: These findings suggest that in females treated for breast cancer, all ETs may be associated with NCI. However, amongst iCDK4/6s, NCI may be specific to palbociclib. NCI most frequently involved learning and memory as well as language. Neurocognitive impact of treatments requires better consideration and management.

COVID-19 outbreak rapidly spread since early 2020 leading to the implementation of nationwide lockdowns. To cope with this sudden change, management guidelines were quickly published to adapt oncological care, with potential impact on cancer outcomes. We conducted a retrospective comparative cohort study to assess the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020 on cancer outcomes in metastatic patients. Two cohorts of metastatic patients receiving intravenous (iv) therapy in a French oncological day care hospital were assessed: a 2020 cohort during the first French lockdown, and a 2018 historical cohort before the COVID-19 pandemic. We performed a propensity score analysis to match patients from the two cohorts. After one-year follow-up, we compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between cohorts. Adaptations of medical oncological treatments in 2020 were also analysed. The 376 patients of the 2020 cohort were matched with 376 of the 2018 cohort. No SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed in the 2020 cohort. The adjusted PFS was significantly shorter in 2020 compared to 2018 (HR = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.03-1.46), as well as among patients without treatment adaptation compared to matched patients of the 2018 cohort (HR = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.10-1.61). We did not observe any significant difference of PFS among the group with treatment adaptations. OS was not significantly different. Metastatic cancer patients treated during the first lockdown had a higher risk of disease progression 1 year after COVID-19 outbreak. However, oncological treatment adaptations or SARS-CoV-2 infections do not explain these results. A longer follow-up is needed to observe the impact on OS.

Ibrutinib and acalabrutinib are both associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the comparative risk of AF between these 2 BTK inhibitors remains largely unknown. Our primary aim was to evaluate the risk of incident AF in patients exposed to ibrutinib compared to those exposed to acalabrutinib. Using the TriNetX research network database, we established a retrospective cohort of adult patients (≥ 18 years) previously diagnosed with a B-cell malignancy (using ICD-10-CM codes) in whom a first BTKi introduction occurred between January 1st, 2013 (first patient exposed to ibrutinib in TriNetX) and July 1st, 2024. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on their exposure to ibrutinib or acalabrutinib. After propensity score matching (PSM) across 37 covariates, Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to compare the 2 matched groups. The appropriateness of the proportional hazard assumption was examined and risk differences (RDs) were used if appropriate. Results were summarized with the use of Kaplan–Meier survival curves. Follow-up started from 1 day after first BTKi introduction and continued over a 6-year follow-up period. A cohort of 12,449 patients exposed to ibrutinib and 4,131 to acalabrutinib were included in the study. After PSM, 4,090 patients remained in each group (1:1). During a mean duration of BTKi exposure of 2.3 ± 1.8 years, we found a significantly higher risk of incident AF in the ibrutinib group compared to the acalabrutinib group (RD 0.09, 95% CI 0.07–0.10). This difference was consistent across subgroups (age ≤ or > 75 and lower or higher baseline cardiovascular risk of developing AF). In conclusion, among patients with B-cell malignancies, the risk of developing incident AF is increased when treated with ibrutinib compared to acalabrutinib. Trial registration ClinicalTrial registration number: NCT06561243.

Background: Ibrutinib has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs), including atrial fibrillation (AF), hypertension (HTN), heart failure (HF), and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). However, baseline predictors of CVAEs remain poorly characterized. In this study, we sought to identify baseline patient characteristics associated with the occurrence of ibrutinib-related CVAEs, with particular emphasis on parameters linked to the renin–angiotensin system. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center cohort study of consecutive patients treated with ibrutinib for B-cell malignancy, with systematic assessment of a predefined panel of potential predictors of CVAEs at baseline (NCT03678337). These predictors included demographic and clinical variables, 16 circulating biomarkers related to inflammation, fibrosis, and neurohormonal activation, as well as nine echocardiographic parameters. The primary objective was to evaluate the association between baseline patient characteristics and the occurrence of CVAEs from ibrutinib initiation through the end of follow-up. The CVAE endpoint was defined as a composite of atrial fibrillation, new or worsening hypertension, new or worsening heart failure, and ventricular arrhythmias. Statistical analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test or Fisher’s exact test, with a p-value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Among the 25 patients included, 7 experienced a total of 9 CVAEs over a median follow-up of 672 days. Elevated baseline plasma renin levels (>1336.10 pg/mL) were significantly associated with CVAEs occurrence (57% vs. 11%, p = 0.032). Higher baseline plasma aldosterone levels (>488.95 pg/mL) were also observed in patients who developed CVAEs, although this association did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.058). Conclusions: Baseline plasma renin level was univariably associated with CVAEs occurrence, while plasma aldosterone levels were higher among patients with CVAEs but did not reach statistical significance. These findings provide preliminary insights into the mechanisms underlying ibrutinib-related cardiovascular toxicity, suggesting a potential role for the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system. Confirmation of this hypothesis, however, will require larger, dedicated studies.

Cyclin-dependent-kinase 4-6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have improved the management of hormone receptor (HR)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2− metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Currently, there are no valid prognostic factors for response to CDK4/6i. Baseline lymphopenia is reported as a prognostic factor in several types of cancer. The present retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effect of baseline absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) on response to palbociclib. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), best response and safety. A total of 114 patients treated for mBC between 2016 and 2019 were included. Median baseline ALC was 1.4 g/l (range, 0.2-4.3 g/l). A total of 65 (57%) and 49 (43%) patients had baseline ALC values of <1.5 and ≥1.5 g/l, respectively. Patients with baseline lymphopenia exhibited significantly shorter PFS (6 vs. 10 months; P=0.004) and OS (20 vs. 33 months; P=0.02). ALC <1.5 g/l independently predicted worse survival, as indicated by multivariate analysis (P=0.04; hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.02). Patients with baseline ALC <1.5 g/l had significantly less partial response (14 vs. 22%; P=0.016) and more disease progression (46 vs. 20%; P=0.016) than those with ALC ≥1.5 g/l. ALC is a strong and easy-to-use dosage with prognostic factor for patients with HR+/HER2− mBC treated with palbociclib and endocrine therapy. Lymphopenia may also be a predictive factor of early progression. These data need to be verified in a larger prospective study.