Explore the vast range of titles available.

The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association convened three separate work groups in 2011 and single work groups in 2012 and 2018 to create recommendations for the diagnosis and characterization of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The present document updates the 2018 research framework in response to several recent developments. Defining diseases biologically, rather than based on syndromic presentation, has long been standard in many areas of medicine (e.g., oncology), and is becoming a unifying concept common to all neurodegenerative diseases, not just AD. The present document is consistent with this principle. Our intent is to present objective criteria for diagnosis and staging AD, incorporating recent advances in biomarkers, to serve as a bridge between research and clinical care. These criteria are not intended to provide step‐by‐step clinical practice guidelines for clinical workflow or specific treatment protocols, but rather serve as general principles to inform diagnosis and staging of AD that reflect current science. Highlights We define Alzheimer's disease (AD) to be a biological process that begins with the appearance of AD neuropathologic change (ADNPC) while people are asymptomatic. Progression of the neuropathologic burden leads to the later appearance and progression of clinical symptoms. Early‐changing Core 1 biomarkers (amyloid positron emission tomography [PET], approved cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, and accurate plasma biomarkers [especially phosphorylated tau 217]) map onto either the amyloid beta or AD tauopathy pathway; however, these reflect the presence of ADNPC more generally (i.e., both neuritic plaques and tangles). An abnormal Core 1 biomarker result is sufficient to establish a diagnosis of AD and to inform clinical decision making throughout the disease continuum. Later‐changing Core 2 biomarkers (biofluid and tau PET) can provide prognostic information, and when abnormal, will increase confidence that AD is contributing to symptoms. An integrated biological and clinical staging scheme is described that accommodates the fact that common copathologies, cognitive reserve, and resistance may modify relationships between clinical and biological AD stages.

At the First WHO Ministerial Conference on Global Action Against Dementia in March, 2015, 160 delegates, including representatives from 80 WHO Member States and four UN agencies, agreed on a call for action to reduce the global burden of dementia by fostering a collective effort to advance research. To drive this effort, we completed a globally representative research prioritisation exercise using an adapted version of the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative method. We elicited 863 research questions from 201 participants and consolidated these questions into 59 thematic research avenues, which were scored anonymously by 162 researchers and stakeholders from 39 countries according to five criteria. Six of the top ten research priorities were focused on prevention, identification, and reduction of dementia risk, and on delivery and quality of care for people with dementia and their carers. Other priorities related to diagnosis, biomarkers, treatment development, basic research into disease mechanisms, and public awareness and understanding of dementia. Research priorities identified by this systematic international process should be mapped onto the global dementia research landscape to identify crucial gaps and inform and motivate policy makers, funders, and researchers to support and conduct research to reduce the global burden of dementia. Efforts are needed by all stakeholders, including WHO, WHO Member States, and civil society, to continuously monitor research investments and progress, through international platforms such as a Global Dementia Observatory. With established research priorities, an opportunity now exists to translate the call for action into a global dementia action plan to reduce the global burden of dementia.

Alzheimer’s disease can be treated by targeting amyloid-β plaques and diagnosed in vivo by biomarkers, prompting the revision of criteria for the diagnosis and staging of this disease.

Here we highlight the Alzheimer's Association's role since its inception, as a strategic collaborator with National Institutes of Health–National Institute on Aging in the development of the modern era of the Alzheimer's Movement and in making Alzheimer's disease (AD) a national priority in the United States by developing several initiatives to advance knowledge about the cause, diagnosis, and treatment of dementia. Among these collaborative undertakings, the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is an exemplary case, launched with groundwork by the Neuroimaging Working Group sponsored by the Association's Ronald and Nancy Reagan Research Institute on AD. The unique contribution of the Association to the development of ADNI includes participation as a member of ADNI's Private Partner Scientific Board and involvement in developing an AD biomarker standardization and validation subproject, which has led to a conceptual shift in the field to define AD based on its underlying biology. Furthermore, the creation of Worldwide ADNI (WW‐ADNI) is highlighted, underscoring the global impact of these efforts. Highlights The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is a keystone undertaking in the evolving landscape of Alzheimer's disease (AD) research, and is now in its fourth iteration. The Alzheimer's Association has partnered with ADNI since its inception. ADNI 4 and the Association continue to collaborate, ensuring representation within the study population.

Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs) are a global crisis facing the aging population and society as a whole. With the numbers of people with ADRDs predicted to rise dramatically across the world, the scientific community can no longer neglect the need for research focusing on ADRDs among underrepresented ethnoracial diverse groups. The Alzheimer's Association International Society to Advance Alzheimer's Research and Treatment (ISTAART; alz.org/ISTAART) comprises a number of professional interest areas (PIAs), each focusing on a major scientific area associated with ADRDs. We leverage the expertise of the existing international cadre of ISTAART scientists and experts to synthesize a cross-PIA white paper that provides both a concise \"state-of-the-science\" report of ethnoracial factors across PIA foci and updated recommendations to address immediate needs to advance ADRD science across ethnoracial populations.

The Alzheimer's Association launched the U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health Through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk (U.S. POINTER), a 2 year clinical trial to evaluate whether lifestyle or behavioral interventions that simultaneously target multiple risk factors protect cognitive function in > 2000 older adults (ages 60–79) at increased risk for cognitive decline. Top‐line results from the study demonstrated that a structured, multi‐domain lifestyle intervention significantly reduces cognitive decline compared to a self‐guided approach over the 2 year interventions. U.S. POINTER positive trial results have far‐reaching implications for public health, clinical care, and possibly dementia prevention strategies in the United States and the world. This perspective describes the implications and the Alzheimer's Association's commitment to creating the conditions that make this possible; activating individuals, communities, and organizations to take charge of and improve their brain health and creating conditions or environments for the success of implementation in communities. Highlights A growing body of evidence suggests that lifestyle modifications may play a critical role in reducing the risk of cognitive decline and dementia. U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health Through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk (U.S. POINTER) positive trial results have far‐reaching implications for public health, clinical care, and possibly dementia prevention strategies in the United States and the world. U.S. POINTER will significantly inform public health action on a multi‐domain intervention for an at‐risk population. Continued analysis of trial data, including biomarkers, along with insights from the Alzheimer's Association‐funded Alumni Extension study, will offer additional insights on the impact of the trial intervention and provide valuable guidance on how best to adapt the intervention for diverse communities.

INTRODUCTION Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) may precede objective cognitive impairment. We examined prevalence, type of SCD, and associations with neuropsychological measures among diverse older adults. METHODS The sample included older adults from three ethnoracial groups enrolled in the U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health Through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk (POINTER) trial. Everyday Cognition (ECog) measured SCD, and neuropsychological function was assessed using global memory, executive function, and processing speed composites. RESULTS Hispanic/Latinx participants were more likely to report SCD than non‐Hispanic White (NHW) or Black participants, particularly executive function concerns. In the full sample, adjusting for demographics and depression, SCD ratings were associated with most neuropsychological outcomes. In analyses stratified by ethnoracial group, SCD ratings were associated with many of the neuropsychological domains in NHW participants and with processing speed among Black participants; no association was observed in Hispanic/Latinx participants. DISCUSSION Prevalence, type of SCD, and associations with cognition varied by ethnoracial group. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03688126 (ClinicalTrials.gov). Highlights Hispanic/Latinx participants endorsed greater subjective cognitive decline (SCD) than other ethnoracial groups. Hispanic/Latinx participants were more likely to endorse executive function concerns. SCD was associated with several neuropsychological domains in non‐Hispanic White participants. SCD was related to processing speed for Black participants. SCD was unrelated to objective cognitive performance in Hispanic/Latinx participants.

BACKGROUND First held in 2020, the Institute on Methods and Protocols for Advancement of Clinical Trials in ADRD (IMPACT‐AD) is a program to train the next generation of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias (AD/ADRD) clinical trialists. METHODS IMPACT‐AD includes didactic, workshop, and small group components. RESULTS IMPACT‐AD has trained 18 alumni–scholars (accepted from 424 applicants), of whom 67% were female. Forty‐eight (26%) were the first in their family to attend college. Scholars included individuals from all racial and ethnic groups. Each year, participants demonstrated increased learning about AD/ADRD clinical trials through a pre/post‐test model of knowledge assessments. Among those completing annual follow‐up surveys, >84% remain in AD/ADRD trials careers, and 80% have experienced career advances or milestones. In the latter group, > 90% indicated that participating in IMPACT‐AD contributed to this career growth. DISCUSSION IMPACT‐AD is a novel educational program that is achieving its goals. Highlights Over 5 years, the Institute on Methods and Protocols for Advancement of Clinical Trials in ADRD (IMPACT‐AD) has trained 188 scholars. The course has been accessible to a broad range of trainees who were diverse in professional and demographic backgrounds. Objective assessments indicate that participants gain knowledge through participation. Eighty‐four percent of trainees have remained in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) trials careers. Eighty percent of alumni have experienced career advances; nearly all indicated that participating in the course contributed to their success.

•MK6240 meningeal off-target signal (OTS) is adjacent to target and reference regions.•Across individuals OTS is continuously distributed and related to sex (F>M).•Erosion of the reference region results in greater OTS influence in target regions.•Approaches to optimize MK6240 processing perform similarly to standard processing. Accurate measurement of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology in older adults without significant clinical impairment is critical to assessing intervention strategies aimed at slowing AD-related cognitive decline. The U.S. Study to Protect Brain Health Through Lifestyle Intervention to Reduce Risk (POINTER) is a 2-year randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of multicomponent risk reduction strategies in older adults (60-79 years) who are cognitively unimpaired but at increased risk for cognitive decline/dementia due to factors such as cardiovascular disease and family history. The POINTER Imaging ancillary study is collecting tau-PET ([18F]MK6240), beta-amyloid (Aβ)-PET ([18F]florbetaben [FBB]) and MRI data to evaluate neuroimaging biomarkers of AD and cerebrovascular pathophysiology in this at-risk sample. Here 481 participants (70.0±5.0; 66% F) with baseline MK6240, FBB and structural MRI scans were included. PET scans were coregistered to the structural MRI which was used to create FreeSurfer-defined reference regions and target regions of interest (ROIs). We also created off-target signal (OTS) ROIs to examine the magnitude and distribution of MK6240 OTS across the brain as well as relationships between OTS and age, sex, and race. OTS was unimodally distributed, highly correlated across OTS ROIs and related to younger age and sex but not race. Aiming to identify an optimal processing approach for MK6240 that would reduce the influence of OTS, we compared our previously validated MRI-guided standard PET processing and 6 alternative approaches. The alternate approaches included combinations of reference region erosion and meningeal OTS masking before spatial smoothing as well as partial volume correction. To compare processing approaches we examined relationships between target ROIs (entorhinal cortex (ERC), hippocampus or a temporal meta-ROI (MetaROI)) SUVR and age, sex, race, Aβ and a general cognitive status measure, the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICSm). Overall, the processing approaches performed similarly, and none showed a meaningful improvement over standard processing. Across processing approaches we observed previously reported relationships with MK6240 target ROIs including positive associations with age, an Aβ+> Aβ- effect and negative associations with cognition. In sum, we demonstrated that different methods for minimizing effects of OTS, which is highly correlated across the brain within subject, produced no substantive change in our performance metrics. This is likely because OTS contaminates both reference and target regions and this contamination largely cancels out in SUVR data. Caution should be used when efforts to reduce OTS focus on target or reference regions in isolation as this may exacerbate OTS contamination in SUVR data.