Explore the vast range of titles available.

Although the pathological significance of tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) heterogeneity is still poorly understood, TAM reprogramming is viewed as a promising anticancer therapy. Here we show that a distinct subset of TAMs (F4/80 hi CD115 hi C3aR hi CD88 hi ), endowed with high rates of heme catabolism by the stress-responsive enzyme heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), plays a critical role in shaping a prometastatic tumor microenvironment favoring immunosuppression, angiogenesis and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. This population originates from F4/80 + HO-1 + bone marrow (BM) precursors, accumulates in the blood of tumor bearers and preferentially localizes at the invasive margin through a mechanism dependent on the activation of Nrf2 and coordinated by the NF-κB1–CSF1R–C3aR axis. Inhibition of F4/80 + HO-1 + TAM recruitment or myeloid-specific deletion of HO-1 blocks metastasis formation and improves anticancer immunotherapy. Relative expression of HO-1 in peripheral monocyte subsets, as well as in tumor lesions, discriminates survival among metastatic melanoma patients. Overall, these results identify a distinct cancer-induced HO-1 + myeloid subgroup as a new antimetastatic target and prognostic blood marker. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) play multifaceted roles in establishing an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Sica and colleagues find that macrophage-intrinsic complement signaling initiates a pathway leading to the induction of highly tumorigenic TAMs.

A prospective, pooled analysis of six randomised phase 3 trials was done to investigate disease-free survival regarding non-inferiority of 3 months versus 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colon cancer; non-inferiority was not shown. Here, we report the final overall survival results. In this prospective, pooled analysis of six randomised phase 3 trials, we included patients with stage III colon cancer aged at least 18 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 recruited between June 20, 2007, and Dec 31, 2015, across 12 countries in the CALGB/SWOG 80702, IDEA France, SCOT, ACHIEVE, TOSCA, and HORG trials, who started any treatment (modified intention-to-treat). Patients in all trials were randomly assigned to 3 months or 6 months of adjuvant fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) every 2 weeks or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) in different doses and methods every 3 weeks, at the treating physician's discretion. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (time to relapse, secondary colorectal primary tumour, or death due to all causes), and overall survival (time to death due to all causes) was the prespecified secondary endpoint. The non-inferiority margin for overall survival was set as a hazard ratio (HR) of 1·11. Pre-planned subgroup analyses included regimen and risk group. Non-inferiority was declared if the one-sided false discovery rate adjusted (FDRadj) p value was less than 0·025. With median follow-up of 72·3 months (IQR 72·2–72·5), 2584 deaths among 12 835 patients were observed. 5064 (39·5%) patients received CAPOX and 7771 (60·5%) received FOLFOX. 5-year overall survival was 82·4% (95% CI 81·4–83·3) with 3 months of therapy and 82·8% (81·8–83·8) with 6 months of therapy (HR 1·02 [95% CI 0·95–1·11]; non-inferiority FDRadj p=0·058). For patients treated with CAPOX, 5-year overall survival was 82·1% (80·5–83·6) versus 81·2% (79·2–82·9; HR 0·96 [0·85–1·08]); non-inferiority FDRadj p=0·033), and for patients treated with FOLFOX 5-year overall survival was 82·6% (81·3–83·8) and 83·8% (82·6–85·0; HR 1·07 [0·97–1·18]; non-inferiority FDRadj p=0·34). Updated disease-free survival results confirmed previous findings (HR 1·08 [95% CI 1·02–1·15]; non-inferiority FDRadj p=0·25). Data on adverse events were not further recorded. Non-inferiority of 3 months versus 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colon cancer was not confirmed in terms of overall survival, but the absolute 0·4% difference in 5-year overall survival should be placed in clinical context. Overall survival results support the use of 3 months of adjuvant CAPOX for most patients with stage III colon cancer. This conclusion is strengthened by the substantial reduction of toxicities, inconveniencies, and cost associated with a shorter treatment duration. US National Cancer Institute.

The long-acting somatostatin analogue octreotide is used either as an adjuvant or primary therapy to lower growth hormone (GH) levels in patients with acromegaly and may also induce pituitary tumor shrinkage. We performed a meta-analysis to accurately assess the effect of octreotide on pituitary tumor shrinkage. A computerized Medline and Embase search was undertaken to identify potentially eligible studies. Eligibility criteria included treatment with octreotide, availability of numerical metrics on tumor shrinkage and clear definition of a clinically relevant reduction in tumor size. Primary endpoints included the proportion of patients with tumor shrinkage and mean percentage reduction in tumor volume. The electronic search identified 2202 articles. Of these, 41 studies fulfilling the eligibility criteria were selected for data extraction and analysis. In total, 1685 patients were included, ranging from 6 to 189 patients per trial. For the analysis of the effect of octreotide on pituitary tumor shrinkage a random effect model was used to account for differences in both effect size and sampling error. Octreotide was shown to induce tumor shrinkage in 53.0% [95% CI: 45.0%-61.0%] of treated patients. In patients treated with the LAR formulation of octreotide, this increased to 66.0%, [95% CI: 57.0%-74.0%). In the nine studies in which tumor shrinkage was quantified, the overall weighted mean percentage reduction in tumor size was 37.4% [95% CI: 22.4%-52.4%], rising to 50.6% [95% CI: 42.7%-58.4%] with octreotide LAR. Most trials examined were open-label and had no control group. Octreotide LAR induces clinically relevant tumor shrinkage in more than half of patients with acromegaly.

We previously found that dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and lapatinib led to inhibition of tumour growth in patient-derived xenografts of HER2-amplified metastatic colorectal cancer. In this study, we aimed to assess the antitumour activity of trastuzumab and lapatinib in patients with HER2-positive colorectal cancer. HERACLES was a proof-of-concept, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial done at four Italian academic cancer centres. We enrolled adult patients with KRAS exon 2 (codons 12 and 13) wild-type and HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard of care (including cetuximab or panitumumab), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and at least one measurable lesion. We defined HER2 positivity in tumour samples by use of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in-situ hybridisation in accordance with our previously validated colorectal cancer-specific diagnostic criteria. Eligible patients received intravenous trastuzumab at 4 mg/kg loading dose followed by 2 mg/kg once per week, and oral lapatinib at 1000 mg per day until evidence of disease progression. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an objective response (defined as complete response or partial response), which was assessed by independent central review in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2012-002128-33. Between Aug 27, 2012, and May 15, 2015, we screened 914 patients with KRAS exon 2 (codons 12 and 13) wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer and identified 48 (5%) patients with HER2-positive tumours, although two died before enrolment. Of these patients, 27 were eligible for the trial. All were evaluable for response. At the time of data cutoff on Oct 15, 2015, with a median follow-up of 94 weeks (IQR 51–127), eight (30%, 95% CI 14–50) of 27 patients had achieved an objective response, with one patient (4%, 95% CI −3 to 11) achieving a complete response, and seven (26%, 95% CI 9–43) achieving partial responses; 12 (44%, 95% CI 25–63) patients had stable disease. Six (22%) of 27 patients had grade 3 adverse events, which consisted of fatigue in four patients, skin rash in one patient, and increased bilirubin concentration in one patient. No grade 4 or 5 adverse events were reported. We detected no drug-related serious adverse events. The combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib is active and well tolerated in treatment-refractory patients with HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer. Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro (AIRC), Fondazione Oncologia Niguarda Onlus, and Roche.

Lombardy is the Italian region most affected by COVID-19. We tested the presence of plasma anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in 3985 employees across 7 healthcare facilities in areas of Lombardy with different exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Subjects filled a questionnaire to self-report on COVID-19 symptoms, comorbidities, smoking, regular or remote working, and the exposure to COVID-infected individuals. We show that the number of individuals exposed to the virus depended on the geographical location of the facility, ranging between 3 and 43%, consistent with the spatial variation of COVID-19 incidence in Lombardy, and correlated with family interactions. We observed a higher prevalence of females than males positive for IgG, however the level of antibodies was similar, suggesting a comparable magnitude of the anti-spike antibody response. IgG positivity among smokers was lower (7.4% vs 13.5%) although without difference in IgG plasma levels. We observed 11.9% of IgG positive asymptomatic individuals and another 23.1% with one or two symptoms. Interestingly, among the IgG positive population, 81.2% of subjects with anosmia/dysgeusia and fever were SARS-CoV-2 infected, indicating that these symptoms are strongly associated to COVID-19. In conclusion, the frequency of IgG positivity and SARS-CoV-2 infection is dependent on the geographical exposure to the virus and primarily to family rather than hospital exposure.

Erlotinib is registered for treatment of all patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its efficacy for treatment of patients whose tumours are EGFR wild-type—which includes most patients—is still contentious. We assessed the efficacy of erlotinib compared with a standard second-line chemotherapy in such patients. We did this randomised controlled trial in 52 Italian hospitals. We enrolled patients who had metastatic NSCLC, had had platinum-based chemotherapy, and had wild-type EGFR as assessed by direct sequencing. Patients were randomly assigned centrally (1:1) to receive either erlotinib orally 150 mg/day or docetaxel intravenously 75 mg/m2 every 21 days or 35 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15, every 28 days. Randomisation was stratified by centre, stage, type of first-line chemotherapy, and performance status. Patients and investigators who gave treatments or assessed outcomes were not masked to treatment allocation, investigators who analysed results were. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00637910. We screened 702 patients, of whom we genotyped 540. 222 patients were enrolled (110 assigned to docetaxel vs 112 assigned to erlotinib). Median overall survival was 8·2 months (95% CI 5·8–10·9) with docetaxel versus 5·4 months (4·5–6·8) with erlotinib (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·73, 95% CI 0·53–1·00; p=0·05). Progression-free survival was significantly better with docetaxel than with erlotinib: median progression-free survival was 2·9 months (95% CI 2·4–3·8) with docetaxel versus 2·4 months (2·1–2·6) with erlotinib (adjusted HR 0·71, 95% CI 0·53–0·95; p=0·02). The most common grade 3–4 toxic effects were: low absolute neutrophil count (21 [20%] of 104 in the docetaxel group vs none of 107 in the erlotinib group), skin toxic effects (none vs 15 [14%]), and asthenia (ten [10%] vs six [6%]). Our results show that chemotherapy is more effective than erlotinib for second-line treatment for previously treated patients with NSCLC who have wild-type EGFR tumours. Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco.

The density of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has been proposed as an independent predictor of outcome in patients with colorectal cancer. However, the relative roles of TIL density, nodal status, and microsatellite instability (MSI) in predicting tumour progression to metachronous metastasis remain to be elucidated. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the density of CD3+ TIL and the postsurgical occurrence of distant-organ metastases in a large series of patients with deeply invading and MSI-typed colorectal cancer. Per cent areas of immunoreactivity due to CD3+ TIL at the invasive margin of the tumour (CD3+ TIL IM) were measured by computer-assisted image analysis in 286 tissue specimens from pT3 or pT4 MSI-tested colorectal cancer. Tissue samples were taken from consecutive patients who underwent resection at the IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan, Italy, from January, 1997, to November, 2004, for colorectal cancer with no evidence of metastasis at diagnosis. Occurrence of metachronous metastasis, disease-specific survival (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS), were assessed retrospectively in relation to per cent immunoreactivity. CD3+ TIL IM density was higher in MSI colorectal cancer than in mismatch repair-system-proficient tumours (6·53% vs 2·19%; p<0·0001). At Cox analysis, higher CD3+ TIL IM densities, colonic site, and absence of nodal involvement were significantly associated with a lower risk of metachronous metastasis, but only the interaction between CD3+ TIL IM density and N-stage was significant on multivariate analysis (p=0·002). On separate analysis of node-negative colorectal cancer, increasing percentage of CD3+ immunoreactive area progressively reduced the risk of metachronous metastasis (<1%, reference; 1–5%, HR 0·28, 95% CI 0·10–0·81, p=0·02; >5%, 0·06, 0·01–0·48, p=0·008). Conversely, no significant association was seen between CD3+ immunoreactive area and risk of metachronous metastasis in node-positive colorectal cancer. Accordingly, CD3+ TIL IM density was associated with a better DSS (p=0·01) and DFS (p=0·006) only in patients with node-negative colorectal cancer. In primary tumours that had progressed to metachronous metastasis, stage III tumours had higher CD3+ TIL IM densities than stage II tumours (p=0·0004). Metachronous metastases are unlikely to arise from node-negative colorectal cancers with a high-density CD3+ TIL IM, whereas high densities of CD3+ TIL IM are not associated with the absence of postsurgical metastasis in patients with node-positive colorectal cancer. Our data suggest that densities of CD3+ TIL IM cannot be used as an independent predictor of clinical outcome in patients with stage III colorectal cancer and, at least for now, the tumour-node-metastasis classification should remain the preferred prognostic system. Our findings are consistent with a relationship between nodal involvement and tumour immunoevasion. MIUR (Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca), Target Project Oncologia 2006, and Alleanza Contro il Cancro.

An established multivariate serum protein test can be used to classify patients according to whether they are likely to have a good or poor outcome after treatment with EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. We assessed the predictive power of this test in the comparison of erlotinib and chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. From Feb 26, 2008, to April 11, 2012, patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed, second-line, stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer were enrolled in 14 centres in Italy. Patients were stratified according to a minimisation algorithm by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, smoking history, centre, and masked pretreatment serum protein test classification, and randomly assigned centrally in a 1:1 ratio to receive erlotinib (150 mg/day, orally) or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m2, intravenously, every 21 days, or docetaxel 75 mg/m2, intravenously, every 21 days). The proteomic test classification was masked for patients and investigators who gave treatments, and treatment allocation was masked for investigators who generated the proteomic classification. The primary endpoint was overall survival and the primary hypothesis was the existence of a significant interaction between the serum protein test classification and treatment. Analyses were done on the per-protocol population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00989690. 142 patients were randomly assigned to chemotherapy and 143 to erlotinib, and 129 (91%) and 134 (94%), respectively, were included in the per-protocol analysis. 88 (68%) patients in the chemotherapy group and 96 (72%) in the erlotinib group had a proteomic test classification of good. Median overall survival was 9·0 months (95% CI 6·8–10·9) in the chemotherapy group and 7·7 months (5·9–10·4) in the erlotinib group. We noted a significant interaction between treatment and proteomic classification (pinteraction=0·017 when adjusted for stratification factors; pinteraction=0·031 when unadjusted for stratification factors). Patients with a proteomic test classification of poor had worse survival on erlotinib than on chemotherapy (hazard ratio 1·72 [95% CI 1·08–2·74], p=0·022). There was no significant difference in overall survival between treatments for patients with a proteomic test classification of good (adjusted HR 1·06 [0·77–1·46], p=0·714). In the group of patients who received chemotherapy, the most common grade 3 or 4 toxic effect was neutropenia (19 [15%] vs one [<1%] in the erlotinib group), whereas skin toxicity (one [<1%] vs 22 [16%]) was the most frequent in the erlotinib group. Our findings indicate that serum protein test status is predictive of differential benefit in overall survival for erlotinib versus chemotherapy in the second-line setting. Patients classified as likely to have a poor outcome have better outcomes on chemotherapy than on erlotinib. Italian Ministry of Health, Italian Association of Cancer Research, and Biodesix.

The prognosis of early breast cancer (EBC) depends on patient and tumor characteristics. The association between tumor size, the largest diameter in TNM staging, and prognosis is well recognized. According to TNM, tumors classified as T2, could have very different volumes; e.g. a tumor of 2.1 cm has a volume of 4500 mm3, while a tumor of 4.9 cm has a volume of 60.000 mm3 even belonging to the same class. The aim of the study is to establish if the prognostic role of tumor size, expressed as diameter and volume, has been overshadowed by other factors. The primary objective is to evaluate the association between tumor dimensions and overall survival (OS) / disease free survival (DFS), in our institution from January 1st 2005 to September 30th 2013 in a surgical T1-T2 population. Volume was evaluated with the measurement of three half-diameters of the tumor (a, b and c), and calculated using the following formula: 4/3π x a x b x c. 341 patients with T1-T2 EBC were included. 86.5% were treated with conservative surgery. 85.1% had a Luminal subtype, 9.1% were Triple negative and 7.4% were HER2 positive. Median volume was 942 mm3 (range 0.52-31.651.2). 44 patients (12.9%) relapsed and 23 patients died. With a median follow-up of 6.5 years, the univariate analysis for DFS showed an association between age, tumor size, volume, histological grading and molecular subtype. The multivariate analysis confirmed the statistically significant association only for molecular subtype (p 0.005), with a worse prognosis for Triple negative and HER2 positive subtypes compared with Luminal (HR: 2.65; 95%CI: 1.34-5.22). Likewise for OS, an association was shown by the multivariate analysis solely for molecular subtype (HER2 and Triple negative vs. Luminal. HR: 2.83; 95% CI:1.46-5.49; p 0.002). In our study, the only parameter that strongly influences survival is molecular subtype. These findings encourage clinicians to choose adjuvant treatment not based on dimensional criteria but on biological features.

The clinical management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is hampered by the lack of reliable biomarkers. This study investigated the value of soluble stroma‐related molecules as PDAC biomarkers. In the first exploratory phase, 12 out of 38 molecules were associated with PDAC in a cohort of 25 PDAC patients and 16 healthy subjects. A second confirmatory phase on an independent cohort of 131 PDAC patients, 30 chronic pancreatitis patients, and 131 healthy subjects confirmed the PDAC association for MMP7, CCN2, IGFBP2, TSP2, sICAM1, TIMP1, and PLG. Multivariable logistic regression model identified biomarker panels discriminating respectively PDAC versus healthy subjects (MMP7 + CA19.9, AUC = 0.99, 99% CI = 0.98–1.00) (CCN2 + CA19.9, AUC = 0.96, 99% CI = 0.92–0.99) and PDAC versus chronic pancreatitis (CCN2 + PLG+FN+Col4 + CA19.9, AUC = 0.94, 99% CI = 0.88–0.99). Five molecules were associated with PanIN development in two GEM models of PDAC (PdxCre/LSL‐Kras G12D and PdxCre/LSL‐Kras G12D/+ /LSL‐Trp53 R172H/+ ), suggesting their potential for detecting early disease. These markers were also elevated in patient‐derived orthotopic PDAC xenografts and associated with response to chemotherapy. The identified stroma‐related soluble biomarkers represent potential tools for PDAC diagnosis and for monitoring treatment response of PDAC patients. Synopsis Seven stroma‐related circulating biomarkers that discriminate between healthy subjects and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in two different cohorts of patients have been identified and suggested as a potential diagnosis tool to monitor treatment efficacy in patients. Panels of biomarkers that improve the performance of CA19.9 in distinguishing i) PDAC from healthy subjects and ii) PDAC from chronic pancreatitis have been developed. Multivariable models confirmed their predictive accuracy at early stages of disease. The association of these biomarkers with the development of pre‐invasive disease in GEM models confirmed their potential to detect early stage lesions. The correlation of biomarker levels with tumor burden and drug response in patient‐derived PDAC xenograft models indicate their value to monitor treatment response and efficacy. Graphical Abstract Seven stroma‐related circulating biomarkers that discriminate between healthy subjects and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in two different cohorts of patients have been identified and suggested as a potential diagnosis tool to monitor treatment efficacy in patients.