Explore the vast range of titles available.

Objectives The present study aimed to evaluate the frequencies of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations and their possible associations with clinicopathological features in 249 Moroccan patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods A retrospective investigation of a cohort of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of 249 patients with CRC was screened for KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations using Idylla™ technology and pyrosequencing. Results KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations were revealed in 46.6% (116/249), 5.6% (14/249), and 2.4% (6/249) of patients. KRAS exon 2 mutations were identified in 87.9% of patients (102/116). KRAS G12D and G12 C were the most frequent, at 32.8% and 12.93%, respectively. Among the patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type (wt), 27.6% (32/116) harbored additional KRAS mutations. Concurrent KRAS mutations were identified in 9.5% (11/116); including six in codon 146 (A146P/T/V), three in codon 61 (Q61H/L/R), one in codon 12 (G12 A and Q61H), and one in codon 13 (G13D and Q61 L). Among the NRAS exon 2 wt patients, 64.3% (9/14) harbored additional NRAS mutations. Concurrent NRAS mutations were identified in 28.6% (4/14) of NRAS-mutant patients. Since 3.2% wt KRAS were identified with NRAS mutations, concomitant KRAS and NRAS mutations were identified in 2.4% (6/249) of patients. KRAS mutations were higher in the >50-year-old age-group (P = .031), and the tumor location was revealed to be significantly associated with KRAS mutations (P = .028) predominantly in left colon (27.5%) and colon (42.2%) locations. NRAS mutations were most prevalent in the left colon (42.8%) and in well-differentiated tumors (64.2%). Conclusion Detection of KRAS mutations, particularly the G12 C subtype, may be significant for patients with CRC and has possible therapeutic implications. However, rare KRAS concomitant mutations in CRC patients suggest that each individual may present distinct therapeutic responses. KRAS testing alongside the identification of other affected genes in the same patient will make the treatments even more personalized by contributing more accurately to the clinical decision process. Overall, early diagnosis using novel molecular techniques may improve the management of CRC by providing the most efficient therapies for Moroccan patients.

Background Our review discuss (i) the findings from analyzed data that have examined KRAS , NRAS and BRAF mutations in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in North Africa and to compare its prevalence with that shown in other populations and (ii) the possible role of dietary and lifestyle factors with CRC risk.  Methods Using electronic databases, a systematic literature search was performed for the KRAS ,  NRAS , and  BRAF mutations in CRC patients from Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria and Lybia.  Results Seventeen studies were identified through electronic searches with six studies conducted in Morocco, eight in Tunisia, two in Algeria, and one in Libya. A total of 1843 CRC patients were included 576 (31.3%) in Morocco, 641 (34.8%) in Tunisia, 592 (32.1%) in Algeria, and 34 (1.8%) in Libya. Overall, the average age of patients was 52.7 years old. Patients were predominantly male (56.6%). The mutation rates of KRAS , NRAS and BRAF were 46.4%, 3.2% and 3.5% of all patients, respectively. A broad range of reported KRAS mutation frequencies have been reported in North Africa countries. The KRAS  mutation frequency was 23.9% to 51% in Morocco, 23.1% to 68.2% in Tunisia, 31.4% to 50% in Algeria, and 38.2% in Libya. The G12D was the most frequently identified KRAS exon 2 mutations (31.6%), followed by G12V (25.4%), G13D (15.5%), G12C (10.2%), G12A (6.9%), and G12S (6.4%). G12R, G13V, G13C and G13R are less than 5%. There are important differences among North Africa countries. In Morocco and Tunisia, there is a higher prevalence of G12D mutation in KRAS exon 2 (≈50%). The most frequently mutation type in KRAS exon 3 was Q61L (40%). A59T and Q61E mutations were also found. In KRAS exon 4, the most common mutation was A146T (50%), followed by K117N (33.3%), A146P (8.3%) and A146V (8.3%). Conclusion KRAS mutated CRC patients in North Africa have been identified with incidence closer to the European figures. Beside established anti-CRC treatment, better understanding of the causality of CRC can be established by combining epidemiology and genetic/epigenetic on CRC etiology. This approach may be able to significantly reduce the burden of CRC in North Africa.

Objectives We retrospectively analyzed the next-generation sequencing (NGS) results from diagnosed NSCLC patients to identify and compare genomic alterations of NSCLC between Moroccan patients and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We also aimed to investigate the distribution and frequency of concurrent genomic alterations. Methods From December 2022 to December 2023, a retrospective study of 76 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples have been profiled using the Oncomine™ Precision Assay on the Ion Torrent™ Genexus™ Integrated Sequencer across the panel of 50 key genes that are applicable for the selection of targeted therapy. Results Seventy of the 76 FFPE sequenced samples carried at least one genetic alteration in the tested genes. The study identified 234 genetic alterations in 18 genes. Targetable genetic alterations in EGFR, KRAS, MET, BRAF, ALK, RET and ROS1 were identified in 84.3% of tumors. EGFR and KRAS mutations were frequently reported, occurring in 24.3% and 22.9% of cases, respectively. The untargetable genetic alterations were found in 74.3% of the specimens in FGFR3, TP53, ERBB2, PIK3CA, CDKN2A, PDL1, FGFR1, PTEN, CHEK2 and ERBB3. There were additional uncommon/rare mutations in EGFR, BRAF, RET and ROS1. Comparing the prevalence of selected mutated genes in the NSCLC patients from the TCGA database identified substantial differences in EGFR (24.3%, vs14.97%), KRAS (22.9%, vs 25.99%), and TP53 (34.3%, vs 50.94%). ALK, ROS1, and RET gene rearrangements were detected in 4.3% of the 70 tumors tested. The ALK/RET/MET/ROS1/EML4 fusions were detected in 11.4% of samples. Co-alterations occurred in 67.1% of specimens. Co-occurring driver gene mutations were observed in 44.3%. TP53 mutations co-occurred driver gene mutations in 30% of tumors. Three cases (4.3%) harbored concurrent FGFR3, TP53, and PIK3CA alterations. Conclusion Our results regarding the proportion of samples with actionable mutations demonstrate the value of NGS testing for NSCLC patients in a real-world clinical diagnostic setting.

Background: The Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) gene, specifically the cysteine residue mutation KRAS (G12C), has garnered significant attention as a therapeutic target for solid cancer patients with KRAS mutations. Despite this interest, the efficacy and safety profiles of KRAS G12C inhibitors remain incompletely understood. In this study, we comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of relevant KRAS G12C inhibitors (Sotorasib, Adagrasib, Garsorasib, and Divarasib) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC). Methods: Our systematic review is guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We review the available clinical trials data on KRAS G12C inhibitors in KRAS G12C-mutated solid tumors. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and major international conferences for clinical trials from January 2020 until August 2023. Results: A total of 17 eligible studies were included. KRAS G12C inhibitions with Sotorasib (41.2%) and Adagrasib (41.2%) each of them were reported in 7 studies. Divarasib was reported in 2 studies (11.8%) and Garsorasib was reported in 1 study (6.7%). Sotorasib showed a significant clinical benefit in terms of objective response rate (ORR) (7.1%-47%), progression-free survival (PFS) (4-6.8 months), and overall survival (OS) (4-24 months); it is more efficient in NSCLC patients with an OS of 2 years, PFS of 6.3 months, and an ORR of 41%. Adagrasib also showed significant clinical activity with an ORR (19%-53%), PFS (3.3-11.1 months), and OS (10.5-23.4 months), with more effectiveness in NSCLC patients with an OS of 23.4 months, PFS of 11.1 months, and an ORR of 53.3%. Adagrasib is more efficient with an ORR of 35.1%, PFS of 7.4 months, and an OS of 14 months in patients with PDAC, than Sotorasib which showed an ORR of 21%, PFS of 4 months, and an OS of 6.9 months. However, Adagrasib and Sotorasib are moderately efficient in CRC clinical trials. Conclusion: This study confirms that patients treated with these KRAS G12C inhibitors, exclusively or combined with conventional therapies, achieve better treatment responses and modulate the progressions of these solid tumors.

Background: This review article aims to investigate the prevalence and spectrum of rat sarcoma (RAS) and V-Raf Murine Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog B (BRAF) mutations, and their connection with geographical location, clinicopathological features, and other relevant factors in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in the Middle East. Methods: A systematic literature review, employing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework, was conducted to investigate the association between the frequency of relevant mutations and the descriptive clinicopathological characteristics of CRC patients. Multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, were searched to analyze the relevant literature. Results: A total of 19 eligible studies comprising 2960 patients with CRC were included in this review. A comprehensive analysis of the collected literature data as well as descriptive and methodological insights is provided. Men were predominant in reviewed studies for the region, accounting for 58.6%. Overall, RAS mutation prevalence was 38.1%. Kirsten RAS Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) mutations were the most common, accounting for 37.1% of cases and distributed among different exons, with the G12D mutation being the most frequent in exon 2 (23.2%) followed by G12V (13.7%), G13D (10.1%), G12C (5.1%), G12A (5.04%), and G12S (3.6%). Neuroblastoma RAS Viral Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) mutations were identified in 3.3% of tumor samples, with the most common mutation site located in exons 2, 3, and 4, and codon 61 being the most common location for the region. The total mutation frequency in the BRAF gene was 2.6%, with the V600E mutation being the most common. Conclusion: The distribution patterns of RAS and BRAF mutations among CRC patients exhibit notable variations across diverse ethnic groups. Our study sheds light on this phenomenon by demonstrating a higher prevalence of KRAS mutations in CRC patients from the Middle East, as compared with those from other regions. The identification of these mutations and geographical differences is important for personalized treatment planning and could potentially aid in the development of novel targeted therapies. The distinct distribution patterns of RAS and BRAF mutations among CRC patients across different ethnic groups, as well as the regional variability in mutation prevalence, highlight the need for further research in this area.

Background: The Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) gene, specifically the cysteine residue mutation KRAS (G12C), has garnered significant attention as a therapeutic target for solid cancer patients with KRAS mutations. Despite this interest, the efficacy and safety profiles of KRAS G12C inhibitors remain incompletely understood. In this study, we comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of relevant KRAS G12C inhibitors (Sotorasib, Adagrasib, Garsorasib, and Divarasib) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC). Methods: Our systematic review is guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We review the available clinical trials data on KRAS G12C inhibitors in KRAS G12C-mutated solid tumors. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and major international conferences for clinical trials from January 2020 until August 2023. Results: A total of 17 eligible studies were included. KRAS G12C inhibitions with Sotorasib (41.2%) and Adagrasib (41.2%) each of them were reported in 7 studies. Divarasib was reported in 2 studies (11.8%) and Garsorasib was reported in 1 study (6.7%). Sotorasib showed a significant clinical benefit in terms of objective response rate (ORR) (7.1%-47%), progression-free survival (PFS) (4-6.8 months), and overall survival (OS) (4-24 months); it is more efficient in NSCLC patients with an OS of 2 years, PFS of 6.3 months, and an ORR of 41%. Adagrasib also showed significant clinical activity with an ORR (19%-53%), PFS (3.3-11.1 months), and OS (10.5-23.4 months), with more effectiveness in NSCLC patients with an OS of 23.4 months, PFS of 11.1 months, and an ORR of 53.3%. Adagrasib is more efficient with an ORR of 35.1%, PFS of 7.4 months, and an OS of 14 months in patients with PDAC, than Sotorasib which showed an ORR of 21%, PFS of 4 months, and an OS of 6.9 months. However, Adagrasib and Sotorasib are moderately efficient in CRC clinical trials. Conclusion: This study confirms that patients treated with these KRAS G12C inhibitors, exclusively or combined with conventional therapies, achieve better treatment responses and modulate the progressions of these solid tumors.

Background: This review article aims to investigate the prevalence and spectrum of rat sarcoma (RAS) and V-Raf Murine Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog B (BRAF) mutations, and their connection with geographical location, clinicopathological features, and other relevant factors in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in the Middle East. Methods: A systematic literature review, employing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework, was conducted to investigate the association between the frequency of relevant mutations and the descriptive clinicopathological characteristics of CRC patients. Multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, were searched to analyze the relevant literature. Results: A total of 19 eligible studies comprising 2960 patients with CRC were included in this review. A comprehensive analysis of the collected literature data as well as descriptive and methodological insights is provided. Men were predominant in reviewed studies for the region, accounting for 58.6%. Overall, RAS mutation prevalence was 38.1%. Kirsten RAS Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) mutations were the most common, accounting for 37.1% of cases and distributed among different exons, with the G12D mutation being the most frequent in exon 2 (23.2%) followed by G12V (13.7%), G13D (10.1%), G12C (5.1%), G12A (5.04%), and G12S (3.6%). Neuroblastoma RAS Viral Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) mutations were identified in 3.3% of tumor samples, with the most common mutation site located in exons 2, 3, and 4, and codon 61 being the most common location for the region. The total mutation frequency in the BRAF gene was 2.6%, with the V600E mutation being the most common. Conclusion: The distribution patterns of RAS and BRAF mutations among CRC patients exhibit notable variations across diverse ethnic groups. Our study sheds light on this phenomenon by demonstrating a higher prevalence of KRAS mutations in CRC patients from the Middle East, as compared with those from other regions. The identification of these mutations and geographical differences is important for personalized treatment planning and could potentially aid in the development of novel targeted therapies. The distinct distribution patterns of RAS and BRAF mutations among CRC patients across different ethnic groups, as well as the regional variability in mutation prevalence, highlight the need for further research in this area.

Objectives The present study aimed to evaluate the frequencies of KRAS , NRAS, and BRAF mutations and their possible associations with clinicopathological features in 249 Moroccan patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods A retrospective investigation of a cohort of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of 249 patients with CRC was screened for KRAS / NRAS / BRAF mutations using Idylla™ technology and pyrosequencing. Results KRAS , NRAS, and BRAF mutations were revealed in 46.6% (116/249), 5.6% (14/249), and 2.4% (6/249) of patients. KRAS exon 2 mutations were identified in 87.9% of patients (102/116). KRAS G12D and G12 C were the most frequent, at 32.8% and 12.93%, respectively. Among the patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type (wt), 27.6% (32/116) harbored additional KRAS mutations. Concurrent KRAS mutations were identified in 9.5% (11/116); including six in codon 146 (A146P/T/V), three in codon 61 (Q61H/L/R), one in codon 12 (G12 A and Q61H), and one in codon 13 (G13D and Q61 L). Among the NRAS exon 2 wt patients, 64.3% (9/14) harbored additional NRAS mutations. Concurrent NRAS mutations were identified in 28.6% (4/14) of NRAS -mutant patients. Since 3.2% wt KRAS were identified with NRAS mutations, concomitant KRAS and NRAS mutations were identified in 2.4% (6/249) of patients. KRAS mutations were higher in the >50-year-old age-group ( P = .031), and the tumor location was revealed to be significantly associated with KRAS mutations ( P = .028) predominantly in left colon (27.5%) and colon (42.2%) locations. NRAS mutations were most prevalent in the left colon (42.8%) and in well-differentiated tumors (64.2%). Conclusion Detection of KRAS mutations, particularly the G12 C subtype, may be significant for patients with CRC and has possible therapeutic implications. However, rare KRAS concomitant mutations in CRC patients suggest that each individual may present distinct therapeutic responses. KRAS testing alongside the identification of other affected genes in the same patient will make the treatments even more personalized by contributing more accurately to the clinical decision process. Overall, early diagnosis using novel molecular techniques may improve the management of CRC by providing the most efficient therapies for Moroccan patients.