Explore the vast range of titles available.

Hereditary angioedema is a rare disorder characterized by episodic, potentially life-threatening swelling caused by kallikrein-kinin dysregulation. Long-term prophylaxis can stabilize this system. Donidalorsen, an antisense oligonucleotide, specifically reduces prekallikrein expression. In this phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned patients with hereditary angioedema to receive donidalorsen (80 mg subcutaneously) or placebo once every 4 or 8 weeks. The primary end point was the time-normalized number of investigator-confirmed hereditary angioedema attacks per 4 weeks (attack rate) from week 1 to week 25. A total of 90 patients received donidalorsen every 4 weeks (45 patients), donidalorsen every 8 weeks (23 patients), or placebo (22 patients). The least-squares mean time-normalized attack rate was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.73) in the 4-week group, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.59) in the 8-week group, and 2.26 (95% CI, 1.66 to 3.09) in the placebo group. The mean attack rate from week 1 to week 25 was 81% lower (95% CI, 65 to 89) in the 4-week group than in the placebo group (P<0.001) and 55% lower (95% CI, 22 to 74) in the 8-week group than in the placebo group (P = 0.004); the median reduction in the attack rate from baseline was 90% in the 4-week group, 83% in the 8-week group, and 16% in the placebo group. The mean attack rate during weeks 5 to 25 was 87% lower (95% CI, 72 to 94) in the 4-week group than in the placebo group (P<0.001) and 60% lower (95% CI, 25 to 79) in the 8-week group than in the placebo group. Donidalorsen administered every 4 weeks resulted in an improvement in the least-squares mean total score for the change at week 25 on the Angioedema Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (scores range from 0 to 100, with a score of 100 indicating the worst possible quality of life) that was 18.6 points (95% CI, 9.5 to 27.7) better than that with placebo (P<0.001). The most common adverse events were erythema at the injection site, headache, and nasopharyngitis; 98% of adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. Donidalorsen treatment reduced the hereditary angioedema attack rate, a finding that supports potential prophylactic use for hereditary angioedema. (Funded by Ionis Pharmaceuticals; OASIS-HAE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05139810.).

Background Berotralstat (BCX7353) is an oral, once‐daily inhibitor of plasma kallikrein recently approved for prevention of angioedema attacks in adults and adolescents with hereditary angioedema (HAE). The objective of this report is to summarize results from an interim analysis of an ongoing long‐term safety study of berotralstat in patients with HAE. Methods APeX‐S is an ongoing, phase 2, open‐label study conducted in 22 countries (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03472040). Eligible patients with a clinical diagnosis of HAE due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE‐C1‐INH) were centrally allocated to receive berotralstat 150 or 110 mg once daily. The primary objective was to determine long‐term safety and the secondary objective was to evaluate effectiveness. Results Enrolled patients (N = 227) received berotralstat 150 mg (n = 127) or 110 mg (n = 100) once daily. The median (range) duration of exposure was 342 (11–540) and 307 (14–429) days for the 150‐mg and 110‐mg groups, respectively. Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 91% (n = 206) of patients. The most common TEAEs across treatment groups were upper respiratory tract infection (n = 91, 40%), abdominal pain (n = 57, 25%), headache (n = 40, 18%), and diarrhea (n = 31, 14%) and were mostly mild to moderate. Fifty percent (n = 113) of patients had at least one drug‐related adverse event (AE; 150 mg, n = 57 [45%]; 110 mg, n = 56 [56%]), and discontinuations due to AEs occurred in 19 (8%) patients (150 mg, n = 13 [10%]; 110 mg, n = 6 [6%]). Three (1.3%) patients experienced a drug‐related serious TEAE. Among patients who received berotralstat through 48 weeks (150 mg, n = 73; 110 mg, n = 30), median HAE attack rates were low in month 1 (150 mg, 1.0 attacks/month; 110 mg, 0.5 attacks/month) and remained low through 12 months (0 attacks/month in both dose groups). Mean HAE attack rates followed a similar trend, and no evidence for patient tolerance to berotralstat emerged. In both dose groups, angioedema quality of life scores showed clinically meaningful changes from baseline. Conclusions In this analysis, both berotralstat doses, 150  and 110 mg once daily, were generally well tolerated. Effectiveness results support the durability and robustness of berotralstat as prophylactic therapy in patients with HAE. Trial registration The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03472040).

Donidalorsen, a prekallikrein-directed antisense oligonucleotide indicated for prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks in patients aged ≥12 years, demonstrated efficacy and acceptable safety in the phase 3, placebo-controlled OASIS-HAE trial (NCT05139810). Here, we report 1-year results from the corresponding open-label extension (OLE) cohort of the OASISplus study (NCT05392114). OASISplus included patients who rolled over from OASIS-HAE. Patients who received donidalorsen 80 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks (Q4W) in OASIS-HAE received donidalorsen Q4W in OASISplus. Patients who received donidalorsen 80 mg or placebo every 8 weeks (Q8W) in OASIS-HAE received donidalorsen Q8W or Q4W, if not attack-free in the final 8 weeks of OASIS-HAE. The primary endpoint was safety (ie, incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]). Secondary endpoints included the monthly rate of HAE attacks and Angioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL). The OLE cohort included 83 patients (Q4W, n=69 [83%]; Q8W, n=14 [17%]). Of these, 75 (90.4%) completed Year 1, and 6 patients receiving donidalorsen Q8W in OASIS-HAE switched to the Q4W dosing group in the OLE. Median donidalorsen exposure was 392.3 days. From Weeks 0 to 52, reductions in mean HAE attack rate from OASIS-HAE baseline were 94% (Q4W) and 95% (Q8W), and patients reported clinically meaningful improvements in mean AE-QoL total score at Week 52 (Q4W, 28.1 points; Q8W, 26.7 points). Twenty-two (27%) patients reported treatment-related TEAEs; none were serious, and injection-site reactions were the most frequently reported. Donidalorsen demonstrated sustained reductions in HAE attack rate, improvements in QoL, and an acceptable safety profile after 1 year of treatment.

Background Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare inherited disorder characterized by unpredictable and potentially life‐threatening attacks of swelling. This international Delphi panel aimed to address questions related to on‐demand treatment of HAE attacks. Methods A modified Delphi method was conducted with three rounds of surveys. Two non‐voting co‐chairs designed and managed the surveys, data collection, and analysis with a third‐party administrator. The international panel consisted of 19 expert HAE clinicians. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement with ≥ 75% of panelists voting. Results The panel confirmed 24 statements across five key areas related to on‐demand treatment: defining “early” treatment, barriers to early administration, burden of treatment, tolerability and convenience, and patient–clinician interactions. Panelists defined early treatment as ≤ 60 min after onset of an HAE attack. Obstacles to early treatment include recognition of an HAE attack, and embarrassment/anxiety about administering parenteral treatment. Access to on‐demand treatment (i.e., carrying medication, cost, insurance coverage, regulatory approval) can be a burden for patients with HAE, and increasing access may improve adherence to guidelines. Logistical obstacles of parenteral administration that impact convenience, tolerability concerns (e.g., side effects), and cost of medication can all limit early use of on‐demand treatment. Additional options for on‐demand therapies beyond parenteral treatments could reduce some of the burdens. Panelists agreed that patient–physician shared decision‐making should be utilized. Conclusions The Delphi consensus statements demonstrate the need for accessible and convenient on‐demand treatments for HAE attacks that will enable patients with HAE to improve adherence to guidelines.

In this trial involving 264 hereditary angioedema attacks, oral sebetralstat provided faster times to the beginning of symptom relief, reduction in attack severity, and complete attack resolution than placebo.

Guidelines recommend effective on-demand therapy for all individuals with hereditary angioedema. We aimed to assess the novel oral plasma kallikrein inhibitor, sebetralstat, which is in development, for on-demand treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks. In this two-part phase 2 trial, individuals with type 1 or 2 hereditary angioedema aged 18 years or older were recruited from 25 sites, consisting of specialty outpatient centres, across nine countries in Europe and the USA. Individuals were eligible if they had experienced at least three hereditary angioedema attacks in the past 93 days, were not on prophylactic therapy, and had access to and the ability to self-administer conventional attack treatment. In part 1 of the trial, participants were given a single 600 mg open-label oral dose of sebetralstat to assess safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the dose. Part 2 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-sequence, two-period (2 × 2) crossover trial; participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either sequence 1, in which they were given a single dose of 600 mg of sebetralstat to treat the first eligible attack and a second dose of placebo to treat the second eligible attack, or sequence 2, in which they were given placebo to treat the first eligible attack and then 600 mg of sebetralstat to treat the second eligible attack. Participants and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was time to use of conventional attack treatment within 12 h of study drug administration, which was assessed in all participants who were randomly assigned to treatment and who received study drug for two attacks during part 2 of the study. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, starting in part 1. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04208412, and is completed. Between July 2, 2019, and Dec 8, 2020, 84 individuals were screened and 68 were enrolled in part 1 and received sebetralstat (mean age 38·3 years [SD 13·2], 37 [54%] were female, 31 [46%] were male, 68 [100%] were White). 42 (62%) of 68 participants completed pharmacokinetic assessments. Sebetralstat was rapidly absorbed, with a geometric mean plasma concentration of 501 ng/mL at 15 min. In a subset of participants (n=6), plasma samples obtained from 15 min to 4 h after study drug administration had near-complete protection from ex vivo stimulated generation of plasma kallikrein and cleavage of high-molecular-weight kininogen. In part 2, all 68 participants were randomly assigned to sequence 1 (n=34) or sequence 2 (n=34). 53 (78%) of 68 participants treated two attacks (25 [74%] in the sequence 1 group and 28 [82%] in the sequence 2 group). Time to use of conventional treatment within 12 h of study drug administration was significantly longer with sebetralstat versus placebo (at quartile 1: >12 h [95% CI 9·6 to >12] vs 8·0 h [3·8 to >12]; p=0·0010). There were no serious adverse events or adverse event-related discontinuations. Oral administration of sebetralstat was well tolerated and led to rapid suppression of plasma kallikrein activity, resulting in increased time to use of conventional attack treatment and faster symptom relief versus placebo. Based on these results, a phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two dose levels of sebetralstat in adolescent and adult participants with hereditary angioedema has been initiated (NCT05259917). KalVista Pharmaceuticals.

Long-term prophylaxis (LTP) has been shown to reduce the frequency of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks; however, attacks occurring in patients receiving LTP have not been well characterized. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the proportion of type I/II HAE (HAE-C1INH) patients who experience attacks while receiving LTP, the characteristics of these attacks, and associated on-demand therapy use. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed to identify studies reporting LTP use with plasma-derived C1 inhibitor (pdC1INH), lanadelumab, berotralstat, androgens, or antifibrinolytics in patients with HAE-C1INH. Forty-five primary studies met the inclusion criteria. In phase 3 trials, attack-free rates were 40% for subcutaneous pdC1INH 60 IU/kg twice weekly at 16 weeks, and 44% for lanadelumab 300 mg every second week at 6 months (77% during steady-state [days 70–182]); there was no difference in attack-free rate for berotralstat 150 mg versus placebo at 24 weeks. Phase 3 studies reported a lower average attack severity with subcutaneous and intravenous pdC1INH versus placebo. With lanadelumab and berotralstat, the prophylactic treatment effect was more pronounced in peripheral attacks than in abdominal and laryngeal attacks. Laryngeal attacks accounted for 2%-7% of all attacks in observational and interventional studies, regardless of the LTP agent received. On-demand therapy was used in 49%-94% of attacks occurring in the presence of LTP. In conclusion, patients receiving LTP experienced attacks in all anatomic locations, including the larynx. Most attacks were treated with on-demand therapy, although outcomes were not reported. Access to on-demand therapy remains essential for all people with HAE-C1INH.

Introduction Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare inherited autosomal dominant disease caused by deficiency or dysfunction of C1 inhibitor (C1INH). Clinical symptoms include recurrent subcutaneous and submucosal angioedema of the internal organs. Abdominal attacks affect more than 90% of patients, are often misdiagnosed and result in unnecessary surgical procedures. Aim To analyse the utility of imaging studies (USG, CT) in patients with C1INH-HAE during an abdominal attack and remission. Material and methods We enrolled 40 patients with type I and II HAE (30 women, 10 men; mean age 39 years). The diagnosis of C1INH-HAE was based on patient and family history, significantly reduced values of C1INH serum level and activity. Abdominal and pelvic ultrasound were performed in patients within the first 6 hours of the abdominal attack and repeated during remission. Moreover, 23 cases underwent abdominal or pelvic computed tomography during acute abdominal symptoms. The most common ultrasound and CT findings showed the transient presence of a significant amount of fluid in the free abdominal cavity and intestinal oedema during the symptom progression and spontaneously disappearing during in 90% and 50% of patients, respectively. CT revealed also an enlargement of the mesenteric lymph nodes as well as a fat stranding along the bowel wall thickening. Conclusions Ultrasound or CT imaging facilitates the diagnosis of the patient suspected of having an abdominal attack due to C1INH-HAE. They allow to identify transitional presence of an abundant fluid in the free abdominal cavity and intestinal swelling which spontaneously disappear with a symptoms attack.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of skin and mucosal edema. The main treatment goal is to enable a “normal life” for all patients. However, due to high costs, there are limited options for the management of HAE in most developing and low-income countries. As a result, most of the recommended first-line treatments are not available. In this review, we attempt to highlight the disparities in health-care resources for the management of patients with HAE amongst different countries. Data was collected from HAE experts in countries who provide tabulated information regarding management and availability of HAE treatments in their countries. We reviewed the two most recent international HAE guidelines. Using India, the world’s second most populous country, as a paradigm for HAE management in lower-income countries, we reviewed the evidence for second-line and non-recommended practices reported by HAE experts. Results suggest significant inequities in provision of HAE services and treatments. HAE patients in low-income countries do not have access to life-saving acute drugs or recently developed highly effective prophylactic medications. Most low-income countries do not have specialized HAE services or diagnostic facilities, resulting in consequent long delays in diagnosis. Suggestions for optimizing the use of limited resources as a basis for future discussion and reaching a global consensus are provided. There is an urgent need to improve HAE services, diagnostics and treatments currently available to lower-income countries. We recommend that all HAE stakeholders support the need for global equity and access to these essential measures.

Introduction and objective: Evaluation of lanadelumab efficacy in preventing angioedema attacks in patients with severe hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency in Poland and descriptive analysis of this group of patients. Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of patients treated with lanadelumab in Poland. Data were acquired from the electronic database of the National Health Fund, compiled from 15 hereditary angioedema centres. Only patients with severe hereditary angioedema course (at least 12 severe – abdominal, pharyngeal or laryngeal – hereditary angioedema attacks per six months, requiring on-demand medications) initiated treatment. The patients received lanadelumab 300 mg every two weeks. The efficacy of the therapy was assessed after six months. Results: Lanadelumab was initiated in a total of 43 patients (group B). Twenty of them achieved the follow-up point after six months (group A). The mean age of the patients was 44 years. The majority (76.7%) were female and 79% had a family history of hereditary angioedema. Most patients (95.3%) had HAE-1 (absolute deficiency of C1-inhibitor). On average, within six months before treatment, group A patients experienced 19.7 (95% confidence interval, CI: 16.06–23.33) severe hereditary angioedema attacks. In the six months following treatment initiation, the number of attacks decreased to an average of 0.5 (95% CI: 0–1.0), with significant reductions in all types of hereditary angioedema attacks – abdominal (p < 0.0001), pharyngeal (p < 0.005), and laryngeal (p < 0.05). Utilisation of on-demand medications dropped from an average of 23.5 (95% CI: 16.7–30.3) to 0.5 standard therapeutic dose (95% CI: 0–1.1). Conclusions: The study highlights the therapeutic potential of lanadelumab in managing hereditary angioedema, usually offering patients a complete resolution of severe hereditary angioedema attacks and release from dependence on rescue medication. Our results support the current paradigm shift in hereditary angioedema treatment.