Explore the vast range of titles available.

Kidney transplant recipients receive therapeutic immunosuppression that impairs their immune responses to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. For this reason, this vulnerable patient population is insufficiently protected by the standard two-dose COVID-19 vaccination programme and requires a specific follow-up to guide personalization of an intensified vaccination approach.

Regardless of the primary disease responsible for kidney failure, patients suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD) have in common multiple impairments of both the innate and adaptive immune systems, the pathophysiology of which has long remained enigmatic. CKD-associated immune dysfunction includes chronic low-grade activation of monocytes and neutrophils, which induces endothelial damage and increases cardiovascular risk. Although innate immune effectors are activated during CKD, their anti-bacterial capacity is impaired, leading to increased susceptibility to extracellular bacterial infections. Finally, CKD patients are also characterized by profound alterations of cellular and humoral adaptive immune responses, which account for an increased risk for malignancies and viral infections. This review summarizes the recent emerging data that link the pathophysiology of CKD-associated immune dysfunctions with the accumulation of microbiota-derived metabolites, including indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate, the two best characterized protein-bound uremic retention solutes.

The widespread introduction of AI in transplant nephrology has been prompted by the ever-increasing complexity and volume of information, as well as the existence of multiple nephrology registries around the world. Since the first kidney transplant, we have witnessed a shift in therapeutic goals to achieve. [...]the use of kidney transplantation as a therapeutic procedure has spread rapidly (becoming, de facto, a victim of its own success, with growing waiting lists), and the focus has had to shift towards long-term success. [...]Yi et al focused on using AI to classify histological kidney abnormalities to use as indicators of graft loss [11]. Once the algorithm was trained on renal graft biopsies, the deriving digital features correlated significantly with existing scoring systems. [...]the Interstitial and Tubular Abnormality Score (ITAS) in baseline samples and the Composite Damage Score in post-transplant biopsies were highly predictive of graft loss, outperforming conventional scores or clinical predictors.

Innovative solutions have entered the routine management of patients with type 1 diabetes or are making the headlines and this is shaking the world of beta cell replacement therapies. Above all, allogeneic islet transplantation is enthusiastically doomed to extinction by the aficionados of “closed loop” artificial insulin delivery systems or those convinced of the imminent large scale availability of stem-cell derived insulin-producing tissues. This opinion paper will propose that neither will be a universal solution in the very near future and will argue that xenogeneic islet transplantation may be a serious outsider in the race for new therapies. In the meantime, the odds are in favor of allogeneic islet (and pancreas) transplantation remaining first line options in the treatment of complicated type 1 diabetes. There is no question that “closed loop” systems have already greatly improved the management of type 1 diabetes, but, while “unlimited” sources of insulin-producing cells are jockeying for approval as standard-of-care, these improvements are more likely to drive a shift of indications -from islet transplant alone to simultaneous islet-kidney transplantation- than to herald the demise of islet transplantation.

In transplantation, genetic differences between donor and recipient trigger immune responses that cause graft rejection. Allorecognition, the process by which the immune system discriminates allogeneic grafts, targets major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and minor histocompatibility antigens. Historically, it was believed that allorecognition was solely mediated by the recipient’s adaptive immune system recognizing donor-specific alloantigens. However, recent research has shown significant roles for innate immune components, such as lymphoid and myeloid cells, which are sometimes triggered by the mere absence of a self-protein in the graft. This review integrates recent breakthroughs into the current allorecognition paradigm based on the well-established direct and indirect pathways, emphasizing the semi-direct pathway where recipient antigen-presenting cells (APCs) acquire donor MHC molecules, and the inverted direct pathway where donor CD4 + T cells within the graft activate recipient B cells to produce donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). The review also explores the role of natural killer (NK) cells in both promoting and inhibiting graft rejection, highlighting their dual role in innate allorecognition. Additionally, it discusses the emerging understanding of myeloid cell-mediated allorecognition and its implications for initiating adaptive immune responses. These insights aim to provide a more comprehensive understanding of allorecognition, potentially leading to improved transplant outcomes.

Rejection remains the main cause of premature graft loss after kidney transplantation, despite the use of potent immunosuppression. This highlights the need to better understand the composition and the cell-to-cell interactions of the alloreactive inflammatory infiltrate. Here, we performed droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing of 35,152 transcriptomes from 16 kidney transplant biopsies with varying phenotypes and severities of rejection and without rejection, and identified cell-type specific gene expression signatures for deconvolution of bulk tissue. A specific association was identified between recipient-derived FCGR3A+ monocytes, FCGR3A +  NK cells and the severity of intragraft inflammation. Activated FCGR3A+ monocytes overexpressed CD47 and LILR genes and increased paracrine signaling pathways promoting T cell infiltration. FCGR3A +  NK cells overexpressed FCRL3 , suggesting that antibody-dependent cytotoxicity is a central mechanism of NK-cell mediated graft injury. Multiplexed immunofluorescence using 38 markers on 18 independent biopsy slides confirmed this role of FcγRIII+ NK and FcγRIII+ nonclassical monocytes in antibody-mediated rejection, with specificity to the glomerular area. These results highlight the central involvement of innate immune cells in the pathogenesis of allograft rejection and identify several potential therapeutic targets that might improve allograft longevity. Although long-term kidney allograft failure is broadly classified as T cell- or antibody-mediated, this dichotomy is not always apparent in all patients, highlighting the need for improved allograft tissue characterisation. Here, the authors use single-cell RNA sequencing and multiplex imaging for transcriptomic and spatial profiling of allograft tissue from patients experiencing different degrees of rejection severity.

Current doctrine is that microvascular inflammation (MVI) triggered by a transplant -recipient antibody response against alloantigens (antibody-mediated rejection) is the main cause of graft failure. Here, we show that histological lesions are not mediated by antibodies in approximately half the participants in a cohort of 129 renal recipients with MVI on graft biopsy. Genetic analysis of these patients shows a higher prevalence of mismatches between donor HLA I and recipient inhibitory killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs). Human in vitro models and transplantation of β2-microglobulin-deficient hearts into wild-type mice demonstrates that the inability of graft endothelial cells to provide HLA I-mediated inhibitory signals to recipient circulating NK cells triggers their activation, which in turn promotes endothelial damage. Missing self-induced NK cell activation is mTORC1-dependent and the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin can prevent the development of this type of chronic vascular rejection. ‘Missing self’ is a mode of natural killer (NK) cell activation aimed to detect the lack of HLA-I molecules on infected or neoplastic cells. Here, the authors show that mismatch between donor HLA-I and cognate receptors on recipient NK cells mediates microvascular inflammation-associated graft rejection, a pathology that is preventable by mTOR inhibition.

NK cell education is the process through which chronic engagement of inhibitory NK cell receptors by self MHC-I molecules preserves cellular responsiveness. The molecular mechanisms responsible for NK cell education remain unclear. Here, we show that mouse NK cell education is associated with a higher basal activity of the mTOR/Akt pathway, commensurate to the number of educating receptors. This higher activity was dependent on the SHP-1 phosphatase and essential for the improved responsiveness of reactive NK cells. Upon stimulation, the mTOR/Akt pathway amplified signaling through activating NK cell receptors by enhancing calcium flux and LFA-1 integrin activation. Pharmacological inhibition of mTOR resulted in a proportional decrease in NK cell reactivity. Reciprocally, acute cytokine stimulation restored reactivity of hyporesponsive NK cells through mTOR activation. These results demonstrate that mTOR acts as a molecular rheostat of NK cell reactivity controlled by educating receptors and uncover how cytokine stimulation overcomes NK cell education. The cells of the immune system patrol the body to detect and destroy harmful microbes and diseased cells. Natural killer cells are immune cells with a natural capacity to kill infected or cancerous cells, as their name suggests. Importantly, they do so while sparing the surrounding healthy cells. As natural killer cells mature they go through an “education” process to learn to distinguish between normal and abnormal cells. During education, the natural killer cells interact continuously with nearby healthy cells. However, it remains unknown how these interactions change the natural killer cells, or how these changes control their killing activity. Marçais et al. now show that a protein called mTOR is essential to the education of natural killer cells. Comparing natural killer cells that had or had not completed the education process revealed that mTOR is more active in the educated cells. Moreover, inhibiting the activity of mTOR caused educated natural killer cells to lose their ability to identify diseased cells, while stimulating mTOR activity in uneducated natural killer cells mimicked the education process, allowing them to recognize and eliminate diseased host cells. Certain nutrients are known to control the activity of mTOR, which suggests these nutrients could also affect how natural killer cells develop. In addition, manipulating the activity of mTOR could be used to control the response of natural killer cells to diseased host cells, and so could form part of treatments for cancer and infectious diseases. However, given that mTOR plays numerous roles within different body cells, any potential therapies that are developed would need to be able to manipulate mTOR specifically in natural killer cells.

Organoids are 3D structures grown from pluripotent stem cells derived from human tissue and serve as in vitro miniature models of human organs. Organoids are expected to revolutionize biomedical research and clinical care. However, organoids are not seen as morally neutral. For instance, tissue donors may perceive enduring personal connections with their organoids, setting higher bars for informed consent and patient participation. Also, several organoid sub-types, e.g., brain organoids and human–animal chimeric organoids, have raised controversy. This systematic review provides an overview of ethical discussions as conducted in the scientific literature on organoids. The review covers both research and clinical applications of organoid technology and discusses the topics informed consent, commercialization, personalized medicine, transplantation, brain organoids, chimeras, and gastruloids. It shows that further ethical research is needed especially on organoid transplantation, to help ensure the responsible development and clinical implementation of this technology in this field.