Explore the vast range of titles available.

This study investigates the mechanical behavior of the Physiomesh/Securestrap system, a hernia repair system used for IPOM procedures associated with high failure rates. The study involved conducting mechanical experiments and numerical simulations to investigate the mechanical behavior of the Physiomesh/Securestrap system under pressure load. Uniaxial tension tests were conducted to determine the elasticity modulus of the Physiomesh in various directions and the strength of the mesh-tissue-staple junction. Ex-vivo experiments on porcine abdominal wall models were performed to observe the system's behavior under simulated intra-abdominal pressure load. Numerical simulations using finite element analysis were employed to support the experimental findings. The results reveal nonlinearity, anisotropy, and non-homogeneity in the mechanical properties of the Physiomesh, with stress concentration observed in the polydioxanone (PDO) stripe. The mesh-tissue junction exhibited inadequate fixation strength, leading to staple pull-out or breakage. The ex-vivo models demonstrated failure under higher pressure loads. Numerical simulations supported these findings, revealing the reaction forces exceeding the experimentally determined strength of the mesh-tissue-staple junction. The implications of this study extend beyond the specific case of the Physiomesh/Securestrap system, providing insights into the mechanics of implant-tissue systems. By considering biomechanical factors, researchers and clinicians can make informed decisions to develop improved implants that mimic the mechanics of a healthy abdominal wall. This knowledge can contribute to better surgical outcomes and reduce complications in abdominal hernia repair and to avoid similar failures in future.

Background International guidelines of groin hernia treatment strongly recommend to fixate the mesh in large M3 medial defects during TAPP/TEP procedures. The main purpose of fixation is to decrease the recurrence rate which is alarmingly high in case of those defects. In 2022, a team consisting of hernia surgeons and scientists from universities of technology conducted an experimental study with the use of 3D groin model to verify the hypothesis that fixation is not necessary in above cases. Experiment showed that rigid and anatomically shaped meshes are able to maintain its position in the groin without fixation. Similar conclusions were recently published in Swedish database registry analysis. To confirm above results, we decided to conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Methods Main objective of MEFI Trial is to verify the hypothesis that non-fixation of spatial, standard polypropylene meshes is non-inferior to fixation of flat, polypropylene lightweight meshes in M3 hernias by laparoendoscopic approach. Eleven large surgery centers in Poland having proficiency in laparoendoscopic groin hernia repairs were recruited for this study. Recurrence in 12-month follow-up was set as a primary endpoint. Pain sensation (Visual Analog Scale) and incidence of other complications (hematoma, seroma, SSI) were also noted. Based on the statistical analysis, minimal sample size in both arms was established at 83–102. The first arm (control) consists of patients undergoing a repair with the use of a flat, macroporous mesh with fixation using histoacryl glue. In the second arm, patients will be operated with the use of anatomically shaped, standard-weight mesh without fixation. Study will be double-blinded (patient/surgeon). After the dissection of preperitoneal space, surgeon will open a sealed envelope and find out which technique he will have to perform. Follow-up will be performed by Study Secretary (also blinded to the method used) via phone call 3 and 12 months after surgery. Discussion Based on experimental study and recent registry analysis, we believe that the recurrence rate in both groups would be on the same level, giving hernia societies a strong argument for amending the guidelines. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05678465. Registered on 10 January 2023.

BackgroundAlthough international guidelines recommend not fixing the mesh in almost all cases of laparoendoscopic repairs, in case of large direct hernias (M3) mesh fixation is recommended to reduce recurrence risk. Despite lack of high-quality evidence, the recommendation was upgraded to strong by expert panel. The authors conducted a research experiment to verify the hypothesis that it is possible to preserve the mesh in the operating field in large direct hernias (M3) without the need to use fixing materials.MethodThe authors conducted an experiment with scientists from Universities of Technology in a model that reflects the conditions in the groin area. By simulating conditions of the highest possible intra-abdominal pressure, they examined the mesh behavior within the groin and its ability to dislocate under the forces generated by this pressure. The experiment involved six spatial implants and one flat macroporous mesh.ResultsHeavyweight spatial meshes and lightweight spatial-individualized meshes showed no tendency to dislocate or move directly to the orifice, which was considered a rapid hernia recurrence. Lightweight meshes, both spatial and flat, underwent significant migration and shifting toward the hernial orifices.ConclusionBased on the results, we believe that mesh fixation is not the only alternative to preventing recurrence in complex defects. Similar effects can be achieved using a larger, more rigid, and anatomically fitted implant. The type of implant (rather than its fixation) seems to be a key factor from the point of view of mechanics and biophysics. Clinical trials confirming the results in vivo will allow to supplement or amend the guidelines for the treatment of large inguinal hernias.

Introduction Parastomal hernia (PH) is a prevalent complication following ostomy formation, presenting significant challenges in surgical management. This study aims to validate the European Hernia Society classification for PH through the application of the Hybrid Parastomal Endoscopic Repair (HyPER) method. The study focuses on establishing the practical utility of the European Hernia Society classification in a clinical setting, particularly in guiding surgical approaches and improving patient outcomes. Materials and methods This retrospective observational study aimed to assess the utility of the European Hernia Society classification in planning surgical strategies for parastomal hernias. The validation of the classification of PH was based on the experience involving 160 patients in single center. Patients were classified according to the European Hernia Society criteria, and data were collected on patient demographics, clinical presentations, and surgical outcomes. Main goal was to assess the consistency and applicability of the European Hernia Society classification in predicting surgical challenges and outcomes. Results The study found a predominance of complex Type III and IV hernias. The European Hernia Society classification was effective in categorizing PH, aiding in surgical planning and highlighting the increased complication rates associated with more complex hernia types. This study represents the largest single-center cohort treated for PH by a single team, providing a controlled evaluation of the HyPER technique’s effectiveness. Conclusions The validation of the European Hernia Society classification in this study is a significant advancement in the standardization of PH management. The findings demonstrate the classification’s utility in enhancing surgical planning and patient-centered care. The study also opens avenues for further research into standardized approaches and techniques in PH treatment.

Background Post-partum abdominal wall insufficiency (PPAWI) with rectus diastasis is present in over 30% of women after pregnancy. Little is known about how PPAWI affects the social, sexual life and self-esteem of patients. This study was designed to evaluate the safety of onlay mesh combined with abdominoplasty and its impact on the well-being of the patients. Method Two hundred patients with PPAWI underwent surgery with onlay mesh and abdominoplasty. The safety of the procedure was assessed by postoperative complications, time of hospitalization and time of drainage. Before the operation and 6 months later, a questionnaire asking about the patient’s sexual and social life and the presence of back pain was completed. The final cosmetic effect was assessed separately. Results The onlay procedure with abdominoplasty was found to be safe and fast. The mean operation time was 82 min, and the drainage time was 2.1 days. In this group < 2% postoperative complications were noted. There were no recurrences within the 6 month. Significant improvements in social and sexual life and the level of self-esteem were noted. Back pain was relieved or minimalized in all patients. The final cosmetic effect was insufficient for 2 patients (1%). Conclusion PPAWI can be treated safely with onlay mesh and abdominoplasty. The patients’ symptoms were strongly correlated with the morphological status of the front abdominal wall and improved after the procedure. Describing the psychological and social consequences of PPAWI should lead the surgical societies to propose a definition of a new disease called PPAWIS (post-partum abdominal wall insufficiency syndrome).

Background Patients’ need to improve outcomes and to reduce the number of complications triggers the development of new materials and surgery concepts. Currently, there are many implants and fixation systems dedicated for intraperitoneal onlay mesh procedure. The aim of this study was to compare two different mesh/fixation system concepts (PH: Physiomesh/Securestrap and VS: Ventralight ST/SorbaFix) for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with respect to pain. Methods A single-center, prospective, randomized study was designed to include 50 patients per group with a planned interim analysis for safety after 25 patients. The endpoints were pain occurrences and intensity, which was measured with the visual analogue scale 7 days, 30 days, 3 months and 6 months after surgery. The safety parameters included the number of recurrences and postoperative complications. Results During the interim analysis, the study was stopped due to safety reasons. We observed five (20 %) recurrences in the PH group in first 6 months and none in the VS group. We observed a significantly higher pain rate in the PH group after 3 months ( p  < 0.0001) and no difference after 7 days ( p  = 0. 7019). The pain intensity decreased significantly over time ( p  < 0.0001) and was significantly higher in the PH group ( p  < 0.0001). Conclusions Although this clinical trial was terminated prior to the preplanned recruitment goal, the obtained results from the enrolled patients indicate that the PH system associated with significantly greater hernia recurrences and postoperative pain compared with the VS system. This confirms the superiority of the elastic mesh concept, which may be a safer and more efficacious option for laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs.

Background Intraabdominal pressure often is blamed as the cause of mesh–fascia junction failure after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Stretching of the mesh during a cough or defecation may lead to recurrence. Little is known about the movements of mesh in the abdominal cavity after this operation. This study investigated the front abdominal wall to describe its elasticity in vivo and searched for elongations that possibly stretched an implanted mesh, thereby causing fixation failure and subsequent recurrence. Methods To measure front abdominal wall elongations, a model of fascia movements was created. Eight healthy volunteers were measured during exercise to determine the extent of elongations in their front abdominal wall. Videos were analyzed in three positions to create a mathematical shell structure. A computerized model based on the net movement of nodes was calculated to determine the axes and values for maximum elongations. Results The largest average elongations were measured for the upper midline (32.08%) and the transverse line in the low lateral area (34.06%). The maximum values for these lines were larger than 100% for the middle line (133.78%) and exceeded 50% for the entire middle line. The values for the horizontal lines did not reach 10% at any level. According to these data, areas of both high and low elasticity were defined. Conclusions The presented experiment adds new parameters to the understanding of in vivo mesh behavior. Elongation of the front abdominal wall may stretch implanted mesh and could be a cause of recurrence in cases of insufficient fixation.

Laparoscopic repair is becoming an increasingly popular alternative in the treatment of abdominal wall hernias. In spite of numerous studies evaluating this technique, indications for laparoscopic surgery have not been established. Similarly, implant selection and fixation techniques have not been unified and are the subject of scientific discussion. To assess whether there is a consensus on the management of the most common ventral abdominal wall hernias among recognised experts. Fourteen specialists representing the boards of European surgical societies were surveyed to determine their choice of surgical technique for nine typical primary ventral and incisional hernias. The access method, type of operation, mesh prosthesis and fixation method were evaluated. In addition to the laparoscopic procedures, the number of tackers and their arrangement were assessed. In none of the cases presented was a consensus of experts obtained. Laparoscopic and open techniques were used equally often. Especially in the group of large hernias, decisions on repair methods were characterised by high variability. The technique of laparoscopic mesh fixation was a subject of great variability in terms of both method selection and the numbers of tackers and sutures used. Recognised experts have not reached a consensus on the management of abdominal wall hernias. Our survey results indicate the need for further research and the inclusion of large cohorts of patients in the dedicated registries to evaluate the results of different surgical methods, which would help in the development of treatment algorithms for surgical education in the future.

Anterior abdominal wall reconstruction surgery in patients who have undergone multiple laparotomies is associated with a high risk of complications. For this reason, minimally invasive surgery techniques are used to avoid abdominal compartment syndrome, to enhance wound healing and to reduce postoperative pain and blood loss. This paper presents a case of a patient who was admitted to the Department of General Surgery in Puck Hospital as a result of extensive anterior abdominal wall deformation with an end descending colostomy. A single-stage procedure was performed: specifically, digestive tract reconstruction followed by anterior abdominal wall reconstruction using intraoperative angiography of indocyanine green in infrared light.