Explore the vast range of titles available.

Alterations in the immune system during pregnancy have been associated with reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) women. However, the effects of pregnancy on CHB remain not well understood. The goal of this study was to examine flares in HBV DNA and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) during pregnancy and postpartum in CHB women untreated prior to pregnancy. This was a multicenter retrospective study of 113 pregnancies in 101 CHB women who presented during pregnancy at two community gastroenterology clinics and two tertiary medical centers in the United States during 1997-2015. Outcomes analyzed included onset, severity, and resolution of flares in HBV and ALT that occurred prior to starting antiviral therapy, if antiviral therapy was subsequently initiated. Women who initiated antiviral therapy during pregnancy were not included in the analysis of postpartum flares. HBV DNA flares were observed in 9% (8/90) of women during pregnancy and 4% (2/48) of women during postpartum. Flares in ALT (99-2522 U/l) were observed in 6% (7/112) of women during pregnancy and 10% (5/51) of women within the first 3 months of delivery. Age, HBeAg positivity, baseline HBV DNA, baseline ALT, gravida, and parity were not found to be significant predictors of flare. Flares in HBV DNA and ALT can occur during late pregnancy and early postpartum in CHB women, and can be severe. Women with CHB should therefore be closely monitored during pregnancy and early postpartum.

Abstract Background Patients on oral antiviral (OAV) therapy remain at hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk. Risk prediction tools distinguishing treated patients with residual HCC risk are limited. The aim of this study was to develop an accurate, precise, simple-to-use HCC risk score using routine clinical variables among a treated Asian cohort. Methods Adult Asian chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients on OAV were recruited from 25 centers in the United States and the Asia-Pacific region. Excluded persons were coinfected with hepatitis C, D, or human immunodeficiency virus, had HCC before or within 1 year of study entry, or their follow-up was <1 year. Patients were randomized to derivation and validation cohorts on a 2:1 ratio. Statistically significant predictors from multivariate modeling formed the Real-world Effectiveness from the Asia Pacific Rim Liver Consortium for HBV (REAL-B) score. Results A total of 8048 patients were randomized to the derivation (n = 5365) or validation group (n = 2683). The REAL-B model included 7 variables (male gender, age, alcohol use, diabetes, baseline cirrhosis, platelet count, and alpha fetoprotein), and scores were categorized as follows: 0–3 low risk, 4–7 moderate risk, and 8–13 high risk. Area under receiver operating characteristics were >0.80 for HCC risk at 3, 5, and 10 years, and these were significantly higher than other risk models (p < .001). Conclusions The REAL-B score provides 3 distinct risk categories for HCC development in Asian CHB patients on OAV guiding HCC surveillance strategy. Treated hepatitis B patients remain at risk for liver cancer. The REAL-B score comprising sex, age, alcohol, diabetes, cirrhosis, platelet, and AFP (derived and validated in 8048 Asians, 25 centers) accurately predicts liver cancer risk for patients on oral antivirals.

BackgroundPatients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with indeterminate phase make up a diverse cohort with likely different outcomes.ObjectiveWe compared the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk in indeterminate CHB with different baseline types and by phase transition.DesignThis was a retrospective cohort study of 1986 (94.2% Asian) patients with indeterminate CHB from nine countries/regions. Patients were classified according to baseline hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HBV DNA. The cumulative HCC incidence was compared.ResultsBased on the 2018 American Association for the Study of Liver Disease guidance, most indeterminate patients were HBeAg negative (84.9%). The 20-year HCC incidence was highest in type 1 (HBeAg positive, ALT<1×upper limit of normal (ULN), HBV DNA 20 000–106 IU/mL, 36.2%) and lowest in type 8 (HBeAg negative, ALT 1–2×ULN, HBV DNA<2000 IU/mL, 1.9%). The 20-year HCC incidence of those who remained indeterminate was 4.7%. Cumulative HCC incidence rates were high in patients with indeterminate CHB who transitioned to immune tolerant (15 years: 16.5%) or immune active (20 years: 13.7%) phase but low for those who transitioned to immune inactive phase (20 years: 2.5%). In multivariable analysis, compared with type 8, higher HCC risk was seen with HBeAg-positive type 1 (adjusted HR (aHR)=40.1, p<0.001), type 2 (ALT 1–2×ULN, HBV DNA≥20 000 IU/mL, aHR=25.1, p<0.001), HBeAg-negative type 9 (ALT>2×ULN, HBV DNA<2000 IU/mL, aHR=4.6, p=0.032) and type 10 (ALT<1×ULN, HBV DNA<2000 IU/mL but with moderate to severe inflammation/fibrosis, aHR=7.3, p=0.033). Similar directions in HCC risks were found in analyses based on the 2017 European Association for the Study of the Liver guideline.ConclusionSeveral types of indeterminate CHB had high HCC risk. These data support the potential expansion of treatment criteria for higher risk types of indeterminate CHB.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a well-documented risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Seven HCV genotypes have been classified, and the genotypes show a great variety of geographic distribution. HCV genotype 6 is prevalent in Southeast Asia and has been less studied than the other genotypes. This follow-up study was designed to evaluate the natural history of HCV genotype 6. The cohort enrolled 851 Asian patients consisting of 222 with HCV genotype 6 and 629 with other genotypes. The incidence of HCC per 1,000 person-years of various HCV genotypes was estimated by dividing the new HCC cases to the person-years of follow-up. The adjusted hazards ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by Cox's proportional hazards models. After 4072 person-years of follow-up, there were 96 newly-developed HCC cases, confirming an incidence of 23.6 per 1000 person-years. By stratifying cirrhosis at study entry, the cumulative risk of HCC among HCV genotype 6 vs. non-6 was 2.9 vs. 2.2% for those without cirrhosis (P=0.45) and 76.2% (95% CI: 55.6-96.8%) vs. 36.2% (95% CI: 28.7-39.1%) for those with cirrhosis (P<0.05), respectively. Among patients with cirrhosis, HCV genotype 6 was significantly associated with HCC compared to patients with non-6 genotypes, with the adjusted HR=2.12 (1.33-3.39), P<0.05. In a model treating patients with genotypes other than 1 or 6 as the reference, the adjusted HR for HCC for HCV genotypes 1 and 6 were 1.13 (0.56-2.27) and 2.34 (1.12-4.86), respectively. Among patients with cirrhosis, those with HCV genotype 6 infection should be given high priority for antiviral therapy to decrease HCC risk and for vigilant adherence to HCC surveillance.

INTRODUCTION:Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are both first-line hepatitis B virus (HBV) therapies, but ETV-to-TAF switch outcome data are limited. We aimed to assess outcomes up to 96 weeks after ETV-to-TAF switch.METHODS:ETV-treated (≥12 months) chronic hepatitis B patients switched to TAF in routine practice at 15 centers (United States, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan) were included. Primary outcome was complete viral suppression (CVS) rate (HBV DNA <20 IU/mL).RESULTS:We analyzed 425 eligible patients (mean age 60.7 ± 13.2 years, 60% men, 90.8% Asian, 20.7% with diabetes, 27% with hypertension, 14.8% with cirrhosis, 8.3% with hepatocellular carcinoma, and mean ETV duration before switch 6.16 ± 3.17 years). The mean baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 89 ± 19 (chronic kidney disease [CKD] stages: 55.6% stage 1, 35.7% stage 2, and 8.8% stages 3–5). CVS rate increased from 91.90% at switch (from 90.46% 24 weeks before switch) to 95.57% and 97.21% at 48 and 96 weeks after (P = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively). Over the 96 weeks after switch, mean HBV DNA (P < 0.001) but not alanine aminotransferase or CKD stage decreased. Between switch and 96-week follow-up, 11% (26/235) of CKD stage 1 patients migrated to stage 2 and 8% (12/151) of stage 2 patients to stages 3–5, whereas 18% (27/151) from stage 2 to 1, and 19% (7/37) from stages 3–5 to 2. On multivariable generalized estimated equation analysis adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, and cirrhosis, baseline eGFR, age (P < 0.001), and CKD stages 2 and 3–5 (vs 1) (both P < 0.001) were associated with lower follow-up eGFR.DISCUSSION:After an average of 6 years on ETV, CVS increased from 91.9% at TAF switch to 97.2% at 96 weeks later.

Purpose Although infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) affects 32 million individuals from Southeast Asia, little is known about the mode of HCV acquisition and the epidemiology of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in these individuals. Our goal was to examine risk factors for HCV acquisition, prevalence, and clinical characteristics of HCV genotype 6 compared with genotypes 1 and 2/3 in Southeast Asian (SEA) patients. Methods We performed a cross-sectional study of 308 consecutive SEA Americans with CHC evaluated by five gastroenterologists from January 2000 to December 2008 at two community clinics in northern California via medical record review, using a case report form. Results A significant proportion of patients (41%) could not recall any specific risk factors for HCV acquisition. The most commonly reported risk factor in patients who reported at least one risk factor was history of surgeries (34%), followed by blood transfusion (25%) and acupuncture (13%). Among patients with core sequence testing for HCV genotype ( n  = 181), the most common HCV genotypes were genotype 1 (42%) and genotype 6 (41%), followed by genotype 2/3 (17%). There were no major differences in the clinical and virological characteristics between the different genotype groups (1 vs. 2/3 vs. 6). Conclusion HCV genotype 6 is as common as genotype 1 in SEAs. Commonly known risk factors for HCV acquisition were not readily identifiable in a large proportion of SEA Americans (41%) and may not be useful in identifying at-risk individuals for HCV screening in this population.

BackgroundNucleos(t)ide analogues, with a proven record of safety and efficacy, have been the therapy of choice for over a decade for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. The approval of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in 2016 provided an additional treatment option.AimsThe aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients treated with TAF in usual clinical practice.MethodsRetrospective data from electronic health records was obtained from those enrolled in TARGET-HBV, a longitudinal observational cohort study of patients with chronic hepatitis B managed according to local practice standards at community and academic medical centers throughout the U.S.ResultsOf 500 patients enrolled, most were male (66%) and of Asian race (66%) with median age of 55 years. Cirrhosis was evident in 15%. Most patients (82%) had switched to TAF after treatment with other antivirals. The perceived safety profile of TAF was cited as the primary reason for changing therapy (32%). TAF was well tolerated and only 4 patients discontinued therapy due to adverse event during a median duration of TAF dosing of 74 weeks. Among those with paired laboratory data 12–18 months after switching to TAF, biochemical response and HBV DNA suppression was maintained. Most patients had normal renal function which was essentially unchanged throughout follow-up.ConclusionsTAF is frequently utilized in routine clinical practice due to the perception of its improved safety profile. The current study supports the growing body of evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of TAF.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03692897, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03692897.

Background and aimsDespite available effective therapies, only a minority of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) receive treatment. Our goal is to study treatment rates and time to treatment initiation in patients who meet treatment criteria on long-term follow-up.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of 608 consecutive treatment-eligible patients with CHB (by 2008 US Panel or 2009 American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) criteria) at a US community gastroenterology clinic and a university liver clinic between 2007 and 2011. Patients were observed until they started treatment or last follow-up if untreated.ResultsMean age was 44 and most were Asian (96%) with community patients being younger and having lower alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. A total of 62% started treatment, and 38% remained untreated after median follow-up of 17 months (IQR=1–40 months). Overall, treatment rate was significantly higher at university liver clinic than in the community (66.7% vs 59.9%, p=0.01). In multivariate analysis, older age (HR 1.02, p=0.002), male gender (HR 1.37, p=0.02), and baseline ALT >45 U/L for males and >29 U/L for females (HR 2.24, p<0.0001) were significant predictors of treatment initiation, but not practice setting.ConclusionsApproximately 40% of treatment-eligible patients still have not started treatment on longer follow-up. Treatment rates were higher at university clinics, but practice setting was not a predictor for treatment, but older age, male gender, and higher ALT levels were. Further studies are needed to determine the barriers for treatment initiation and to improve treatment rates in treatment-eligible patients.

At present there is no clear consensus on how patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), high serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, and normal alanine aminotransferase (NLALT) levels should be managed. This study hypothesizes that a significant proportion of such patients may have histological disease. We carried out a retrospective study of 101 consecutive treatment-naive patients with CHB who underwent liver biopsies at a community gastroenterology clinic and had high HBV DNA and NLALT (< or = 40 U/l) levels at the time of biopsy. All patients were Asians. ALT levels were observed for a period of time before liver biopsy and were used to classify patients into two groups, namely those with only NLALT levels and those with fluctuating ALT (FLALT) levels. All patients had at least two ALT measurements during this period of time. Significant histology was defined as stage > or = 2 fibrosis or stage 1 fibrosis plus grade > or = 2 inflammation using the Batts-Ludwig scoring system. In patients with NLALT levels, the proportions of those with significant histology were 0, 22, and 45% for age < or = 35, 36-50, and >50 years, respectively (n=11, n=27, n=19; P=0.033). In patients who had FLALT levels, the corresponding proportions were 22, 42, and 69% (n=9, n=22, n=13; P=0.091). After adjustments for gender, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status, and mean pre-biopsy HBV DNA levels, significant predictors of histological disease were older age (odds ratio (OR)=6.2 for age 36-50 years and OR=17.6 for age >50 years compared with age < or = 35 years, P=0.041 and P=0.003, respectively) and FLALT levels (OR=3.6, P=0.008). Sub-analysis of patients with NLALT levels using lower cutoffs (30 U/l for men and 19 U/l for women) showed similar trends. Patients with CHB, high HBV DNA, and NLALT levels and aged more than 35 years or those with FLALT levels may have significant histological disease (22-70%).

Background and Aims Data on usage of antiviral therapy and application of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) management guidelines in different settings are limited. Our goal is to evaluate the proportion of treatment-eligible patients by 6-month follow-up and treatment rate among eligible patients by 12-month follow-up in diverse settings. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 1,976 treatment-naïve CHB patients were categorized as primary care physician (PCP) group if seen by community PCP ( n  = 329), gastroenterology (GI) group if seen by community gastroenterologists ( n  = 1,268), and hepatology group if seen by university hepatologists ( n  = 379). Treatment eligibility was based on the US Panel 2008 and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) 2009 guidelines. Results All groups had similar age, gender, and ethnic distribution. GI and hepatology groups had similar treatment eligibility rates by US Panel (53–54 %) and AASLD guidelines (24–25 %). However, treatment rate was significantly higher in hepatology compared to GI group by the US Panel guideline (59 vs. 45 %, P  = 0.001). PCP group had the lowest eligibility and treatment rates by both guidelines. Common reasons for non-treatment were perceived “normal” alanine aminotransferase, desire for further observation, and patient refusal. Male gender, age >50, and subspecialty care predicted treatment initiation in treatment-eligible patients. Conclusions Less than half of treatment-eligible patients at primary care clinics received treatment. Community gastroenterology and university liver clinics treated about one-half to two-thirds of eligible patients. Patient and provider education should highlight treatment benefits and the new alanine aminotransferase upper limit of normal.