Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
5 result(s) for "Thind, Ravneet"
Sort by:
Palliative care use and utilization determinants among patients treated for advanced stage lung cancer care in the community and academic medical setting
Purpose Despite clinical guidelines, palliative care is underutilized during advanced stage lung cancer treatment. To inform interventions to increase its use, patient-level barriers and facilitators (i.e., determinants) need to be characterized, especially among patients living in rural areas or those receiving treatment outside academic medical centers. Methods Between 2020 and 2021, advanced stage lung cancer patients ( n  = 77; 62% rural; 58% receiving care in the community) completed a one-time survey assessing palliative care use and its determinants. Univariate and bivariate analyses described palliative care use and determinants and compared scores by patient demographic (e.g., rural vs. urban) and treatment setting (e.g., community vs. academic medical center) factors. Results Roughly half said they had never met with a palliative care doctor (49.4%) or nurse (58.4%) as part of cancer care. Only 18% said they knew what palliative care was and could explain it; 17% thought it was the same as hospice. After palliative care was distinguished from hospice, the most frequently cited reasons patients stated they would not seek palliative care were uncertainty about what it would offer (65%), concerns about insurance coverage (63%), difficulty attending multiple appointments (60%), and lack of discussion with an oncologist (59%). The most common reasons patients stated they would seek palliative care were a desire to control pain (62%), oncologist recommendation (58%), and coping support for family and friends (55%). Conclusion Interventions should address knowledge and misconceptions, assess care needs, and facilitate communication between patients and oncologists about palliative care.
Clinician perspectives on delivering primary and specialty palliative care in community oncology practices
Purpose Clinical guidelines recommend early palliative care for patients with advanced lung cancer. In rural and underserved community oncology practices with limited resources, both primary palliative care from an oncologist and specialty palliative care are needed to address patients’ palliative care needs. The aim of this study is to describe community oncology clinicians’ primary palliative care practices and perspectives on integrating specialty palliative care into routine advanced lung cancer treatment in rural and underserved communities. Methods Participants were clinicians recruited from 15 predominantly rural community oncology practices in Kentucky. Participants completed a one-time survey regarding their primary palliative care practices and knowledge, barriers, and facilitators to integrating specialty palliative care into advanced-stage lung cancer treatment. Results Forty-seven clinicians (30% oncologists) participated. The majority (72.3%) of clinicians worked in a rural county. Over 70% reported routinely asking patients about symptom and physical function concerns, whereas less than half reported routinely asking about key prognostic concerns. Roughly 30% held at least one palliative care misconception (e.g., palliative care is for only those who are stopping cancer treatment). Clinician-reported barriers to specialty palliative care referrals included fear a referral would send the wrong message to patients (77%) and concern about burdening patients with appointments (53%). Notably, the most common clinician-reported facilitator was a patient asking for a referral (93.6%). Conclusion Educational programs and outreach efforts are needed to inform community oncology clinicians about palliative care, empower patients to request referrals, and facilitate patients’ palliative care needs assessment, documentation, and standardized referral templates.
The role of salvage reirradiation for malignant gliomas that progress on bevacizumab
Bevacizumab and irinotecan are effective against recurrent malignant gliomas. However, at subsequent progression, patients rarely respond to a second bevacizumab-containing chemotherapeutic regimen. Salvage re-irradiation with bevacizumab for recurrent but bevacizumab naive malignant gliomas showed encouraging results. We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of 23 patients treated with either fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) after progression on an initial bevacizumab regimen. Patients were treated after re-irradiation with bevacizumab but combined with a different chemotherapy. We then compared them to another 23 patients who progressed on an initial bevacizumab + chemotherapy regimen. These patients did not receive re-irradiation but bevacizumab was continued combined with a different chemotherapy. Patients treated with FSRT/SRS/bevacizumab had a longer median progression-free period (2.6 vs. 1. 7 months, P  = 0.009), longer median post FSRT/SRS treatment survival (7.2 vs. 3.3 months, P  = 0.03) and higher radiographic response rate (22 vs. 0%, P  = 0.049). FSRT or SRS followed by bevacizumab + chemotherapy may have a role for patients who progress on bevacizumab.
Effects of different packaging conditions and storage temperatures on the physico-chemical properties of barbecue sauce
Recipe and preparation procedure of Barbecue sauce incorporating traditional ingredients to suit the Indian palate was standardized. Barbecue sauce prepared was thermally processed, preserved and stored in glass bottles and retortable pouches at room temperature (15-30°C) and low temperature (5-7°C) respectively upto three months and evaluated for different physico-chemical properties after every 15 days. The average acidity of Barbecue sauce stored in glass bottles and retortable pouches decreased non-significantly (p<0.05) with the increase in the storage time. But the average pH value increased non-significantly (p<0.05) with the increase in the storage time. of Barbecue sauce stored in glass bottles and retortable pouches. The average total soluble solids (TSS) increased non-significantly (p<0.05) with the increase in the storage period. The average viscosity of Barbecue sauce stored in glass bottles and retortable pouches increased significantly (p<0.05) with the increase in the storage time. However, the average spreadibility of Barbecue sauce stored in glass bottles and retortable pouches decreased significantly (p<0.05) with the increase in the storage time. It was concluded that Barbecue sauce prepared incorporating traditional ingredients was found highly acceptable to the consumers. The product was found stable and highly acceptable at the end of storage period of three months, in glass bottles and retortable pouches.