Explore the vast range of titles available.

AbstractTelemental health—the use of videoconferencing or audio only (telephone) in mental health care—has accelerated tremendously since the start of the covid-19 pandemic. Meta-analyses have examined the reliability (ie, concordance) of assessment and the efficacy/effectiveness of telemental health compared with in-person care. Results indicate that telemental health assessment and clinical outcomes are similar compared with in-person care but there is much unexplained variability, as well as evidence that patient clinical and demographic characteristics can influence these findings. Further, gaps exist in the literature regarding specific patient populations (eg, psychotic disorders, children/adolescents), treatment modalities (eg, group therapy), audio only telemedicine, and hybrid care that mixes in-person with telemental health care. These gaps provide important directions for the next generation of telemental health research. Comprehensive clinical guidelines from mental health organizations are available to telemental health practitioners and focus on five content themes: legal and regulatory issues, clinical considerations, standard operating procedures and protocols, technical requirements, and considerations of specific populations and settings.

Research documents that drinking to cope behavior can be disrupted by enhancing emotion regulation and coping skills related to the experience of stress and negative affect. The Alpha Element Self-Coaching Plan incorporates principles of positive psychology and cognitive behavioral therapy to redirect negative thinking and emotions and, therefore, has the potential to benefit individuals who use alcohol to cope with stress. This study aimed to evaluate satisfaction and usability of the web-based Alpha Element Self-Coaching Plan in order to inform the development of an expanded digital platform based on the Alpha Element framework. Participants enrolled in the web-based program as part of their clinical care were eligible to participate. A total of 20 individuals (14 women and 6 men) between ages 30 and 79 (mean 54.5, SD 14.14) years completed web-based questionnaires to assess product performance in areas such as ease of technology use, quality of videos and handouts, and the value of the activities. Participants also completed the System Usability Scale (SUS) and provided background and demographic information, including alcohol use. Only 1 participant reported no alcohol use in the past year; 55% (11/20) of participants drank alcohol 2-4 times per month or less and 45% (9/20) reported drinking alcohol 2-3 times per week or more. The average SUS score of 76.38 (SD 17.85) was well above the commonly accepted threshold of 68, indicating high system usability. A majority of the sample (16/19, 84%) agreed or strongly agreed that the activities in the program inspired behavioral changes; and most agreed or strongly agreed that the program was engaging (16/20, 80%), well-organized (18/20, 90%), and easy to follow (17/20, 85%). Only 2 participants endorsed experiencing difficulty using the program on a smartphone. Suggestions for program improvements included expanding the platform, updating the web format, adding user interactivity, and enhancing navigation. These data suggest that participants were generally satisfied with the web-based Alpha Element Self-Coaching Plan, and rated usability of the program as favorable. Importantly, a significant portion of participants reported that the program inspired behavioral changes. More research is needed with a larger sample to obtain specific data about alcohol consumption and investigate associations between alcohol use and program components, as well as examine gender differences. Data collected from this study will be used to expand the platform and improve user experience.

Rates of opioid use disorder (OUD) have increased among women over the past 2 decades. Medication treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is effective but underused. Gender-specific treatments for women have been associated with improved substance use outcomes. However, these treatments have not specifically targeted women's engagement in MOUD, and the impact of existing gender-specific treatments is restricted by in-person delivery. The aim of this study was to develop a digital intervention to feasibly deliver gender-specific care that addresses the individualized needs of women with OUD to increase engagement in MOUD. A mixed methods, user-centered design approach was used to inform the development of a digital intervention. In phase 1, qualitative interviews were conducted with women with lived experience of OUD (n=20) and providers who treat women with OUD (n=8). Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded for themes. In addition, a larger sample of treatment providers (n=55) completed an online survey to further inform the content of the digital intervention. Phase 2 consisted of designing, beta-testing (n=5), and refining the intervention. The age of women with lived experience ranged from 21 to 59 (mean 38.5, SD 9.4) years; 63% (5/8) of providers interviewed were female participants. The qualitative interview data from women with lived experience and providers were grouped into 6 thematic categories: 3 treatment-related (1) barriers to treatment, (2) facilitators to successful recovery, and (3) important issues to address in treatment, and 3 technology-related (4) positives of using technology as part of treatment, (5) suggested technology features, and (6) barriers to using technology. Across the treatment-related categories, several themes touched on women-specific factors including family responsibilities, abusive partners, stigma, and motivation for treatment (eg, pregnancy). The technology-related categories provided information for designing the features of the intervention, as well as revealing barriers to technology use, which could be helpful in developing implementation strategies. Provider survey participants were primarily female participants (40/55, 73%), with a mean age of 42.5 (SD 12.5) years. Survey data provided additional information on barriers to treatment and suggested technology features. Based on these data and preliminary work, the Healthy Women intervention was created. Minor edits to content and visual design were made in the beta-testing phase. The final version includes a web-based component with 6 topic modules and a mobile component. Topics in the web-based component are presented through infographics, text, videos, and interactive questions. The mobile component includes daily motivational messages, skills practice activities (2/wk), weekly check-ins, and resources (always available). Important themes and suggested features from women with lived experience and providers were incorporated into a digital intervention for women with OUD. Data on feasibility, satisfaction, and engagement with the Healthy Women intervention are currently being collected in phase 3, a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Purpose of Review The purpose of this review is to examine recent literature (2012–2022) on alcohol treatment access and engagement in women in the USA and propose future directions for research and clinical practice. Recent Findings A targeted literature review resulted in 27 studies encompassing screening and brief intervention (SBIRT), treatment utilization, treatment engagement, and barriers to treatment. Recent literature demonstrates overall low rates of screening and brief interventions and treatment utilization in the population with women less likely to be screened and utilize alcohol treatment. The magnitude of these gender differences varies with race/ethnicity. Extensive barriers to care include provider knowledge, structural barriers, and attitudinal barriers and these vary with service setting, gender, and race/ethnicity. Summary There is an increasing prevalence of alcohol use and alcohol use disorder (AUD) in women with low rates of screening, brief treatment, treatment, and engagement which have resulted from extensive barriers to care. Possible areas of further inquiry include the impact of race/ethnicity on gender differences, improving provider and system level policies to promote SBIRT and treatment engagement and utilization, further developing digital interventions and implementation research to investigate factors associated with optimizing effectiveness of gender-responsive and culturally tailored interventions that address the unique needs of women.

Purpose of Review This review critically examines recent literature (2010–2016) on substance use outcomes in women-only treatment studies and gender differences in treatment outcomes in mixed-gender studies. We then focus on outcomes in three areas salient to women with substance use disorders (SUDs): treatment of comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), pregnancy and parenting interventions, and treatment for women in the criminal justice system. Recent Findings Favorable results were found for behavioral treatments for women including couples therapy and gender-responsive group therapy. When gender differences were observed in mixed-gender behavioral treatment, outcomes were more favorable in women than in men. However, when gender differences were observed in pharmacotherapy trial results, outcomes were worse for women. With regard to the three subgroups that we reviewed, most recent research on co-occurring PTSD and SUD has been secondary analysis studies which suggest that factors such as group attendance and co-occurring psychiatric disorders influence substance use outcomes. In contrast to the other two subgroups examined, behavioral treatments for pregnant women did not show superior outcomes when compared to control groups. However, buprenorphine was found to be safe and effective for use with pregnant women with an opioid use disorder. Finally, studies of treatment outcomes for women in the criminal justice system found preliminary evidence of efficacy for several behavioral treatments. Summary Consistent with findings of previous reviews, gender alone did not necessarily predict treatment response; rather, interaction of gender and other factors affected outcomes. Evidence showing worse outcomes for women in pharmacotherapy trials, with the exception of buprenorphine with pregnant women, further reinforces the need for research to evaluate differential treatment outcomes for men and women.

The integration of behavioral health and primary care has received much attention in the literature. Behavioral health providers (BHPs) in integrated settings are faced with different treatment constraints than those who work in specialty mental health. The existing literature focuses on what BHPs should do in primary care settings; however, little research exists specifying what BHPs are actually doing. This study provides a glimpse into what types of interventions BHPs are using, and what types of patients they are seeing, in primary care. A chart review was conducted of patients ( N  = 180) seen by BHPs in five Veterans Affairs primary care clinics. Depression was the most common diagnosis, while less common presenting problems included substance abuse/dependence, psychosis, and bipolar disorder. Common interventions used were medical management, psycho-education, elements of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and supportive psychotherapy. Future research should examine the efficacy of brief interventions in primary care settings.

There is a need to advance the quality of healthcare by increasing knowledge about multiple risk factors and how to intervene to improve health outcomes. In an effort to better describe the presentation of multiple risks, this study involved a database review to describe the prevalence and covariation of multiple risk factors in individuals presenting to primary care. Patients with a primary care encounter from January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2005 ( N  = 10,043) were identified from the Department of Veteran’s Affair’s medical database and information about the following risk factors was extracted: alcohol use, psychiatric distress, body mass, smoking status, blood pressure, and posttraumatic stress. Exploratory and confirmatory latent class analyses identified three classes of individuals. Class 1 consisted of individuals with an overall lower level of risk for health problems, but a moderately high likelihood of elevated blood pressure. Individuals in Class 2 appeared to have the greatest need for intervention because they had a moderate to high likelihood of reporting at risk alcohol use, smoking, depression, and posttraumatic stress. Class 3 consisted of individuals reporting the co-occurrence of at risk alcohol use, smoking, and elevated blood pressure. Similar to past research, the findings highlight the need for addressing multiple risk factors in primary care. In addition, this study expands on the literature by identifying specific patterns of covariation among different risk factors that suggest avenues for research and program development.