Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background/Objectives: The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) depends on the underlying disease, immunosuppression degree and the vaccine regimens. We evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of different COVID-19 vaccine schedules. Methods: The SAFER study: “Safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Disease”, is a Brazilian multicentric prospective observational phase IV study in the real-life. Data were analyzed after 2 or 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccines: adenoviral vectored vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Astrazeneca), mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2, Pfizer–BioNTech) or inactivated SARS-COV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac, Sinovac Biotech). IgG antibody against SARS-CoV-2 spike (IgG-S) receptor-binding domain level were quantified at baseline (T1) and 28 days after the first (T2), 2nd (T3) and 3rd (T4) doses by chemiluminescence (SARS-CoV-2-IgG-II Quant-assay, Abbott-Laboratories). Results: 721 patients with IMID were included in the analysis. The median titers of IgG-S (BAU/mL) increased progressively over the times: at baseline was 6.26 (5.41–7.24), T2: 73.01 (61.53–86.62), T3: 200.0 (174.36–229.41) and T4: 904.92 (800.49–1022.97). The multivariate linear regression showed that greater IgG-S titers were associated with pre-exposure to COVID-19 (p < 0.001) and BNT162b2 booster vaccine (p < 0.001). Rituximab and immunosuppressant drugs were independent factors for low titers (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, respectively). No serious adverse event was reported. Conclusions: All platforms were safe and induced an increase in IgG-S antibodies. COVID-19 pre-exposure and BNT162b2 booster regimens were predictors of higher humoral immune responses, which is relevant in immunosuppressed populations. Immunosuppressants (mainly rituximab) predicted the lowest antibodies.

Patients with systemic vasculitis faced the risk of severe COVID-19 and high mortality during the pandemic. Although SARS-CoV-2 vaccination mitigates these outcomes, vaccine hesitancy persists, and data on immunogenicity and safety in vasculitis is still limited. This study aims to assess response to primary and booster doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in systemic vasculitis. This multicenter cohort study including systemic vasculitis included patients from SAFER study (Safety and Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccines in Rheumatic Diseases). We evaluated serum IgG levels against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain (IgG anti-RBD) at baseline and 28 days post-vaccination, disease activity scores, new cases of COVID-19 infections, and adverse events. Seventy-three patients with systemic vasculitis were included. Behçet's disease (n=39), Takayasu arteritis (n=15), and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (n=14) were the most common vasculitis forms. The majority of the patients had no comorbidities and were in remission. Seventy patients received one, 65 two, and 60 three vaccine doses. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca/Oxford) (n=36) and CoronaVac (Sinovac) (n=25) were primarily the most common vaccines, while BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) was usually the booster vaccine. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 induced higher IgG anti-RBD than CoronaVac after two doses ( =0.002), but this difference disappeared after the booster dose. No differences in vaccine response were noted between heterologous and homologous regimens or vasculitis types. The new cases of COVID-19 (16.9%), hospitalization (1.5%), and mortality (1.5%) rates were relatively low following vaccination. Disease activity remained stable, and adverse events were mostly mild. Only one severe adverse event was observed. Different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines demonstrated immunogenicity and clinical effectiveness in systemic vasculitis. The three-dose schedule was safe without increasing relapse risk.

Background: Dose-sparing approaches can be effective in maintaining immunogenicity and safety while expanding vaccine coverage. We previously demonstrated that a half dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 is as effective and immunogenic for primary vaccination. Methods: This non-inferiority, non-randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, humoral, and cellular immune responses of a third booster dose—comparing half-dose and full-dose regimens—in individuals aged 18–49 years, with a 1-year follow-up. Results: A total of 2801 participants were enrolled: 2352 received half doses and 449 received full doses. The incidence rate of COVID-19 was 225.0 per 1000 person-years in the half-dose group and 173.8 in the full-dose group, with no significant difference in effectiveness (β = −0.05; 95% CrI: −0.24 to 0.15). No deaths occurred, and hospitalization rates were similar. In a subsample (n = 558), anti-S IgG levels peaked 28 days post-dose and declined by day 180 after the primary series [175 (121–252) vs. 121 (71–208) GMT, p < 0.001], but remained elevated after the booster [192.1 (124–297) vs. 550 (380–797) GMT, p < 0.001]. Booster antibody levels were similar between groups [592.4 (318–1140) vs. 550 (380–797) GMT]. The half-dose group showed high titers against Omicron and robust T/B-cell responses (e.g., EMCD4, EMCD8, IFN+CD4+, CD19+TNF+). Conclusions: Fractional half dose of ChAdOx nCov-19 was effective and non-inferior to a full booster dose. Homologous regimen with 3 half doses or 3 full doses induced a similar increase in antibody titers and robust cellular response. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05059106).

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic posed additional challenges for this vulnerable population, such as Sjögren’s disease (SjD), underscoring the need for effective and safe vaccination strategies. Objective: To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with SjD. Methods: This prospective, observational, longitudinal study included SjD patients from the SAFER cohort. Immunogenicity was assessed via anti-spike IgG (IgG-S) titers using chemiluminescence reported as geometric mean titers (GMT) and fold increase in GMT (FI-GMT). Disease activity was evaluated using the ESSDAI score. Adverse events and COVID-19 infections were also monitored. Assessments were conducted at four time points: pre-first dose (T1), pre-second dose (T2), pre-booster (T3), and four weeks post-booster (T4). Primary vaccination involved ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac), and boosters were either homologous (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) or heterologous (BNT162b2). Results: Among 51 participants (mean age 46 years; 90% female), 41% had comorbidities and 27% (n = 14/51) were highly immunosuppressed. Among those 73% (n = 37/51) under low immunosuppression, n = 8/51 (13%) were not using any medication. At baseline, 11% (n = 4/35) showed moderate/high disease activity, which decreased to 6.5% (n = 2/31) at T4. Primary vaccination was ChAdOx1 in 94% (n = 48/51) and CoronaVac in 6% (n = 3/51); 73% (n = 37/51) received heterologous and 27% (n = 14/51) homologous boosters. COVID-19 infection post-booster occurred in 20% (n = 10/51). Seroconversion rates reached nearly 100% across all medication subgroups except for biologic users, who showed delayed but stable seroconversion by T4. IgG-S titers increased progressively through T4. Primary immunization induced an ascending GMT in both vaccine types. At T4, the GMT was significantly higher in the BNT162b2 group (2148.03 [1452.05–3155.84]; p < 0.001; 95% CI) than in the ChAdOx1 group (324.29 [107.92–974.48]; p < 0.001; 95% CI); the fold-increase in immune response was six times greater with BNT162b2 (5.98 [2.97–12.03]; p = 0.001; 95% CI). Seroconversion was 100% in the heterologous group versus 83% in the homologous group (p > 0.01). Those with prior infection showed significantly higher titers, particularly at T2 and T3 (p < 0.001 for T1–T3). Adverse events were mild and not statistically significant. Multivariate regression confirmed BNT162b2 as an independent factor for higher antibody titers. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccination in patients with SjD was safe and induced high anti-spike antibody titers and seropositivity. Heterologous boosting, particularly with BNT162b2, demonstrated superior immunogenicity. No association was found between vaccination and SjD disease flares or worsening activity.

Objective: To evaluate the humoral response to and impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in a multicenter cohort design. Methods: Data for this analysis were obtained from the Study of Safety, Effectiveness and Duration of Immunity after Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (SAFER), a prospective, multicenter, phase IV, real-world study conducted across different regions of Brazil from June/2021 to March/2024. Patients aged >18 years with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who received any one of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines approved by the Brazilian health regulatory agency (CoronaVac [inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine], ChAdOx-1 [AstraZeneca], or BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech]) were included. Immunogenicity was assessed in pre- and post-vaccination blood samples, and patients were monitored in person and remotely for the occurrence and severity of COVID-19. Results: Two hundred and thirty-five patients with SLE who had completed their vaccination schedules (two doses + booster dose) were included in this study. Most patients were female (89.3%) and had low disease activity or were in remission (72.4%); the majority were also on some form of immunosuppressive therapy (58.1%). One hundred and sixteen patients received two doses of CoronaVac followed by one dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine, eighty-seven received two doses of ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca) followed by one dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine, and thirty-two received three doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine. Twenty-eight cases of COVID-19, none meeting criteria for severe COVID-19, were recorded in patients with respiratory symptoms after the second dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Regarding immunogenicity, an increase in seroconversion rate was observed following consecutive vaccine doses, with no difference between vaccination schedules, reaching 97.57% seropositivity after a booster dose. The geometric mean IgG titers differed between the different vaccination schedules after the first and the second vaccine dose, being lowest for the CoronaVac-based schedule, but titers were similar after the administration of a booster dose. Conclusion: In patients with SLE, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are immunogenic, inducing a robust humoral response. No severe outcomes associated with death or hospitalization were found in the evaluated patient sample. Complete vaccination schedules including a booster dose induced higher humoral responses than incomplete schedules, especially in patients initially immunized with an inactivated virus vaccine schedule and those with a suboptimal humoral response.