Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Language
      Language
      Clear All
      Language
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
2 result(s) for "Trikoupi, Georgia"
Sort by:
A Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Voiding Urosonography (CE-VUS) and Contrast Retrograde Cystourethrography (RCUG) for the Detection of Vesicoureteral Reflux in Young Dogs
The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate contrast-enhanced urosonography (CE-VUS) as an alternative to radiographic retrograde cystourethrography (RCUG) in the detection of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in young dogs. A total of 62 dogs, ranging in age from 6 weeks to 12 months, and 124 ureterorenal units (UUs) were investigated for VUR using RCUG and CE-VUS. After a baseline gray-scale ultrasound (US) of the urinary tract, a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent (UCA), diluted in a bottle of normal saline, was instilled into the urinary bladder via a catheter and CE-VUS was performed. VUR was detected when microbubbles were observed in the ureter and/or in the renal pelvis. In addition, RCUG was performed on the same day. The findings obtained by CE-VUS and RCUG were concordant in 117/124 UUs (94.35%). No reflux was detected in 101/124 UUs (81.45%) using both methods. With RCUG as the standard of reference, the sensitivity of CE-VUS was 94.12%, and the specificity was 94.39%. The positive predictive value was 72.73%, and the negative predictive value was 99.02%. CE-VUS is highly sensitive for the detection of VUR in young dogs.
A Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Voiding Urosonography for the Detection of Vesicoureteral Reflux in Young Dogs
This study evaluated the use of contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (CE-VUS) as a radiation-free alternative to retrograde cystourethrography (RCUG) for detecting vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in young dogs. While RCUG is the standard diagnostic method in veterinary medicine, CE-VUS has shown a high accuracy in pediatric human medicine. A total of 62 dogs aged 6 weeks to 12 months were examined using both CE-VUS and RCUG. This study assessed 124 ureterorenal units and found a 94.4% agreement between the two methods. CE-VUS demonstrated a 94.1% sensitivity and a 94.4% specificity, with a negative predictive value of 99%, indicating a strong reliability in ruling out VUR. Additionally, CE-VUS identified six cases of VUR not seen with RCUG. No adverse effects were reported, and CE-VUS was well tolerated. Its advantages include the absence of radiation, dynamic real-time imaging, and the ability to perform repeated evaluations. This study concludes that CE-VUS is a safe, accurate, and practical tool for diagnosing VUR in young dogs and may serve as a valuable alternative to RCUG in clinical practice.