Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background: Involvement of the axial skeleton (sacroiliac joints and spine) is a relatively frequent manifestation associated with psoriatic skin disease, mostly along with involvement of peripheral musculoskeletal structures (peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis), which are referred to as psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Data suggest that up to 30% of patients with psoriasis have PsA. Depending on the definition used, the prevalence of axial involvement varies from 25% to 70% of patients with PsA. However, there are currently no widely accepted criteria for axial involvement in PsA.Objective: The overarching aim of the Axial Involvement in Psoriatic Arthritis (AXIS) study is to systematically evaluate clinical and imaging manifestations indicative of axial involvement in patients with PsA and to develop classification criteria and a unified nomenclature for axial involvement in PsA that would allow defining a homogeneous subgroup of patients for research. Design: Prospective, multicenter, multinational, cross-sectional study. Methods and analyses: In this multicenter, multinational, cross-sectional study, eligible patients [adult patients diagnosed with PsA and fulfilling Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) with musculoskeletal symptom duration of ⩽10 years not treated with biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs] will be recruited prospectively. They will undergo study-related clinical and imaging examinations. Imaging will include radiography and magnetic resonance imaging examinations of sacroiliac joints and spine. Local investigators will evaluate for the presence of axial involvement based on clinical and imaging information which will represent the primary outcome of the study. In addition, imaging will undergo evaluation by central review. Finally, the central clinical committee will determine the presence of axial involvement based on all available information. Ethics: The study will be performed according to the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The study protocol will be approved by the individual Independent Ethics Committee / Institutional Review Board of participating centers. Written informed consent will be obtained from all included patients.Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04434885.

BackgroundPsoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a multifaceted condition with a broad spectrum of manifestations and a range of associated comorbidities. A notable segment of patients with PsA remains resistant to even advanced therapeutic interventions. This resistance stems from myriad causes, including inflammatory and non-inflammatory factors.ObjectivesTo collate and critically assess the various definitions and criteria of difficult-to-treat (D2T PsA present in the literature.MethodsUsing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, we conducted a scoping review in July 2023, searching PubMed, American College of Rheumatology Convergence 2022, European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology Congress 2023, Google Scholar and cited articles. Selection was made by two independent authors using Rayyan software, and conflicts were adjudicated by a third author. Eligibility criteria for PubMed focused on all article designs that were written in English, with full-text available, from the past decade, excluding only those not defining D2T PsA or targeting other populations.ResultsFrom the 565 references sourced, 15 studies were analysed, revealing considerable variations in defining both ‘active disease’ and ‘resistant PsA’, which was most often termed ‘D2T’ PsA.ConclusionThe definitions and criteria for D2T PsA and for ‘active disease’ are notably heterogeneous, with considerable variation across sources. The ongoing Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis initiative stands to bridge these definitional gaps and aims to provide guidance for clinicians and illuminate a path for pharmaceuticals and regulatory agencies to follow.

Background Radiographs of the sacroiliac joints are commonly used for the diagnosis and classification of axial spondyloarthritis. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an artificial neural network for the detection of definite radiographic sacroiliitis as a manifestation of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Methods Conventional radiographs of the sacroiliac joints obtained in two independent studies of patients with axSpA were used. The first cohort comprised 1553 radiographs and was split into training ( n  = 1324) and validation ( n  = 229) sets. The second cohort comprised 458 radiographs and was used as an independent test dataset. All radiographs were assessed in a central reading session, and the final decision on the presence or absence of definite radiographic sacroiliitis was used as a reference. The performance of the neural network was evaluated by calculating areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) as well as sensitivity and specificity. Cohen’s kappa and the absolute agreement were used to assess the agreement between the neural network and the human readers. Results The neural network achieved an excellent performance in the detection of definite radiographic sacroiliitis with an AUC of 0.97 and 0.94 for the validation and test datasets, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for the cut-off weighting both measurements equally were 88% and 95% for the validation and 92% and 81% for the test set. The Cohen’s kappa between the neural network and the reference judgements were 0.79 and 0.72 for the validation and test sets with an absolute agreement of 90% and 88%, respectively. Conclusion Deep artificial neural networks enable the accurate detection of definite radiographic sacroiliitis relevant for the diagnosis and classification of axSpA.

Spondyloarthritis is a group of chronic inflammatory diseases that includes axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). AxSpA primarily affects the axial skeleton, manifesting with hallmark features such as inflammatory back pain and a strong association with human leukocyte antigen-B27. On the other hand, axial involvement in PsA (axial PsA) poses unique challenges in the diagnosis, classification, and management. These challenges stem from a limited understanding of this condition and an absence of a specific definition for its diagnosis. Although shared genetic and environmental contributors are observed, the presence of differences suggests the possibility that axial PsA may, in fact, represent a distinct clinical entity rather than axSpA. The prevailing classification criteria, such as ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis for PsA and the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria for axSpA, are insufficient in capturing the full scope of axial PsA. Moreover, treatment paradigms for axial PsA are primarily extrapolated from axSpA due to the lack of targeted trials in this specific population. Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, encompassing tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors, and Janus kinase inhibitors, have demonstrated efficacy in axSpA and PsA. However, IL-23 inhibitors have not shown efficacy in axSpA, and currently, no results from randomized controlled trials in axial PsA are available. While axial PsA exhibits features that overlap with axSpA, emerging evidence underscores its distinct pathophysiology and clinical characteristics, highlighting the need for standardized definitions and tailored therapeutic approaches to optimize outcomes. Ongoing studies evaluating therapeutic efficacy and molecular characterization hold promises to enhance understanding and management of axial PsA, thus paving the way for personalized treatment strategies. This review aims to provide an overview of the similarities and differences between axial PsA and axSpA and seeks to disentangle the intersections between these two diseases.

ObjectiveTo describe the clinical characteristics of neuro-Behçet’s syndrome (NBS) and to define the factors associated with relapses and poor outcome.MethodsAmong 2118 patients with Behçet’s syndrome who fulfilled the international study group criteria, 208 (9.8%) patients had NBS. Retrospective data of 125 NBS patients (55.5% male; mean age 37.2 ± 11.8 years) were analysed. We divided patients into two subgroups, either parenchymal (p-NBS) or non-parenchymal (np-NBS), according to international consensus recommendations for NBS. We assessed the predictor factors associated with relapse and poor outcome—which was defined as a modified Rankin score (mRS) ≥ 3 at last follow-up and/or death—using Cox and logistic regression analyses, respectively.ResultsIn total, 79 (63.2%) patients presented with p-NBS and 46 (36.8%) presented with np-NBS. Ocular involvement was more common in p-NBS than np-NBS (55.7% vs. 37.0%, p = 0.04), whereas vascular involvement excluding cerebral vein thrombosis was more frequent in patients with np-NBS (19.0% vs. 52.2%, p < 0.001). Forty-two patients (33.6%) experienced at least one relapse. Factors associated with relapse were BS diagnosis at a younger age and cranial nerve dysfunction (HR 0.96 95% CI 0.93–0.99 and 2.36 95% CI 1.23–4.52, respectively). After a median of 68 (Q1–Q3: 25–125) months, 23 patients (18.4%) had a poor outcome. Indicators of a poor outcome were higher initial mRS and the progressive p-NBS type (OR 8.28 95% CI 1.04–66.20 and 33.57 95% CI 5.99–188.21, respectively).ConclusionOur findings indicate that clinical characteristics and prognosis differ between NBS subgroups, of which patients with p-NBS have worse outcomes.

ObjectiveTo investigate complement system activation and complement protein levels in relation to radiographic progression in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) within a longitudinal randomised controlled trial (RCT) of radiographic axSpA patients initiating tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapy.MethodsSerum samples from 96 patients with active radiographic axSpA in the multicentre RCT CONSUL were analysed by immunoassays for complement activation, that is, C3dg and complement proteins (MBL, CL-L1, M-, H- and L-ficolin; MASP-1,–2 and −3; and MAp44) before and after 108 weeks of TNF inhibitor therapy with golimumab.ResultsBaseline serum levels of total complement activation, that is, C3dg and lectin pathway activating protease MASP-1 were elevated in patients with new bone formation (new syndesmophytes and/or growth of existing syndesmophytes) after 2 years of follow-up, whereas baseline MASP-3 levels were decreased. Assessed by univariate logistic regression, baseline levels of MASP-1, MASP-3 and C3dg were associated with the development of new bone formation and remained significant in a corresponding multivariate logistic regression analysis. At follow-up, serum levels of C3dg and complement lectin pathway initiator L-ficolin were elevated in patients with new bone formation, and C3dg remained significant in a corresponding multivariate logistic regression analysis.ConclusionsComplement activation marker C3dg, MASP-1 and MASP-3 levels before TNFi therapy predicted new bone formation after 2 years of follow-up among axSpA patients with a high risk of radiographic progression. Furthermore, levels of L-ficolin and C3dg at follow-up were elevated in axSpA patients with new bone formation. Our findings support an association between activation of the complement system and radiographic spinal progression in patients with axSpA.

ObjectiveRecently, the definition for ‘early axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA)’ was developed by the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS), including ≤2 years of axial symptoms as a key element. The aim of this study was to analyse the longitudinal association of early axSpA with achieving low disease activity or inactive disease.MethodsUsing 10-year longitudinal data from the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort (GESPIC), a generalised estimating equations model was fitted to estimate the effect of early axSpA on disease activity, as measured by the Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS). The model adjusted for confounders identified through a directed acyclic graph and accounted for repeated measurements within patients. Additional analyses were conducted, including stratification by radiographic status (non-radiographic—nr or radiographic—r).ResultsOf 525 patients (277 nr-axSpA, 248 r-axSpA) included in GESPIC, 161 (30%) fulfilled the ASAS early axSpA consensus definition (115 nr-axSpA and 46 r-axSpA) at baseline. Over the 10-year follow-up period, patients with early axSpA consistently achieved ASDAS states of inactive disease or low disease activity at a higher rate than those with non-early axSpA, rising from 41% versus 30% at baseline to 57% versus 44% at year 10. The total effect of early axSpA on ASDAS was −0.42 (95% CI: −0.57 to –0.26). Stratification by r-axSpA/nr-axSpA showed a total effect of −0.50 (95% CI: −0.81 to –0.19) for r-axSpA and −0.28 (95% CI: −0.46 to –0.10) for nr-axSpA.ConclusionFulfilment of the ASAS early axSpA definition at inclusion was associated with lower disease activity over 10 years.

IntroductionPsoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory disease characterised by synovitis, enthesitis, dactylitis and axial involvement. The prevalence of axial involvement ranges from 25% to 70% in this patient group. Treatment recommendations for axial PsA were mainly extrapolated from guidelines for axial spondyloarthritis, and the main treatment options are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tumour necrosis factor, IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors). Tofacitinib was approved for the treatment of PsA and its efficacy on axial inflammation has been demonstrated in a phase II study of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). This prospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy of tofacitinib in reducing inflammation in the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) and spine on MRI in patients with axial disease of their PsA presenting with active axial involvement compatible with axial PsA.Methods and analysesThis is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical trial in patients with axial PsA who have evidence of axial involvement, active disease as defined by a Bath AS Disease Activity Index score of ≥4 and active inflammation on MRI of the SIJs and/or spine as assessed by and independent central reader. The study includes a 6-week screening period, a 24-week treatment period, which consist of a 12-week placebo-controlled double-blind treatment period followed by a 12-week active treatment period with tofacitinib for all participants, and a safety follow-up period of 4 weeks. At baseline, 80 subjects shall be randomised (1:1) to receive either tofacitinib or matching placebo for a 12-week double-blind treatment period. At week 12, an MRI of the whole spine and SIJs will be performed to evaluate the primary study endpoint.Ethics and disseminationThe study will be performed according to the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the German drug law. The independent ethics committees of each centre approved the ethical, scientific and medical appropriateness of the study before it was conducted.Trial registration numberNCT04062695; ClinicalTrials.gov and EudraCT No: 2018-004254-22; European Union Clinical Trials Register.

Introduction/objectivesNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), mean platelet volume (MPV), and red cell distribution width (RDW) may potentially reflect inflammatory status in systemic autoimmune diseases. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between these proposed markers and disease manifestations, activity, and severity in systemic sclerosis (SSc).MethodWe conducted a cross-sectional study of 69 systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients and 50 healthy volunteers in a single center. Adult patients with SSc and healthy controls were compared in terms of NLR, MLR, MPV, RDW, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Venous blood samples were drawn after at least 8 h of fasting in the morning. Extension of skin fibrosis was evaluated by using modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS). Disease severity and activity were assessed by Medsger disease severity and European Scleroderma Trials and Research Group (EUSTAR) disease activity scores, respectively. Associations of disease manifestations, clinical, laboratory, and capillaroscopic findings, mRSS, and the disease activity and severity scores with the proposed hematological markers were evaluated. Multiple regression models were generated for significant associations.ResultsThe neutrophil number was higher (p = 0.004) and lymphocyte number was lower (p < 0.001) in SSc group compared to controls. SSc group also had higher NLR, MLR, and RDW. In multiple logistic regression, only the NLR (regression coefficient = 3.49, p = 0.031) and CRP (regression coefficient = 0.17, p = 0.037) remained significantly different between SSc and healthy control groups (Cox and Snell R2 = 0.243, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.337, p < 0.001). NLR and MLR positively correlated with mRSS, EUSTAR score, and CRP. MLR also positively correlated with Medsger score. Higher monocyte counts independently predicted higher EUSTAR and Medsger scores in multiple linear regressions. Patients with digital ulcers had higher NLR and MLR. We did not find any difference in MPV values between SSc and healthy control groups.ConclusionsGlobally available and inexpensive hematological tests, particularly the NLR and MLR, may be associated with vascular and cutaneous manifestations as well as disease activity and severity in SSc.Key Points• Monocyte count itself independently predicted higher activity and severity scores in SSc.• Globally available and inexpensive hematological markers, particularly the NLR and MLR, may have an association with vascular and cutaneous manifestations as well as disease activity and severity in patients with SSc.

ObjectiveTo report the clinical characteristics of pulmonary artery involvement (PAI) in patients with Behçet’s syndrome (BS) and to define the predictors of relapses.MethodsWe performed retrospective analysis of BS patients with PAI who fulfilled international study group criteria. Among 460 patients with vascular Behçet’s syndrome (VBS), 66 were diagnosed with PAI. For final analyses, 61 patients with PAI were included who had at least 2 follow-up visits (72.1% male, mean age at BS diagnosis 29.34 ± 10.1 years). The patient data were recorded. Relapse was defined as the reoccurrence of vascular event in any vascular structure. Factors associated with relapse were assessed by logistic regression analysis.ResultsThere were no differences considering demographic and clinical features of the patients with and without PAI in the VBS group, except that intracardiac thrombosis was more common in the patients with PAI (19.7% vs 0.3%). Among 61 patients, 50 (82.0%) had isolated pulmonary artery thrombosis (PAT), whereas 11 (18.0%) had pulmonary artery aneurysm with or without PAT. Twenty-four (39.3%) patients experienced vascular relapse during median follow-up of 65.9 (Q1-Q3: 20.1–109.0) months. To define the factors associated with relapses, patients with isolated PAT were analysed. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, older age at BS diagnosis and anticoagulation usage seemed to be protective (OR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.86–1.02, OR: 0.34, 95% CI 0.09–1.33, respectively).ConclusionOur results indicate a higher frequency of intracardiac thrombosis in BS patients with PAI and possible efficacy of anticoagulation usage in preventing relapses. Key Points• This study shows that intracardiac and intracranial thromboses are seen more frequently in patients with PAI and the prevalence of pulmonary artery thrombosis has been increasing in the case of PAI. Furthermore, our report indicates that anticoagulation might be effective in preventing further vascular relapses.