Explore the vast range of titles available.

Chronic unexplained gastrointestinal symptoms impact more than 1 in 5 Americans and their families; these disorders include the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional dyspepsia (FD), currently classified by Rome IV as functional gastrointestinal disorders. By definition, IBS and FD have no established pathology, but emerging evidence suggests this paradigm may need revision. Immune activation and, in subsets, subtle intestinal pathology have been identified in FD (most notably, postprandial distress syndrome) and IBS-diarrhea. A disease model is proposed that accounts for all of the intestinal and extraintestinal symptoms, relationship to food and infection, and the overlap with gastroesophageal reflux disease. It is speculated that antigen presentation to the mucosa (e.g., microbial antigens or food proteins after acute gastroenteritis) induces, in a genetically primed host, immune activation of the intestine with low-grade intestinal inflammation and subsequently neuronal structural and functional alterations, producing regional intestinal hypersensitivity and motor dysfunction. Immune activation may explain the female predominance and fluctuations in immune activity for symptom variability over time. In the future, as further evidence accumulates, the management paradigm may potentially shift to objective pathology-based subtyping based on serological, microbiological, and clinical assessments to identify when targeted therapies should be deployed in subsets. Potential targeted interventions may include therapies to dampen down immune activation or block release of key mediators such as histamine, specific microbial targeted treatments that may reverse disease, and dietary advice to eliminate relevant food antigens after objective in vivo testing. Only by identifying causation can we eventually anticipate cure, and as the true pathology unravels in subsets, this may become a reality.

Gastrointestinal symptoms are highly prevalent, but many people who have them will have no organic explanation for their symptoms. Most of these people will be labelled as having a functional gastrointestinal disorder, such as irritable bowel syndrome, functional dyspepsia, or functional constipation. These conditions affect up to 40% of people at any one point in time, and two-thirds of these people will have chronic, fluctuating symptoms. The pathophysiology of functional gastrointestinal disorders is complex, but involves bidirectional dysregulation of gut–brain interaction (via the gut–brain axis), as well as microbial dysbiosis within the gut, altered mucosal immune function, visceral hypersensitivity, and abnormal gastrointestinal motility. Hence, nomenclature refers to the conditions as disorders of gut–brain interaction. Psychological comorbidity is common; however, whether or not this predates, or is driven by, symptoms is not clear. Patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders can feel stigmatised, and often this diagnosis is not communicated effectively by physicians, nor is education provided. Prompt identification and treatment of these conditions is crucial as they have a considerable impact on health-care systems and society as a whole because of repeated consultations, unnecessary investigations and surgeries, prescriptions and over-the-counter medicine use, and impaired health-related quality of life and ability to work. Symptom-based criteria are used to make a diagnosis, with judicious use of limited investigations in some patients. The general principles of treatment are based on a biopsychosocial understanding and involve management of physical symptoms and, if present, psychological comorbidity. In the future, treatment approaches to functional gastrointestinal disorders are likely to become more personalised, based not only on symptoms but also underlying pathophysiology and psychology.

Emerging data increasingly point towards the duodenum as a key region underlying the pathophysiology of functional dyspepsia (FD), one of the most prevalent functional GI disorders. The duodenum plays a major role in the control and coordination of gastroduodenal function. Impaired duodenal mucosal integrity and low-grade inflammation have been associated with altered neuronal signalling and systemic immune activation, and these alterations may ultimately lead to dyspeptic symptoms. Likely luminal candidates inducing the duodenal barrier defect include acid, bile, the microbiota and food antigens although no causal association with symptoms has been convincingly demonstrated. Recognition of duodenal pathology in FD will hopefully lead to the discovery of new biomarkers and therapeutic targets, allowing biologically targeted rather than symptom-based therapy. In this review, we summarise the recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of FD with a focus on the duodenum.

The Rome III consensus has divided functional dyspepsia into two subgroups; postprandial distress syndrome, characterized by postprandial fullness and early satiation, and epigastric pain syndrome, characterized by epigastric pain or burning. This Review describes the symptoms of functional dyspepsia and discusses the evidence to support the two subgroups. Dyspepsia refers to a heterogeneous group of symptoms that are localized in the epigastric region. Typical dyspeptic symptoms include postprandial fullness, early satiation, epigastric pain and epigastric burning, but other upper gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, belching or abdominal bloating often occur. Functional dyspepsia is defined as the presence of dyspeptic symptoms in the absence of an organic cause that readily explains them. The Rome III consensus proposed the subdivision of functional dyspepsia into postprandial distress syndrome (PDS), characterized by postprandial fullness and early satiation, and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS), characterized by epigastric pain or burning. Epidemiological studies in the USA and Europe confirmed the presence of both subgroups, with good separation between EPS and PDS. By contrast, other studies have found major overlap between EPS and PDS in patients with functional dyspepsia in specialist care centres in Europe and Asia. Preliminary pathophysiological studies suggest that PDS might be characterized by a higher prevalence of impaired gastric accommodation than EPS and raised duodenal eosinophil counts. Whether different treatment approaches are needed for EPS and PDS is currently unclear; only acotiamide, a new drug for the treatment of functional dyspepsia, has been found to be efficacious in PDS but not in EPS. Further randomized controlled trials testing treatment response by subgroup are urgently needed. Key Points Functional dyspepsia refers to dyspeptic symptoms that cannot currently be explained by an organic cause The Rome III criteria has divided functional dyspepsia into two subgroups; postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) Patients with PDS typically report postprandial fullness and early satiation, whereas those with EPS are more likely to experience epigastric pain and burning Currently, it is unknown whether patients with PDS and EPS need to be treated differently; randomized controlled trials are required to test treatment response by subgroup

INTRODUCTION:An association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and common psychiatric conditions, most notably anxiety and depression, has been reported. However, the magnitude of this association is poorly understood. Therefore, we aimed to systematically assess this issue.METHODS:We comprehensively searched multiple bibliographic databases (Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) from inception to May 15, 2023. We retrieved observational studies that reported the prevalence of anxiety and/or depressive symptoms diagnosed by validated questionnaires in ≥100 adults (aged 18 years or older) with GERD. We also included cohort studies that explored the risk of incident GERD in subjects with anxiety/depression vice versa scenario. Finally, we included Mendelian randomization studies that assessed the cause-and-effect relationship between anxiety/depression and GERD. The extracted data were combined using a random-effects model.RESULTS:In total, 36 eligible studies were included. The pooled prevalences of anxiety and depressive symptoms were 34.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.7-44.2; I2 = 99.4%) and 24.2% (95% CI 19.9-28.5; I2 = 98.8%) in subjects with GERD based on 30 studies, respectively. Both anxiety and depressive symptoms were more common in subjects with GERD compared with those in healthy controls (odds ratio = 4.46 [95% CI 1.94-10.25] and odds ratio = 2.56 [95% CI 1.11-5.87], respectively). According to 3 cohort studies, subjects with GERD were at an increased risk of developing anxiety/depression and vice versa. Finally, 3 Mendelian randomization studies showed that genetic liability to these mood disorders is linked to an increased risk of developing GERD and vice versa.DISCUSSION:Up to 1 in 3 subjects with GERD experience anxiety and depression. There is likely a bidirectional causal relationship between anxiety/depression and GERD.

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the prevalence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and controls. Electronic databases were searched up to December 2018 for studies reporting SIBO prevalence in patients with IBS. Prevalence rates, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of SIBO in patients with IBS and controls were calculated. We included 25 studies with 3,192 patients with IBS and 3,320 controls. SIBO prevalence in patients with IBS was significantly increased compared with controls (OR = 3.7, 95% CI 2.3-6.0). In studies using only healthy controls, the OR for SIBO in patients with IBS was 4.9 (95% CI 2.8-8.6). With breath testing, SIBO prevalence in patients with IBS was 35.5% (95% CI 33.6-37.4) vs 29.7% (95% CI 27.6-31.8) in controls. Culture-based studies yielded a SIBO prevalence of 13.9% (95% CI 11.5-16.4) in patients with IBS and 5.0% (95% CI 3.9-6.2) in controls with a cutoff value of 10 colony-forming units per milliliter vs 33.5% (95% CI 30.1-36.9) in patients with IBS and 8.2% (95% CI 6.8-9.6) in controls with a cutoff value of 10 colony-forming unit per milliliter, respectively. SIBO prevalence diagnosed by lactulose breath test is much greater in both patients with IBS (3.6-fold) and controls (7.6-fold) compared with glucose breath test. Similar difference is seen when lactulose breath test is compared with culture methods. OR for SIBO in patients with IBS-diarrhea compared with IBS-constipation was 1.86 (95% CI 1.83-2.8). Methane-positive breath tests were significantly more prevalent in IBS-constipation compared with IBS-diarrhea (OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.2). In patients with IBS, proton pump inhibitor was not associated with SIBO (OR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.5, P = 0.55). This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests a link between IBS and SIBO. However, the overall quality of the evidence is low. This is mainly due to substantial \"clinical heterogeneity\" due to lack of uniform selection criteria for cases and controls and limited sensitivity and specificity of the available diagnostic tests.

Background The causes of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remain obscure. Some investigators have proposed chronic low-grade mucosal inflammation as a potential etiological factor. We performed a systematic review to examine this issue in detail. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EMBASE classic were searched up to December 2010 to identify studies of case–control design applying tests for low-grade inflammation to either full-thickness intestinal or endoscopic mucosal biopsies from patients with IBS. Controls were required to be healthy individuals, or asymptomatic patients undergoing investigation for reasons other than the reporting of upper or lower gastrointestinal symptoms. Individual study results were summarized descriptively. Results The literature search identified 1388 citations, of which 16 studies were eligible for inclusion. Individual study results were diverse, partly as a consequence of the different surrogate markers for inflammatory mechanisms studied. Mast cells, T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, and mucosal cytokine production all appeared altered among cases with IBS in individual studies, while no study demonstrated a significant difference in numbers of plasma cells, neutrophils, or eosinophils. Some studies suggested a relationship between mast cell abnormalities and symptom severity and frequency, as well as co-existent fatigue and depression. Studies were limited by the lack of comparability of controls, and the fact that most were conducted in highly selected groups of patients with IBS. Conclusions Low-grade mucosal inflammation, particularly mast cell activation, may be a contributory factor in the pathogenesis of IBS. Mast cell stabilizers warrant further assessment as a potential therapy in the condition.

Recently, we have shown that although the microbiota found in the healthy duodenum are taxonomically similar to the oral microbiota, their presence and association with the intestinal mucosa is not merely a result of luminal contamination. 4 Thus, small intestinal dysbiosis and its potential impact on the gut must also be considered. Using previously described methods, 4 the duodenal mucosal microbiota was assessed in patients with FD (Rome III; n=9) and controls (screening for iron-deficiency anaemia, mucosal/coeliac disease excluded; n=9) matched for age, sex and body mass index. An inverse relationship between the relative abundance of Streptococcus and the anaerobic genera Prevotella, Veillonella and Actinomyces was observed, which were significantly decreased in patients with FD (Mann-Whitney U test, p<0.05, false discovery rate q<0.2). Figure 1; Relative abundance of bacterial genera in the duodenal mucosa, assessed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Differences between patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) and controls were established using the Mann-Whitney U test, with false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons (#-family). In the patients with FD, we also assessed quality of life (Nepean Dyspepsia Index 8 ), symptom responses to a meal (standardised nutrient challenge 9 ) and total bacterial load (quantitative PCR). Aliment Pharmacol...

Background Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is considered a disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), presenting as chronic abdominal pain and altered defaecation. Symptoms are often food related. Much work in the field has focused on identifying physiological, immune and microbial abnormalities in the colon of patients; however, evidence of small intestinal immune activation and microbial imbalance has been reported in small studies. The significance of such findings has been largely underappreciated despite a growing body of work implicating small intestinal homeostatic imbalance in the pathogenesis of DGBIs. Main text Small intestinal mechanosensation is a characteristic feature of IBS. Furthermore, altered small intestinal barrier functions have been demonstrated in IBS patients with the diarrhoea-predominant subtype. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and increased populations of small intestinal mast cells are frequently associated with IBS, implicating microbial imbalance and low-grade inflammation in the pathogenesis of IBS. Furthermore, reports of localised food hypersensitivity responses in IBS patients implicate the small intestine as the site of immune-microbial-food interactions. Conclusions Given the association of IBS symptoms with food intake in a large proportion of patients and the emerging evidence of immune activation in these patients, the current literature suggests the pathogenesis of IBS is not limited to the colon but rather may involve dysfunction of the entire intestinal tract. It remains unclear if regional variation in IBS pathology explains the various symptom phenotypes and further work should consider the intestinal tract as a whole to answer this question.

ObjectiveFunctional dyspepsia (FD) is a complex disorder, with debilitating epigastric symptoms. Evidence suggests alterations in gastrointestinal (GI) motility, visceral hypersensitivity, permeability and low-level immune activation in the duodenum may play a role. However, we still have a relatively poor understanding of how these factors interact to precipitate the onset of FD symptoms which are frequently meal related. The duodenal microbiota, in combination with specific dietary substrates, may be important mediators in disease pathophysiology; however, these interlinked factors have not been thoroughly investigated in FD.DesignEighty-six individuals (56 FD, 30 controls) undergoing endoscopy were consecutively recruited and underwent detailed clinical assessment, including upper GI symptoms, gastric emptying and dietary assessment. Duodenal biopsies were obtained aseptically, and the mucosa-associated microbiota (MAM) analysed via 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing.ResultsThe relative abundances of predominant members of the Firmicutes, Bacteroidota and Fusobacteriota phyla were linked to symptom burden in FD. Inverse relationships between the relative abundances of Streptococcus and Prevotella, and the relative abundance of Veillonella spp with gastric emptying time, were also observed. No significant differences in long-term nutrient intake or diet quality were found between FD and controls, and there appeared to be limited association between habitual diet and duodenal MAM profiles.ConclusionThis study suggests a link between the duodenal MAM, gastric emptying and FD symptoms, and this is largely independent of long-term dietary intake.