Explore the vast range of titles available.

Artemether–lumefantrine and artesunate–amodiaquine are used as first-line artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) in west Africa. Pyronaridine–artesunate and dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine are potentially useful for diversification of ACTs in this region, but further safety and efficacy data are required on malaria retreatment. We did a randomised, multicentre, open-label, longitudinal, controlled phase 3b/4 clinical trial at seven tertiary centres in Burkina Faso, Guinea, and Mali. Eligible participants for first malaria episode and all retreatment episodes were adults and children aged 6 months and older with microscopically confirmed Plasmodium spp malaria (>0 to <200 000 parasites per μL of blood) and fever or history of fever in the previous 24 h. Individuals with severe or complicated malaria, an alanine aminotransferase concentration of more than twice the upper limit of normal, or a QTc greater than 450 ms were excluded. Using a randomisation list for each site, masked using sealed envelopes, participants were assigned to either pyronaridine–artesunate or dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine versus either artesunate–amodiaquine or artemether–lumefantrine. Block sizes were two or four if two treatments were allocated, and three or six if three treatments were allocated. Microscopists doing the parasitological assessments were masked to treatment allocation. All treatments were once-daily or twice-daily tablets or granules given orally and dosed by bodyweight over 3 days at the study centre. Patients were followed up as outpatients up to day 42, receiving clinical assessments on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42. Two primary outcomes were compared for non-inferiority: the 2-year incidence rate of all microscopically confirmed, complicated and uncomplicated malaria episodes in patients in the intention-to-treat population (ITT; non-inferiority margin 20%); and adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) in uncomplicated malaria across all episodes (unadjusted and PCR-adjusted for Plasmodium falciparum and unadjusted for other Plasmodium spp) in the per-protocol population on days 28 and 42 (non-inferiority margin 5%). Safety was assessed in all participants who received one dose of study drug. This study is registered at the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR201105000286876). Between Oct 24, 2011, and Feb 1, 2016, we assigned 4710 eligible participants to the different treatment strategies: 1342 to pyronaridine–artesunate, 967 to artemether–lumefantrine, 1061 to artesunate–amodiaquine, and 1340 to dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine. The 2-year malaria incidence rate in the ITT population was non-inferior for pyronaridine–artesunate versus artemether–lumefantrine (1·77, 95% CI 1·63–1·93 vs 1·87, 1·72–2·03; rate ratio [RR] 1·05, 95% CI 0·94–1·17); and versus artesunate–amodiaquine (1·39, 95% CI 1·22–1·59 vs 1·35, 1·18–1·54; RR 0·97, 0·87–1·07). Similarly, this endpoint was non-inferior for dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine versus artemether–lumefantrine (1·16, 95% CI 1·01–1·34 vs 1·42 1·25–1·62; RR 1·22, 95% CI 1·06–1·41) and versus artesunate–amodiaquine (1·35, 1·21–1·51 vs 1·68, 1·51–1·88; RR 1·25, 1·02–1·50). For uncomplicated P falciparum malaria, PCR-adjusted ACPR was greater than 99·5% at day 28 and greater than 98·6% at day 42 for all ACTs; unadjusted ACPR was higher for pyronaridine–artesunate versus comparators at day 28 (96·9% vs 82·3% for artemether–lumefantrine and 95·6% vs 89·0% for artesunate–amodiaquine) and for dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus comparators (99·5% vs 81·6% for artemether–lumefantrine and 99·0% vs 89·0% for artesunate–amodiaquine). For non-falciparum species, unadjusted ACPR was greater than 98% for all study drugs at day 28 and at day 42 was greater than 83% except for artemether–lumefantrine against Plasmodium ovale (in ten [62·5%] of 16 patients) and against Plasmodium malariae (in nine [75·0%] of 12 patients). Nine deaths occurred during the study, none of which were related to the study treatment. Mostly mild transient elevations in transaminases occurred with pyronaridine–artesunate versus comparators, and mild QTcF prolongation with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus comparators. Pyronaridine–artesunate and dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine treatment and retreatment of malaria were well tolerated with efficacy that was non-inferior to first-line ACTs. Greater access to these efficacious treatments in west Africa is justified. The European and Developing Countries Clinical Trial Partnership, Medicines for Malaria Venture (Geneva, Switzerland), the UK Medical Research Council, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, German Ministry for Education and Research, University Claude Bernard (Lyon, France), University of Science, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (Bamako, Mali), the Centre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme (Burkina Faso), Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso), and Centre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale (Republic of Guinea).

Background: Most malaria-endemic countries use artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) as their first-line treatment. ACTs are known to be highly effective on asexual stages of the malaria parasite. Malaria transmission and the spread of resistant parasites depend on the infectivity of gametocytes. The effect of the current ACT regimens on gametocyte infectivity is unclear. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the infectivity of gametocytes to Anopheles gambiae following ACT treatment in the field. Methods: During a randomised controlled trial in Bougoula-Hameau, Mali, conducted from July 2005 to July 2007, volunteers with uncomplicated malaria were randomised to receive artemether-lumefantrine, artesunate-amodiaquine, or artesunate-sulfadoxine/ pyrimethamine. Volunteers were followed for 28 days, and gametocyte carriage was assessed. Direct skin feeding assays were performed on gametocyte carriers before and after ACT administration. Results: Following artemether-lumefantrine treatment, gametocyte carriage decreased steadily from Day 0 to Day 21 post-treatment initiation. In contrast, for the artesunateamodiaquine and artesunate-sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine arms, gametocyte carriage increased on Day 3 and remained constant until Day 7 before decreasing afterward. Mosquito feeding assays showed that artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-amodiaquine significantly increased gametocyte infectivity to Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) (p < 10−4), whereas artesunate-sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine decreased gametocyte infectivity in this setting (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Different ACT regimens could lead to gametocyte populations with different capacity to infect the Anopheles vector. Frequent assessment of the effect of antimalarials on gametocytogenesis and gametocyte infectivity may be required for the full assessment of treatment efficacy, the potential for spread of drug resistance and malaria transmission in the field.

A novel strain of a Gram-stain negative, non-motile, non-spore forming rod-shaped, obligate anaerobic bacterium, designated AT11T, was isolated from a stool sample of a morbidly obese woman living in Marseille, France. This bacterium was characterized using biochemical, chemotaxonomic, and phylogenetic methods. The 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed that strain AT11T had a 97.8% nucleotide sequence similarity with Eisenbergiella tayi strain B086562T, the closest species with standing in nomenclature. The major cellular fatty acids of the novel isolate were C16:0 followed by saturated or unsaturated C18 fatty acids (C18:1n9, C18:1n5 and C18:0). The draft genome of strain AT11T is 7,114,554 bp long with 48% G+C content. 6176 genes were predicted, including 6114 protein-coding genes and 62 were RNAs (with 2 5S rRNA genes, two 16S rRNA genes, two 23S rRNA genes, and 56 tRNA genes). The digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) relatedness between the new isolate and E. tayi strain B086562T was 23.1% ± 2.2. Based on the phenotypic, chemotaxonomic, genomic, and phylogenetic characteristics, Eisenbergiella massiliensis sp. nov., is proposed. The type strain is AT11T (= DSM 100838T = CSUR P2478T).

The use of Amodiaquine monotherapy is associated with the selection of molecular markers of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to chloroquine (pfcrt and pfmdr1). The decrease in sensitivity and the emergence of P. falciparum resistant to artemisinin-based combination therapy have been reported. Therefore, it is important to assess the impact of treatment of uncomplicated malaria with Artesunate-Amodiaquine (AS+AQ) on molecular markers of antimalarial resistance. We used standard World Health Organization (WHO) protocols to determine the in vivo efficacy of the combination (AS+AQ). In total, 170 subjects were included in the study. The molecular analysis focused on 168 dried blood spots. The aims were to determine the frequency of pfcrt 76T and pfmdr1 86Y mutations and the rates of reinfection using polymorphism markers msp1, msp2, and microsatellite markers (CA1, Ta87, TA99). Nested-PCR was used, followed in some cases by a restriction digestion. The level of P. falciparum clinical response was 92.9% (156/168) of Adequate Clinical and Parasitological Response (ACPR) before molecular correction and 97.0% (163/168) after molecular correction (P = 0.089). The frequency of mutation point pfcrt 76T was 76.2% (128/168) before treatment and 100% (7/7) after treatment (P = 0.1423). For the pfmdr1 mutation, the frequency was 28% (47/168) before treatment and 60% (6/10) after treatment (P = 0.1124). The rate of pfcrt 76T + pfmdr1 86Y was 22% (37/168) before and 50% (6/12) after treatment (P = 0.1465). Despite the presence of AS in the combination, AS+AQ selects for pfcrt 76T and pfmdr1 86Y mutant P. falciparum in Guinea.