Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Scientific research can offer the joy of discovery. For many graduating neurosurgeons, often, a seminar, class, or instructional module is their first and only formal exposure to the world of conducting research responsibly, to write down and report the results of such research. The pressure to publish scientific research is high, but any young neurosurgeon who is unaware of how predatory publishers operate can get duped by it and can lose their valuable and hard-fought research. Hence, we have attempted to provide an overview of all potentially predatory neurosurgery publications and provide some “red flags” to recognize them. Methods A suspected list of predatory publications was collected via a thorough review of the Neurosurgery journals listed in 4 major so-called blacklists, i.e., Beall’s list, Manca’s list, Cabell’s blacklist, and Strinzel blacklist and then cross-referenced with UGC CARE whitelist to remove any potential legitimate journals. All journals with a scope of the Neurosurgery publication were searched using terms in the search bar: “Neurosurgery”, “Neuroanatomy”, “Neuropathology”, and “Neurological disorder/disease”. Since all predatory journals claim to be open access, all possible types of open access journals on Scimago were also searched, and thus a comparison was possible in terms of publication cost and number of legitimate open access journals when compared with predatory ones. In addition, methodologies by which these journals penetrate legitimate indexes like PubMed was investigated. Results A total of 46 predatory journals were found and were enlisted along with their publishers and web addresses. Sixty of the 360 Neurosurgery journals listed on Scimago were open access and the fee for the predatory journals was substantially lower (< $150) when compared with legitimate journals ($900–$3000). Six types of open access types exist while a total of 26 red flags in 7 stages of publication can be found in predatory journals. These journals have penetrated indexes by having similar names to legitimate journals and by publishing articles with external funding which mandate their indexing. Conclusion These 46 journals were defined as predatory by 4 major blacklists, and none of them was found in the UGC Care white list. They also fulfill the 26 red-flags that define a predatory journal. The blacklist detailed here may become redundant; hence “whenever in doubt” regarding a journal with “red-flags”, the authors are advised to refer to whitelists to be on the safer side. Publishing in predatory journals leads to not only loss of valuable research but also discredits a researcher among his peers and can be hindrance in career progression. Some journals are even indexed on PubMed, and they have sophisticated webpages and high-quality online presentations.

With advances in technology, neurosurgical procedures are being examined for potential use in psychiatric conditions. However, the use of neurosurgical procedures in psychiatry carries the baggage of memories of psychosurgery. Different neurosurgical techniques carry their characteristic safety, efficacy, and complication profile. The introduction of deep brain stimulation has generated a new interest in surgical treatment with a distinct advantage over lesioning procedures used in the past. In such a scenario, it is essential that an informed discussion takes place regarding the use of these neurosurgical procedures in psychiatric disorders such that patient safety, informed consent, regulatory requirements, and research are taken care of.

Neurosurgical residency is tough. Grueling hours and tough decisions require a mental makeup unlike many other specialties. But the real examination begins after the residency is over. Many young neurosurgeons are faced with a daunting task of deciding their future as soon as they step out of the medical school. Sometimes, such decisions can shape the entire career of the neurosurgeon. However, over the many years of academic teaching and learning what we are not taught is how to \"Manage.\" Management of careers, decision making, and understanding the business end of our profession is lacking. Here, we review the career and decisions needed to be taken by a young neurosurgeon through the glass of a business management mindset. We try to define the opportunities and decisions and how they may reflect on the general population and patients as a whole.

We share our experience with stereotactic gamma knife thalamotomy (GKT) for medically refractory Holmes tremor (HT). A 22-year-old patient underwent gamma knife thalamotomy at ventrointermediate nucleus for disabling HT of the right upper limb. A single 4-mm isocenter was used to target the ventral intermediate nucleus with 130 Gy radiation. At 4 months follow up, we observed 84% improvement in his Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) rating scale with significant improvement in the right upper limb dystonic tremor. There was only subtle improvement in the ataxic component of the right lower limb. At 1 year after stereotactic GKT, there was sustained neurological improvement with no side effect, We present the stereotactic GKT as a treatment modality for drug-resistant HT. Moreover, it may be considered an alternate treatment modality especially in patients reluctant or contraindicated for any invasive surgical technique. Clinical trial registration number Not required.

Background: Sexual dysfunction significantly affects interpersonal relationships and overall quality of life. It remains a matter of concern for risk assessment and counseling in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Objective: To assess the sexual dysfunctions in patients undergoing clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms and comparative evaluation among different anterior circulation aneurysms. Method: We prospectively included 40 male patients of ruptured intracranial aneurysms of anterior circulation (age range: 20-60 years; sexually active preoperatively), managed with craniotomy and clipping. We evaluated the sexual outcome in patients with excellent Glasgow outcome score (GOS) five at a minimum one year of follow-up. Patients with GOS-5 status at follow-up were broadly classified into two groups: Anterior communicating artery aneurysm (Acom), and non-Acom) aneurysms. We valued sexual outcome with Subjective Sexual Arousal Scale for Men at follow-up, and compared in the two groups. Results: Mean age of patients was 44.78 ± 9.51 years. Besides 20 Acom aneurysms, other groups included 11 middle cerebral artery aneurysms, five internal carotid artery aneurysms, three posterior communicating artery aneurysms, and one distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysm. The mean follow-up was 24.45 ± 13.58 months. Patients with non-Acom aneurysms had an overall better outcome in the sexual performance domain \"P = 0.015,\" mental satisfaction domain \"P = 0.009,\" and sexual assertiveness domain \"P = 0.007.\" However, there was no statistical difference in partner communication domain \"P = 0.593,\" and partner relationship domain \"P = 0.378.\" Overall, the sexual outcome was inferior in patients treated for Acom aneurysms compared to other anterior circulation aneurysms. Conclusions: In cases of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, sexual dysfunctions are common even after good clinical outcomes. The study revealed prominent differences in outcomes on the sexual quality of life in patients harboring Acom aneurysms as compared to anterior circulation aneurysms located off-midline.

While sudden hearing loss after stereotactic radiosurgery has been demonstrated in some cases a recent article by Linge et al. and have demonstrated the need for further discussion on this topic. We attempt to delineate the fact that the type of dosing regimen or technology used will not affect the hearing or radio-graphical control outcomes and thus should not be a consideration while administering treatment. Also we discuss the role of location of the lesion and vascularity and potential new therapies for this unexpected outcome after radiosurgery.

BackgroundThe literature seems fractured for the management of craniovertebral junction (CVJ)-tuberculosis (TB). Presently, non-surgical management has been in vogue for neurologically intact patients. On the contrary, severely disabled cases of CVJ-TB continue to attract discussion, tilted towards surgical intervention. We present our experience with the non-surgical management of CVJ-TB tailored to their neurological status.MethodsAuthors managed 37 cases (2004–2019; age 1–57 years, mean 36 years) of CVJ-TB, of which eighteen (18/37, 48.6%) were severely disabled (Nurick grade ≥ 3) with a mean follow-up of 84 months (48–192 months). Irrespective of the clinical status and radiological findings, all patients were managed on medical management only. Needle aspiration established pathology in 23 (62.2%) cases, while 9 (24.3%) cases required drainage of an abscess. All patients received 18 months of anti-tubercular therapy (ATT). In patients with Nurick grade ≥ 3 and documented AAD, we applied halo vest for 12 months to achieve cervical immobilization. Only hard cervical collar for 3 months was prescribed in patients with no documented AAD.ResultsAll minimally disabled cases (Nurick grade ≤ 2, n = 19) responded favorably (n = 18) to ATT, except for an infant, who succumbed to irreversible hypoxic brain damage due to the obstructed aero-digestive gateway. Of the severely disabled cases (Nurick grade ≥ 3, n = 18), 16 cases had favorable outcomes with only external orthosis (12) and 18-month ATT. One patient succumbed to multiple cerebral infarcts, while one required realignment surgery at CVJ due to fusion in malaligned position.ConclusionThe authors conclude that the disability grading of CVJ-TB is pertinent only for assessing the functional disability of patients at presentation, with minimal relevance in deciding its management strategy. Irrespective of neurological disability, almost all patients respond favorably to external immobilization and ATT.