Explore the vast range of titles available.

Most rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) can be placed along a spectrum of disorders, with autoinflammatory diseases (including monogenic systemic autoinflammatory diseases) and autoimmune diseases (such as systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome) representing the two ends of this spectrum. However, although most autoinflammatory diseases are characterized by the activation of innate immunity and inflammasomes and classical autoimmunity typically involves adaptive immune responses, there is some overlap in the features of autoimmunity and autoinflammation in RMDs. Indeed, some ‘mixed-pattern’ diseases such as spondyloarthritis and some forms of rheumatoid arthritis can also be delineated. A better understanding of the pathogenic pathways of autoinflammation and autoimmunity in RMDs, as well as the preferential cytokine patterns observed in these diseases, could help us to design targeted treatment strategies.Most rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) fall along a spectrum of disorders from autoinflammatory diseases to autoimmune diseases, with ‘mixed-pattern’ RMDs having features of autoinflammation and autoimmunity. A better understanding of the pathogenic pathways of autoinflammation and autoimmunity in RMDs should enhance targeted treatment strategies.

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib, are increasingly used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There has been debate about their safety, particularly following the issuance of guidance by regulatory agencies advising caution in their use in certain patients. The registrational clinical trials and registry data of JAK inhibitors did not identify a difference in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), venous thromboembolism, malignancies or infections (other than herpes zoster) with a JAK inhibitor versus a biologic DMARD. In the ORAL Surveillance trial, which enrolled patients >50 years of age with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor, tofacitinib was statistically not non-inferior to TNF inhibitors for the occurrence of MACEs and malignancy. Further post hoc analysis of the data revealed that an age of ≥65 years, a high baseline cardiovascular risk, a history of smoking, sustained inflammation, disease activity and suboptimal treatment of cardiovascular comorbidities all increase the risk of these outcomes. The guidance issued by regulatory agencies should be carefully considered to ensure appropriate and safe treatment of patients with RA without undertreatment of patients who might benefit from JAK inhibitor, as well as biologic, treatment. As always, the risks associated with the use of these agents, treatment goals, costs and patient preferences should be discussed with the patient.Concerns have been raised about the safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. This Review summarizes the evidence regarding the risks and benefits of JAK inhibitors to clarify which patients are most at risk of adverse events and guide clinical decision-making.

Generalized bone loss (osteoporosis) and fragility fractures can occur in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases including rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis (SpA; including ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis). In addition, rheumatoid arthritis can involve localized, periarticular bone erosion and, in SpA, local (pathological) bone formation can occur. The RANK–RANKL–osteoprotegerin axis and the Wnt–β-catenin signalling pathway (along with its inhibitors sclerostin and Dickkopf 1) have been implicated in inflammatory bone loss and formation, respectively. Targeted therapies including biologic DMARDs and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors can stabilize bone turnover and inhibit radiographic joint damage, and potentially also prevent generalized bone loss. Targeted therapies interfere at various points in the mechanisms of local and generalized bone changes in systemic rheumatic diseases, and they effect biomarkers of bone resorption and formation, bone mass and risk of fragility fractures. Studies on the effects of targeted therapies on rates of fragility fracture are scarce. The efficacy of biologic DMARDs for arresting bone formation in axial SpA is debated. Improved understanding of the most relevant therapeutic targets and identification of important targeted therapies could lead to the preservation of bone in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.Targeted therapies, including biologic DMARDs and Janus kinase inhibitors, can interfere with the mechanisms of pathological bone metabolism in inflammatory arthritis. In this Review, the authors discuss the effects of these therapies on local and generalized bone changes.

It is well known that certain active ingredients of the plants of genus, i.e., the \"phytocannabinoids\" [pCBs; e.g., (-)- -Δ -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), (-)-cannabidiol, etc.] can influence a wide array of biological processes, and the human body is able to produce endogenous analogs of these substances [\"endocannabinoids\" (eCB), e.g., arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide, AEA), 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), etc.]. These ligands, together with multiple receptors (e.g., CB and CB cannabinoid receptors, etc.), and a complex enzyme and transporter apparatus involved in the synthesis and degradation of the ligands constitute the endocannabinoid system (ECS), a recently emerging regulator of several physiological processes. The ECS is widely expressed in the human body, including several members of the innate and adaptive immune system, where eCBs, as well as several pCBs were shown to deeply influence immune functions thereby regulating inflammation, autoimmunity, antitumor, as well as antipathogen immune responses, etc. Based on this knowledge, many and studies aimed at exploiting the putative therapeutic potential of cannabinoid signaling in inflammation-accompanied diseases (e.g., multiple sclerosis) or in organ transplantation, and to dissect the complex immunological effects of medical and \"recreational\" marijuana consumption. Thus, the objective of the current article is (i) to summarize the most recent findings of the field; (ii) to highlight the putative therapeutic potential of targeting cannabinoid signaling; (iii) to identify open questions and key challenges; and (iv) to suggest promising future directions for cannabinoid-based drug development.

Key Points The main goal of antigen-specific immunotherapies (ASIs) in autoimmune diseases is to reprogramme or remove autoreactive cells and to induce immune tolerance to self-antigens Depleting autoreactive T cells, B cells and plasma cells could be a future therapeutic strategy for rheumatic diseases and could lead to temporary improvement in disease Awakening antigen-specific tolerance by inducing regulatory T (T reg ) cells using antigen-specific tolerogenic peptides alone or coupled to cells or nanoparticles can reprogramme autoreactive cells, resulting in long-term tolerance T cells can be engineered to specifically target and delete self-reactive B cells or to redirect the specificity of T reg cells towards self-antigens The use of antigen-boosted tolerogenic dendritic cells and DNA-based vaccines are promising ASIs. Antigen-specific immunotherapies (ASIs) aim to modulate autoreactive cells and/or induce immune tolerance to self-antigens, and have the potential to be used in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. This Review summarizes current strategies for ASIs, progress in applying these strategies to rheumatic diseases and their limitations and future prospects. The main goal of antigen-specific immunotherapy (ASI) in autoimmune and rheumatic diseases is to reprogramme or remove autoreactive cells and/or induce immune tolerance to self-antigens. Current therapies in these diseases either treat symptoms or slow down disease progression but are not yet curative or preventative — disease-specific treatments are urgently needed. In contrast to the nonspecific treatments in current use that induce generalized immune suppression, which is associated with several adverse effects including increased risk of infections, ASIs target a restricted subset of B cells or T cells, and thus do not compromise systemic immunity and host defence. This Review provides a summary of novel approaches for identifying autoepitopes and detecting and targeting autoreactive cells that might help in the development of ASIs. Promising approaches include the use of tolerizing peptides coupled to MHC constructs and/or nanocompounds, tolerizing dendritic cells and antigen-specific vaccines. Following studies in animal models of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, several of these strategies have now entered clinical trials. However, to use these approaches in humans, several important limitations must first be addressed, such as; selecting the proper immunodominant autoantigen; identifying the optimal timing, dosing and route of administration; finding biomarkers for monitoring the therapy; and optimizing methodology.

The risk of cardiovascular disease is increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with the general population owing to the influence of traditional and non-traditional risk factors. Inflammation has a pivotal contribution and can accelerate the atherosclerotic process. Although dampening inflammation with DMARDs should theoretically abrogate this process, evidence suggests that these drugs can also promote atherosclerosis directly and indirectly, hence adding to an increased cardiovascular burden. However, the extent and direction of the effects largely differ across drugs. Understanding how these drugs influence endothelial damage and vascular repair mechanisms is key to understanding these outcomes. NSAIDs and glucocorticoids can increase the cardiovascular risk. Conversely, conventional, biologic and targeted DMARDs control inflammation and reduce this risk, although some of these drugs can also aggravate traditional factors or thrombotic events. Given these data, the fundamental objective for clinicians should be disease control, in an individualized approach that considers the most appropriate drug for each patient, taking into account joint and cardiovascular outcomes. This Review provides a comprehensive analysis of the effects of DMARDs and other approved drugs on cardiovascular involvement in rheumatoid arthritis, from a clinical and mechanistic perspective, with a roadmap to inform the research agenda.Various drugs used in rheumatoid arthritis management have anti-inflammatory effects that can hinder atherosclerosis development and progression. However, these drugs can also concurrently have different pro-atherogenic effects, complicating the relationship between these drugs and cardiovascular involvement in rheumatoid arthritis.

For people with chronic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD), such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or systemic sclerosis (SSc), normal cognitive functions are essential for performing daily activities. These diseases may be associated with cognitive dysfunction (CD). In RA, CD has been associated with age, lower education and disease duration and activity. Great advances have been achieved in neuropsychiatric SLE in the identification of pathogenic pathways, assessment and possible treatment strategies. SSc rarely exerts direct effects on the brain and cognitive function. However, the psychological burden that includes depression, anxiety and social impact may be high. AIRD patients with sustained disease activity, organ damage or lower education should be evaluated for CD. The control of systemic inflammation together with tailored behavioural cognitive therapies may benefit these patients.

Key Points Chemokines and chemokine receptors have been implicated in leukocyte recruitment and angiogenesis underlying rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other inflammatory rheumatic diseases Chemokines and chemokine receptors are abundant in the synovium and other inflammatory sites Promising results from preclinical studies of agents targeting chemokines and chemokine receptors in animal models of arthritis have not been replicated in human trials of antibodies and synthetic compounds in RA Possible reasons for the lack of positive results from human trials include pathway redundancy, incomplete antagonism and interspecies differences that limit translation of results from animal models An alternative approach to the targeting of individual chemokines is chemokine-receptor blockade The CCR1 receptor is a potential target, assuming that a high level of receptor occupancy can be maintained throughout treatment Chemokines and their receptors are involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Therapeutic strategies targeting chemokine pathways have had promising results in animal models, but have been less successful in human trials. Szekanecz and Koch discuss the different approaches to chemokine-pathway targeting and the possible reasons for the difficulty in developing effective therapies. Chemokines and chemokine receptors are involved in leukocyte recruitment and angiogenesis underlying the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Numerous chemokines, along with both conventional and atypical cell-surface chemokine receptors, are found in inflamed synovia. Preclinical studies carried out in animal models of arthritis involving agents targeting chemokines and chemokine receptors have yielded promising results. However, most human trials of treatment of RA with antibodies and synthetic compounds targeting chemokine signalling have failed to show clinical improvements. Chemokines can have overlapping actions, and their activities can be altered by chemical modification or proteolytic degradation. Effective targeting of chemokine pathways must take acount of these properties, and can also require high levels of receptor occupancy by therapeutic agents to prevent signalling. CCR1 is a promising target for chemokine-receptor blockade.

Periodontal disease (PD) can be an important precipitating factor in the production of citrullinated proteins. Its importance is emphasized, but it is not the only way to produce citrullinated proteins. The aim of the current study was to determine the periodontal conditions and the salivary citrullinated protein content in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to healthy controls. We also wished to correlate citrullinated protein levels in the saliva and serum biomarkers with the periodontal status and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) involvement of patients with RA. Twenty-three patients with RA and 17 healthy controls participated the study. Saliva samples were taken: citrulline content of saliva was measured. Blood test results for patients with RA were collected. TMJ disorders were described. Cariological and periodontal indices were registered. Periodontal conditions and periodontal staging were also registered. Comparison of measured values between groups was performed. Intragroup correlation of patients’ values was counted. The prevalence of TMJ complaints was significantly higher in the RA group (8/23) versus controls (1/17). The patients with RA had worse periodontal condition because more patients with RA had gingivitis with a significantly higher bleeding on probing (BOP) (RA: 22.4 ± 25.0%; controls: 6.36 ± 11.6%; p  = 0.018). Gingival index (GI) was also significantly higher in the patients than in controls (RA: 0.68 ± 0.58; controls: 0.19 ± 0.38; p  = 0.010). The citrullinated protein (relative) content of saliva did not differ significantly ( p  = 0.147) between patients with RA (1102.2 ± 530.8) and healthy controls (1873.1 ± 1594.9). In RA, the salivary anti-CCP levels positively correlated with PD staging (R = 0.464, p  = 0.039) . Control subjects more commonly had healthy gingiva than RA patients. Moreover, in the control group more individuals had intact and reduced height periodontium than periodontitis compared to the RA group. There was no significant difference in the levels of salivary citrulline between patients with RA and controls, despite the significant differences in their periodontal status. Thus, salivary citrulline levels are not associated with RA disease severity.