Explore the vast range of titles available.

Objectives:Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are more likely to be both absent from and impaired at work compared to non-IBS patients. We investigated the impact of IBS on work productivity and activity impairment and the relationship to disease specific and general health measures.Method:In total, 525 patients with IBS completed questionnaires assessing work productivity and activity impairment, IBS symptom severity, IBS-related quality of life and GI-specific anxiety. In addition, 155 of the patients completed questionnaires assessing severity of somatic symptoms, depression, anxiety and fatigue. Uni- and bivariate analyses were performed, as well as linear regression to determine factors independently associated with the work productivity and activity impairment measures.Results:Of employed patients, 24.3% reported absenteeism and 86.8% reported presenteeism because of their IBS. With increasing severity of IBS symptoms and GI-specific anxiety, higher degrees of work impairment were seen. Work productivity impairment in IBS was also associated with low quality of life. GI-specific anxiety was independently associated with absenteeism (R2 = 0.23; p < 0.05), IBS-symptom severity and general fatigue with presenteeism (R2 = 0.40; p < 0.05), IBS-symptom severity, general fatigue and GI-specific anxiety with overall work loss (R2 = 0.50; p < 0.05), and IBS symptom severity and somatic symptoms with activity impairment (R2 = 0.38; p < 0.05).Conclusion:Work impairment is a substantial problem in patients with IBS. A combination of IBS and somatic symptom severity, fatigue and psychological factors influence patients’ ability to be present, active and productive at work. Based on this, a multidimensional treatment approach for patients with IBS seems logical.

Key Points Altered gut microbiota composition, aberrant expression pattern and function of enterochromaffin cells, abnormal gut permeability and dysregulated immune activity have been found in at least subgroups of patients with IBS The complex interaction between these systems has been demonstrated in different animal models of IBS The association between these abnormalities and the symptom profile in patients with IBS has been demonstrated Targeting these alterations in the development of new therapies for IBS seems promising The pathophysiology of IBS is complex with a number of different factors involved. Here, the authors highlight crosstalk between the gut microbiota, enteroendocrine system, immune system (including neuroimmune interactions) and intestinal permeability in the development of IBS. Insights into how these entities might interact are discussed. The aetiology and pathology of IBS, a functional bowel disorder thought to lack an organic cause, is largely unknown. However, studies suggest that various features, such as altered composition of the gut microbiota, together with increased intestinal permeability, a changed balance in the enteroendocrine system and a dysregulated immune system in the gut, most likely have an important role in IBS. Exactly how these entities act together and give rise to symptoms is still unknown, but an altered gut microbiota composition could lead to dysregulation of the intestinal barrier as well as the enteroendocrine and the immune systems, which (through interactions with the nervous system) might generate symptoms. This Review highlights the crosstalk between the gut microbiota, the enteroendocrine system, the immune system and the role of intestinal permeability in patients with IBS.

Psychological alterations are common and considered important for symptom generation in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, the possible cumulative effect of having multiple psychological alterations on gastrointestinal (GI) symptom severity in IBS is largely unknown. Patients with IBS (Rome IV) completed validated questionnaires assessing GI symptoms (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, IBS version and IBS Severity Scoring System), personality traits (Big Five), posttraumatic stress and psychological alterations, anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire, 9-item version), fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory), pain catastrophizing, somatization (Patient Health Questionnaire, 12-item version), stress (Perceived Stress Scale), and GI-specific anxiety (Visceral Sensitivity Index). Of the 18 possible psychological factors, those with significant associations with GI symptom severity, corrected for multiple comparisons, were identified. The associations between increasing number of psychological alterations (validated cutoff values or uppermost tertile) and the severity of GI symptoms were analyzed with linear trend analyses. In total, 106 patients with IBS (Rome IV criteria) were included (72 [68%] women, median age of 35 [interquartile range: 26-45] years). Psychological alterations were common and overlap among these factors were frequently seen. Five psychological factors (physical fatigue, GI-specific anxiety, perceived stress, pain catastrophizing, and trait anxiety) demonstrated significant, noncollinear associations with GI symptom severity. With increasing number of these psychological alterations, a gradual increase was seen in the overall severity of GI symptoms (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, IBS version: partial η = 0.268, P < 0.001; IBS Severity Scoring System: partial η = 0.219, P < 0.001, both large effect sizes). Distinct associations were seen between the severity of GI symptoms and individual, as well as an increasing number of psychological alterations. This highlights the importance of understanding different psychological alterations for the disease burden in IBS (visual abstract, Supplementary Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/AJG/B756).

Background and aims Rectal sensory and motor interactions in patients with IBS have not been studied in detail. The aim of this study was to evaluate fasting and postprandial rectal sensorimotor characteristics and their interactions in IBS compared with healthy controls. Design We included 274 patients with IBS and 34 controls. All subjects underwent a rectal barostat study before and 60 min after a standardised liquid meal (800 kcal; 60% fat). Sensory thresholds, intensity of sensations, viscerosomatic referral and compliance were measured. During 15 min before the first distension sequence and until 50 min after meal intake, rectal balloon volumes were registered in 5 min intervals at operating pressure to quantify rectal tone. Mixed models were used to analyse the rectal tone response over time. Results Rectal sensory thresholds and compliance were decreased and viscerosomatic referral areas increased in patients with IBS compared with controls. Meal intake increased rectal sensitivity, compliance and referral areas in patients and controls and the same proportions of patients were hypersensitive to distension before and after meal intake. There was a higher basal rectal tone in IBS and a significantly different rectal tone response after meal intake in patients with IBS compared with controls and, interestingly, also in IBS with rectal hypersensitivity (defined in the preprandial state), compared with normosensitive patients. Conclusions Meal intake affects rectal sensorimotor function in IBS and health. Importantly, the rectal tone responses to a high-caloric meal are different between patients with IBS and controls, as well as between hypersensitive and normosensitive patients with IBS.

Background Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a highly prevalent functional gastrointestinal disorder. Earlier studies have shown that IBS can limit the ability to perform at work and lead to absenteeism. However, few studies focus on work life experiences based on patients’ narratives. The purpose of this study was to construct a theory for how persons with IBS maintain their work life. Methods A qualitative study was performed using constructivist grounded theory. Semi-structured interviews with 15 women and 8 men with IBS (26–64 years of age) were conducted. Fourteen participants worked full-time, six worked part-time and three were on sick leave. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded line-by-line, incident-by-incident and thereafter focused coding was done. From the data and codes, categories were generated. Finally, a core category was constructed explaining the process of maintaining work life when living with IBS. Results Balancing work life while being under threat of symptoms constituted of four categories, being prepared, restricting impact, reconciling and adjusting. Persons with IBS restricted the impact of IBS on work by using strategies and upholding daily routines and strived to being prepared by exerting control over work life. These ongoing processes served to limit the influence of IBS on work by symptoms being less intense, perceived as less frequent, or not as bothersome. Reconciling IBS with work life was understood as a successful outcome from being prepared and restricting impact but was also influenced by the individual’s outlook on life. Adjusting to other people at work interfered with the strategies of being prepared, restricting impact, and reconciling, leaving persons with IBS more susceptible to symptoms. Conclusions This study deepens the understanding of the work situation for persons with IBS. Health care professionals can use the results of this study in the dialogue with the patient discussing work ability and sick leave. The results imply that although balancing work life under threat of symptoms can be a struggle, there are strategies that persons with IBS and employers together can initiate and use to reduce impact on work on several different levels.

[...]a confident diagnosis and a treatment based on best evidence is essential to avoid unnecessary distress. [...]clinical recommendations including non-evidenced based aspects such as general consequences of strategies, also including health economy, was made. [...]the Rome IV criteria advocate that all FBD, not only those with similar stool habits, could be seen as a continuum.

Visceral hypersensitivity, 11 gut motor abnormalities 12 and signs of immune activation 2 considered to be important factors in IBS can only be detected in a subset of patients with IBS, and mostly with modest associations with the symptoms reported by patients. [...]it may be better in future studies to base inclusion of patients in clinical trials in IBS on fulfilment of diagnostic criteria for IBS combined with detectable abnormalities of relevance for the pharmacological agent that is evaluated.

The majority of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) experiences food‐related symptoms, which are associated with high symptom burden, reduced quality of life, increased healthcare consumption and reduced intake of certain nutrients. In this review we aimed to describe a clinically useful approach for physicians, by presenting the latest progress in knowledge and its translation to management in IBS patients with food‐related symptoms, as well as the underlying mechanisms involved. The research tools currently available that can be used in the future for a better characterization of this subgroup of patients are also discussed. Working towards this approach could lead to a more individualised work‐up and management of IBS patients with food‐related symptoms.

ObjectivesThe diagnostic criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have recently been updated from Rome III to Rome IV. Whereas in Rome III a diagnosis of IBS entailed chronic abdominal pain or discomfort at least 3 days per month, in Rome IV the term discomfort has been removed and the frequency of abdominal pain increased to at least 1 day per week. We examined how this change in IBS criteria impacts on clinical characteristics and pathophysiological factors.MethodsA total of 542 Swedish subjects with Rome III IBS completed a baseline questionnaire enquiring for the number of abdominal pain days in the last 10 days; this was subsequently used as a surrogate marker to identify Rome IV IBS, in that (a) those with 0 or 1 day of pain were classed as Rome IV-negative, and (b) those with ≥2 days of pain were classed as Rome IV-positive. Comparisons were made between Rome IV-positive and -negative IBS groups for demographics, IBS subtype, gastrointestinal and psychological symptoms, somatisation, fatigue, disease-specific quality of life, rectal sensitivity, and oro-anal transit time.ResultsOverall, 85% of Rome III IBS patients fulfilled the Rome IV criteria for IBS, but 15% did not. Rome IV-positive subjects were significantly more likely to be female, have poorer quality of life, greater pain severity, bloating, somatisation, fatigue, and rectal sensitivity than Rome IV-negative subjects. There were no differences in severity of anxiety or depression, IBS subtypes, bowel habit dissatisfaction, or oro-anal transit time. Finally, increasing number of pain days correlated positively with symptoms and visceral hypersensitivity.ConclusionsMost Rome III-positive IBS patients seeking healthcare fulfil the Rome IV IBS criteria. They constitute a more severe group than those who lose their IBS diagnosis.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is subtyped based on bowel habits. However, a more comprehensive subgrouping based on combined gastrointestinal (GI), non-GI somatic, and psychological symptom profiles has been proposed. This study aimed to validate this new approach, including the exploration of differences in patient-reported outcomes and gut physiology across subgroups. Six subgroups were identified based on Gaussian mixture model analysis including 760 patients with IBS: diarrhea with low or high comorbidity burden, constipation with low or high comorbidity burden, overall mild severity, and mixed GI symptoms with high comorbidity burden. IBS symptoms, GI-specific anxiety, and fatigue were more severe, and quality of life was lower in those with high comorbidity burden. Oro-anal transit time differed between the diarrhea and constipation subgroups, but only between those with low comorbidity burden. Our data revealed a relevance for the proposed novel subgrouping strategies, including links to distinct pathophysiological mechanisms.