Explore the vast range of titles available.

A monobody was identified that binds to an allosteric lobe at the α4-β6-α5 interface to block H- and K-RAS signaling and transformation by disrupting RAS dimerization and nanoclustering. RAS GTPases are important mediators of oncogenesis in humans. However, pharmacological inhibition of RAS has proved challenging. Here we describe a functionally critical region, located outside the effector lobe of RAS, that can be targeted for inhibition. We developed NS1, a synthetic binding protein (monobody) that bound with high affinity to both GTP- and GDP-bound states of H-RAS and K-RAS but not N-RAS. NS1 potently inhibited growth factor signaling and oncogenic H-RAS- and K-RAS-mediated signaling and transformation but did not block oncogenic N-RAS, BRAF or MEK1. NS1 bound the α4-β6-α5 region of RAS, which disrupted RAS dimerization and nanoclustering and led to blocking of CRAF–BRAF heterodimerization and activation. These results establish the importance of the α4-β6-α5 interface in RAS-mediated signaling and define a previously unrecognized site in RAS for inhibiting RAS function.

First-generation RAF inhibitors paradoxically induce ERK signaling in normal and tumor cells exhibiting RAS activity. Compound-induced RAF dimerization through stabilization of the RAF ON/active state by inhibitors has emerged as a critical contributing factor. RAF inhibitors also enhance RAS−RAF association. Although this event is thought to play a key role in priming RAF activation, the underlying mechanism is not known. Here we report that RAF inhibitors induce the disruption of intramolecular interactions between the kinase domain and its N-terminal regulatory region independently of RAS activity. This provides a molecular basis to explain the induction of RAS−RAF association by RAF inhibitors, as well as the co-operativity observed between RAS activity and RAF kinase inhibitors in driving RAF activation. Profiling of second-generation RAF inhibitors confirmed their improved mode of action, but also revealed liabilities that allowed us to discern two properties of an ideal RAF inhibitor: high-binding affinity to all RAF paralogs and maintenance of the OFF/autoinhibited state of the enzyme. RAF family kinases transmit signals from activated RAS at the plasma membrane to downstream kinases to control cell proliferation, differentiation and survival. Here the authors shed light on the molecular mechanisms whereby small molecule RAF inhibitors induce RAS-RAF association and paradoxical RAF activation.

Key Points The three cellular RAF family kinases (ARAF, BRAF and CRAF) were identified 30 years ago on the basis of their homology to the viral oncoprotein v-raf. They were then found to be core members of the RAS–ERK pathway. Kinase suppressor of RAS (KSR) pseudokinases were identified in 1995 as modulators of the RAS–ERK pathway. They are closely related to RAF proteins and were originally defined as scaffolding proteins. In quiescent cells, inactive RAF is maintained in the cytosol in an auto-inhibited state stabilized by 14-3-3 proteins. Upon cell stimulation, RAF is recruited to the plasma membrane by activated RAS. This relieves RAF auto-inhibition, which is concomitant with its phosphorylation on various activating residues. The catalytic activation of RAF also relies on an allosteric mechanism implemented by the formation of homotypic or heterotypic kinase domain dimers. KSR proteins also dimerize with RAF proteins and promote their catalytic activation. BRAF oncogenic mutations are found at high frequency in diverse tumour types. BRAF and CRAF mutant alleles have also been detected in developmental syndromes termed RASopathies. RAF inhibitors have been developed and exhibit significant clinical efficacy against metastatic melanoma driven by the Val600Glu BRAF mutation. However, relapse invariably occurs within a year. Moreover, these inhibitors paradoxically induce ERK signalling in activated RAS mutant cells by their ability to promote RAF dimerization. Paradox-breaking RAF inhibitors are currently being developed. RAF family kinases, which were first described over 30 years ago, primarily act as signalling relays downstream of RAS. Key mechanistic and structural studies are shaping our view of how RAF proteins and RAF-related pseudokinases are regulated; they also highlight the mechanisms underlying pathological RAF signalling and the unforeseen limitations of RAF inhibitors. RAF family kinases were among the first oncoproteins to be described more than 30 years ago. They primarily act as signalling relays downstream of RAS, and their close ties to cancer have fuelled a large number of studies. However, we still lack a systems-level understanding of their regulation and mode of action. The recent discovery that the catalytic activity of RAF depends on an allosteric mechanism driven by kinase domain dimerization is providing a vital new piece of information towards a comprehensive model of RAF function. The fact that current RAF inhibitors unexpectedly induce ERK signalling by stimulating RAF dimerization also calls for a deeper structural characterization of this family of kinases.

The proteins extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 (ERK1) and ERK2 are the downstream components of a phosphorelay pathway that conveys growth and mitogenic signals largely channelled by the small RAS GTPases. By phosphorylating widely diverse substrates, ERK proteins govern a variety of evolutionarily conserved cellular processes in metazoans, the dysregulation of which contributes to the cause of distinct human diseases. The mechanisms underlying the regulation of ERK1 and ERK2, their mode of action and their impact on the development and homeostasis of various organisms have been the focus of much attention for nearly three decades. In this Review, we discuss the current understanding of this important class of kinases. We begin with a brief overview of the structure, regulation, substrate recognition and subcellular localization of ERK1 and ERK2. We then systematically discuss how ERK signalling regulates six fundamental cellular processes in response to extracellular cues. These processes are cell proliferation, cell survival, cell growth, cell metabolism, cell migration and cell differentiation.Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 (ERK1) and ERK2 relay cell growth and mitogenic signals to multiple substrates, and thus control essential physiological processes. This Review discusses the regulation of ERKs, and their control of cell proliferation, cell survival, cell growth, cell metabolism, cell migration and cell differentiation.

Cell motility is a critical feature of invasive tumour cells that is governed by complex signal transduction events. Particularly, the underlying mechanisms that bridge extracellular stimuli to the molecular machinery driving motility remain partially understood. Here, we show that the scaffold protein CNK2 promotes cancer cell migration by coupling the pro-metastatic receptor tyrosine kinase AXL to downstream activation of ARF6 GTPase. Mechanistically, AXL signalling induces PI3K-dependent recruitment of CNK2 to the plasma membrane. In turn, CNK2 stimulates ARF6 by associating with cytohesin ARF GEFs and with a novel adaptor protein called SAMD12. ARF6-GTP then controls motile forces by coordinating the respective activation and inhibition of RAC1 and RHOA GTPases. Significantly, genetic ablation of CNK2 or SAMD12 reduces metastasis in a mouse xenograft model. Together, this work identifies CNK2 and its partner SAMD12 as key components of a novel pro-motility pathway in cancer cells, which could be targeted in metastasis. Cancer cell motility is necessary for cell invasion and metastasis. Here, the authors identify CNK2 as a key mediator of cancer cell motility, linking extracellular stimuli via AXL signalling and downstream activation of ARF6 GTPase, resulting in increased metastasis in preclinical models.

The BDNF Val66Met polymorphism is associated with impaired short-term plasticity in the motor cortex, short-term motor learning, and intermanual transfer of a procedural motor skill. Here, we investigated the impact of the Val66Met polymorphism on the modulation of cortical excitability and interhemispheric inhibition through sensorimotor practice of simple dynamic skills with the right and left first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles. To that end, we compared motor evoked potentials (MEP) amplitudes and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) in the bilateral representations of the FDI muscle in the primary motor cortex (M1), and interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) from the left to right M1, before and after right and left FDI muscle training in an alternated sequence. Val66Met participants did not differ from their Val66Val counterparts on motor performance at baseline and following motor training, or on measures of MEP amplitude and IHI. However, while the Val66Val group displayed significant SICI reduction in the bilateral M1 in response to motor training, SICI remained unchanged in the Val66Met group. Further, Val66Val group's SICI decrease in the left M1, which was also observed following unimanual training with the right hand in the Control Right group, was correlated with motor improvement with the left hand. The potential interaction between left and right M1 activity during bimanual training and the implications of altered activity-dependent cortical excitability on short-term motor learning in Val66Met carriers are discussed.

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a central regulator of cell growth and proliferation. mTOR signaling is frequently dysregulated in oncogenic cells, and thus an attractive target for anticancer therapy. Using CellDesigner, a modeling support software for graphical notation, we present herein a comprehensive map of the mTOR signaling network, which includes 964 species connected by 777 reactions. The map complies with both the systems biology markup language (SBML) and graphical notation (SBGN) for computational analysis and graphical representation, respectively. As captured in the mTOR map, we review and discuss our current understanding of the mTOR signaling network and highlight the impact of mTOR feedback and crosstalk regulations on drug‐based cancer therapy. This map is available on the Payao platform, a Web 2.0 based community‐wide interactive process for creating more accurate and information‐rich databases. Thus, this comprehensive map of the mTOR network will serve as a tool to facilitate systems‐level study of up‐to‐date mTOR network components and signaling events toward the discovery of novel regulatory processes and therapeutic strategies for cancer.

The tumor suppressor and deubiquitinase (DUB) BAP1 and its Drosophila ortholog Calypso assemble DUB complexes with the transcription regulators Additional sex combs-like (ASXL1, ASXL2, ASXL3) and Asx respectively. ASXLs and Asx use their DEUBiquitinase ADaptor (DEUBAD) domain to stimulate BAP1/Calypso DUB activity. Here we report that monoubiquitination of the DEUBAD is a general feature of ASXLs and Asx. BAP1 promotes DEUBAD monoubiquitination resulting in an increased stability of ASXL2, which in turn stimulates BAP1 DUB activity. ASXL2 monoubiquitination is directly catalyzed by UBE2E family of Ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and regulates mammalian cell proliferation. Remarkably, Calypso also regulates Asx monoubiquitination and transgenic flies expressing monoubiquitination-defective Asx mutant exhibit developmental defects. Finally, the protein levels of ASXL2, BAP1 and UBE2E enzymes are highly correlated in mesothelioma tumors suggesting the importance of this signaling axis for tumor suppression. We propose that monoubiquitination orchestrates a molecular symbiosis relationship between ASXLs and BAP1. Additional sex combs-like (ASXLs) stimulate BAP1 deubiquitinase activity to induce tumor suppression, but how these complexes work in coordination in vivo is unclear. Here, the authors show the mutually reinforcing roles of BAP1 and ASXLs such that BAP1 promotes DEUBAD monoubiquitination of ASXL2, which in turn stimulates BAP1 DUB activity.

RAS-induced MAPK signaling is a central driver of the cell proliferation apparatus. Disruption of this pathway is widely observed in cancer and other pathologies. Consequently, considerable effort has been devoted to understanding the mechanistic aspects of RAS-MAPK signal transmission and regulation. While much information has been garnered on the steps leading up to the activation and inactivation of core pathway components, comparatively little is known on the mechanisms controlling their expression and turnover. We recently identified several factors that dictate Drosophila MAPK levels. Here, we describe the function of one of these, the deubiquitinase (DUB) USP47. We found that USP47 acts post-translationally to counteract a proteasome-mediated event that reduces MAPK half-life and thereby dampens signaling output. Using an RNAi-based genetic interaction screening strategy, we identified UBC6, POE/UBR4, and UFD4, respectively, as E2 and E3 enzymes that oppose USP47 activity. Further characterization of POE-associated factors uncovered KCMF1 as another key component modulating MAPK levels. Together, these results identify a novel protein degradation module that governs MAPK levels. Given the role of UBR4 as an N-recognin ubiquitin ligase, our findings suggest that RAS-MAPK signaling in Drosophila is controlled by the N-end rule pathway and that USP47 counteracts its activity.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) underlies the uncontrolled accumulation of immature myeloid blasts. Several cytogenetic abnormalities have been associated with AML. Among these is the NUP98-HOXA9 ( NA9 ) translocation that fuses the Phe-Gly repeats of nucleoporin NUP98 to the homeodomain of the transcription factor HOXA9. The mechanisms enabling NA9 -induced leukemia are poorly understood. Here, we conducted a genetic screen in Drosophila for modifiers of NA9 . The screen uncovered 29 complementation groups, including genes with mammalian homologs known to impinge on NA9 activity. Markedly, the modifiers encompassed a diversity of functional categories, suggesting that NA9 perturbs multiple intracellular events. Unexpectedly, we discovered that NA9 promotes cell fate transdetermination and that this phenomenon is greatly influenced by NA9 modifiers involved in epigenetic regulation. Together, our work reveals a network of genes functionally connected to NA9 that not only provides insights into its mechanism of action, but also represents potential therapeutic targets.