Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
22
result(s) for
"Slotnick, Scott"
Sort by:
Different patterns of cortical activity in females and males during spatial long-term memory
It is generally assumed that identical neural regions mediate the same cognitive functions in females and males. However, anatomic and molecular sex differences exist in the brain, including in regions associated with long-term memory, which suggests there may be functional differences. The present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) investigation aimed to identify the differences and similarities in brain activity between females and males during spatial long-term memory. During encoding, abstract shapes were presented to the left or right of fixation. During retrieval, shapes were presented at fixation and participants made “old-left” or “old-right” judgments. For both females and males, spatial memory hits versus misses produced activity in regions commonly associated with visual long-term memory; however, the activations were almost completely distinct between the sexes. An interaction analysis revealed sex-specific activity for males in visual processing regions, the left putamen, the right caudate nucleus, and bilateral cerebellum, and sex-specific activity for females in the parietal cortex. A targeted anatomic region-of-interest (ROI) analysis identified sex-specific activity for males and females in the left hippocampus and language processing cortex, respectively. A multi-voxel pattern correlation analysis within functional ROIs between all pairs of participants showed greater within-sex than between-sex correlations, indicating the differential activations were due to sex differences rather than other individual differences between groups. These results indicate that spatial long-term memory is mediated by largely different brain regions in females and males. These findings have major implications for the field of cognitive neuroscience, where it is common practice to collapse across sex.
Journal Article
A sensory signature that distinguishes true from false memories
Human behavioral studies show that there is greater sensory/perceptual detail associated with true memories than false memories. We therefore hypothesized that true recognition of abstract shapes would elicit greater visual cortical activation than would false recognition. During functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), participants studied exemplar shapes and later made recognition memory decisions (“old” or “new”) concerning studied exemplars (old shapes), nonstudied lures (related shapes) and new shapes. Within visual processing regions, direct contrasts between true recognition (“old” response to an old shape; old-hit) and false recognition (“old” response to a related shape; related-false alarm) revealed preferential true recognition–related activity in early visual processing regions (Brodmann area (BA)17, BA18). By comparison, both true and false recognition were associated with activity in early and late (BA19, BA37) visual processing regions, the late regions potentially supporting “old” responses, independent of accuracy. Further analyses suggested that the differential early visual processing activity reflected repetition priming, a type of implicit memory. Thus, the sensory signature that distinguishes true from false recognition may not be accessible to conscious awareness.
Journal Article
Does the hippocampus mediate objective binding or subjective remembering?
Human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) evidence suggests the hippocampus is associated with context memory to a greater degree than item memory (where only context memory requires item-in-context binding). A separate line of fMRI research suggests the hippocampus is associated with “remember” responses to a greater degree than “know” or familiarity based responses (where only remembering reflects the subjective experience of specific detail). Previous studies, however, have confounded context memory with remembering and item memory with knowing. The present fMRI study independently tested the binding hypothesis and remembering hypothesis of hippocampal function by evaluating activity within hippocampal regions-of-interest (ROIs). At encoding, participants were presented with colored and gray abstract shapes and instructed to remember each shape and whether it was colored or gray. At retrieval, old and new shapes were presented in gray and participants classified each shape as “old and previously colored”, “old and previously gray”, or “new”, followed by a “remember” or “know” response. In 3 of 11 hippocampal ROIs, activity was significantly greater for context memory than item memory, the context memory–item memory by remember–know interaction was significant, and activity was significantly greater for context memory-knowing than item memory-remembering. This pattern of activity only supports the binding hypothesis. The analogous pattern of activity that would have supported the remembering hypothesis was never observed in the hippocampus. However, a targeted analysis revealed remembering specific activity in the left inferior parietal cortex. The present results suggest parietal cortex may be associated with subjective remembering while the hippocampus mediates binding.
Journal Article
The fusiform face area responds equivalently to faces and abstract shapes in the left and central visual fields
The fusiform face area (FFA) is widely believed to be specialized for processing faces. Although the FFA is most responsive to faces, this region also consistently responds to non-face items. This suggests that the FFA may be tuned to a feature that is shared by faces and non-face items. Based on the known left visual field face-processing bias along with evidence that the FFA responds to the visual feature of shape, we hypothesized that the FFA may be particularly tuned to shapes presented in the left visual field. We tested this hypothesis using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In a face localizer run, participants viewed blocks of faces or objects. In a separate run, blocks of intact or scrambled abstract shapes were presented in the left, the central, or the right visual field. Within each of the eleven face-processing regions-of-interest (identified by contrasting faces and objects), the magnitude of activity associated with faces was compared to the magnitude of activity associated with intact shapes. Consistent with previous results, collapsing over shape visual field location, the magnitude of activity associated with faces was greater than the magnitude of activity associated with shapes in the FFA. However, separating by shape visual field location revealed an equivalent magnitude of activity associated with faces and shapes in the FFA when shapes were presented in the left and central visual fields. These findings indicate that the FFA, rather than being specialized for holistic face processing, mediates shape processing in the left and central visual fields.
•Abstract shapes and faces produce equivalent activity in the fusiform face area•The fusiform face area is involved in processing the visual feature of shape•The fusiform face area does not selectively process faces
Journal Article
Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory
Does memory retrieval occur in a continuous or an all-or-none manner? The shape of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) has been used to answer this question, with curvilinear and linear memory ROCs indicating continuous and all-or-none retrieval processes, respectively. Signal detection models (e.g., the unequal variance model) correspond to a continuous retrieval process, whereas threshold models (including the multinomial model and the recollection component of the dual-process model) correspond to an all-or-none process. In studies of source memory, Slotnick et al. (2000) and others have observed curvilinear ROCs (supporting the unequal variance model), whereas Yonelinas (1999) observed linear ROCs (supporting the dual-process model). We resolve these seemingly inconsistent results, showing that source memory ROCs are naturally curvilinear but can appear linear when nondiagnostic source information is included in the analysis. Furthermore, the unequal variance model accounted for both recognition memory and source memory ROCs, supporting a continuous process of memory retrieval.
Journal Article
Entorhinal Cortex Functional Connectivity during Item Long-Term Memory and the Role of Sex
A growing body of literature shows there are sex differences in the patterns of brain activity during long-term memory. However, there is a paucity of evidence on sex differences in functional brain connectivity. We previously identified sex differences in the patterns of connections with the hippocampus, a medial temporal lobe (MTL) subregion, during spatial long-term memory. The perirhinal/entorhinal cortex, another MTL subregion, plays a critical role in item memory. In the current functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we investigated perirhinal/entorhinal functional connectivity and the role of sex during item memory. During the study phase, abstract shapes were presented to the left or right of fixation. During the test phase, abstract shapes were presented at fixation, and the participants classified each item as previously “old” or “new”. An entorhinal region of interest (ROI) was identified by contrasting item memory hits and misses. This ROI was connected to regions generally associated with visual memory, including the right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and visual-processing regions (the bilateral V1, bilateral cuneus, and left lingual gyrus). Males produced greater connectivity than females with the right IFG/insula and the right V1/bilateral cuneus. Broadly, these results contribute to a growing body of literature supporting sex differences in the brain.
Journal Article
Thalamic Functional Connectivity during Spatial Long-Term Memory and the Role of Sex
The thalamus has been implicated in many cognitive processes, including long-term memory. More specifically, the anterior (AT) and mediodorsal (MD) thalamic nuclei have been associated with long-term memory. Despite extensive mapping of the anatomical connections between these nuclei and other brain regions, little is known regarding their functional connectivity during long-term memory. The current study sought to determine which brain regions are functionally connected to AT and MD during spatial long-term memory and whether sex differences exist in the patterns of connectivity. During encoding, abstract shapes were presented to the left and right of fixation. During retrieval, shapes were presented at fixation, and participants made an “old-left” or “old-right” judgment. Activations functionally connected to AT and MD existed in regions with known anatomical connections to each nucleus as well as in a broader network of long-term memory regions. Sex differences were identified in a subset of these regions. A targeted region-of-interest analysis identified anti-correlated activity between MD and the hippocampus that was specific to females, which is consistent with findings in rodents. The current results suggest that AT and MD play key roles during spatial long-term memory and suggest that these functions may be sex specific.
Journal Article
Attentional inhibition of visual processing in human striate and extrastriate cortex
Allocating attention to a spatial location in the visual field is associated with an increase in the cortical response evoked by a stimulus at that location, compared to when the same stimulus is unattended. We used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate attentional modulation of the cortical response to a stimulus probe at an attended location and to multiple probes at unattended locations. A localizer task and retinotopic mapping were used to precisely identify the cortical representations of each probe within striate (V1) and extrastriate cortex (V2, VP, V3, V4v, and V3A). The magnitude and polarity of attentional modulation were assessed through analysis of event-related activity time-locked to shifts in spatial attention. Attentional facilitation at the attended location was observed in striate and extrastriate cortex, corroborating earlier findings. Attentional inhibition of visual stimuli near the attended location was observed in striate cortex, and attentional inhibition of more distant stimuli occurred in both striate and extrastriate cortex. These findings indicate that visual attention operates both through facilitation of visual processing at the attended location and through inhibition of unattended stimulus representations in striate and extrastriate cortex.
Journal Article
Memory for motion and spatial location is mediated by contralateral and ipsilateral motion processing cortex
Memory and perception have been associated with common sensory cortical activity. However, previous studies have only investigated memory and perception effects associated with a single feature (i.e., spatial location or color). The aim of the present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study was to assess whether memory for multiple (two) features would produce sensory cortical activity that mirrored perceptual processing of the same features. During encoding, moving or stationary abstract shapes were presented to the right or left of fixation. During retrieval, shapes were presented at fixation and participants classified each item as previously in motion or stationary within the right or left visual field. Memory for items in motion, regardless of spatial location, produced fMRI activity in perceptual motion processing region MT+. Memory for motion and spatial location produced contralateral and ipsilateral fMRI activity in perceptual motion processing sub-region MT. Following TMS to MT, memory for motion was impaired, but performance did not differ between the contralateral and ipsilateral visual fields. The present results are consistent with previous findings in that memory for motion produced fMRI activity in MT+ and was impaired following TMS to MT. However, memory for motion and spatial location produced contralateral and ipsilateral fMRI and TMS effects, deviating from the primarily contralateral perceptual processing organization of MT. The present evidence suggests that during memory for motion and spatial location only motion information is coded in motion processing cortex, while previous findings suggest spatial location information is coded in earlier extrastriate cortex.
► Memory for motion reactivates MT+. ► TMS to MT impairs memory for motion. ► Discordant memory and perception effects in MT.
Journal Article