Explore the vast range of titles available.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a S. aureus strain with resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, making it a global human and veterinary health concern. Specifically, immunosuppressed patients have a remarkably higher risk of clinical MRSA infections with significantly increased rates of prolonged clinical recovery, morbidity, and mortality. The current treatment of choice for MRSA is vancomycin. Importantly, we report the first known vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) carriers in a cohort of Mauritian cynomolgus macaques (CM) imported to the Oregon National Primate Research Center (ONPRC), with a MRSA carrier rate of 76.9% (10/13 animals). All MRSA isolates also demonstrated resistance to vancomycin with prevalence of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) at 30% (3/10 MRSA-positive CMs) and VRSA at 70% (7/10 MRSA-positive CMs). Additionally, we identified VRSA in a rhesus macaque (RM) housed within the same room as the VRSA-positive CMs and identified a MRSA/VISA carrier rate of 18.8% in RMs (3/16 positive for both MRSA and VISA) in unexposed recently assigned animals directly from the ONPRC RM breeding colony. Considering that the MRSA and VRSA/VISA-positive CMs future study aims included significant immunosuppression, MRSA/VRSA/VISA decolonization treatment and expanded “MRSA-free” practices were employed to maintain this status. We report the first controlled study using in-depth analyses with appropriate diagnostic serial testing to definitively show an MRSA decolonization therapy (90% success rate) and expanded barrier practice techniques to successfully prevent recolonization (100%) of a cohort of CMs MRSA-free (up to 529 days with a total of 4,806 MRSA-free NHP days).

Yellow fever virus (YFV) infection is fatal in 5%-10% of the 200,000 yearly cases. There is currently no available antiviral treatment. We showed previously that administration of 50 mg/kg of a YFV-specific neutralizing monoclonal antibody (nmAb) at 2 days postinfection (dpi), prior to the onset of severe disease, protected YFV-infected rhesus macaques from death. To further explore the clinical applicability of our nmAb MBL-YFV-01, we treated rhesus macaques with a lower dose (10 mg/kg) of this nmAb prophylactically or therapeutically at 3.5 dpi. We show that a single prophylactic or therapeutic i.v. dose of our nmAb protects rhesus macaques from death following challenge. A comprehensive analysis of 167 inflammatory cytokine and chemokines revealed that protection was associated with significantly reduced expression of 125 of these markers, including type I IFN, IL-6, and CCL2. This study further expands the potential clinical use of our YFV-specific nmAb, which could be used during an outbreak for immediate prophylactic immunity or for patients with measurable serum viremia.

Key Points The treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and of end-stage kidney disease (ESRD) has a high societal cost Insufficient efforts are being made to promote the use of cost-effective renal replacement therapies (RRT), such as transplantation and home dialysis (including peritoneal dialysis) In CKD and in many other chronic diseases, the time has come to decrease investment in curative approaches and to focus on prevention The relative costs and benefits of each approach should be carefully analysed before a preventive or curative method is favoured A need exists for more health-economic studies of primary and secondary prevention in CKD to be conducted, and for the quality of such research to be improved The treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with immense societal costs, with particularly high expenditure for renal replacement therapy. This Review addresses the economic aspects of CKD and ESRD with a focus on approaches to prevent the conditions that contribute to CKD and its progression. The treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) imposes substantial societal costs. Expenditure is highest for renal replacement therapy (RRT), especially in-hospital haemodialysis. Redirection towards less expensive forms of RRT (peritoneal dialysis, home haemodialysis) or kidney transplantation should decrease financial pressure. However, costs for CKD are not limited to RRT, but also include nonrenal health-care costs, costs not related to health care, and costs for patients with CKD who are not yet receiving RRT. Even if patients with CKD or ESRD could be given the least expensive therapies, costs would decrease only marginally. We therefore propose a consistent and sustainable approach focusing on prevention. Before a preventive strategy is favoured, however, authorities should carefully analyse the cost to benefit ratio of each strategy. Primary prevention of CKD is more important than secondary prevention, as many other related chronic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, liver disease, cancer, and pulmonary disorders could also be prevented. Primary prevention largely consists of lifestyle changes that will reduce global societal costs and, more importantly, result in a healthy, active, and long-lived population. Nephrologists need to collaborate closely with other sectors and governments, to reach these aims.