Explore the vast range of titles available.

To examine the influence of the distance between adjacent implant osteotomies on heat accumulation in the inter-osteotomy area, two experimental groups with 15 pairs of osteotomies in Type II polyurethane blocks were compared: 7 mm inter-osteotomy separations (Group A, n = 15) and 14 mm inter-osteotomy separations (Group B, n = 15). An infrared thermographic analysis of thermal changes in the inter-osteotomy area was completed. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher post-test were used to determine group differences. Higher temperatures were recorded in Group A at the coronal and middle levels compared to the apical level in both groups. The temperature reached max temperatures at T80s and T100s. In Group A, the threshold for thermal necrosis was exceeded. Meanwhile, Group B did not reach the threshold for thermal necrosis. Preparing adjacent implant osteotomies in dense bone with a 7 mm separation between their centers increases the temperature in the inter-osteotomy area, exceeding the threshold for bone thermal necrosis; meanwhile, increasing the distance between osteotomies reduces the thermal accumulation and the risk for thermal necrosis.

Internet giants, leading retailers, and other firms are voraciously gathering data with little oversight from anyone. In Las Vegas, no company knows the value of data better than Caesars Entertainment. Thousands of clients pour through the ever-open doors of their casinos. The secret to the company's success lies in their one unrivaled asset: they know their clients intimately by tracking the activities of the overwhelming majority of gamblers. Caesars' dogged data-gathering methods have been so successful that they have grown to become the world's largest casino operator, and have inspired companies of all kinds to ramp up their own data mining in the hopes of boosting their targeted marketing efforts. Tanner's timely warning resounds: Yes, there are many benefits to the free flow of data, but there is a dark, unregulated, and destructive netherworld as well. --

When I tell people about the growing commercial trade in anonymized patient data from sources including electronic health records, insurance claims data, and prescriptions, the sale of lab data from companies such as Quest and LabCorp sparks the greatest surprise and concern. The more information data miners aggregate into patient dossiers, the greater the possibility of re-identification, especially as computing power increases.12 Such information could be exploited to target medical marketing, deny life insurance or bank loans, embarrass someone, or steal an identity to obtain medical services.

Adam Tanner writes about the business of personal data. He is a fellow at the Institute for Quantitative Social Science at Harvard University and was previously a Nieman fellow there. Tanner has worked for Reuters News Agency as Balkans bureau chief (based in Belgrade, Serbia), as well as San Francisco bureau chief, and has had previous postings in Berlin, Moscow, and Washington, DC. He also contributes to Forbes and other magazines.

This article explores how the law of England and Wales1 has responded thus far to medical and clinical advances that have enabled patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness to survive. The authors argue that, although the courts have taken account of much of the science, they are now lagging behind, with the result that some patients are being denied their legal rights under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. The article further argues that English law does not comply with the United Kingdom’s commitments under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Stressing the need for the law to keep in step with advances in science, the article concludes with robust recommendations for improvements, based on the latest research in neuroscience, to the way in which life-sustaining treatment decisions are made. This would mean that the wishes of patients, including those with covert awareness, can be better reflected in best interests assessments.

The current law and practice surrounding decision-making for adult patients who lack capacity, because they are in a prolonged disorder of consciousness, leaves these vulnerable patients without adequate protections to ensure their voices are heard. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 and subsequent case law have established that the test to be applied in such cases is whether the decision being made is in the \"best interests” of the patient. This thesis looks at how the legal test of best interests is understood and how it is used in practice by doctors and lawyers. It argues that there is a critical misunderstanding of what is meant by best interests, and as a result, vulnerable patients are not having their rights protected.The main thrust of this thesis stems from empirical research into how decisions are made in practice by both clinicians and lawyers; this research takes the form of a series of interviews with leading practitioners and a number of observations of Court of Protection hearings to see first-hand whether decision-makers are following the established law.The empirical work highlights the levels of misunderstanding and poor application of the best interests standard. The interviews identified that the proportion of professionals who do not have an adequate understanding of the law relating to decision-making is perhaps even worse than has been stated in some previous pieces of research. The observations of the Court of Protection indicate that there is a wide discrepancy between what professionals say they do and what they actually do. These observations also uncovered several problems in the current system such as the length of delays and the weight given to expert evidence.This thesis concludes that the law is ultimately misunderstood and incorrectly applied on a routine basis by people whose job is to protect vulnerable parties. The recent developments in the law, by the Supreme Court, potentially go against the foundations of why the Mental Capacity Act 2005 was introduced. There is further consideration as to what future reforms are needed to ensure a patient-centred decision-making framework.