Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the efficacy of rotigotine transdermal patch on apathy and motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods Patients with PD-associated apathy (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS] I item 4 [motivation] ≥2 and patient-rated Apathy Scale [AS] ≥14) were randomized 1:1:1 to “low-dose” rotigotine (≤6 mg/24 h for early PD [those not receiving levodopa] or ≤8 mg/24 h for advanced PD [those receiving levodopa]), “high-dose” rotigotine (≤8 mg/24 h for early PD or ≤16 mg/24 h for advanced PD), or placebo, and maintained at optimal/maximal dose for 12 weeks. Coprimary efficacy variables were: change from baseline to End of Maintenance in patient-rated AS and UPDRS II + III total score. Recruitment was stopped after an interim futility analysis; therefore, all p values are exploratory. Results Of 122 patients randomized, 81.1 % completed the study (placebo, n = 32/40 [80.0 %]; low-dose rotigotine, n = 30/41 [73.2 %]; high-dose rotigotine, n = 37/41 [90.2 %]). No treatment difference was observed in the change in patient-rated AS (least squares mean [95 % confidence interval (CI)] difference: low-dose, 0.04 [−2.42, 2.50], p =0.977; high-dose, −0.22 [−2.61, 2.18], p = 0.859). Rotigotine improved UPDRS II + III total scores versus placebo (least squares mean [95 % CI] treatment difference: low-dose, −7.29 [−12.30, −2.28], p = 0.005; high-dose, −6.06 [−10.90, −1.21], p = 0.015), and the “mood/apathy” domain of the Non-Motor Symptom Scale as rated by the investigator (secondary outcome). The most frequent adverse events in rotigotine-treated patients were application site reactions, somnolence, and nausea. Conclusions Rotigotine did not improve PD-associated apathy as rated by the patient but provided clinically relevant improvement in motor control and activities of daily living. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01782222 . Trial registration date: January 30, 2013.

Pain is a troublesome non-motor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). The RECOVER (Randomized Evaluation of the 24-hour Coverage: Efficacy of Rotigotine; Clintrials.gov: NCT00474058) study demonstrated significant improvements in early-morning motor function (UPDRS III) and sleep disturbances (PDSS-2) with rotigotine transdermal system. Improvements were also reported on a Likert pain scale (measuring any type of pain). This post hoc analysis of RECOVER further evaluates the effect of rotigotine on pain, and whether improvements in pain may be attributable to benefits in motor function or sleep disturbance. PD patients with unsatisfactory early-morning motor impairment were randomized to optimal-dose (up to 16 mg/24 h) rotigotine or placebo, maintained for 4 weeks. Pain was assessed in the early-morning using an 11-point Likert pain scale (rated average severity of pain (of any type) over the preceding 12 hours from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain ever experienced]). Post hoc analyses for patients reporting 'any' pain (pain score ≥1) at baseline, and subgroups reporting 'mild' (score 1-3), and 'moderate-to-severe' pain (score ≥4) were performed. Likert pain scale change from baseline in rotigotine-treated patients was further analyzed based on a UPDRS III/PDSS-2 responder analysis (a responder defined as showing a ≥30% reduction in early morning UPDRS III total score or PDSS-2 total score). As post hoc analyses, all p values presented are exploratory. Of 267 patients with Likert pain data (178 rotigotine, 89 placebo), 187 (70%) reported 'any' pain; of these 87 (33%) reported 'mild', and 100 (37%) 'moderate-to-severe' pain. Change from baseline pain scores decreased with rotigotine compared with placebo in patients with 'any' pain (-0.88 [95% CI: -1.56, -0.19], p = 0.013), and in the subgroup with 'moderate-to-severe' pain (-1.38 [-2.44, -0.31], p = 0.012). UPDRS III or PDSS-2 responders showed greater improvement in pain than non-responders. The results from this post hoc analysis of the RECOVER study suggest that pain was improved in patients with PD treated with rotigotine; this may be partly attributable to benefits in motor function and sleep disturbances. Prospective studies are warranted to investigate this potential benefit and the clinical relevance of these findings.

The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of the rotigotine transdermal patch is well characterized in Caucasian patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) but not in Chinese subjects. This article reports the PK variables, safety, and tolerability of the rotigotine transdermal patch (2 mg/24 hours and 4 mg/24 hours cold-chain PR2.1.1 formulation) in healthy Chinese subjects (SP0913; NCT01675024). A second study (PD0011; NCT02070796) evaluated the relative bioavailability of cold-chain (PR2.1.1) and room temperature–stable (PR2.2.1) formulations of rotigotine in healthy Chinese men. In treatment period 1 of SP0913, subjects received a single application of rotigotine 2 mg/24 hours on day 1 followed by a washout period (days 2–6); treatment period 2 (days 6–14) involved multiple doses of rotigotine 2 mg/24 hours (days 7–9) followed by multiple doses of rotigotine 4 mg/24 hours (days 10–12), with patches applied for 24 hours each. In PD0011, subjects received a single dose (2 mg/24 hours) of each rotigotine formulation (PR2.2.1 and PR2.1.1) for 24 hours each in a crossover design. Blood samples were collected at scheduled time points to determine rotigotine plasma concentrations. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by adverse events monitoring. Twenty-four healthy Chinese subjects (12 males, 12 females) were enrolled and completed SP0913. Geometric mean plasma concentrations of unconjugated and total rotigotine increased to a plateau beginning at ∼8 hours (multiple dose) to 16 hours (single dose) postdose; no characteristic Tmax was observed for unconjugated and total rotigotine. The respective geometric mean Cmax, Cmax,ss, AUC from zero up to the last analytically quantifiable concentration, and AUC0–24,ss values for unconjugated and total rotigotine were similar when rotigotine 2 mg/24 hours was applied as a single dose or multiple-dose regimen. During the multiple-dose period, geometric mean Cmax,ss and AUC0–24,ss of both unconjugated and total rotigotine were ∼2-fold higher for rotigotine 4 mg/24 hours than for rotigotine 2 mg/24 hours. Forty-seven of 50 male Chinese subjects completed PD0011. Primary PK parameters for the room temperature–stable formulation of rotigotine were highly comparable to the cold-chain formulation. Common adverse events included application site pruritus, nausea, dizziness, and constipation (SP0913 only), with no clinically significant changes in other safety measures. PK profiles and derived PK parameters of unconjugated and total rotigotine in healthy Chinese subjects were consistent with findings from other ethnic groups receiving single and multiple doses of the rotigotine transdermal patch. Single and repeated daily doses of the rotigotine transdermal patch were well tolerated. Room temperature–stable and cold-chain formulations were bioequivalent. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01675024 and NCT02070796.

Background: RECOVER (NCT00474058), a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and unsatisfactory early-morning motor symptom control, demonstrated significant improvements with rotigotine in early-morning motor function (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS] III), and nocturnal sleep disturbances (modified Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale [PDSS-2]), and improvements in nonmotor symptoms (NMS; Non-Motor Symptom Scale [NMSS]). Methods: Post hoc analyses investigated the correlation between motor symptom and NMS severity in PD by evaluating associations between UPDRS III and both NMSS and PDSS-2 scores. Categories were defined for UPDRS III, NMSS, and PDSS-2 total scores; analyses were conducted for the full analysis set (n = 267). Results: There was a trend toward increasing PDSS-2 and NMSS total and domain scores with increasing UPDRS III category at baseline and end of maintenance (EoM). Pearson correlation coefficients between UPDRS III and both NMSS and PDSS-2 total and domain scores were r = 0.12-0.44 (r 2 = 0.01-0.19) at baseline, r = 0.05-0.38 (r 2 = 0.00-0.14) at EoM, and r = -0.02-0.36 (r 2 = 0.00-0.13) for change from baseline to EoM. Conclusion: There was only a small correlation between severity of early-morning motor symptoms and overall burden of NMS and nocturnal sleep disturbances in RECOVER, suggesting that motor symptoms and NMS originate, at least partly, from distinct pathophysiological pathways.

Background Pain is a troublesome non-motor symptom of Parkinson’s disease (PD). The RECOVER (Randomized Evaluation of the 24-hour Coverage: Efficacy of Rotigotine; Clintrials.gov: NCT00474058) study demonstrated significant improvements in early-morning motor function (UPDRS III) and sleep disturbances (PDSS-2) with rotigotine transdermal system. Improvements were also reported on a Likert pain scale (measuring any type of pain). This post hoc analysis of RECOVER further evaluates the effect of rotigotine on pain, and whether improvements in pain may be attributable to benefits in motor function or sleep disturbance. Methods PD patients with unsatisfactory early-morning motor impairment were randomized to optimal-dose (up to 16 mg/24 h) rotigotine or placebo, maintained for 4 weeks. Pain was assessed in the early-morning using an 11-point Likert pain scale (rated average severity of pain (of any type) over the preceding 12 hours from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain ever experienced]). Post hoc analyses for patients reporting ‘any’ pain (pain score ≥1) at baseline, and subgroups reporting ‘mild’ (score 1–3), and ‘moderate-to-severe’ pain (score ≥4) were performed. Likert pain scale change from baseline in rotigotine-treated patients was further analyzed based on a UPDRS III/PDSS-2 responder analysis (a responder defined as showing a ≥30% reduction in early morning UPDRS III total score or PDSS-2 total score). As post hoc analyses, all p values presented are exploratory. Results Of 267 patients with Likert pain data (178 rotigotine, 89 placebo), 187 (70%) reported ‘any’ pain; of these 87 (33%) reported ‘mild’, and 100 (37%) ‘moderate-to-severe’ pain. Change from baseline pain scores decreased with rotigotine compared with placebo in patients with ‘any’ pain (-0.88 [95% CI: -1.56, -0.19], p = 0.013), and in the subgroup with ‘moderate-to-severe’ pain (-1.38 [-2.44, -0.31], p = 0.012). UPDRS III or PDSS-2 responders showed greater improvement in pain than non-responders. Conclusions The results from this post hoc analysis of the RECOVER study suggest that pain was improved in patients with PD treated with rotigotine; this may be partly attributable to benefits in motor function and sleep disturbances. Prospective studies are warranted to investigate this potential benefit and the clinical relevance of these findings.