Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
807
result(s) for
"Tanaka, Shiro"
Sort by:
Kingdom hearts. Birth by sleep : the novel
\"Ten years before Sora fought to save the worlds, three young Keyblade wielders named Terra, Aqua, and Ventus trained in the hopes of becoming Masters one day. But on the day of Terra and Aqua's Mark of Mastery exam, everything changed forever, and the three each set off on their own journey.\"-- Provided by publisher.
Book
Rare event approximation between subdistribution hazard ratio and cause-specific hazard ratio in survival analysis with competing risks
BackgroundDespite the fact that competing risks are inevitable in epidemiological and clinical studies, distinctions between the hazard ratio estimated by handling competing risks as censoring and the subditribution hazard ratio are often overlooked.MethodsWe derive quantitative relationships between subdistribution hazard ratio and cause-specific hazard ratio, and derive an approximate calculation method to transform the two into each other. Numerical examinations of hypothetical six scenarios and published information of a randomized clinical trial of cholesterol–lowering therapy and a registry of acute myeloid leukemia were provided.ResultsGeneral and approximate relationships under rare event assumptions between the two types of hazard ratio were given. The approximation formula is based on a survival ratio and has two possible applications. First, one can calculate a subdistribution hazard ratio from published information. Second, this formula allows sample size estimation that takes the presence of competing risks into account.ConclusionsThe distinction between the two types of hazard ratio can be addressed by focusing on two quantities. One is how the event of interest and competing risk is rare, and the other is the survival ratio.
Journal Article
Kingdom hearts 358/2 days : the novel
After the Organization tells her to look after a mysterious stranger, Roxas spends many meaningful days with this new Nobody whose face and body is hidden by a hood.
Book
Risk Ratio and Risk Difference Estimation in Case-cohort Studies
Background: In case-cohort studies with binary outcomes, ordinary logistic regression analyses have been widely used because of their computational simplicity. However, the resultant odds ratio estimates cannot be interpreted as relative risk measures unless the event rate is low. The risk ratio and risk difference are more favorable outcome measures that are directly interpreted as effect measures without the rare disease assumption.Methods: We provide pseudo-Poisson and pseudo-normal linear regression methods for estimating risk ratios and risk differences in analyses of case-cohort studies. These multivariate regression models are fitted by weighting the inverses of sampling probabilities. Also, the precisions of the risk ratio and risk difference estimators can be improved using auxiliary variable information, specifically by adapting the calibrated or estimated weights, which are readily measured on all samples from the whole cohort. Finally, we provide computational code in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) that can easily perform these methods.Results: Through numerical analyses of artificially simulated data and the National Wilms Tumor Study data, accurate risk ratio and risk difference estimates were obtained using the pseudo-Poisson and pseudo-normal linear regression methods. Also, using the auxiliary variable information from the whole cohort, precisions of these estimators were markedly improved.Conclusion: The ordinary logistic regression analyses may provide uninterpretable effect measure estimates, and the risk ratio and risk difference estimation methods are effective alternative approaches for case-cohort studies. These methods are especially recommended under situations in which the event rate is not low.
Journal Article
Antiresorptive Drugs and the Risk of Femoral Shaft Fracture in Men and Women With Osteoporosis: A Cohort Study Using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims of Japan
Background: This cohort study aimed to estimate incidence rates of femoral shaft fracture in patients who were treated with antiresorptive drugs.Methods: We used data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims of Japan from April 2009 and October 2016. All patients with new use of an antiresorptive drug, prescription-free period of ≥3 months, and no prior femoral fractures were included. Femoral shaft fractures were identified using a validated definition based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes. Incidence rate ratios were estimated using Poisson regression, with adjustment for sex, age, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index.Results: We identified 7,958,655 patients (women: 88.4%; age ≥75 years: 51.2%). Femoral shaft fractures were identified in 22,604 patients. Incidence rates per 100,000 person-years were 74.8 for women, 30.1 for men, 30.1 for patients aged ≤64 years, 47.7 for patients aged 65–74 years, and 99.0 for patients aged ≥75 years. Adjusted incidence rate ratios in patients taking versus not taking each type of antiresorptive drug were 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98–1.03) for bisphosphonates, 0.46 (95% CI, 0.44–0.48) for selective estrogen receptor modulators, 0.24 (95% CI, 0.18–0.32) for estrogens, 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71–0.79) for calcitonins, and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.84–1.03) for denosumab. The adjusted incidence rate ratio for alendronate was 1.18 (95% CI, 1.14–1.22).Conclusion: The incidence rates of femoral shaft fracture varied across patients treated with different antiresorptive drugs. Further research on a specific antiresorptive drug can increase understanding of the risk of femoral shaft fracture.
Journal Article
Design of a randomized trial of teriparatide followed by alendronate: Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-05 (JOINT-05)
IntroductionDespite advances in drug treatment, the optimal treatment strategy for severe osteoporosis remains uncertain.Materials and methodsThis article reports the design and rationale for the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-05 (JOINT-05), a randomized, controlled trial that compares the efficacy and safety of teriparatide followed by alendronate with alendronate monotherapy for severe osteoporosis.ResultsPostmenopausal women aged at least 75 years were eligible for the study if they were at high risk of fracture. Patients were recruited from 113 institutions in Japan between October 2014 and December 2017. They were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the sequential therapy arm (once-weekly subcutaneous injections of teriparatide 56.5 μg for 72 weeks followed by alendronate for 48 weeks) or monotherapy arm (alendronate for 120 weeks). The regimens for alendronate are 5 mg (orally administered once daily), 35 mg (orally administered once weekly), or 900 μg (intravenously administered once every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint is the incidence of morphometric vertebral fracture at 72 weeks. The secondary endpoints include the incidence of morphometric vertebral fracture at 120 weeks; incidence of morphometric vertebral or non-vertebral fractures at 72 and 120 weeks; incidence of clinical vertebral fracture at 72 and 120 weeks; changes in bone mineral density, quality of life scores (EuroQol 5 Dimensions and the Japanese Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire short form), and a visual analog scale for back pain; and adverse events.ConclusionWe reported the design and rationale for the JOINT-05. The trial is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031180235) and the University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000015573).
Journal Article
Reliability of early stage symptoms/clinical findings of osteonecrosis of the jaw: Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-05 (JOINT-05)
IntroductionTo investigate the differences in the incidence rates of suspected stage 0/1 osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and incidence risk of relevant clinical findings of suspected stage 0 ONJ between patients treated with sequential therapy comprising weekly teriparatide for 72 weeks followed by alendronate for 48 weeks vs. those who received monotherapy with alendronate for 120 weeks.Materials and methodsSuspected stage 0/1 ONJ was defined by non-specific symptoms. Tooth mobility and periodontal symptoms (gingival bleeding, swelling, and/or pain) were selected as clinical findings of suspected stage 0 ONJ. Poisson regression models were applied to calculate the incidence rate ratios of suspected stage 0/1 between the teriparatide group (TG) and alendronate group (AG). Generalized linear models were used to calculate the risk ratios of clinical findings between groups.ResultsTwo hundred and sixty-one participants in the TG and 344 in the AG answered a structured questionnaire on oral health and were included in this study. There were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence rate of suspected stage 0/1 ONJ at both 72 and 120 weeks. The risk ratio of the TG to AG for tooth mobility was 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13–0.88, p = 0.02) at 72 weeks and 0.90 (95% CI 0.40–2.03, p = 0.83) at 120 weeks. The incidence rate of tooth mobility related to periodontal symptoms decreased in the TG and increased in the AG during the study.ConclusionTooth mobility accompanied by clinical periodontal symptoms may be a useful early sign of stage 0 ONJ.
Journal Article
Achieving osteoporosis treat-to-target goals with teriparatide or alendronate: sub-analysis of Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial-05 (JOINT-05)
IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to evaluate whether bone mineral density (BMD) ≥ −2.5 SD could be used as the treat-to-target (T2T) goal when treating osteoporosis with teriparatide (TPTD) and alendronate (ALN), and to investigate the relationship with incident vertebral fracture by re-analyzing data from a randomized, controlled trial (JOINT-05) involving postmenopausal Japanese women at high fracture risk.Materials and methodsParticipants received sequential therapy with once-weekly TPTD for 72 weeks, followed by ALN for 48 weeks (TPTD-ALN group) or ALN monotherapy for 120 weeks (ALN group). BMDs were measured at the lumbar spine (L2-4), total hip, and femoral neck at 0, 24, 48, 72, and 120 weeks by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The T2T goal was BMD ≥ −2.5 SD, and the endpoint was the proportion of participants with baseline BMD < −2.5 SD in three measurement sites achieving BMD ≥ −2.5 SD.ResultsA total of 559 participants were selected. BMD ≥ −2.5 SD at 120 weeks in the L2-4, total hip, and femoral neck sites was achieved in 20.5%, 23.1%, and 5.9%, respectively, in the TPTD-ALN group and 22.2%, 11.7%, and 7.3%, respectively, in the ALN group. Incident vertebral fractures occurred in areas of both lower and high BMD.ConclusionDuring the 1.5-year treatment period, more than 20% of participants achieved BMD ≥ −2.5 SD as a T2T goal at L2-4. Since the achievement level differed depending on the BMD measurement site, the appropriate site should be selected according to the baseline BMD level.
Journal Article
Salvage Therapy After Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Conditional Landmark Analysis
This study aimed to describe the chemotherapy effects after trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) and/or regorafenib treatment in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.
Patients receiving regorafenib or TFTD for metastatic CRC during 2013-2018 were selected and divided into two groups: one with additional chemotherapy after regorafenib or TFTD (CTX group) and one without additional chemotherapy (Non-CTX group). Patients were followed up from a landmark point (90 days from the last day of administration of regorafenib or TFTD). We compared overall survival (OS) between the groups.
The median OS was 7.7 months in the CTX group and 4.1 months in the non-CTX groups. Several sensitivity analyses did not negate the survival advantage detected in the CTX group.
The chemotherapy after regorafenib or TFTD was associated with prolonged OS in advanced CRC patients. Further study is required to determine appropriate treatment choice.
Journal Article
The association of urinary pentosidine levels with the prevalence of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women
To evaluate whether or not the urinary pentosidine level has clinical value in the assessment of the osteoporotic fracture risk, a novel ELISA for pentosidine was used in clinical samples. This study employed a cross-sectional design to analyze a subset of postmenopausal women in the Nagano Cohort Study. A total of 517 urine samples were analyzed using an ELISA system, which can measure urinary pentosidine without hydrolysis. Patients were asked about their history of non-vertebral osteoporotic fracture and the prevalence of vertebral fracture was semi-quantitatively assessed on X-ray films. A 10-year increase in age was related to a 1.09-fold increase in the urinary pentosidine level (95% CI 1.05–1.13, P < 0.001), prevalent fracture (+) was related to a 1.10-fold increase in the urinary pentosidine level (95% CI 1.03–1.18, P = 0.006). Patients with prevalent fracture who had a normal bone mineral density (BMD) showed higher pentosidine levels (median 34.3 pM/mg Cr) than patients with a low BMD without fracture (median 31.4 pM/mg Cr). A multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that urinary pentosidine was significantly associated with the prevalence of fracture after adjustment for known risk factors for fracture (odds ratio 1.92, 95% CI 1.09–3.37, P = 0.023). The present results indicated a significant association between urinary pentosidine and fracture after adjustment for age and BMD, suggesting that urinary pentosidine may be useful for assessing the fracture risk in postmenopausal women.
Journal Article