Explore the vast range of titles available.

Recently, extended reality (XR) displays, including augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR), have integrated eye tracking capabilities, which could enable novel ways of interacting with XR content. In natural settings, eye vergence angle (EVA) changes constantly, based on the distance of fixated objects. Here, we measured EVA for eye fixations on real and virtual target objects in three different environments: real objects in the real world (real), virtual objects in the real world (AR), and virtual objects in a virtual world (VR). In a repeated measures design with 13 participants, EVA was measured while participants fixated on targets at varying distances. As expected, the results showed a significant main effect of target depth such that increasing EVA was associated with closer targets. However, there were consistent individual differences in baseline EVA. There was also a smaller but statistically significant main effect of environment (real, AR, VR) on EVA. Importantly, EVA was stable with respect to the starting depth of previously fixated targets and invariant to the direction (convergence vs. divergence) of vergence changes. In addition, EVA proved to be a more veridical depth estimate than verbal subjective depth judgments.

يتناول كتاب (معجم اللغويات الاجتماعية : (ضوابط وتحليل)) والذي قام بتأليفه (جون سوان) في حوالي (584) صفحة من القطع المتوسط موضوع (علم الاجتماع اللغوي) مستعرضا المحتويات التالية : تصدير-مقدمة المترجمين-مقدمة المؤلفين-المحتوى الأكاديمي للمعجم-A- B- C- D- E- F- G- H- I- J -K- L- M- N- O-P-Q-R-S-T-U-V-W-X-Y-Z- المراجع-فهرس المصطلحات (إنجليزي-عربي)-فهرس المصطلحات (عربي-إنجليزي)-نبذة عن المترجمين.

Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological results of the MAKO CT-based robotic-assisted system for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods A PRISMA systematic review was conducted using four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Pubmed, GOOGLE SCHOLAR) to identify all clinical and radiological studies reporting information regarding the use and results of the CT-based robotic-assisted system to perform TKA between 2016 and 2020. The main investigated outcome criteria were postoperative pain, analgesia requirements, clinical scores, knee range of motion, implant positioning and the revision rate. The ROBINS-I tool (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions) was used to evaluate the quality of included studies and the risk of bias. Results A total of 36 studies were identified, of which 26 met inclusion criteria. Of these 26 studies, 14 were comparative. The follow-up varied from 30 days to 17 months. This CT-based, saw cutting Robotic TKA is associated with a significantly lower postoperative pain score (2.6 versus 4.5) and with significantly reduced time to hospital discharge (77 h versus 105), compared with conventional TKA. The two comparative studies assessing functional outcomes at 1 year reported significantly better functional scores with CT-based robotic TKA compared with conventional TKA (WOMAC score: 6 ± 6 versus 9 ± 8 ( p  < 0.05); KSS function score: 80 versus 73 ( p  = 0.005)). Only three comparative studies assessed implant positioning, and these reported better implant positioning with CT-based robotic-assisted TKA. Conclusion The CT-based robotic-assisted system for TKA reduced postoperative pain and improved implant positioning with equal or slightly superior improvement of the functional outcomes at one year, compared to conventional TKA. Level of evidence Systematic review level IV.

\"Arthur Curry, ruler of the underwater kingdom of Atlantis, the King of the Seven Seas wasn't always this; discover Aquaman's humble beginnings as told by comics legend Keith Giffen. Born as Orin to Queen Atlanna and the mysterious wizard Atlan in the Atlantean city of Poseidonis he was abandoned as a baby on Mercy Reef above sea level. To any other Atlantean, this would have been fatal but Orin survived and traveled the wilds of the ocean until he was found by a lighthouse keeper and renamed Arthur Curry. Arthur eventually returns home to become the ruler of all of Atlantis and the oceans beyond.\"-- Provided by publisher.

Purpose In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), knee phenotypes including joint line obliquity are of interest regarding surgical realignment strategies. The hypothesis of this study is that better clinical results, including decreased postoperative knee pain, will be observed for patients with a restored knee phenotype. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on prospective data, including 1078 primary osteoarthritic knees in 936 patients. The male:female ratio was 780:298, mean age at surgery was 71.3 years ± 8.0. International Knee Society Scores and standardized long-leg radiographs (LLR) were collected preoperatively and at 2 years follow-up after TKA. Patients were categorized using the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification including the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) measured on LLR by a single observer, allowing knee phenotypes to be categorized considering the arithmetic hip–knee–ankle (aHKA) angle (MPTA-LDFA) as measure of constitutional alignment, and joint line obliquity (JLO) (MPTA + LDFA). Clinical results were compared between patients with surgically restored preoperative constitutional knee phenotype to patients without restored constitutional knee phenotypes. Descriptive data analysis such as means, standard deviations and ranges were performed. T tests for independent samples were performed to compare group differences. Comparisons of categorical data were performed using the χ 2 test. Significance was set at p  < 0.05. Results A third of patients (33.4%) had constitutional knee varus with apex distal JLO. 63.5% of patients had preoperative apex distal JLO. Postoperatively, 57.8% of patients had a neutral HKA (− 2° to 2°) and a neutral JLO (− 3° and 3°), with only 18% of patients with restored constitutional knee phenotype. Of these patients, statistically less postoperative pain was observed in patients where apex distal JLO was restored compared to non-restored apex distal JLO (pain score 46.7 vs. 44.6; p  = 0.02) without clinical relevance. Other categories of restored JLO or arithmetic HKA angle were not associated with improved outcomes. Conclusion This study showed that performing mechanical alignment for primary TKA resulted in most cases in a change of the preoperative knee phenotype. These results emphasize the relevance of considering joint line obliquity to better understand preoperative knee deformity and better restore knee phenotypes with a more personalized realignment strategy to potentially improve TKA postoperative results. Level of evidence III.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for severe osteoarthritis. Despite good survival rates, up to 20% of TKA patients remain dissatisfied. Recently, promising new technologies have been developed in knee arthroplasty, and could improve the functional outcomes. The aim of this paper was to present some new technologies in TKA, their current concepts, their advantages, and limitations. The patient-specific instrumentations can allow an improvement of implant positioning and limb alignment, but no difference is found for functional outcomes. The customized implants are conceived to reproduce the native knee anatomy and to reproduce its biomechanics. The sensors have to aim to give objective data on ligaments balancing during TKA. Few studies are published on the results at mid-term of these two devices currently. The accelerometers are smart tools developed to improve the TKA alignment. Their benefits remain yet controversial. The robotic-assisted systems allow an accurate and reproducible bone preparation due to a robotic interface, with a 3D surgical planning, based on preoperative 3D imaging or not. This promising system, nevertheless, has some limits. The new technologies in TKA are very attractive and have constantly evolved. Nevertheless, some limitations persist and could be improved by artificial intelligence and predictive modeling.

Purpose : The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine whether there are any clinical or radiological differences in mechanically aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) compared with kinematically aligned TKA. Methods : This study included retrospective cohort studies, prospective randomized controlled trials (PRCTs) and prospective cohort studies comparing clinical and radiological outcomes, and complications in TKA with kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA). All studies had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Results : Five PRCTs published between 2014 and 2020 were included. These studies showed a low risk of bias and were of very high quality. We did not find a superiority of KA compared to MA technique for clinical and radiological outcomes, except in one study which showed a significant difference favoring KA between the two groups for all clinical scores. Conclusion : We found that KA in TKA achieved clinical and radiological results similar to those of MA. The complication rate was not increased for KA TKAs. Studies with longer follow-up and larger cohorts are required to prove any benefit of KA technique over MA technique.

IntroductionUp to 30% of individuals with depression develop persistent depressive disorder (PDD), an often disabling and difficult to treat condition. The Cognitive Behavioural Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) is the only psychotherapy developed specifically for treating individuals with PDD. While several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated its efficacy in outpatient settings, evidence for its use in inpatient settings remains limited. Pilot studies of CBASP inpatient programmes in Germany have shown promising feasibility and effectiveness; however, no RCTs to date have systematically evaluated their outcomes. This study represents the first RCT to compare the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of CBASP with Behavioural Activation (BA), a first-line psychotherapy for depression, within an intensive multimodal inpatient setting.Methods and analysisIn this prospective, multicentre, rater-blinded RCT with an active control group, we aim to recruit 396 adults (aged 18–70 years) with treatment-resistant PDD at eight German university hospitals. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either (1) CBASP or (2) BA within an intensive treatment programme consisting of 10 weeks acute treatment in an inpatient and/or day clinic setting, followed by 6 weeks of outpatient continuation treatment. Primary and secondary outcome assessments will be conducted at multiple time points: baseline (T0), treatment onset (T1), after 5 and 10 weeks of acute treatment (T2, T3), at the end of continuation treatment (T4, week 16) and every 2 months up to week 64 (T5, naturalistic follow-up).The primary outcome measure will be the change in depression severity, as assessed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (24-item version), after 16 weeks of treatment (from T0 to T4). Secondary outcomes will include response, remission, deterioration and relapse rates, self-reported depression and anxiety symptoms and additional psychological variables. A cost-benefit analysis will evaluate the health-economic benefits of both interventions. Additionally, this RCT will explore personalised treatment selection and mechanisms of change, including potential moderators and mediators of treatment effects. The findings from this trial are expected to provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance on choosing CBASP versus BA for inpatients with treatment-resistant PDD.Ethics and disseminationThis study has received ethical approval from the ethics committees of all participating university hospitals. All participants will provide written informed consent before enrolment. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. We have involved people with lived experience from the earliest pilots onward, using their feedback to refine our study design. Ongoing consultation at conferences and public events has further ensured that our research remains grounded in patient perspectives.Trial registration numberNCT04996433.