Explore the vast range of titles available.

Purpose: To report on the prospective evaluation of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in experienced ametropic naval aviators that led to the approval of refractive surgery for military pilots. Methods: This was the first study evaluating refractive surgery in naval aviators. Return to flight status after PRK and clinical outcomes and subjective and objective flight performance were evaluated. Results: A total of 785 U.S. naval aviators were enrolled in the study. Average preoperative refraction was −2.92 ± 1.73 diopters (D) (range: +5.25 to −9.13 D). By 6 months, 85.9% of eyes were within ±0.50 D and 96.4% were within ±1.00 D of emmetropia. 94.4% of eyes achieved 20/20 or better, 74.3% had 20/16 or better, and 45.2% had 20/12.5 or better uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at 6 months. A total of 78.5% of aviators met return-to-flight criteria by 4 weeks, 83.3% by 8 weeks, and 90.8% by 12 weeks following PRK. All aviators eventually returned to full flight status. Cumulative flight experience included logging more than 48,000 flight hours and 19,500 landings in the 6 months following PRK. Psychometric questionnaire results showed that 78% reported improved ability to detect other aircraft and 92% reported improved ability to land on an aircraft carrier (82% significantly improved) compared to wearing corrective lenses. No one felt their vision was worse in these dynamic environments. All aviators indicated they would undergo the procedure again and would recommend it to a fellow aviator. Conclusions: This prospective study in U.S. naval aviators determined PRK to be safe and effective in a unique patient population operating in a visually demanding and hazardous environment. The program continues to be enthusiastically supported by aviators and PRK is now allowed in all branches of the military and for National Aeronautics and Space Administration astronauts. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(6):e371–e380.]

Purpose: To present the outcomes of the U.S. Navy photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) accessioning study conducted between 2000 and 2005 that helped lead to the acceptance of laser vision correction within the U.S. aviation industry. Methods: In this prospective masked study, a total of 301 students who had PRK and underwent naval flight training were compared to 4,368 untreated peers. Three training pipelines were compared: propeller/jet transport, jet fighters, and helicopters. The evaluated metrics were flight and academic performance (assessed for the primary and advanced stage of the training as normalized Navy Standard Score [NSS]), as well as the student attrition rate from training. Results: The attrition rate was lower in the PRK group compared to controls (15.9% vs 23.2%; P = .004). In the primary stage of training, students who had PRK outperformed controls in flight training performance in the propeller/jet transport pipeline (average NSS after PRK: 52.4 ± 7.5 vs controls: 50.7 ± 6.4, P = .02), but the flight performance in the jet fighter and helicopter pipelines was comparable between the two groups. Academic performance in the primary stage of training was approximately 7% to 13% higher in students who had PRK for all training pipelines. During the advanced training stage, there was no difference in the flight performance between the groups in any of the presented pipelines. Academic performance was significantly better for students who had PRK in the helicopter pipeline (51.2 ± 11.0 vs 46.7 ± 11.7 P < .001) but comparable between the two groups in the remaining pipelines. Conclusions: Refractive surgery did not have adverse effects on flight performance metrics. Pilots who had PRK had comparable or better outcomes than their untreated peers. [J Refract Surg. 2024:40(3):e173–e181.]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and biological activity of a topical selective integrin inhibitor (OTT166) eyedrop administered BID for diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME). STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked Phase 1b study. Subjects with nonproliferative DR and DME with central subfield thickness (CST) > 325 microns were randomized to OTT166 eyedrops (2.5% or 5%) BID for 28 days. Subjects were followed for an additional 28 days after treatment cessation. RESULTS: Forty-four subjects were enrolled. No drug-related serious adverse events (SAEs) and two drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported. OTT166 was well-tolerated with no evidence of ocular toxicity. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) remained stable. Mean central retinal thickness (CRT) overall was variable: +12.8/+1.8 microns at Day 28 (end of treatment) and −50.3/+5.5 microns at Day 56 (end of study) for the 2.5% and 5% groups, respectively. Median CRT overall demonstrated consistent reduction by end of study: −39.0/−16.5 microns for the 2.5% and 5% groups, respectively. Median responses were greater in the treatment-naïve group (−41.5/−26.0 microns for the 2.5% and 5% groups, respectively). Thirty-seven percent of ‘responder’ subjects exhibited a mean reduction in CRT of 46.6 microns on optical coherence tomography (OCT) at end of treatment (Day 28) which persisted to end of the study (Day 56) – mean reduction of 67.4 microns, suggesting a durable effect. CONCLUSION: OTT166 eyedrops were safe, well-tolerated, and demonstrated biological activity in 37% of responders. These results warrant further evaluation of OTT166 eyedrops. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2022;53:553–560.]

The authors report a case of an immunocompetent 38-year-old male who presented with an indolent keratitis that eluded diagnosis after multiple cultures taken over 9 months. He was started initially on medications against Acanthamoeba, after presenting with a nearly complete corneal ring 2 months after trauma. These medications likely partially treated his condition, thereby making laboratory diagnosis more difficult. He was identified as having Encephalitozoon hellum by PCR. The patient subsequently underwent cornea transplant after a full course of medical treatment and recovered best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20.

Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) has become the community standard in corneal refractive surgery and is being performed by surgeons in the Army, Navy, and Air Force. LASIK differs from photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in that a partial-thickness corneal flap is created in the LASIK procedure before removing a microscopic amount of corneal tissue, whereas no flap creation is required in PRK. The benefits of LASIK include minimal discomfort after surgery, as well as a much faster return of visual function. PRK involves a surface ablation and therefore heals differently, involving more discomfort and a slower return of functional vision. LASIK flap integrity is a concern to anyone undergoing the procedure, as well as for those making recommendations on the best form of refractive surgery for military personnel. A case report and a review of the literature are presented on the identification and management of LASIK flap trauma.

The authors report a case of an immunocompetent 38-year-old male who presented with an indolent keratitis that eluded diagnosis after multiple cultures taken over 9 months. He was started initially on medications against Acanthamoeba, after presenting with a nearly complete corneal ring 2 months after trauma. These medications likely partially treated his condition, thereby making laboratory diagnosis more difficult. He was identified as having Encephalitozoon hellum by PCR. The patient subsequently underwent cornea transplant after a full course of medical treatment and recovered best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20.

Prior RK, PRK, LASIK, or ICRS are considered disqualifying for new accessions into the U.S. Navy or Marine Corps. Nonetheless, a uniform set of waiver requirements have been established for PRK and LASIK This apparent contradiction in policy is in place to enable the U.S. Navy to specify limits on applicants who have had refractive surgery. Consider, for example, an applicant who has 20/20 vision after PRK, but had a preoperative refraction of -20 D.