Explore the vast range of titles available.

The development of novel therapy classes such as Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, which target disability progression independent of relapses and largely independent of new lesion formation, requires a reappraisal of strategies in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). We argue that this novel class of treatment further emphasizes the need for early and aggressive treatment with classical disease-modifying compounds for the prevention of both relapses and new MRI lesion formation and their associated disability accrual. This will extend the window to recognize early progressive disability accumulation independent of acute focal inflammatory activity, and for people with MS to benefit from novel therapies such as BTK inhibition, which target damaging pathophysiological processes independent of peripherally driven focal inflammation. Plain language summary Aggressive treatment of MS attacks to extend the window for novel therapies to halt progressive disability in multiple sclerosis People affected by multiple sclerosis (MS) experience attacks which can result in persistent neurological disability. Additionally, a gradual and relentless neurological deterioration can be experienced over time without attacks, referred to as MS progression. MS attacks can be treated well with currently registered highly-effective MS therapies. However, these drugs have little impact on progression-associated disability. Currently, novel classes of MS therapies are appearing. These drugs have a limited impact MS attacks but do delay MS progression-associated disability in clinical studies. In this work, we argue that this novel development warrants an aggressive and active treatment of MS attacks. This approach allows detection of MS progression-associated disability independent of MS attacks. Hereby, this can create an optimal window for people with MS to benefit from these novel therapies.

Magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and brain volumetric imaging are (semi-)quantitative MRI markers capturing demyelination, axonal degeneration and/or inflammation. However, factors shaping variation in these traits are largely unknown. In this study, we collected a longitudinal cohort of 33 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and extended it cross-sectionally to 213. We measured MTR in lesions, normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), normal-appearing grey matter (NAGM) and total brain, grey matter, white matter and lesion volume. We also calculated the polygenic MS risk score. Longitudinally, inter-patient differences at inclusion and intra-patient changes during follow-up together explained > 70% of variance in MRI, with inter-patient differences at inclusion being the predominant source of variance. Cross-sectionally, we observed a moderate correlation of MTR between NAGM and NAWM and, less pronounced, with lesions. Age and gender explained about 30% of variance in total brain and grey matter volume. However, they contributed less than 10% to variance in MTR measures. There were no significant associations between MRI traits and the genetic risk score. In conclusion, (semi-)quantitative MRI traits change with ongoing disease activity but this change is modest in comparison to pre-existing inter-patient differences. These traits reflect individual variation in biological processes, which appear different from those involved in genetic MS susceptibility.

Background In high-income countries, four anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are used or in the pipeline for relapsing MS: ocrelizumab, ofatumumab (both registered), ublituximab (awaiting registration) and rituximab (off-label). List prices differ significantly between registered and off-label drugs. Objective Comparing differences in benefits between anti-CD20 mAbs from a health-economic and societal perspective. Methods To reflect lifetime use of DMTs, we used a treatment-sequence model to compare ocrelizumab/ofatumumab and eight other drug classes in terms of health (lifetime relapses, time to Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] 6, lifetime quality-adjusted life years) and cost-effectiveness (net health benefit). To become cost-effective compared to ocrelizumab, we modelled the list price of ublituximab and desired effect on EDSS progression of rituximab. Results Although drug sequences with ocrelizumab in first- and second-line were more cost-effective than ofatumumab, our probabilistic analysis suggests this outcome was very uncertain. To be more cost-effective than ocrelizumab, ublituximab needs to be about 25% cheaper whilst rituximab needs to equal the effect on disability progression seen with first-line treatments. Conclusions Our model showed no clear difference in cost-effectiveness between ocrelizumab and ofatumumab. Hence, prescribing the least costly anti-CD20 mAb can democratise MS care without a loss in health benefits.

Although fingolimod and interferon-β are two mechanistically different multiple sclerosis (MS) treatments, they both induce B cell activating factor (BAFF) and shift the B cell pool towards a regulatory phenotype. However, whether there is a shared mechanism between both treatments in how they influence the B cell compartment remains elusive. In this study, we collected a cross-sectional study population of 112 MS patients (41 untreated, 42 interferon-β, 29 fingolimod) and determined B cell subsets, cell-surface and RNA expression of BAFF-receptor (BAFF-R) and transmembrane activator and cyclophilin ligand interactor (TACI) as well as plasma and/or RNA levels of BAFF, BAFF splice forms and interleukin-10 (IL-10) and -35 (IL-35). We added an in vitro B cell culture with four stimulus conditions (Medium, CpG, BAFF and CpG+BAFF) for untreated and interferon-β treated patients including measurement of intracellular IL-10 levels. Our flow experiments showed that interferon-β and fingolimod induced BAFF protein and mRNA expression (P ≤ 3.15 x 10 -4 ) without disproportional change in the antagonizing splice form. Protein BAFF correlated with an increase in transitional B cells (P = 5.70 x 10 -6 ), decrease in switched B cells (P = 3.29 x 10 -4 ), and reduction in B cell-surface BAFF-R expression (P = 2.70 x 10 -10 ), both on TACI-positive and -negative cells. TACI and BAFF-R RNA levels remained unaltered. RNA, plasma and in vitro experiments demonstrated that BAFF was not associated with increased IL-10 and IL-35 levels. In conclusion, treatment-induced BAFF correlates with a shift towards transitional B cells which are enriched for cells with an immunoregulatory function. However, BAFF does not directly influence the expression of the immunoregulatory cytokines IL-10 and IL-35. Furthermore, the post-translational mechanism of BAFF-induced BAFF-R cell surface loss was TACI-independent. These observations put the failure of pharmaceutical anti-BAFF strategies in perspective and provide insights for targeted B cell therapies.

Objective A substantial part of central nervous system (CNS) disorders remains unexplained, despite various new and minimally invasive diagnostic techniques. Within this rapidly developing diagnostic field, the precise role of brain biopsy is unknown. We aimed to study the clinical impact and safety of brain biopsies in unexplained CNS disorders. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we included all adult patients who were referred for a diagnostic work‐up to our academic center with neuro‐inflammatory, neuro‐oncological, and neuro‐infectious expertise and underwent a brain biopsy between January 2010 and December 2023. Typical cases of CNS neoplasms and infections were not analyzed. Brain biopsies were evaluated with respect to diagnostic and therapeutic impact and complication risk. Results Brain biopsy was performed in 587 patients. Ninety‐four patients with a CNS disorder of unknown cause, with 107 biopsies, were analyzed (44% female, median age 58 years). Postoperative diagnoses included brain tumors/lymphomas (37/94, 39%), inflammatory disorders (11/94, 12%), infections (8/94, 9%), autoimmune encephalitis (8/94, 9%), and primary angiitis of the CNS (4/94, 4%). Diagnostic yield of brain biopsy was 62%, increasing up to 72% after repeat biopsies, as 10 additional patients were diagnosed with a brain tumor. In 77% of patients, brain biopsy changed the treatment strategy. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 4 of 107 brain biopsies (4%). Interpretation In a selected population of patients with unexplained CNS disorders, clinical impact of brain biopsies is high, while being relatively safe. A multidisciplinary team approach is fundamental in establishing optimal indication for brain biopsy and subsequent treatment decisions.