Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
Content TypeContent Type
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectPublisherSourceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
398
result(s) for
"Sridhar, Devi"
Sort by:
Preventable : how a pandemic changed the world & how to stop the next one
Professor Devi Sridhar has risen to prominence for her vital roles in communicating science to the public and speaking truth to power. In 'Preventable' she highlights lessons learned from outbreaks past and present in a narrative that traces the COVID-19 pandemic - including her personal experience as a scientist - and sets out a vision for how we can better protect ourselves from the inevitable health crises to come.
COVID-19: what health experts could and could not predict
2020
Nearly a year after the first cases of COVID-19 were reported, it is time to look back and assess what could have been predicted by health experts.
Journal Article
Governing global health : who runs the world and why?
\"Chelsea Clinton and Devi Sridhar [believe that global health public-private partnerships] are not only important for combating infectious diseases; they also provide models for developing solutions to a host of other serious global health challenges and questions beyond health. But what do we actually know about the accountability and effectiveness of PPPs in relation to the traditional multilaterals? According to Clinton and Sridhar, we have known very little because scholars have not accumulated enough data or developed effective ways to assess them--until now\"--Amazon.com.
Who Sets the Global Health Research Agenda? The Challenge of Multi-Bi Financing
2012
As part of a cluster of articles critically reflecting on the theme of “no health without research,” Devi Sridhar discusses a major challenge in the governance of research funding: “multi-bi” financing that allows the priorities of funding bodies to dictate what health issues and diseases are studied.
Journal Article
Diagnosing the undiagnosed—what happened to PIMS?
2025
Adriel Chen and Devi Sridhar discuss the outbreak of Paediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome in 2020 and consider what lessons we can learn
Journal Article
How can we improve self-isolation and quarantine for covid-19?
by
Sridhar, Devi
,
Fernandes, Genevie
,
Patel, Jay
in
Coronaviruses
,
COVID-19
,
COVID-19 - epidemiology
2021
Jay Patel and colleagues examine international approaches and argue for comprehensive support initiatives driven by local government and community based teams
Journal Article
Making the SDGs useful: a Herculean task
2016
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have been called “senseless, dreamy, garbled”,1 given that they include 17 goals, 169 targets, and 230 indicators, in contrast to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) that focused on eight goals, 18 targets, and 48 indicators. Among the earliest sceptics of the SDGs was the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which argued that any new goals should be specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, time bound, and easy to communicate.2
Journal Article
Who pays for cooperation in global health? A comparative analysis of WHO, the World Bank, the Global Fund to Fight HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance
2017
In this report we assess who pays for cooperation in global health through an analysis of the financial flows of WHO, the World Bank, the Global Fund to Fight HIV/AIDS, TB and Malaria, and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. The past few decades have seen the consolidation of influence in the disproportionate roles the USA, UK, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have had in financing three of these four institutions. Current financing flows in all four case study institutions allow donors to finance and deliver assistance in ways that they can more closely control and monitor at every stage. We highlight three major trends in global health governance more broadly that relate to this development: towards more discretionary funding and away from core or longer-term funding; towards defined multi-stakeholder governance and away from traditional government-centred representation and decision-making; and towards narrower mandates or problem-focused vertical initiatives and away from broader systemic goals.
Journal Article