Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Series Title
      Series Title
      Clear All
      Series Title
  • Reading Level
      Reading Level
      Clear All
      Reading Level
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Content Type
    • Item Type
    • Is Full-Text Available
    • Subject
    • Country Of Publication
    • Publisher
    • Source
    • Target Audience
    • Donor
    • Language
    • Place of Publication
    • Contributors
    • Location
150 result(s) for "Stollberg-Rilinger, Barbara"
Sort by:
The Emperor's Old Clothes
For many years, scholars struggled to write the history of the constitution and political structure of the Holy Roman Empire. This book argues that this was because the political and social order could not be understood without considering the rituals and symbols that held the Empire together. What determined the rules (and whether they were followed) depended on complex symbolic-ritual actions. By examining key moments in the political history of the Empire, the author shows that it was a vocabulary of symbols, not the actual written laws, that formed a political language indispensable in maintaining the common order.
The Emperor's Old Clothes
For many years, scholars struggled to write the history of the constitution and political structure of the Holy Roman Empire. This book argues that this was because the political and social order could not be understood without considering the rituals and symbols that held the Empire together. What determined the rules (and whether they were followed) depended on complex symbolic-ritual actions. By examining key moments in the political history of the Empire, the author shows that it was a vocabulary of symbols, not the actual written laws, that formed a political language indispensable in maintaining the common order.
Maria Theresa and the Love of Her Subjects
I have been asked to speak about the life of the Empress-Queen Maria Theresa. I would like to start by directing your attention to the cover pictures of three recent biographies (Figures 1‒3). If you look at these pictures you will find one astonishing commonality. I am sure that this is neither a coincidence, nor just a fad: on each of the three covers, you only see a part of the portrait. For me, this perfectly symbolizes a specific, skeptical view of biography writing. As a biographer, these cover pictures say, you never get the whole picture of a person. It's always up to the author not only to choose the material but also to establish a certain narrative structure. A life is not a story, and a biography does not simply tell itself. There is always more than one true life story of a person. As the Swiss historian Valentin Groebner recently put it: “The past is a big untidy cellar. It is a bit damp and dark and smells a bit strange there. We go down and get what we want.” What you choose and how you arrange it—which story you tell—depends on which perspective you take and in what you are interested.
The Impact of Communication Theory on the Analysis of the Early Modern Statebuilding Processes
This chapter proposes a critical assessment of the heuristic potential of communication theory for research in political and constitutional history. Drawing on the theoretical premises of the work of Anthony Giddens, Roger Chartier, Pierre Bourdieu, Alfred Schütz, Ernst Cassirer, Peter Berger, Thomas Luckmann, Erving Goffman and also Niklas Luhmann, it puts forward some converging assumptions of communication theory which lead to an altered apprehension of the emergence and perpetuation of institutions as the result of communicative practices. Applied to the history of statebuilding, these theoretical influences 'blur established institutional categories and allow abstract structures to be seen as flexible social practices'. Communication theory furthermore enlarges our understanding of pre-modern institutionalization processes by increasing our attention to the basic structuring effect of symbolizations of all types. It also sharpens 'the sense for the internal logic of communicative action, for certain autonomy of the communicative dynamic with regard to the intentions and purposes of the actors', and teaches us to be sceptical about simple end-means models of action. Against the often-raised objection that the application of communication theory in historical research may induce the general deconstruction of the 'master narrative', this contribution states that, quite on the contrary, it offers the opportunity to bridge the gap between macro-history and micro-history.
Leibniz, der Höfling
Leibniz's work is of an almost immeasurable scope and just as great variety. His legacy is one of the most extensive scholarly legacies anywhere. Editing this work appropriately is a mammoth task that can only be accomplished in cross-generational collaboration within the framework of academies such as the Berlin-Brandenburg and Lower Saxony academies, a task that demands an almost unbelievable level of expertise from the editors, and in every conceivable field. It is also a demanding, arduous task that is usually carried out very quietly and with the greatest precision, and whose immeasurable benefit for all possible fields of research is inversely proportional to the fuss that is usually made about it. This work deserves the greatest respect and gratitude. It is therefore a very special honor for me to have the opportunity, on the occasion of the recent publication of two further volumes of the Political Writings, to say a little about what this Academy edition means for my own work. In view of the awe-inspiring \"cathedral\" of this complete edition1, however, this is, to stay with the metaphor, only a tiny little stone. I am anything but a Leibniz specialist. I cannot in any way compete with the expertise of my fellow editors. I am therefore speaking as a beneficiary of their work, not as a Leibniz researcher.
Editorial
Das Verhältnis von wissenschaftlicher Expertise, Politik und Recht erfährt – im Jahr I nach Corona – eine nie dagewesene Aufmerksamkeit. Aber schon bevor die aktuelle Krise alle anderen Themen in den Hintergrund gedrängt hat, beschäftigte ein anderer Fall die deutsche Öffentlichkeit, der ein nicht minder interessantes Schlaglicht auf die Rolle wissenschaftlichen Expertentums wirft.