Explore the vast range of titles available.

In acutely ill patients, 10 days of rivaroxaban was noninferior to 10 days of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis. Extended-duration rivaroxaban treatment (35 days) reduced the risk of venous thromboembolism. Rivaroxaban was associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Patients with active cancer, stroke, myocardial infarction, or acute exacerbations of a variety of medical conditions are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism. 1 Prolonged immobilization and risk factors such as an age older than 75 years, chronic heart failure, a history of venous thromboembolism, and obesity can increase this risk further. 2 , 3 Randomized, controlled trials involving hospitalized patients at increased risk for venous thromboembolism have shown the benefits of administering anticoagulant agents for up to 14 days, 4 – 8 and guidelines recommend the use of unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, or fondaparinux in such patients. 9 There is some evidence that the risk . . .

Acutely ill medical patients are at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE-related mortality during hospitalization and posthospital discharge, but widespread adoption of extended thromboprophylaxis has not occurred. We analyzed a subpopulation within the MAGELLAN study of extended thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban to reevaluate the benefit risk profile. We identified 5 risk factors for major and fatal bleeding after a clinical analysis of the MAGELLAN study and analyzed efficacy and safety with these patients excluded (n = 1551). Risk factors included: active cancer, dual antiplatelet therapy at baseline, bronchiectasis/pulmonary cavitation, gastroduodenal ulcer, or bleeding within 3 months before randomization. We evaluated efficacy, safety, and benefit risk using clinically comparable endpoints in the subpopulation. At day 10, rivaroxaban was noninferior to enoxaparin (relative risk [RR] = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-1.15) and at day 35 rivaroxaban was significantly better than enoxaparin/placebo (RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.53-0.88) in reducing VTE and VTE-related death. Major bleeding was reduced at day 10 (RR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.07-4.44 vs 1.19, 95% CI = 0.54-2.65) and at day 35 (2.87, 95% CI = 1.60-5.15 vs 1.48, 95% CI = 0.77-2.84) for MAGELLAN versus this subpopulation, respectively. The benefit risk profile was favorable in this subpopulation treated for 35 days, with the number needed to treat ranging from 55 to 481 and number needed to harm from 455 to 1067 for all pairwise evaluations. Five exclusionary criteria defined a subpopulation of acutely ill medical patients with a positive benefit risk profile for in-hospital and extended thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban.

Research into new anticoagulants for preventing and treating thromboembolic disorders has focused on targeting single enzymes in the coagulation cascade, particularly Factor Xa and thrombin, inhibition of which greatly decreases thrombin generation. Based on the results of phase III clinical trials, rivaroxaban, a direct Factor Xa inhibitor, has been approved in many countries for the management of several thromboembolic disorders. Owing to its predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, fixed-dose regimens are used without the need for routine coagulation monitoring. In situations where assessment of rivaroxaban exposure may be helpful, anti-Factor Xa chromogenic assays (in tandem with standard calibration curves generated with the use of rivaroxaban calibrators and controls) could be used. It is important to note that test results will be affected by the timing of blood sampling after rivaroxaban intake. In addition, the anti-Factor Xa method measures the drug concentration and not the intensity of the drug’s anticoagulant activity, and a higher than expected rivaroxaban plasma level does not necessarily indicate an increased risk of bleeding complications. Therefore, clinicians need to consider test results in relation to the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban and other patient risk factors associated with bleeding.

Patients with heart failure, coronary artery disease, and no atrial fibrillation were randomly assigned to receive 2.5 mg of rivaroxaban twice daily or placebo. Rivaroxaban did not have a significant effect on the composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.

Prothrombin time (PT) is a measure of coagulation status and was assessed in the majority of patients in the rivaroxaban phase II and III clinical trials as a pharmacodynamic marker. In the absence of sufficient phase III pharmacokinetic (PK) data to provide individual exposure measures for input into rivaroxaban exposure–response analyses, the aim of the present study was to investigate the use of PT‐adjustment approaches (i.e., the use of observed individual PT measurements) to enhance the prediction of individual rivaroxaban exposure metrics (derived using a previously developed integrated population PK model) based on the observed linear relationship between PT and rivaroxaban plasma concentrations. The PT‐adjustment approaches were established using time‐matched PK and PT measurements, which were available from 1,779 patients across four phase II trials and one phase III trial of rivaroxaban. PT‐adjusted exposure estimates improved the identification of statistically significant effects when compared with covariate‐only exposure estimates.

BackgroundPatients undergoing hip or knee joint replacement are at risk for venous thromboembolic complications for up to twelve weeks postoperatively. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a prolonged post-hospital regimen of enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, in this patient population.MethodsFollowing elective total hip or knee replacement, 968 patients received subcutaneous enoxaparin (30 mg twice daily) for seven to ten days, and 873 were then randomized to receive three weeks of double-blind outpatient treatment with either enoxaparin (40 mg once daily) or a placebo. The primary efficacy end point was the prevalence of objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism or symptomatic pulmonary embolism during the double-blind phase of treatment.ResultsOf the 873 randomized patients, 435 underwent elective total hip replacement and 438 underwent elective total knee replacement. Enoxaparin was superior to the placebo in reducing the prevalence of venous thromboembolism in patients treated with hip replacement8.0% (eighteen) of the 224 patients treated with enoxaparin had venous thromboembolism compared with 23.2% (forty-nine) of the 211 patients treated with the placebo (p < 0.001; odds ratio, 3.62; 95% confidence interval, 2.00 to 6.55; relative risk reduction, 65.5%). Enoxaparin had no significant benefit in the patients treated with knee replacementthirty-eight (17.5%) of the 217 patients treated with enoxaparin had venous thromboembolism compared with forty-six (20.8%) of the 221 patients treated with the placebo (p = 0.380; odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.76 to 2.02; relative risk reduction, 15.9%). Symptomatic pulmonary embolism developed in three patients, one with a hip replacement and two with a knee replacement; all had received the placebo. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of hemorrhagic episodes or other types of toxicity between the enoxaparin and placebo-treated groups.ConclusionsProlonging enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis following hip replacement for a total of four weeks provided therapeutic benefit, by reducing the prevalence of venous thromboembolism, without compromising safety. A similar benefit was not observed in patients treated with knee replacement.

This study evaluated the prothrombin time (PT) assay for the measurement of plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban using calibrators and controls. The intra- and interlaboratory precision of the measurement was investigated in a field trial involving 21 laboratories. Each laboratory was provided with rivaroxaban calibrators and control plasma samples containing different concentrations of rivaroxaban, and PT reagents. The evaluation was carried out over 2 consecutive weeks using centrally provided and local PT reagents. A calibration curve was produced each day (for inter-run precision), and day-to-day precision was evaluated by testing 3 control plasma samples. A large interlaboratory variation (in seconds) was observed with local PT reagents. The results were less variable when expressed as rivaroxaban concentrations (ng/mL) or when central PT reagent was used (STA Neoplastine CI Plus). The widely available PT assay, in conjunction with rivaroxaban calibrators, may be useful for the measurement of peak plasma levels of rivaroxaban.

Anticoagulant plasma concentrations and patient characteristics might affect the benefit–risk balance of therapy. The study objective was to assess the impact of model-predicted rivaroxaban exposure and patient characteristics on outcomes in patients receiving rivaroxaban for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis (VTE-P) after hip/knee replacement surgery. Post hoc exposure–response analyses were conducted using data from the phase 3 RECORD1–4 studies, in which 12,729 patients were randomized to rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily or enoxaparin for ≤ 39 days. Multivariate regression approaches were used to correlate model-predicted individual rivaroxaban exposures and patient characteristics with outcomes. In the absence of measured rivaroxaban exposure, exposure estimates were predicted based on individual increases in prothrombin time (PT) and by making use of the known correlation between rivaroxaban plasma concentration and dynamics of PT. No significant associations between rivaroxaban exposure and total VTE or major bleeding were identified. A significant association between exposure and a composite of major or non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding from day 4 after surgery was observed. The relationship was shallow, with an approximate predicted absolute increase in a composite of major or NMCR bleeding from 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76–1.54] to 2.18% (95% CI 1.51–3.17) at the 5th and 95th percentiles of trough plasma concentration, respectively. In conclusion, based on the underlying data and analysis, no reliable target window for exposure with improved benefit–risk could be identified within the investigated exposure range. Hence, monitoring rivaroxaban levels is unlikely to be beneficial in VTE-P.

This study evaluated the prothrombin time (PT) assay for the measurement of plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban using calibrators and controls. The intra- and interlaboratory precision of the measurement was investigated in a field trial involving 21 laboratories. Each laboratory was provided with rivaroxaban calibrators and control plasma samples containing different concentrations of rivaroxaban, and PT reagents. The evaluation was carried out over 2 consecutive weeks using centrally provided and local PT reagents. A calibration curve was produced each day (for inter-run precision), and day-to-day precision was evaluated by testing 3 control plasma samples. A large interlaboratory variation (in seconds) was observed with local PT reagents. The results were less variable when expressed as rivaroxaban concentrations (ng/mL) or when central PT reagent was used (STA Neoplastine CI Plus). The widely available PT assay, in conjunction with rivaroxaban calibrators, may be useful for the measurement of peak plasma levels of rivaroxaban.

To the Editor: As a follow-up to the article by Cohen et al. (Feb. 7 issue) 1 examining the role of oral rivaroxaban, as compared with subcutaneous enoxaparin, in the thromboprophylaxis of patients with acute medical illnesses: we report a 24-year-old man with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who was treated with enoxaparin (40 mg subcutaneously daily) for thromboprophylaxis. Because of worsening thrombocytopenia, the patient was switched from enoxaparin to rivaroxaban (10 mg per day). The patient's thrombocytopenia improved, but 2 weeks after the initiation of therapy, a sudden deterioration in alertness and mental status was noted. Urgent computed tomography . . .