Explore the vast range of titles available.

It has been a clinically important, long-standing challenge to accurately localize epileptogenic focus in drug-resistant focal epilepsy because more intensive intervention to the detected focus, including resection neurosurgery, can provide significant seizure reduction. In addition to neurophysiological examinations, neuroimaging plays a crucial role in the detection of focus by providing morphological and neuroanatomical information. On the other hand, epileptogenic lesions in the brain may sometimes show only subtle or even invisible abnormalities on conventional MRI sequences, and thus, efforts have been made for better visualization and improved detection of the focus lesions. Recent advance in neuroimaging has been attracting attention because of the potentials to better visualize the epileptogenic lesions as well as provide novel information about the pathophysiology of epilepsy. While the progress of newer neuroimaging techniques, including the non-Gaussian diffusion model and arterial spin labeling, could non-invasively detect decreased neurite parameters or hypoperfusion within the focus lesions, advances in analytic technology may also provide usefulness for both focus detection and understanding of epilepsy. There has been an increasing number of clinical and experimental applications of machine learning and network analysis in the field of epilepsy. This review article will shed light on recent advances in neuroimaging for focal epilepsy, including both technical progress of images and newer analytical methodologies and discuss about the potential usefulness in clinical practice.

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder characterized by recurrent and disabling seizures. An increasing number of clinical and experimental applications of machine learning (ML) methods for epilepsy and other neurological and psychiatric disorders are available. ML methods have the potential to provide a reliable and optimal performance for clinical diagnoses, prediction, and personalized medicine by using mathematical algorithms and computational approaches. There are now several applications of ML for epilepsy, including neuroimaging analyses. For precise and reliable clinical applications in epilepsy and neuroimaging, the diverse ML methodologies should be examined and validated. We review the clinical applications of ML models for brain imaging in epilepsy obtained from a PubMed database search in February 2021. We first present an overview of typical neuroimaging modalities and ML models used in the epilepsy studies and then focus on the existing applications of ML models for brain imaging in epilepsy based on the following clinical aspects: (i) distinguishing individuals with epilepsy from healthy controls, (ii) lateralization of the temporal lobe epilepsy focus, (iii) the identification of epileptogenic foci, (iv) the prediction of clinical outcomes, and (v) brain-age prediction. We address the practical problems and challenges described in the literature and suggest some future research directions.

Psychiatric non-epileptic seizure (PNES), also known as a form of functional neurological disorders (FND), is a common but still underrecognized disorder presenting seizure-like symptoms and no electrophysiological abnormality. Despite the significant burden of this disorder, the neurobiological mechanisms are not clearly understood, which hinders the development of better diagnosis and treatment. In the recent neuroimaging research on PNES, brain network analysis has become a relevant topic beyond conventional methodologies. The human brain is a highly intricate system of interconnected regions that collaborate to facilitate a wide range of cognitive and behavioral functions. White matter tracts, which are comprised of bundles of axonal fibers, are the primary means by which information is transmitted between different brain regions. As such, comprehending the organization and structure of the brain's white matter network is critical for gaining insight into its functional architecture. This review article aims to provide an overview of the brain mechanisms underlying PNES, with a special focus on analyzing brain networks.

Epilepsy is a diverse brain disorder, and the pathophysiology of its various forms and comorbidities is largely unknown. A recent machine learning method enables us to estimate an individual’s “brain-age” from MRI; this brain-age prediction is expected as a novel individual biomarker of neuropsychiatric disorders. The aims of this study were to estimate the brain-age for various categories of epilepsy and to evaluate clinical discrimination by brain-age for (1) the effect of psychosis on temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), (2) psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNESs) from MRI-negative epilepsies, and (3) progressive myoclonic epilepsy (PME) from juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). In total, 1196 T1-weighted MRI scans from healthy controls (HCs) were used to build a brain-age prediction model with support vector regression. Using the model, we calculated the brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD: predicted age—chronological age) of the HCs and 318 patients with epilepsy. We compared the brain-PAD values based on the research questions. As a result, all categories of patients except for extra-temporal lobe focal epilepsy showed a significant increase in brain-PAD. TLE with hippocampal sclerosis presented a significantly higher brain-PAD than several other categories. The mean brain-PAD in TLE with inter-ictal psychosis was 10.9 years, which was significantly higher than TLE without psychosis (5.3 years). PNES showed a comparable mean brain-PAD (10.6 years) to that of epilepsy patients. PME had a higher brain-PAD than JME (22.0 vs. 9.3 years). In conclusion, neuroimaging-based brain-age prediction can provide novel insight into or clinical usefulness for the diverse symptoms of epilepsy.

The biological basis of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in individuals who have dementia is poorly understood, despite the significant burden on patients, caregivers, and communities. Recent neuroimaging advances have provided reliable and less-invasive methods to investigate human brains in vivo . However, compared to the significant progress that has been made in the fields of diagnostic values and cognitive symptoms in dementia, the neuroimaging findings of NPS are less consistent, particularly in terms of the affected brain regions. This discrepancy may be due to differences in neuroimaging modalities or analytical methods, the fact that NPS can change over time, and/or the subjective nature of NPS assessments. In this narrative review, we summarize the extant literature on neuroimaging findings of NPS in dementia. We also discuss both the controversies and potential solutions to overcome the current problems.

It is now possible to estimate an individual’s brain age via brain scans and machine-learning models. This validated technique has opened up new avenues for addressing clinical questions in neurology, and, in this review, we summarize the many clinical applications of brain-age estimation in neuropsychiatry and general populations. We first provide an introduction to typical neuroimaging modalities, feature extraction methods, and machine-learning models that have been used to develop a brain-age estimation framework. We then focus on the significant findings of the brain-age estimation technique in the field of neuropsychiatry as well as the usefulness of the technique for addressing clinical questions in neuropsychiatry. These applications may contribute to more timely and targeted neuropsychiatric therapies. Last, we discuss the practical problems and challenges described in the literature and suggest some future research directions.

In the field of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for neuroimaging, white matter tracts have traditionally been analyzed using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures, such as fractional anisotropy. However, recent advances in diffusion MRI have provided further information on brain microstructures using multi-shell protocols of diffusion MRI. Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) is one such emerging advanced diffusion MRI method that enables investigation of the neurite density and neurite orientation dispersion of brain microstructures. NODDI was developed as a practical and clinically feasible diffusion MRI technique to evaluate the microstructural complexity of dendrites and axons. This review shed light on recent studies on the use of NODDI in human brain. Indeed, a growing number of studies are using NODDI to examine neurological and psychiatric disorders, with most reporting its clinical utility. The time has thus come, for us to seriously consider the clinical use of NODDI.

Abnormal brain aging is suggested in epilepsy. Given the brain network dysfunction in epilepsy, the white matter tracts, which primarily interconnect brain regions, could be of special importance. We focused on white matter brain aging in diverse forms of epilepsy and comorbid psychosis. We obtained brain diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data at 3 T-MRI in 257 patients with epilepsy and 429 healthy subjects. The tract-based fractional anisotropy values of the healthy subjects were used to build a brain-age prediction model, and we calculated the brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD: predicted age—chronological age) of all subjects. As a result, almost all epilepsy categories showed significantly increased brain-PAD (p < 0.001), including temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) with no MRI-lesion (+ 4.2 yr), TLE with hippocampal sclerosis (+ 9.1 yr), extratemporal focal epilepsy (+ 5.1 yr), epileptic encephalopathy or progressive myoclonus epilepsy (+ 18.4 yr), except for idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE). Patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures also presented increased brain-PAD. In TLE, interictal psychosis significantly raised brain-PAD by 8.7 years. In conclusion, we observed increased brain aging in most types of epilepsy, which was generally consistent with brain morphological aging results in previous studies. Psychosis may accelerate brain aging in TLE. These findings may suggest abnormal aging mechanisms in epilepsy and comorbid psychotic symptoms.

Neuroimaging [...]

With the widespread increase in elderly populations, the quality of life and mental health in old age are issues of great interest. The human brain changes with age, and the brain aging process is biologically complex and varies widely among individuals. In this cross-sectional study, to clarify the effects of mental health, as well as common metabolic factors (e.g., diabetes) on healthy brain aging in late life, we analyzed structural brain MRI findings to examine the relationship between predicted brain age and life satisfaction, depressive symptoms, resilience, and lifestyle-related factors in elderly community-living individuals with unimpaired cognitive function. We extracted data from a community-based cohort study in Arakawa Ward, Tokyo. T1-weighted images of 773 elderly participants aged ≥65 years were analyzed, and the predicted brain age of each subject was calculated by machine learning from anatomically standardized gray-matter images. Specifically, we examined the relationships between the brain-predicted age difference (Brain-PAD: real age subtracted from predicted age) and life satisfaction, depressive symptoms, resilience, alcohol consumption, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Brain-PAD showed significant negative correlations with life satisfaction (Spearman’s rs= −0.102, p  = 0.005) and resilience (rs= −0.105, p  = 0.004). In a multiple regression analysis, life satisfaction ( p  = 0.038), alcohol use ( p  = 0.040), and diabetes ( p  = 0.002) were independently correlated with Brain-PAD. Thus, in the cognitively unimpaired elderly, higher life satisfaction was associated with a ‘younger’ brain, whereas diabetes and alcohol use had negative impacts on life satisfaction. Subjective life satisfaction, as well as the prevention of diabetes and alcohol use, may protect the brain from accelerated aging.