Explore the vast range of titles available.

Bariatric endoscopy (BE) is an emerging treatment option for people with obesity. Spin (i.e., the practice of frequent misrepresentation or overinterpretation of study findings) may lead to imbalanced and unjustified optimism in the interpretation of the results. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the frequency and type of spin in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of endoscopic primary weight loss techniques with statistically significant and nonsignificant primary outcomes. In conclusion, spin is observed in the abstract and main text of BE reports and can lead to misinterpretation or overinterpretation of the results. Since BE challenges the available non-endoscopic treatments for obesity, further research is needed to better qualify these techniques, as being effective and safe, as well as predefined hypotheses and analyses. Graphical abstract

IntroductionPatients with one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) can develop gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The nature of this GERD (acid or biliary) remains unclear.ObjectiveTo assess the nature of GERD via impedance pH testing in patients presenting with reflux post OAGB.MethodsRetrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of 43 patients with OAGB backgrounds who developed postoperative GERD and were investigated with impedance pH monitoring between 2006 and 2019.ResultsMean age was 52.48 ± 9 years. Mean body mass index (BMI) prior to OAGB was 46.82 kg/m2. None of these patients had clinical GERD before surgery. The median time interval between surgery and investigation with 24-h impedance pH monitoring was 64 (56) months. The mean BMI at the time of investigations was 32.67 ± 6.9 kg/m2. The type of reflux was acid in 13 (30.2%), non-acid (biliary) in 12 (27.9%), and mixed (acid and biliary) in 5 (11.6%) patients. However, it remained not confirmed in 13 (30.2%). Median DeMeester score was 48.95 (27.67) in patients with acid, 2.8 (7.4) in patients with biliary, and 28.7 (5.6) in patients with mixed reflux. Median percent of time spent with pH < 4 was 9.65 (8) in patients with acid, 0.6 (1.75) in patients with biliary, and 7.7 (3.9) in patients with mixed reflux.ConclusionAcid reflux seems to be as common as bile reflux in patients presenting with GERD after OAGB. In case of revisional surgery for severe GERD post OAGB, 24-h impedance pH monitoring could be essential to determine the surgical procedure of choice.

Since 2007, single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) has been proposed as an alternative to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in the treatment of obesity. We conducted a multicentre randomised trial, with the hypothesis that SADI-S could be more effective than RYGB at 2-year follow-up. This multicentre, open-label, individually randomised superiority trial was conducted in France; patients were recruited from 22 bariatric institutions, mostly public academic hospitals. Key inclusion criteria were patients with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2 or ≥35 kg/m2 with obesity-related comorbidities (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, sleep apnoea, or osteoarthrosis), and a candidate for SADI-S or RYGB gastric bypass as a primary surgery or after a sleeve gastrectomy. Main key exclusions included previous bariatric surgery (other than sleeve gastrectomy), inflammatory bowel disease, type 1 diabetes, and untreated Helicobacter pylori infection. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to SADI-S or RYGB, stratified by centre, failure of sleeve gastrectomy, and presence of type 2 diabetes. The primary endpoint was percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) at 2 years (%EWL=[(weight at 2 years – initial weight)/(initial weight – ideal weight)] × 100). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03610256 and is completed. Between Nov 8, 2018, and Sept 29, 2021, a total of 381 patients were randomly assigned (intention-to-treat population) and included in the primary analysis (SADI-S: 190, RYGB: 191). Mean age was 44·4 years (SD 10·64), mean BMI was 46·2 kg/m2 (6·40), 265 (70%) were female, and 79 (21%) had a primary sleeve gastrectomy. 43 (12%) of 370 participants were lost to follow-up. At 2 years, the mean %EWL was statistically significantly higher in the SADI-S group compared with the RYGB group (–76·0% [SD 26·7] vs –68·1% [28·7], confirming the superiority of SADI-S (mean difference –6·72% [95% CI –12·64 to –0·80], p=0·026). The primary outcome was missing for 78 (20%) of 381 participants, with 46 (59%) of 78 participants in the SADI-S group and 32 (41%) of 78 in the RYGB group, p=0·09. The number of serious adverse events related to the surgical technique in the safety population, including all operated patients, was 40 in the SADI-S group including three anastomotic leaks and eight severe diarrhoea compared with 35 in the RYGB group including five internal hernia and five severe abdominal pain cases of which two required diagnostic laparoscopy. SADI-S showed superior weight loss compared with RYGB at 2 years, with a similar safety profile. French Ministry of Health (Direction Générale de l'offre de Soin – DGOS).

Objectives One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is as effective as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) regarding weight loss and diabetes remission. However, there are no data on gut hormone secretions after OAGB. The aim of this study was to compare fasting and postprandial secretions of gut and pancreatic hormones in OAGB versus RYGB patients. Design and Methods Twenty-nine patients, 16 OAGB- and 13 RYGB-operated, underwent a liquid mixed-meal tolerance test at 2 years’ post-surgery. Blood was sampled before and 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after meal for plasma measurement of glucose, C-peptide, insulin, glucagon, GLP-1, GIP, GLP-2, PYY, and ghrelin. Results Percentage of total weight loss 2 years post-surgery were -33.9 ± 1.8% for OAGB and -31.2 ± 1.6% for RYGB ( p  = 0.6). Four patients with persistent diabetes were excluded for further analysis. Fasting and postprandial glucose levels (peaks and area under curve values) were similar between groups. HOMA index was lower in the OAGB group (0.8 ± 0.1 vs 1.3 ± 0.2 in RYGB, p  < 0.05). Levels of C-peptide (or insulin) measured at 30 min were significantly lower in OAGB vs RYGB patients (6.9 ± 0.5 vs 9.7 ± 1.1 µg/l, p  < 0.05). No difference was observed between OAGB and RYGB groups for GLP-1, GLP-2, PYY, or ghrelin postprandial secretions, but GIP tended to be lower in OAGB vs RYGB patients (756 ± 155 vs 1100 ± 188 pg/ml for postprandial peak concentrations, p  = 0.06). Conclusions This is the first clinical study showing that OAGB procedure, like RYGB, results in high postprandial secretions of gut hormones, in particular GLP-1. Trial Registration Clinical Trials NCT03482895 Graphical abstract

Purpose One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) may be associated with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The nature of this GERD remains unclear. This complication can be treated either with an additional enteroenterostomy without shortening of gastric pouch (long biliopancreatic limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (L-BPL-RYGB)) or revision to conventional short biliopancreatic limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (S-BPL-RYGB). The objective of this study is to compare the aforementioned procedures in terms of efficacy on GERD symptoms. Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis between October 2012 and June 2020. Results Fifty-two patients underwent OAGB revision to S-BPL-RYGB ( n  = 21) or L-BPL-RYGB ( n  = 31) secondary to GERD. Investigation with pH impedance prior to revision was performed in 15 patients showing biliary reflux (BR) in 7 (46.6%), acid reflux (AR) in 6 (40%), and no confirmation in 2. Patients with AR had a revision to S-BPL-RYGB, whereas patients with BR underwent L-BPL-RYGB. Among the patients without pH metry results ( n  = 37), S-BPL-RYGB was performed for associated disabling digestive disorders or nutritional deficiencies. GERD was treated in 68% of patients with L-BPL-RYGB versus 95% of patients after S-BPL-RYGB. Patients, whose decision for revisional procedure was based on the results of pH impedance testing, did not reveal refractory GERD. Conclusion L-BPL-RYGB seems appropriate in patients with BR, whereas conversion to S-BPL-RYGB should be preferred if AR is present. Graphical Abstract

To systematically identify the strategy and frequency of spin in reports of bariatric surgery randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with statistically nonsignificant primary endpoint. The use of specific reporting strategies to highlight the beneficial effect of an experimental treatment can affect the reader interpretation of trial results, particularly when the primary endpoint is not statistically significant. A literature search was performed to identify RCTs publications assessing the impact of bariatric surgery on obesity-related comorbidities published over the past 10 years (from January 2020 till December 2020) in MEDLINE and EMBASE. RCTs publications with statistically non-significant primary outcomes were included. Of 46 576 reports screened for title and abstract inclusion, 29 RCT reports met the inclusion criteria for spin analysis. In total, 16 abstracts (55%) and 18 main texts (62%) were classified as having a spin. In abstract results and conclusion sections, the spin was identified in 69% of reports. In main text results, discussion, and conclusion sections, the spin was recognized in 37%, 72%, and 76% of reports respectively. The spin consisted mainly of focusing on within-group improvements and the interpretation of statistically nonsignificant results as showing treatment equivalence. Spin occurred in a high proportion of bariatric surgery RCTs with a statistically nonsignificant primary endpoint.

In some cases, in addition to the usual difficulties that the bariatric surgeon may encounter during standard bariatric procedures, anatomical anomalies such as situs inversus can pose an additional technical challenge. A 58-year-old patient with total situs inversus underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery in our department. The main difficulty was the realization of a mirrored RYGB. Laparoscopic RYGB in a patient with situs inversus totalis is feasible but requires significant concentration and three-dimensional coordination to perform the mirrored procedure.

People suffering from extreme obesity may be exposed to delayed diagnosis and treatment of cancer. A 37-year-old woman (weight = 245 kg, body mass index (BMI) = 79 kg/m2), presented a sepsis associated with nonspecific abdominal pain for 4 months. After several unsuccessful attempts due to her weight and a large waist circumference, abdominal CT scan was finally successfully performed and showed a large retroperitoneal mass. An ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy was performed and was in favor of a liposarcoma. Surgery was performed to remove the entire tumor of an estimated weight of 98 kg, a giant retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma. This case highlights the difficulties to screen, diagnose, and manage cancers encountered in patients suffering from massive obesity.

BackgroundOne-anastomosis gastric bypass/mini-gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) remains controversial because it may cause chronic biliary reflux (BR). The risk of developing esogastric cancer due to BR after OAGB/MGB is based on the results of experimental rat studies using esojejunostomy (EJ). The aim of this study was to analyze the potential long-term consequences of BR on the esogastric mucosae in OAGB/MGB-operated rats and to compare these results to those from the use of EJ.MethodsWistar rats received OAGB/MGB (n = 16), EJ (n = 16), and sham (n = 8) operations. Mortality and weight changes were evaluated throughout the experiment. BR was measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Rats received follow-ups for 30 weeks. A double-blinded histological analysis was performed in the esogastric segments.ResultsBR was diagnosed in OAGB/MGB and EJ rats using the MRI technique; no BR occurred in the sham group. After a 30-week follow-up, no incidences of dysplasia or cancer were observed in the three groups. Additionally, esophageal intestinal metaplasia and mucosal ulcerations were observed in 41.7% and 50% of EJ rats, respectively, and no incidences of these conditions were observed in OAGB/MGB and sham rats. The incidence of esophagitis was significantly higher and more severe in the EJ group compared to those in the OAGB/MGB and sham groups (EJ = 100%, OAGB/MGB = 16.7%, sham = 8.3%; p < 0.001).ConclusionsAfter a 30-week follow-up period, OAGB/MGB rats did not develop any precancerous or cancerous lesions when more than 40% of EJ rats had intestinal metaplasia.

The most dreadful complication after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is staple line leak. Its rate varies between 1 and 2%. With the development of interventional endoscopy, its treatment is currently fairly standardized and allows healing in the majority of cases without revisional surgery. However, if endoscopic treatment fails, surgical treatment becomes unavoidable. Fistulojejunostomy is a surgical option in the management of chronic fistula after SG. Laparoscopic fistulojejunostomy in a patient with chronic fistula after SG is difficult but feasible. This procedure allows complete healing and nutritional recovery in the case of failure of other endoscopic modalities.