Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
1 result(s) for "Stroebel, Maxwell H."
Sort by:
Optimization of window settings for standard and advanced virtual monoenergetic imaging in abdominal dual-energy CT angiography
Objectives To determine the optimal window setting for displaying virtual monoenergetic reconstructions of third generation dual-source, dual-energy CT (DECT) angiography of the abdomen. Methods Forty-five patients were evaluated with DECT angiography (90/150 kV, 180/90 ref. mAs). Three datasets were reconstructed: standard linear blending (M_0.6), 70 keV traditional virtual monoenergetic (M70), and 40 keV advanced noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic (M40+). The best window setting (width and level, W/L ) was assessed by two blinded observers and was correlated with aortic attenuation to obtain the Optimized W/L setting (O- W/L ). Subjective image quality was assessed, and vessel diameters were measured to determine any possible influences between different W/L settings. Repeated measures of variance were used to evaluate comparison of W/L values, image quality, and vessel sizing between M_0.6, M70, and M40+. Results The Best W/L (B- W/L ) for M70 and M40+ was 880/280 and 1410/450, respectively. Results from regression analysis inferred an O- W/L of 850/270 for M70 and 1350/430 for M40+. Significant differences for W and L were found between the Best and the Optimized W/L for M40+, and between M70 and M40+ for both the Best and Optimized W / L . No significant differences for vessel measurements were found using the O- W / L for M40+ compared to the standard M_0.6 ( p  ≥ 0.16), and significant differences were observed when using the B- W / L with M40+ compared to M_0.6 ( p  ≤ 0.04). Conclusion In order to optimize virtual monoenergetic imaging with both traditional M70 and advanced M40+, adjusting the W / L settings is necessary. Our results suggest a W / L setting of 850/270 for M70 and 1350/430 for M40+.